AzTrials
AzTrials

Generalized Pustular PsoriasisPhase 2NCT03782792

Effisayil™ 1: A Study to Test Spesolimab (BI 655130) in Patients With a Flare-up of a Skin Disease Called Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

A Phase 2 study testing Spesolimab in people with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 37 sites in 12 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of spesolimab (BI 655130) compared to placebo in patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) presenting with an acute flare of moderate to severe intensity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
What is being tested?
Spesolimab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
53 participants
Where
37 sitesin 12 countries
Study dates
31 Jan 2019to 5 Jan 2021
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with GPPGA of 0 or 1 and a known and documented history of GPP per European Rare And Severe Psoriasis Expert Network (ERASPEN) criteria regardless of IL36RN mutation status, with previous evidence of fever, and/or asthenia, and/or myalgia, and/or elevated C-reactive protein, and/or leucocytosis with peripheral blood neutrophilia (above ULN) OR
  • -- Patients with an acute flare of moderate to severe intensity meeting the (ERASPEN) criteria of GPP with a known and documented history of GPP (per ERASPEN criteria) regardless of IL36RN mutation status, with previous evidence of fever, and/or asthenia, and/or myalgia, and/or elevated C-reactive protein, and/or leucocytosis with peripheral blood neutrophilia (above ULN)
  • Male or female patients, aged 18 to 75 years at screening.
  • Signed and dated written informed consent prior to admission to the study in accordance with ICH GCP and local legislation prior to start of any screening procedures.
  • Women of childbearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. Note: A woman is considered of childbearing potential, i.e. fertile, following menarche and until becoming postmenopausal unless permanently sterile. Permanent sterilisation methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. Tubal ligation is not a method of permanent sterilization. A postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause
  • Further inclusion criteria apply

Who cannot join

  • Patients with SAPHO (Synovitis-acne-pustulosis-hyperostosis-osteitis) syndrome.
  • Patients with primary erythrodermic psoriasis vulgaris.
  • Patients with primary plaque psoriasis vulgaris without presence of pustules or with pustules that are restricted to psoriatic plaques.
  • Drug-triggered Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP).
  • Immediate life-threatening flare of GPP or requiring intensive care treatment, according to the investigator's judgement. Life-threatening complications mainly include, but are not limited to, cardiovascular/cytokine driven shock, pulmonary distress syndrome, or renal failure.
  • Severe, progressive, or uncontrolled hepatic disease, defined as >3- fold Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) elevation in AST or ALT or alkaline phosphatase, or >2-fold ULN elevation in total bilirubin.
  • Further exclusion criteria apply

Trial locations and contacts

37 sites in 12 countries.

37 sites in 12 countries

Malaysia7 sites
  • Hospital Sultanah Aminah

    Johor Bahru, 80100

  • Hospital Sultan Ismail

    Johor Bahru, 81100

  • Hospital Kuala Lumpur

    Kuala Lumpur, 50586

  • Hospital Selayang

    Kuala Selangor, 68100

  • Hospital Pakar Sultanah Fatimah

    Muar town, 84000

  • Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun

    Negeri Perak/Ipoh, 30450

  • Hospital Pulau Pinang

    Pulau Pinang, 10990

Other trials in Malaysia

Japan6 sites
  • Nagoya City University Hospital

    Aichi, Nagoya, 467-8602

  • Fukuoka University Hospital

    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 814-0180

  • Asahikawa Medical University Hospital

    Hokkaido, Asahikawa, 078-8510

  • Tohoku University Hospital

    Miyagi, Sendai, 980-8574

  • Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center

    Tokyo, Hachioji, 193-0998

  • Tokyo Medical University Hospital

    Tokyo, Shinjuku-ku, 160-0023

Other trials in Japan

China5 sites
  • The First Hospital of Dalian Medical University

    Dalian, 116011

  • 2nd Affiliated Hosp Zhejiang University College of Medical

    Hangzhou, 310009

  • Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital

    Shanghai, 200000

  • Huashan Hospital, Fudan University

    Shanghai, 200040

  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

    Tianjin, 30052

Other trials in China

United States4 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • University of Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33125

