Type 1 Diabetes MellitusNCT03767790
Model Predictive Control (MPC) Artificial Pancreas vs. Sensor Augmented Pump (SAP)/Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS) With Different Food Choices in the Outpatient Setting
A study testing iAPS in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sansum Diabetes Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of this randomized crossover clinical trial is to 1) assess the efficacy and safety of an automated insulin delivery (AID) system using a Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm versus sensor augmented pump therapy (SAP)/Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS) in people with type 1 diabetes, and 2) assess… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- iAPS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 3 Jan 2019to 27 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year and using insulin for at least 1 year.
- Using an insulin pump for at least 3 months at the time of screening. Insulin pump use includes use of automated features, to include predictive or threshold low-glucose suspend or hybrid closed-loop with without a Dexcom sensor.
- Familiarity and use of a carbohydrate ratio for meal boluses.
- Age ≥18.0 years old
- HbA1c < 10.5%, as performed by point of care or central laboratory testing. A1c will be assessed at the screening visit, or if already completed within 2 weeks of the screening visit, the prior lab value may be used in lieu of repeating this assessment.
- For females, not currently known to be pregnant. If female and sexually active, must agree to use a form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative serum or urine pregnancy test will be required for all females of child-bearing potential. Participants who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study. Also, participants who during the study develop and express the intention to become pregnant within the timespan of the study will be discontinued.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Willingness to switch home pump to PLGS or full manual mode if using hybrid closed-loop with an FDA approved system.
- Have an emergency contact living at home with the subject who will be available to be contacted by the study staff overnight in the event of an emergency.
- Investigator has confidence that the participant can successfully operate all study devices and is capable of adhering to the protocol, to include having basic cooking equipment at home to prepare the study meals.
- Willingness to switch to lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog) if not using already, and to use no other insulin besides lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog) during the study.
- Willingness not to start any new non-insulin glucose-lowering agent during the course of the trial.
Who cannot join
- Use of an unapproved closed-loop insulin delivery system within 2 weeks before screening or during the study is not allowed.
- Gastrointestinal disease such as celiac disease or multiple food allergies.
- Any form of gluten sensitivity or wheat allergy.
- Allergies to any form of nuts or ingredients present in the study meals (tomatoes etc).
- History of difficulty digesting food.
- Concurrent use of Afrezza or any non-insulin glucose-lowering agent other than metformin (including GLP-1 agonists, Symlin, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors, sulfonylureas).
Show all 13Show fewer
- Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder
- One or more episodes of hypoglycemia requiring an emergency room visit or hospitalization in the past 6 months.
- One or more episodes of hyperglycemia requiring an emergency room visit or hospitalization in the past 6 months.
- Self-reported or clinically documented hypoglycemia unawareness.
- A condition, which in the opinion of the investigator or designee, would put the participant or study at risk
- Participation in another pharmaceutical or device trial at the time of enrollment or during the study
- Having a direct supervisor at place of employment who is also directly involved in conducting the clinical trial (as a study investigator, coordinator, etc.); or having a first-degree relative who is directly involved in conducting the clinical trial
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
Santa Barbara, California, 93105
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Crossover Comparison of Model Predictive Control (MPC) Artificial Pancreas vs. Sensor Augmented Pump (SAP)/Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS) With Different Food Choices in the Outpatient Setting
The objective of this randomized crossover clinical trial is to 1) assess the efficacy and safety of an automated insulin delivery (AID) system using a Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm versus sensor augmented pump therapy (SAP)/Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS) in people with type 1 diabetes, and 2) assess the impact of different meal macronutrient content on glucose control when using AID and SAP.
Read the detailed description
The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of an AID system using a MPC algorithm versus SAP/PLGS therapy with different food choices over a 4 week period.
The AID system (iAPS) is comprised of an insulin pump, a Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring sensor, and a smart phone that contains the algorithm and communicates with the other devices.
