Generalized Pustular PsoriasisPhase 2NCT03782792
Effisayil™ 1: A Study to Test Spesolimab (BI 655130) in Patients With a Flare-up of a Skin Disease Called Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
A Phase 2 study testing Spesolimab in people with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 37 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of spesolimab (BI 655130) compared to placebo in patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) presenting with an acute flare of moderate to severe intensity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- Spesolimab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- 31 Jan 2019to 5 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with GPPGA of 0 or 1 and a known and documented history of GPP per European Rare And Severe Psoriasis Expert Network (ERASPEN) criteria regardless of IL36RN mutation status, with previous evidence of fever, and/or asthenia, and/or myalgia, and/or elevated C-reactive protein, and/or leucocytosis with peripheral blood neutrophilia (above ULN) OR
- -- Patients with an acute flare of moderate to severe intensity meeting the (ERASPEN) criteria of GPP with a known and documented history of GPP (per ERASPEN criteria) regardless of IL36RN mutation status, with previous evidence of fever, and/or asthenia, and/or myalgia, and/or elevated C-reactive protein, and/or leucocytosis with peripheral blood neutrophilia (above ULN)
- Male or female patients, aged 18 to 75 years at screening.
- Signed and dated written informed consent prior to admission to the study in accordance with ICH GCP and local legislation prior to start of any screening procedures.
- Women of childbearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. Note: A woman is considered of childbearing potential, i.e. fertile, following menarche and until becoming postmenopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilisation methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. Tubal ligation is not a method of permanent sterilization. A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause
- Further inclusion criteria apply
Who cannot join
- Patients with SAPHO (Synovitis-acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis-osteitis) syndrome.
- Patients with primary erythrodermic psoriasis vulgaris.
- Patients with primary plaque psoriasis vulgaris without presence of pustules or with pustules that are restricted to psoriatic plaques.
- Drug-triggered Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP).
- Immediate life-threatening flare of GPP or requiring intensive care treatment, according to the investigator's judgement. Life-threatening complications mainly include, but are not limited to, cardiovascular/cytokine driven shock, pulmonary distress syndrome, or renal failure.
- Severe, progressive, or uncontrolled hepatic disease, defined as >3- fold Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) elevation in AST or ALT or alkaline phosphatase, or >2-fold ULN elevation in total bilirubin.
- Further exclusion criteria apply
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 12 countries.
37 sites in 12 countries
Malaysia7 sites
Hospital Sultanah Aminah
Johor Bahru, 80100
Hospital Sultan Ismail
Johor Bahru, 81100
Hospital Kuala Lumpur
Kuala Lumpur, 50586
Hospital Selayang
Kuala Selangor, 68100
Hospital Pakar Sultanah Fatimah
Muar town, 84000
Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun
Negeri Perak/Ipoh, 30450
Hospital Pulau Pinang
Pulau Pinang, 10990
Japan6 sites
Nagoya City University Hospital
Aichi, Nagoya, 467-8602
Fukuoka University Hospital
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 814-0180
Asahikawa Medical University Hospital
Hokkaido, Asahikawa, 078-8510
Tohoku University Hospital
Miyagi, Sendai, 980-8574
Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center
Tokyo, Hachioji, 193-0998
Tokyo Medical University Hospital
Tokyo, Shinjuku-ku, 160-0023
China5 sites
The First Hospital of Dalian Medical University
Dalian, 116011
2nd Affiliated Hosp Zhejiang University College of Medical
Hangzhou, 310009
Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital
Shanghai, 200000
Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, 200040
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Tianjin, 30052
United States4 sites
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33125
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Germany4 sites
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117
Universitätsklinikum Bonn AöR
Bonn, 53127
Universitätsklinikum Essen AöR
Essen, 45147
Klinikum der Universität München - Campus Innenstadt
München, 80337
France3 sites
HOP Saint-André
Bordeaux, 33000
HOP Saint-Louis
Paris, 75010
HOP Robert Debré
Reims, 51092
Tunisia3 sites
Farhat Hached Hospital
Sousse, 4000
La Rabta Hospital
Tunis, 1007
Hedi Chaker Hospital, Department of Dermatology
Tunisia, 1053
About this study
Official title: Effisayil™ 1:Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Single Intravenous Dose of Spesolimab (BI 655130) in Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) Presenting With an Acute Flare of Moderate to Severe Intensity
To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of spesolimab (BI 655130) compared to placebo in patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) presenting with an acute flare of moderate to severe intensity.
- Conditions
- Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
- Being tested
- Spesolimab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Psoriasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SpesolimabDrug
Also called BI 655130
Solution for infusion
PlaceboDrug
Solution for infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Spesolimab | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Spesolimab |
| Placebo | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Subscore of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 1
The Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) relies on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The investigator (or qualified site personnel) scored the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4.