  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    New York, New York, 10029

  • University of South Florida

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

Other trials in United States

Germany4 sites
  • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 10117

  • Universitätsklinikum Bonn AöR

    Bonn, 53127

  • Universitätsklinikum Essen AöR

    Essen, 45147

  • Klinikum der Universität München - Campus Innenstadt

    München, 80337

Other trials in Germany

France3 sites
  • HOP Saint-André

    Bordeaux, 33000

  • HOP Saint-Louis

    Paris, 75010

  • HOP Robert Debré

    Reims, 51092

Other trials in France

Tunisia3 sites
  • Farhat Hached Hospital

    Sousse, 4000

  • La Rabta Hospital

    Tunis, 1007

  • Hedi Chaker Hospital, Department of Dermatology

    Tunisia, 1053

Other trials in Tunisia

Singapore1 site
  • National University Hospital

    Singapore, 119074

Other trials in Singapore

South Korea1 site
  • Severance Hospital

    Seoul, 03722

Other trials in South Korea

Switzerland1 site
  • University Hospital of Lausanne

    Lausanne, 1011

Other trials in Switzerland

Taiwan1 site
  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 10016

Other trials in Taiwan

Thailand1 site
  • Ramathibodi Hospital

    Ratchatewi, Bangkok, 10400

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: Effisayil™ 1:Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Single Intravenous Dose of Spesolimab (BI 655130) in Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) Presenting With an Acute Flare of Moderate to Severe Intensity

To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of spesolimab (BI 655130) compared to placebo in patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) presenting with an acute flare of moderate to severe intensity.

Being tested
Spesolimab, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Psoriasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SpesolimabDrug

    Also called BI 655130

    Solution for infusion

  • PlaceboDrug

    Solution for infusion

Study groups in NCT03782792
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SpesolimabExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Spesolimab
PlaceboExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Subscore of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 1

    The Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) relies on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The investigator (or qualified site personnel) scored the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4.

    The GPPGA pustulation subscore ranges from 0 to 4 where:

    0 = clear;

    1. = almost clear;
    2. = mild:
    3. = moderate;
    4. = severe. A lower GPPGA pustulation subscore indicates a better outcome. A GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 means no visible pustules.

    The proportion of patients who achieved a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 at Week 1 is reported.

    Measured: At Week 1.

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Key Secondary: Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1

    GPPGA relied on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The GPPGA total score was calculated by taking the mean of the erythema subscore, pustules subscore and scaling/crusting subscore. The severity of each subscore was assessed using a 5 point scale score ranging from 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). The final GPPGA score is assigned as follows:

    • 0, if scores for all three subscores are 0,
    • 1, if 0 < mean < 1.5,
    • 2, if 1.5 ≤ mean < 2.5,
    • 3, if 2.5 ≤ mean < 3.5,
    • 4, if mean ≥ 3.5. A lower GPPGA score indicates a better outcome, with 0 being clear and 1 being almost clear. The proportion of patients with a GPPGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 1 is reported.

    Measured: At Week 1.

  2. Proportion of Patients With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPPASI) 75 at Week 4

    Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs).

    A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. GPPASI 75 is based on the percent reduction from baseline, generally summarized as a dichotomous outcome based on achieving over an 75% reduction.

    Proportion of patients with GPPASI 75 at Week 4 is reported.

    Measured: At Week 4.

  3. Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 4

    The pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a participant-administered single-item scale designed to measure skin pain intensity from generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) using a 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS. Overall severity of participant's skin pain from GPP is indicated by placing a single mark on the horizontal 100 mm scale from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (pain as bad as one can imagine).

    Change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the VAS score at baseline from the VAS score at Week 4. A negative change indicates an improvement from baseline.

    Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR).

    NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 4.

  4. Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) Score at Week 4

    PSS is a 4-item patient-reported outcome instrument that assesses the severity of psoriasis symptoms in moderate to severe psoriasis patients. The symptoms included are: pain, redness, itching, and burning. The symptom severity was assessed using a 5 point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe. The symptom scores are added to an unweighted total score (range: 0 to 16). A lower PSS score indicates a better outcome. Change from baseline =PSS score at Week 4 - PSS score at baseline. Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR). NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 4.

  5. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Score at Week 4

    The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. Each items is scored from 0 to 4. Score range is 0 (extreme fatigue)-52 (no fatigue).

    Change from baseline=FACIT Fatigue score at Week 4- FACIT-Fatigue score at baseline. Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR). NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is s (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 4.

  6. Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 4

    GPPGA relied on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The GPPGA total score is calculated by taking the mean of the erythema subscore, pustules subscore and scaling/crusting subscore. The severity of each subscore was assessed using a 5 point scale score ranging from 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). The final GPPGA score is assigned as follows:

    • 0, if scores for all three scores are 0,
    • 1, if 0 < mean < 1.5,
    • 2, if 1.5 ≤ mean < 2.5,
    • 3, if 2.5 ≤ mean < 3.5,
    • 4, if mean ≥ 3.5. A lower GPPGA score indicates a better outcome, with 0 being clear and 1 being almost clear.

    The proportion of participants with a GPPGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 4 is reported.

    Measured: At Week 4.

  7. Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Sub-score of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 4

    The Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) relies on clinical assessment of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patient's skin presentation. The investigator (or qualified site personnel) scores the erythema, pustules, and scaling of all GPP lesions from 0 to 4.

    The GPPGA pustulation subscore ranges from 0 to 4 where:

    0 = clear;

    1. = almost clear;
    2. = mild:
    3. = moderate;
    4. = severe. A lower GPPGA pustulation subscore indicates a better outcome. The proportion of patients who achieved a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 at Week 1 is reported.

    Measured: At Week 4.

  8. Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 4

    Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs).

    A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. GPPASI 50 is based on the percent reduction from baseline, generally summarized as a dichotomous outcome based on achieving over an 50 % reduction.

    Proportion of patients with GPPASI 50 at Week 4 is reported.

    Measured: At Week 4.

  9. Percent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 4

    GPPASI provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 (no disease) to 72 (worse disease state). It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs).

    %GPPASI change from baseline=(GPPASI at Week 4-GPPASI at baseline) *100/(GPPASI at baseline).

    Death, any use of escape medication, OL Spesolimab at Day 8, or rescue medication with Spesolimab after Day 8, prior to observing the endpoint was considered to reflect a failure to achieve the endpoint outcome, i.e. non-response (NR).NR is not a missing value but the worst possible outcome of the endpoint. For example, if the achieved data is (NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, NR, 2, 3, 3, 3, 5) then Q1 is NR, median is NR and Q3 is 3. Planned statistical analysis were not performed due to lack of valid data.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 4.

  10. Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) 50 at Week 1

    Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs).

    A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease. GPPASI 50 is based on the percent reduction from baseline, generally summarized as a dichotomous outcome based on achieving over an 50 % reduction.

    Proportion of patients with GPPASI 50 at Week 1 is reported.

    Measured: At Week 1.

  11. Percent Change in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) From Baseline at Week 1

    Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) provides a numeric scoring for a patient's overall Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) disease state, ranging from 0 to 72. It is a linear combination of percent of surface area of skin affected by erythema, pustules, and scaling and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation) over 4 body regions (head, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs).

    A higher score indicates a worse disease state, while a score of 0 indicates no disease.

    The percent change from baseline at Week 1 is calculated as:

    % GPPASI change from baseline = (GPPASI at Week 1 - GPPASI at baseline) *100/GPPASI at baseline. If % GPPASI change from baseline is positive, it means the disease is becoming worse.

