IchthyosisNCT03796052
Study Determining Safety and Efficacy of Avena Sativa (Oat) Skincare Products for Treating Skin Dryness and Itching in Cancer Patients
A study testing Avena Sativa Skincare Regimen in people with Ichthyosis and Pruritus, run by Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (J&JCI) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will test the safety and efficacy of three topical agents containing oat kernel flour to determine how well they relieve skin dryness and itching related to cancer therapies. Participants will receive a body wash, a body cream, and an anti-itch balm to use at home for 4-6 weeks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ichthyosis, Pruritus
- What is being tested?
- Avena Sativa Skincare Regimen
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 23 May 2019to 18 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- able to read, write, speak, and understand English
- has signed Informed Consent including Photograph Release
- has a prior diagnosis of a solid or hematologic tumor and either:
- is currently undergoing therapy with a systemic agent and has completed at least 3 cycles without severe skin reactions.
- has received therapy with a systemic agent in the past 28 days.
- is greater than 1 year status post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Show all 10Show fewer
- is undergoing one or more types of cancer treatment that are commonly known to cause mild to moderate skin reactions such as rash, dryness, and/or itching
- is diagnosed with mild to moderate skin dryness (xerosis) and/or itching (pruritus).
- is capable of all self-care and is up and mobile at least 50% of the day
- intends to complete the study and is willing/able to follow all study instructions.
Who cannot join
- has known allergies or sensitivity to skincare products or study product ingredients.
- has other skin conditions or diseases that the investigator thinks would interfere with the study or put the subject at higher risk (e.g. immunosuppressive diseases, skin infections, etc.)
- has severe skin dryness, itching, or rash.
- is undergoing radiation therapy.
- is undergoing chemotherapy or adjuntive therapies known to commonly cause complex or severe skin reactions.
- has uncontrolled diabetes.
Show all 9Show fewer
- is pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study.
- is participating in another study for which the participant is receiving a treatment or therapy (observational studies are okay).
- is an employee or family member of the investigator, study site, or Sponsor.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10022
About this study
Official title: A Single Center, Clinical Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of an Avena Sativa Skincare Regimen for Therapy-Related Pruritus and Xerosis in Cancer Patients
This study will test the safety and efficacy of three topical agents containing oat kernel flour to determine how well they relieve skin dryness and itching related to cancer therapies. Participants will receive a body wash, a body cream, and an anti-itch balm to use at home for 4-6 weeks.
Read the detailed description
Many patients undergoing cancer therapies experience skin reactions like dry skin, rash, redness, itchiness, and hyperpigmentation. Dry skin and itching are especially common for those undergoing chemotherapy and targeted treatments.
Skincare products containing Avena sativa (oat) kernel flour have a long history of tolerance and efficacy in treating various skin conditions involving pruritus (itching) and xerosis (dry skin), as Avena sativa (oat) kernel flour is known for its skin protectant properties and soothing effects on skin. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a regimen of three topical agents containing Avena sativa (oat) kernel flour for cancer patients experiencing mild to moderate pruritus and/or xerosis.
Participants will received the products at Baseline (Visit 1) and return to the clinical site at Week 5 +/- 1 week for Visit 2. In addition, questionnaires will be completed remotely between Baseline and Visit 2.
- Conditions
- Ichthyosis, Pruritus
- Being tested
- Avena Sativa Skincare Regimen
- Keywords
- Pruritis, Itching, Dryness, Xerosis
- Medical subject headings
- Ichthyosis, Pruritus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Avena Sativa Skincare RegimenOther
Regimen consisting of 3 topical agents containing Avena Sativa (oat) kernel flour: a body wash (type = cosmetic), a body cream (type = cosmetic), and an anti-itch balm (type = OTC monograph drug with 0.5% Pramoxine HCl)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Avena Sativa Skincare Regimen | Experimental | Avena sativa-containing body wash, body cream, and anti-itch balm Receives: Other: Avena Sativa Skincare Regimen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in CTCAE Grading of Xerosis
The investigator will evaluate subjects for overall xerosis (skin dryness) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading scale. For xerosis, the scale ranges from 1 (dryness covering less 10% of body surface area and no associated erythema or pruritus) to 3 (dryness covering greater than 30% of body surface area and associated with itching; limits daily self care activities of daily living). A "0" grade will be used to document subjects with no presence of the CTCAE skin adverse event symptoms for xerosis. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in CTCAE Grading of Pruritus
The investigator will evaluate subjects for overall pruritus (skin itching) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading scale. For pruritus, the scale ranges from 1 (Mild or localized; topical intervention indicated) to 3 (widespread and constant itching; limits daily self-care activities or sleep). A "0" grade will be used to document subjects with no presence of the CTCAE skin adverse event symptoms for pruritus. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Overall Xerosis Grading
The investigator will evaluate subjects for overall xerosis (skin dryness) using a 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Overall Pruritus Grading
The investigator will question subjects for overall pruritus (skin itching) using a 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Overall Irritation Assessment
The investigator will evaluate subjects for overall irritation using a 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Secondary outcomes (18)
Frequency Distribution for Overall Tolerance at Visit 2 - Subject Rating
The subject will rate how well he/she tolerated the study regimen using the following choices: Well tolerated, tolerated, or not tolerated.
