AzTrials
AzTrials

Deep Carious LesionPhase 4NCT03791255

Light Cured Resin Modified Calcium Silicate Versus Light Cured Calcium Hydroxide in Indirect Pulp Treatment of Primary Molars

A Phase 4 study testing Calcium silicate liner and Calcium hydroxide liner in people with Deep Carious Lesion and Indirect Pulp Treatment, run by Cairo University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to explore if light cured resin modified Calcium silicate could result in better clinical and radiographic success if compared to light cured Calcium hydroxide when used in indirect pulp capping treatment in primary molars. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 7 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Deep Carious Lesion, Indirect Pulp Treatment
What is being tested?
Calcium silicate liner and Calcium hydroxide liner
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
46 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Feb 2019to Feb 2021
Phase
Phase 4

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 7 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Medically free children.
  • Age range from 4-7 years.
  • Presence of lower second primary molars with deep carious occlusal lesion.
  • No history of spontaneous pain (reversible pulpitis).
  • Clinically: Absence of swelling, sinus, fistula, pain on percussion and tooth mobility.
  • Radiographically: Absence of radiolucent lesions at furcation or periapical region and absence of internal or external root resorption.

Who cannot join

  • Uncooperative children.
  • Any unmet previous criterion.

About this study

Official title: Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Light Cured Resin Modified Calcium Silicate Versus Light Cured Calcium Hydroxide in Indirect Pulp Treatment of Primary Molars

The objective of this study is to explore if light cured resin modified Calcium silicate could result in better clinical and radiographic success if compared to light cured Calcium hydroxide when used in indirect pulp capping treatment in primary molars.

Read the detailed description

To evaluate clinical and radiographic success of resin modified calcium silicate in comparison to light cured calcium hydroxide as indirect pulp capping materials in primary molars.

P: Children aged (4-7 years) with deep carious lesions in lower primary second molars indicated for indirect pulp treatment.

I: Indirect pulp treatment using light cured resin modified Calcium Silicate (TheraCal).

C: Indirect pulp treatment using light cured Calcium Hydroxide. O: clinical and radiographic success.

Being tested
Calcium silicate liner, Calcium hydroxide liner
Keywords
resin modified calcium silicate, indirect pulp treatment, primary molars

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Calcium silicate linerDrug

    new light-cured resin-modified calcium silicate-filled base/ liner material designed for direct and indirect pulp capping

  • Calcium hydroxide linerDrug

    Calcium hydroxide is the gold standard for pulp capping, allows for the formation of a reparative dentin bridge

Study groups in NCT03791255
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Resin Modified Calcium SilicateExperimentallight-cured resin-modified calcium silicate-filled base/ liner material designed for direct and indirect pulp capping
Receives: Drug: Calcium silicate liner
Light Cured Calcium HydroxideActive comparatorgold standard for pulp capping, It allows for the formation of a reparative dentine bridge through cellular differentiation, extracellular matrix secretion and subsequent mineralization.
Receives: Drug: Calcium hydroxide liner

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative pain

    Pain questionnaire (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Postoperative pain

    Pain questionnaire (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Postoperative pain

    Pain questionnaire (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Postoperative pain

    Pain questionnaire (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Swelling

    Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Swelling

    Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Swelling

    Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Swelling

    Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Sinus or fistula

    Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 1 month

  6. Sinus or fistula

    Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 3 months

  7. Sinus or fistula

    Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 6 months

  8. Sinus or fistula

    Visual examination by the operator (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 12 months

  9. Tooth mobility

    back of the mirror to check mobility (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 1 month

  10. Tooth mobility

    back of the mirror to check mobility (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 3 months

  11. Tooth mobility

    back of the mirror to check mobility (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 6 months

  12. Tooth mobility

    back of the mirror to check mobility (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 12 months

  13. pain on percussion

    back of the mirror to check pain on percussion (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 1 month

  14. pain on percussion

    back of the mirror to check pain on percussion (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 3 months

  15. pain on percussion

    back of the mirror to check pain on percussion (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 6 months

  16. pain on percussion

    back of the mirror to check pain on percussion (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 12 months

  17. Occurrence of radiolucent lesions at furcation or periapical region

    (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 1 months

  18. Occurrence of radiolucent lesions at furcation or periapical region

    (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 3 months

  19. Occurrence of radiolucent lesions at furcation or periapical region

    (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 6 months

  20. Occurrence of radiolucent lesions at furcation or periapical region

    (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 12 months

  21. widening in the periodontal membrane space

    (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 1 month

  22. widening in the periodontal membrane space

    (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 3 months

  23. widening in the periodontal membrane space

    (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 6 months

  24. widening in the periodontal membrane space

    (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 12 months

  25. presence of internal or external root resorption

    (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 1 month

  26. presence of internal or external root resorption

    (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 3 months

  27. presence of internal or external root resorption

    (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 6 months

  28. presence of internal or external root resorption

    (binary yes/no)

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jan 2019
  2. Study startFeb 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionFeb 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
46 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03791255
Sponsor's protocol ID
Indirect pulp primary molars
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
27 Dec 2018
Last updated
15 Jan 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in