In this study, during each two-week period, subjects will be given pre-weighed portions of different meals to eat (either regular semolina pasta or extra-long grain white rice) with detailed cooking instructions, and will eat these meals on 6 different occasions for dinner. They will bolus as they normally do for these meals. This will allow us to observe the postprandial meal response when using sensor-augmented pump (SAP) or iAPS, showing the importance of nutrition choices with modern technological treatments in T1D.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- iAPS
- Keywords
- Artificial Pancreas, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Nutrition
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
iAPSDevice
The AID system (iAPS) is comprised of an insulin pump, a Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring sensor, and a smart phone that contains the algorithm and communicates with the other devices.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Automated Insulin Delivery | Experimental | Participants will use the Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) iAPS system for 2 weeks in the outpatient setting. During AID use, subjects will consume 6 study meals (3 meals of each meal type in assigned random order, 1-2 portions per meal,) at dinner time over the 2-week period in a pre-assigned random order, and document on the study meal forms when they consume each numbered meal. Receives: Device: iAPS |
| SAP/PLGS | No intervention | Participants will use their home pump with a CGM sensor (sensor augmented pump) or in Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS) mode if their home pump supports this mode, for 2 weeks in the outpatient setting. During these 2 weeks, subjects will consume 6 study meals (3 meals of each meal type in assigned random order, 1-2 portions per meal,) at dinner time over the 2-week period in a pre-assigned random order, and document on the study meal forms when they consume each numbered meal. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time in target glucose range
Time in target glucose range 70-180 mg/dL measured by CGM to determine safety and efficacy of the integrated system
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (12)
Postprandial glucose peak
Postprandial glucose peak rise (highest measurement in mg/dL) from baseline glucose (mg/dl) for the 5-hour period after the study meals, during both use of SAP/PLGS and when using the iAPS
Measured: 4 weeks
Time to postprandial glucose peak
Time (minutes) to postprandial glucose (highest measurement in mg/dL) rise from baseline glucose (mg/dl) during the 5-hour period after the study meals, during both use of SAP/PLGS and when using the iAPS
Measured: 4 weeks
Postprandial Area Under the Curve
Area Under the Curve Glucose (mg/dl x min) for the 5-hour period after the study meals, during both use of SAP/PLGS and when using the iAPS
Measured: 4 weeks
Postprandial time for glucose to return to baseline
Time (minutes) for CGM glucose to return to baseline (starting value) after the study meals, during both use of SAP/PLGS and when using the iAPS
Measured: 4 weeks
Glucose < 70 mg/dL
Percent time GGM glucose < 70 mg/dL
Measured: 4 weeks
Glucose < 54 mg/dL
Percent time GGM glucose < 54 mg/dL
Measured: 4 weeks
Glucose > 180 mg/dL
Percent time GGM glucose > 180 mg/dL
Measured: 4 weeks
Glucose > 250 mg/dL
Percent time GGM glucose > 250 mg/dL
Measured: 4 weeks
Serious adverse events (SAE)
The total number of serious adverse events during the clinical trial
Measured: 4 weeks
Serious adverse device events (SADE)
The total number of serious adverse events related to the study device use during the clinical trial
Measured: 4 weeks
Adverse device effects (ADE)
The total number of adverse device effects (ADE) during the clinical trial
Measured: 4 weeks
Unanticipated adverse device effects (UADE)
The total number of unanticipated adverse device effects (UADE) during the clinical trial
Measured: 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Dec 2018
- Study start3 Jan 2019
- Primary completion27 Jun 2019
- Study completion27 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 1 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Harvard University, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eyal Dassau, PhD, Principal investigator, John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied SciencesDavid Eisenberg, MD, Principal investigator, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)Jordan E Pinsker, MD, Principal investigator, Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03767790
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- G180011-S001
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 8 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Deshpande S, Pinsker JE, Church MM, Piper M, Andre C, Massa J, Doyle Iii FJ, Eisenberg DM, Dassau E. Randomized Crossover Comparison of Automated Insulin Delivery Versus Conventional Therapy Using an Unlocked Smartphone with Scheduled Pasta and Rice Meal Challenges in the Outpatient Setting. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Dec;22(12):865-874. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0022. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
PubMed 32319791
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Crossover Comparison of Model Predictive Control (MPC) Artificial Pancreas vs. Sensor Augmented Pump (SAP)/Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS) With Different Food Choices in the Outpatient Setting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03767790
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- G180011-S001
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Artificial Pancreas, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Nutrition
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sansum Diabetes Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Harvard University, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
- Study start
- 3 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this randomized crossover clinical trial is to 1) assess the efficacy and safety of an automated insulin delivery (AID) system using a Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm versus sensor augmented pump therapy (SAP)/Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS) in people with type 1 diabetes, and 2) assess the impact of different meal macronutrient content on glucose control when using AID and SAP.
Detailed description
The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of an AID system using a MPC algorithm versus SAP/PLGS therapy with different food choices over a 4 week period.