Measured: Week 5 +/- 1 week
Frequency Distribution for Overall Tolerance at Visit 2 - Investigator Rating
The investigator will rate how well the participant tolerated the study regimen using the following choices: Well tolerated, tolerated, or not tolerated.
Measured: Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in PRO-CTCAE Skin Dryness
The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) will be completed for Skin Dryness. The question asks subjects to rate the severity of their dry skin at its worst over the last 7 days from None to Very Severe on a 5-point scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in PRO-CTCAE Itching
The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) will be completed for Itching. The question asks subjects to rate the severity of their itchy skin at its worst over the last 7 days from None to Very Severe on a 5-point scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skindex-16 Global Score
The Skindex-16 is a dermatology-specific quality of life measuring tool. (The SKINDEX contact information and permission to use: Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France. Internet: https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org). It contains 16 questions that ask subjects to rate how often over the last 7 days they have been bothered by various skin conditions on a scale of 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered). The global score is the average score for all questions and is transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered) so a higher score indicates a lower quality of life. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skindex-16 Emotional Subscale
The Skindex-16 is a dermatology-specific quality of life measuring tool (The SKINDEX contact information and permission to use: Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France. Internet: https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org). It contains 16 questions that ask subjects to rate how often over the last 7 days have they been bothered by various skin conditions on a scale of 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered). The Emotional subscale looks at the average score of questions 5-11 regarding emotion; the emotional score is transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered) so a higher score indicates a lower quality of life. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skindex-16 Symptoms Subscale
The Skindex-16 is a dermatology-specific quality of life measuring tool (The SKINDEX contact information and permission to use: Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France. Internet: https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org). It contains 16 questions that ask subjects to rate how often over the last 7 days have they been bothered by various skin conditions on a scale of 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered). The Symptoms subscale looks at the average score of questions 1-4 individual responses regarding symptoms; the symptoms score is transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered) so a higher score indicates a lower quality of life. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skindex-16 Functional Subscale
The Skindex-16 is a dermatology-specific quality of life measuring tool (The SKINDEX contact information and permission to use: Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France. Internet: https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org). It contains 16 questions that ask subjects to rate how often over the last 7 days have they been bothered by various skin conditions on a scale of 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered). The Functional subscale looks at the average score of questions 12 - 16 regarding daily functioning; the functional score is transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered) so a higher score indicates a lower quality of life. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skin Moisture
Skin moisture will be measured with a Corneometer, with values ranging from 0 (no moisture) to 120 (most moisturized) arbitrary units. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skin Water Loss
The amount of water lost through the skin will be measured with a Vapometer. Higher numbers indicate more water loss. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Dryness
Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin dryness on a scale of 1 (very dry) to 10 (skin feels moisturized). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Flakiness
Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin flakiness on a scale of 1 (flaking very apparent) to 10 (no visible flaking). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Itchiness
Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin itchiness on a scale of 1 (very itchy) to 10 (not at all itchy). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 weeks).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Roughness
Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin roughness/texture on a scale of 1 (very rough) to 10 (not at all rough). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 weeks).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Smoothness
Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin smoothness on a scale of 1 (not at all smooth) to 10 (very smooth). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Softness
Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin softness on a scale of 1 (not at all soft) to 10 (very soft). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Comfort
Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin comfort on a scale of 1 (uncomfortable/irritated) to 10 (very comfortable/not at all irritated). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Overall Look/Feel
Subjects will be asked to rate the overall look and feel of their skin on a scale of 1 (not healthy looking) to 10 (healthy looking). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Measured: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jan 2019
- Study start23 May 2019
- Primary completion18 Dec 2019
- Study completion18 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for IchthyosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- All participants will receive the same study regimen consisting of 3 products: a body wash, a body cream, and an anti-itch balm.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (J&JCI)
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mario Lacouture, M.D., Principal investigator, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03796052
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CCSSKA000844
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2019
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Johnson \& Johnson Consumer Inc. has an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu.
Publications
Kurtz ES, Wallo W. Colloidal oatmeal: history, chemistry and clinical properties. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Feb;6(2):167-70.
PubMed 17373175Fowler JF Jr. Colloidal oatmeal formulations and the treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Oct;13(10):1180-3; quiz 1184-5.