The GPPGA pustulation subscore ranges from 0 to 4 where:
0 = clear;
- = almost clear;
- = mild:
- = moderate;
- = severe. A lower GPPGA pustulation subscore indicates a better outcome. A GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 means no visible pustules.
The proportion of patients who achieved a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 at Week 1 is reported.
Measured: At Week 1.
Secondary outcomes (15)
Key Secondary: Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1
GPPGA relied on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The GPPGA total score was calculated by taking the mean of the erythema subscore, pustules subscore and scaling/crusting subscore. The severity of each subscore was assessed using a 5 point scale score ranging from 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). The final GPPGA score is assigned as follows:
- 0, if scores for all three subscores are 0,
- 1, if 0 < mean < 1.5,
- 2, if 1.5 ≤ mean < 2.5,
- 3, if 2.5 ≤ mean < 3.5,
- 4, if mean ≥ 3.5. A lower GPPGA score indicates a better outcome, with 0 being clear and 1 being almost clear. The proportion of patients with a GPPGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 1 is reported.
Measured: At Week 1.
Proportion of Patients With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPPASI) 75 at Week 4
Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs).
A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. GPPASI 75 is based on the percent reduction from baseline, generally summarized as a dichotomous outcome based on achieving over an 75% reduction.
Proportion of patients with GPPASI 75 at Week 4 is reported.
Measured: At Week 4.
Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 4
The pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a participant-administered single-item scale designed to measure skin pain intensity from generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) using a 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS. Overall severity of participant's skin pain from GPP is indicated by placing a single mark on the horizontal 100 mm scale from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (pain as bad as one can imagine).
Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the VAS score at baseline from the VAS score at Week 4. A negative change indicates an improvement from baseline.
Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR).
NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 4.
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) Score at Week 4
PSS is a 4-item patient-reported outcome instrument that assesses the severity of psoriasis symptoms in moderate to severe psoriasis patients. The symptoms included are: pain, redness, itching, and burning. The symptom severity was assessed using a 5 point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe. The symptom scores are added to an unweighted total score (range: 0 to 16). A lower PSS score indicates a better outcome. Change from baseline =PSS score at Week 4 - PSS score at baseline. Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR). NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 4.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Score at Week 4
The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. Each items is scored from 0 to 4. Score range is 0 (extreme fatigue)-52 (no fatigue).
Change from baseline=FACIT Fatigue score at Week 4- FACIT-Fatigue score at baseline. Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR). NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is s (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 4.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 4
GPPGA relied on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The GPPGA total score is calculated by taking the mean of the erythema subscore, pustules subscore and scaling/crusting subscore. The severity of each subscore was assessed using a 5 point scale score ranging from 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). The final GPPGA score is assigned as follows:
- 0, if scores for all three scores are 0,
- 1, if 0 < mean < 1.5,
- 2, if 1.5 ≤ mean < 2.5,
- 3, if 2.5 ≤ mean < 3.5,
- 4, if mean ≥ 3.5. A lower GPPGA score indicates a better outcome, with 0 being clear and 1 being almost clear.
The proportion of participants with a GPPGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 4 is reported.
Measured: At Week 4.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Sub-score of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 4
The Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) relies on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The investigator (or qualified site personnel) scores the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4.
The GPPGA pustulation subscore ranges from 0 to 4 where:
0 = clear;
- = almost clear;
- = mild:
- = moderate;
- = severe. A lower GPPGA pustulation subscore indicates a better outcome. The proportion of patients who achieved a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 at Week 1 is reported.
Measured: At Week 4.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 4
Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs).
A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. GPPASI 50 is based on the percent reduction from baseline, generally summarized as a dichotomous outcome based on achieving over an 50 % reduction.
Proportion of patients with GPPASI 50 at Week 4 is reported.
Measured: At Week 4.
Percent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 4
GPPASI provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 (no disease) to 72 (worse disease state). It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs).
%GPPASI change from baseline=(GPPASI at Week 4-GPPASI at baseline) *100/(GPPASI at baseline).
Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR).NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3. Planned statistical analysis were not performed due to lack of valid data.
Measured: Baseline and at Week 4.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 1
Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs).
A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. GPPASI 50 is based on the percent reduction from baseline, generally summarized as a dichotomous outcome based on achieving over an 50 % reduction.
Proportion of patients with GPPASI 50 at Week 1 is reported.
Measured: At Week 1.
Percent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 1
Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs).
A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease.