The AID system (iAPS) is comprised of an insulin pump, a Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring sensor, and a smart phone that contains the algorithm and communicates with the other devices.
In this study, during each two-week period, subjects will be given pre-weighed portions of different meals to eat (either regular semolina pasta or extra-long grain white rice) with detailed cooking instructions, and will eat these meals on 6 different occasions for dinner. They will bolus as they normally do for these meals. This will allow us to observe the postprandial meal response when using sensor-augmented pump (SAP) or iAPS, showing the importance of nutrition choices with modern technological treatments in T1D.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Automated Insulin Delivery | Experimental | Device: iAPSParticipants will use the Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) iAPS system for 2 weeks in the outpatient setting. During AID use, subjects will consume 6 study meals (3 meals of each meal type in assigned random order, 1-2 portions per meal,) at dinner time over the 2-week period in a pre-assigned random order, and document on the study meal forms when they consume each numbered meal. |
| SAP/PLGS | No intervention | –Participants will use their home pump with a CGM sensor (sensor augmented pump) or in Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS) mode if their home pump supports this mode, for 2 weeks in the outpatient setting. During these 2 weeks, subjects will consume 6 study meals (3 meals of each meal type in assigned random order, 1-2 portions per meal,) at dinner time over the 2-week period in a pre-assigned random order, and document on the study meal forms when they consume each numbered meal. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year and using insulin for at least 1 year.
- Using an insulin pump for at least 3 months at the time of screening. Insulin pump use includes use of automated features, to include predictive or threshold low-glucose suspend or hybrid closed-loop with without a Dexcom sensor.
- Familiarity and use of a carbohydrate ratio for meal boluses.
- Age ≥18.0 years old
- HbA1c < 10.5%, as performed by point of care or central laboratory testing. A1c will be assessed at the screening visit, or if already completed within 2 weeks of the screening visit, the prior lab value may be used in lieu of repeating this assessment.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Use of an unapproved closed-loop insulin delivery system within 2 weeks before screening or during the study is not allowed.
- Gastrointestinal disease such as celiac disease or multiple food allergies.
- Any form of gluten sensitivity or wheat allergy.
- Allergies to any form of nuts or ingredients present in the study meals (tomatoes etc).
- History of difficulty digesting food.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| iAPSThe AID system (iAPS) is comprised of an insulin pump, a Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring sensor, and a smart phone that contains the algorithm and communicates with the other devices. | Device | Automated Insulin Delivery |
Primary outcome
Time in target glucose range
Time frame: 4 weeks
Time in target glucose range 70-180 mg/dL measured by CGM to determine safety and efficacy of the integrated system
12 secondary outcomes
Postprandial glucose peak
Time frame: 4 weeks
Time to postprandial glucose peak
Time frame: 4 weeks
Postprandial Area Under the Curve
Time frame: 4 weeks
Postprandial time for glucose to return to baseline
Time frame: 4 weeks
Glucose < 70 mg/dL
Time frame: 4 weeks
Glucose < 54 mg/dL
Time frame: 4 weeks
Glucose > 180 mg/dL
Time frame: 4 weeks
Glucose > 250 mg/dL
Time frame: 4 weeks
Serious adverse events (SAE)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Serious adverse device events (SADE)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Adverse device effects (ADE)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Unanticipated adverse device effects (UADE)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Aug 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32319791Deshpande S, Pinsker JE, Church MM, Piper M, Andre C, Massa J, Doyle Iii FJ, Eisenberg DM, Dassau E. Randomized Crossover Comparison of Automated Insulin Delivery Versus Conventional Therapy Using an Unlocked Smartphone with Scheduled Pasta and Rice Meal Challenges in the Outpatient Setting. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Dec;22(12):865-874. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0022. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Clinical Application of Stem Cell Educator Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Study of High Density Lipoprotein Function in Type 1 Diabetic Patients With Nephropathy
Type 1 Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A First-In-Human Study of ARO-INHBE in Adults With Obesity With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Obesity
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Effect of AZD6234 in Adult Participants With Obesity or Overweight With Weight-related Comorbidity Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Obesity or Overweight
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of 4th Generation Safety-engineered CAR T Cells Targeting Sarcomas
Sarcoma, Osteoid Sarcoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eyal Dassau, PhD principal investigator
John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences
David Eisenberg, MD principal investigator
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
Jordan E Pinsker, MD principal investigator
Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing iAPS in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Sansum Diabetes Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time in target glucose range (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03767790, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2019.