PubMed 25607551Ilnytska O, Kaur S, Chon S, Reynertson KA, Nebus J, Garay M, Mahmood K, Southall MD. Colloidal Oatmeal <em>(Avena Sativa)</em> Improves Skin Barrier Through Multi-Therapy Activity. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016 Jun 1;15(6):684-90.
PubMed 27272074Sur R, Nigam A, Grote D, Liebel F, Southall MD. Avenanthramides, polyphenols from oats, exhibit anti-inflammatory and anti-itch activity. Arch Dermatol Res. 2008 Nov;300(10):569-74. doi: 10.1007/s00403-008-0858-x. Epub 2008 May 7.
PubMed 18461339Criquet M, Roure R, Dayan L, Nollent V, Bertin C. Safety and efficacy of personal care products containing colloidal oatmeal. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2012;5:183-93. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S31375. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
PubMed 23204849Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55. No abstract available.
PubMed 7165009Elman S, Hynan LS, Gabriel V, Mayo MJ. The 5-D itch scale: a new measure of pruritus. Br J Dermatol. 2010 Mar;162(3):587-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09586.x. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
PubMed 19995367Chren MM, Lasek RJ, Sahay AP, Sands LP. Measurement properties of Skindex-16: a brief quality-of-life measure for patients with skin diseases. J Cutan Med Surg. 2001 Mar-Apr;5(2):105-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02737863. Epub 2001 Mar 21.
PubMed 11443481Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). (2018, Mar 01). Retrieved from https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm
The PRO-CTCAE Measurement System. (2018, Sep 14). Retrieved from https://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/pro-ctcae/measurement.html
Blume-Peytavi U, Kottner J, Sterry W, Hodin MW, Griffiths TW, Watson RE, Hay RJ, Griffiths CE. Age-Associated Skin Conditions and Diseases: Current Perspectives and Future Options. Gerontologist. 2016 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S230-42. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw003.
PubMed 26994263Skin Conditions. (2012, Jun 26). Retrieved from https://www.cancer.net/navigating-cancer-care/side-effects/skin-conditions
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single Center, Clinical Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of an Avena Sativa Skincare Regimen for Therapy-Related Pruritus and Xerosis in Cancer Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03796052
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CCSSKA000844
- Conditions
- Ichthyosis, Pruritus
- Keywords
- Pruritis, Itching, Dryness, Xerosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (J&JCI)Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 23 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will test the safety and efficacy of three topical agents containing oat kernel flour to determine how well they relieve skin dryness and itching related to cancer therapies. Participants will receive a body wash, a body cream, and an anti-itch balm to use at home for 4-6 weeks.
Detailed description
Many patients undergoing cancer therapies experience skin reactions like dry skin, rash, redness, itchiness, and hyperpigmentation. Dry skin and itching are especially common for those undergoing chemotherapy and targeted treatments.
Skincare products containing Avena sativa (oat) kernel flour have a long history of tolerance and efficacy in treating various skin conditions involving pruritus (itching) and xerosis (dry skin), as Avena sativa (oat) kernel flour is known for its skin protectant properties and soothing effects on skin. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a regimen of three topical agents containing Avena sativa (oat) kernel flour for cancer patients experiencing mild to moderate pruritus and/or xerosis.
Participants will received the products at Baseline (Visit 1) and return to the clinical site at Week 5 +/- 1 week for Visit 2. In addition, questionnaires will be completed remotely between Baseline and Visit 2.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- All participants will receive the same study regimen consisting of 3 products: a body wash, a body cream, and an anti-itch balm.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Avena Sativa Skincare Regimen | Experimental | Other: Avena Sativa Skincare RegimenAvena sativa-containing body wash, body cream, and anti-itch balm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- able to read, write, speak, and understand English
- has signed Informed Consent including Photograph Release
- has a prior diagnosis of a solid or hematologic tumor and either:
- is undergoing one or more types of cancer treatment that are commonly known to cause mild to moderate skin reactions such as rash, dryness, and/or itching
- is diagnosed with mild to moderate skin dryness (xerosis) and/or itching (pruritus).
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- has known allergies or sensitivity to skincare products or study product ingredients.
- has other skin conditions or diseases that the investigator thinks would interfere with the study or put the subject at higher risk (e.g. immunosuppressive diseases, skin infections, etc.)
- has severe skin dryness, itching, or rash.
- is undergoing radiation therapy.