The percent change from baseline at Week 1 is calculated as:
% GPPASI change from baseline = (GPPASI at Week 1 - GPPASI at baseline) *100/GPPASI at baseline. If % GPPASI change from baseline is positive, it means the disease is becoming worse.
Measured: At Week 1.
Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 1
TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and Day 8 (Day 8 excluded). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.
The exposure-adjusted incidence rate was calculated as:
Incidence rate [1/100 patients-years] = 100 × number of patients with AE / Total AE specific time at risk [patient-years] where: Time at risk [patient-years] = (date of onset of TEAE - study drug start date + 1) /365.25
Measured: From start of treatment until Day 7, up to 7 days.
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 1
TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and Day 8 (Day 8 excluded). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.
Measured: From start of treatment until Day 7, up to 7 days.
Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase
TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and end of the residual effect period (REP) (16 weeks). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.
The exposure-adjusted incidence rate was calculated as:
Incidence rate [1/100 patients-years] = 100 × number of patients with AE / Total AE specific time at risk [patient-years] where Time at risk where: Time at risk [patient-years] = (date of onset of TEAE - study drug start date + 1) /365.25 If, for a patient, the selected TEAE did not occur then the time at risk was censored at min
- Date of death
- For patients who did not roll over into the Open Label Extension (OLE) study: last contact date Visit14/15
- For patients who rolled over into the OLE study: the 1st dose in the OLE study
- Drug stop date + 112 days
- Date of Day 8 if OL spesolimab was given
- Date of rescue medication if spesolimab was given.
Measured: From start of treatment until end of the residual effect period (REP) but censored at any use of open label spesolimab, up to 16 weeks.
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase
TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and end of the residual effect period (REP) (16 weeks). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.
Measured: From start of treatment until end of the residual effect period (REP) but censored at any use of open label spesolimab, up to 16 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Dec 2018
- Study start31 Jan 2019
- Primary completion23 Sep 2020
- Study completion5 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Generalized Pustular PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03782792
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1368-0013
- Other IDs
- 2017-004231-37, 2017
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents. Exceptions might apply, e.g. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (in case of low number of patients and therefore limitations with anonymization). For more details refer to: https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datatransparency
Publications
Gwillim EC, Nichols AJ. Spesolimab for generalized pustular psoriasis: a review of two key clinical trials supporting initial US regulatory approval. Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 22;15:1359481. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1359481. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39104539Tsai TF, Zheng M, Ding Y, Song Z, Liu Q, Chen Y, Hu H, Xu J. Efficacy and Safety of Spesolimab in Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: A Subgroup Analysis of Chinese Patients in the Effisayil 1 Trial. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Dec;13(12):3097-3110. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01037-4. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
PubMed 37840119Bachelez H, Choon SE, Marrakchi S, Burden AD, Tsai TF, Morita A, Navarini AA, Zheng M, Xu J, Turki H, Anadkat MJ, Rajeswari S, Hua H, Vulcu SD, Hall D, Tetzlaff K, Thoma C, Lebwohl MG; Effisayil 1 Trial Investigators. Trial of Spesolimab for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 23;385(26):2431-2440. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111563.
PubMed 34936739Choon SE, Lebwohl MG, Marrakchi S, Burden AD, Tsai TF, Morita A, Navarini AA, Zheng M, Xu J, Turki H, Rajeswari S, Deng H, Tetzlaff K, Thoma C, Bachelez H. Study protocol of the global Effisayil 1 Phase II, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of spesolimab in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis presenting with an acute flare. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 30;11(3):e043666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043666.
PubMed 33785490
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effisayil™ 1:Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Single Intravenous Dose of Spesolimab (BI 655130) in Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) Presenting With an Acute Flare of Moderate to Severe Intensity
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03782792
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1368-0013
- Conditions
- Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 9 Mar 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of spesolimab (BI 655130) compared to placebo in patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) presenting with an acute flare of moderate to severe intensity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Spesolimab | Experimental | Drug: Spesolimab |
| Placebo | Experimental | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with GPPGA of 0 or 1 and a known and documented history of GPP per European Rare And Severe Psoriasis Expert Network (ERASPEN) criteria regardless of IL36RN mutation status, with previous evidence of fever, and/or asthenia, and/or myalgia, and/or elevated C-reactive protein, and/or leucocytosis with peripheral blood neutrophilia (above ULN) OR
- -- Patients with an acute flare of moderate to severe intensity meeting the (ERASPEN) criteria of GPP with a known and documented history of GPP (per ERASPEN criteria) regardless of IL36RN mutation status, with previous evidence of fever, and/or asthenia, and/or myalgia, and/or elevated C-reactive protein, and/or leucocytosis with peripheral blood neutrophilia (above ULN)
- Male or female patients, aged 18 to 75 years at screening.