    Measured: At Week 1.

  12. Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 1

    TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and Day 8 (Day 8 excluded). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.

    The exposure-adjusted incidence rate was calculated as:

    Incidence rate [1/100 patients-years] = 100 × number of patients with AE / Total AE specific time at risk [patient-years] where: Time at risk [patient-years] = (date of onset of TEAE - study drug start date + 1) /365.25

    Measured: From start of treatment until Day 7, up to 7 days.

  13. Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) up to Week 1

    TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and Day 8 (Day 8 excluded). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.

    Measured: From start of treatment until Day 7, up to 7 days.

  14. Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase

    TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and end of the residual effect period (REP) (16 weeks). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.

    The exposure-adjusted incidence rate was calculated as:

    Incidence rate [1/100 patients-years] = 100 × number of patients with AE / Total AE specific time at risk [patient-years] where Time at risk where: Time at risk [patient-years] = (date of onset of TEAE - study drug start date + 1) /365.25 If, for a patient, the selected TEAE did not occur then the time at risk was censored at min

    • Date of death
    • For patients who did not roll over into the Open Label Extension (OLE) study: last contact date Visit14/15
    • For patients who rolled over into the OLE study: the 1st dose in the OLE study
    • Drug stop date + 112 days
    • Date of Day 8 if OL spesolimab was given
    • Date of rescue medication if spesolimab was given.

    Measured: From start of treatment until end of the residual effect period (REP) but censored at any use of open label spesolimab, up to 16 weeks.

  15. Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase

    TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and end of the residual effect period (REP) (16 weeks). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.

    Measured: From start of treatment until end of the residual effect period (REP) but censored at any use of open label spesolimab, up to 16 weeks.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2018
  2. Study start31 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion23 Sep 2020
  4. Study completion5 Jan 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
53 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03782792
Sponsor's protocol ID
1368-0013
Other IDs
2017-004231-37, 2017
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
19 Dec 2018
Last updated
16 Oct 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents. Exceptions might apply, e.g. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (in case of low number of patients and therefore limitations with anonymization). For more details refer to: https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datatransparency

Publications

  • Gwillim EC, Nichols AJ. Spesolimab for generalized pustular psoriasis: a review of two key clinical trials supporting initial US regulatory approval. Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 22;15:1359481. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1359481. eCollection 2024.

    PubMed 39104539
  • Tsai TF, Zheng M, Ding Y, Song Z, Liu Q, Chen Y, Hu H, Xu J. Efficacy and Safety of Spesolimab in Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: A Subgroup Analysis of Chinese Patients in the Effisayil 1 Trial. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Dec;13(12):3097-3110. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01037-4. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

    PubMed 37840119
  • Bachelez H, Choon SE, Marrakchi S, Burden AD, Tsai TF, Morita A, Navarini AA, Zheng M, Xu J, Turki H, Anadkat MJ, Rajeswari S, Hua H, Vulcu SD, Hall D, Tetzlaff K, Thoma C, Lebwohl MG; Effisayil 1 Trial Investigators. Trial of Spesolimab for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 23;385(26):2431-2440. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111563.

    PubMed 34936739
  • Choon SE, Lebwohl MG, Marrakchi S, Burden AD, Tsai TF, Morita A, Navarini AA, Zheng M, Xu J, Turki H, Rajeswari S, Deng H, Tetzlaff K, Thoma C, Bachelez H. Study protocol of the global Effisayil 1 Phase II, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of spesolimab in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis presenting with an acute flare. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 30;11(3):e043666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043666.

    PubMed 33785490

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Spesolimab in people with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 37 sites in 12 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 37 sites in Malaysia, Japan, China, United States, Germany and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Mar 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Patients With a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) Pustulation Subscore of 0 Indicating no Visible Pustules at Week 1 (time frame: At Week 1.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03782792, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in