- is undergoing chemotherapy or adjuntive therapies known to commonly cause complex or severe skin reactions.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Avena Sativa Skincare RegimenRegimen consisting of 3 topical agents containing Avena Sativa (oat) kernel flour: a body wash (type = cosmetic), a body cream (type = cosmetic), and an anti-itch balm (type = OTC monograph drug with 0.5% Pramoxine HCl) | Other | Avena Sativa Skincare Regimen |
Primary outcome
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in CTCAE Grading of Xerosis
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
The investigator will evaluate subjects for overall xerosis (skin dryness) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading scale. For xerosis, the scale ranges from 1 (dryness covering less 10% of body surface area and no associated erythema or pruritus) to 3 (dryness covering greater than 30% of body surface area and associated with itching; limits daily self care activities of daily living). A "0" grade will be used to document subjects with no presence of the CTCAE skin adverse event symptoms for xerosis. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in CTCAE Grading of Pruritus
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
The investigator will evaluate subjects for overall pruritus (skin itching) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading scale. For pruritus, the scale ranges from 1 (Mild or localized; topical intervention indicated) to 3 (widespread and constant itching; limits daily self-care activities or sleep). A "0" grade will be used to document subjects with no presence of the CTCAE skin adverse event symptoms for pruritus. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Overall Xerosis Grading
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
The investigator will evaluate subjects for overall xerosis (skin dryness) using a 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Overall Pruritus Grading
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
The investigator will question subjects for overall pruritus (skin itching) using a 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Overall Irritation Assessment
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
The investigator will evaluate subjects for overall irritation using a 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).
18 secondary outcomes
Frequency Distribution for Overall Tolerance at Visit 2 - Subject Rating
Time frame: Week 5 +/- 1 week
Frequency Distribution for Overall Tolerance at Visit 2 - Investigator Rating
Time frame: Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in PRO-CTCAE Skin Dryness
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in PRO-CTCAE Itching
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skindex-16 Global Score
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skindex-16 Emotional Subscale
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skindex-16 Symptoms Subscale
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skindex-16 Functional Subscale
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skin Moisture
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skin Water Loss
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Dryness
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Flakiness
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Itchiness
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Roughness
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Smoothness
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Softness
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Comfort
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Overall Look/Feel
Time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2020.
- Background: PubMed 17373175Kurtz ES, Wallo W. Colloidal oatmeal: history, chemistry and clinical properties. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Feb;6(2):167-70.
- Background: PubMed 25607551Fowler JF Jr. Colloidal oatmeal formulations and the treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Oct;13(10):1180-3; quiz 1184-5.
- Background: PubMed 27272074Ilnytska O, Kaur S, Chon S, Reynertson KA, Nebus J, Garay M, Mahmood K, Southall MD. Colloidal Oatmeal <em>(Avena Sativa)</em> Improves Skin Barrier Through Multi-Therapy Activity. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016 Jun 1;15(6):684-90.
- Background: PubMed 18461339Sur R, Nigam A, Grote D, Liebel F, Southall MD. Avenanthramides, polyphenols from oats, exhibit anti-inflammatory and anti-itch activity. Arch Dermatol Res. 2008 Nov;300(10):569-74. doi: 10.1007/s00403-008-0858-x. Epub 2008 May 7.
- Background: PubMed 23204849Criquet M, Roure R, Dayan L, Nollent V, Bertin C. Safety and efficacy of personal care products containing colloidal oatmeal. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2012;5:183-93. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S31375. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
- Background: PubMed 7165009Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19995367Elman S, Hynan LS, Gabriel V, Mayo MJ. The 5-D itch scale: a new measure of pruritus. Br J Dermatol. 2010 Mar;162(3):587-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09586.x. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
- Background: PubMed 11443481Chren MM, Lasek RJ, Sahay AP, Sands LP. Measurement properties of Skindex-16: a brief quality-of-life measure for patients with skin diseases. J Cutan Med Surg. 2001 Mar-Apr;5(2):105-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02737863. Epub 2001 Mar 21.
- BackgroundCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). (2018, Mar 01). Retrieved from https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm
- BackgroundThe PRO-CTCAE Measurement System. (2018, Sep 14). Retrieved from https://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/pro-ctcae/measurement.html
- Background: PubMed 26994263Blume-Peytavi U, Kottner J, Sterry W, Hodin MW, Griffiths TW, Watson RE, Hay RJ, Griffiths CE. Age-Associated Skin Conditions and Diseases: Current Perspectives and Future Options. Gerontologist. 2016 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S230-42. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw003.
- BackgroundSkin Conditions. (2012, Jun 26). Retrieved from https://www.cancer.net/navigating-cancer-care/side-effects/skin-conditions
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Johnson \& Johnson Consumer Inc. has an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu.
Related trials for Ichthyosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of BCX17725
Netherton Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Acupuncture Combined With Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Anxiety State
IBS, Constipation Predominant, Anxiety State
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Diseases With Salivary Gland Involvement
Healthy Volunteer, Sjogren's Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Phase 2/3 Clinical Study of QRX003 Lotion in Subjects With Netherton Syndrome
Netherton Syndrome
Recruiting
HPTC Versus AFSM in Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mario Lacouture, M.D. principal investigator
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Avena Sativa Skincare Regimen in people with Ichthyosis and Pruritus, run by Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (J&JCI) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in CTCAE Grading of Xerosis (time frame: Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03796052, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2020.