- Signed and dated written informed consent prior to admission to the study in accordance with ICH GCP and local legislation prior to start of any screening procedures.
- Women of childbearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. Note: A woman is considered of childbearing potential, i.e. fertile, following menarche and until becoming postmenopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilisation methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. Tubal ligation is not a method of permanent sterilization. A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with SAPHO (Synovitis-acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis-osteitis) syndrome.
- Patients with primary erythrodermic psoriasis vulgaris.
- Patients with primary plaque psoriasis vulgaris without presence of pustules or with pustules that are restricted to psoriatic plaques.
- Drug-triggered Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP).
- Immediate life-threatening flare of GPP or requiring intensive care treatment, according to the investigator's judgement. Life-threatening complications mainly include, but are not limited to, cardiovascular/cytokine driven shock, pulmonary distress syndrome, or renal failure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SpesolimabAlso: BI 655130Solution for infusion | Drug | Spesolimab |
| PlaceboSolution for infusion | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Subscore of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 1
Time frame: At Week 1.
The Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) relies on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The investigator (or qualified site personnel) scored the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4. The GPPGA pustulation subscore ranges from 0 to 4 where: 0 = clear; 1. = almost clear; 2. = mild: 3. = moderate; 4. = severe. A lower GPPGA pustulation subscore indicates a better outcome. A GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 means no visible pustules. The proportion of patients who achieved a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 at Week 1 is reported.
15 secondary outcomes
Key Secondary: Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1
Time frame: At Week 1.
Proportion of Patients With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPPASI) 75 at Week 4
Time frame: At Week 4.
Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 4.
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) Score at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 4.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Score at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 4.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 4
Time frame: At Week 4.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Sub-score of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 4
Time frame: At Week 4.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 4
Time frame: At Week 4.
Percent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline and at Week 4.
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 1
Time frame: At Week 1.
Percent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 1
Time frame: At Week 1.
Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 1
Time frame: From start of treatment until Day 7, up to 7 days.
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 1
Time frame: From start of treatment until Day 7, up to 7 days.
Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of the residual effect period (REP) but censored at any use of open label spesolimab, up to 16 weeks.
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase
Time frame: From start of treatment until end of the residual effect period (REP) but censored at any use of open label spesolimab, up to 16 weeks.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39104539Gwillim EC, Nichols AJ. Spesolimab for generalized pustular psoriasis: a review of two key clinical trials supporting initial US regulatory approval. Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 22;15:1359481. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1359481. eCollection 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37840119Tsai TF, Zheng M, Ding Y, Song Z, Liu Q, Chen Y, Hu H, Xu J. Efficacy and Safety of Spesolimab in Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: A Subgroup Analysis of Chinese Patients in the Effisayil 1 Trial. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Dec;13(12):3097-3110. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01037-4. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34936739Bachelez H, Choon SE, Marrakchi S, Burden AD, Tsai TF, Morita A, Navarini AA, Zheng M, Xu J, Turki H, Anadkat MJ, Rajeswari S, Hua H, Vulcu SD, Hall D, Tetzlaff K, Thoma C, Lebwohl MG; Effisayil 1 Trial Investigators. Trial of Spesolimab for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 23;385(26):2431-2440. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111563.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33785490Choon SE, Lebwohl MG, Marrakchi S, Burden AD, Tsai TF, Morita A, Navarini AA, Zheng M, Xu J, Turki H, Rajeswari S, Deng H, Tetzlaff K, Thoma C, Bachelez H. Study protocol of the global Effisayil 1 Phase II, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of spesolimab in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis presenting with an acute flare. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 30;11(3):e043666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043666.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents. Exceptions might apply, e.g. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (in case of low number of patients and therefore limitations with anonymization). For more details refer to: https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datatransparency
Related trials for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of SHR-1139 Injection in Adult Patients With Palmoplantar Pustulosis
Palmoplantar Pustulosis of Adults
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Samples From Subjects With Various Skin Conditions and Healthy Volunteers
Acne, Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 2
A 16-week Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Delgocitinib Cream 20 mg/g in Adult Participants With Mild to Severe Palmoplantar Pustulosis
Palmoplantar Pustulosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Study Comparing the Risk of Serious Infections and Malignancies With Deucravacitinib or Biologics in Japanese Patients With Psoriasis
Psoriasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis or Erythrodermic Psoriasis
Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, Erythrodermic Psoriasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
37 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Spesolimab in people with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 37 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in Malaysia, Japan, China, United States, Germany and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Mar 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Subscore of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 1 (time frame: At Week 1.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03782792, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2025.