AzTrials
AzTrials

Back PainNCT03762174

Characteristics of Back Pain Attendances at ED

An observational study of Back Pain, run by Matt Capsey.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Back pain is experienced by approximately 80% of the population during their life. However, only a small minority (<1%) will have a medical condition (such as Cauda Equina Syndrome) which requires immediate medical intervention. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Back Pain
How many people
62,000 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Aug 2016to 31 Jul 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: People attending ED

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who have attended Darlington Memorial Hospital between 01-08-2016 and 31-07-2017
  • Aged 16 or over

Who cannot join

  • Below the age of 16

About this study

Official title: An Investigation Into the Use of Emergency Medical Services by People Attending the Emergency Department With Back Pain

Back pain is experienced by approximately 80% of the population during their life. However, only a small minority (<1%) will have a medical condition (such as Cauda Equina Syndrome) which requires immediate medical intervention.

Currently, it is not known how many people access Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in an attempt to meet their needs for their back pain. The demand on EMS is increasing and many of these patients could be better managed by other services. Additionally, little is known about the characteristics of those accessing EMS due to back pain, or the nature of the contacts regarding issues such as outcome of the patient contact. The aims of this study are:

Read more
  1. to quantify the prevalence of people accessing EMS via attendance at an Emergency Department (ED)
  2. to describe the characteristics of people attending ED with non-traumatic back pain
  3. to describe key characteristics of the contact between the service user and EMS
  4. to compare the prevalence of attendance, patient characteristics and contact characteristics between people with non-traumatic back pain and the general population of those attending ED.

A secondary aim of the work is to explore what factors might predict patient outcomes such as whether the patient self presents or is referred to ED by another service, whether the patient receives analgesics, whether the patient receives a diagnostic scan and whether the patient is admitted to hospital.

Read the detailed description

Purpose and Design

Back Pain is a common cause of pain and disability. The National Institute for Clinical Excellent [NICE] (2016) identify back pain as affecting 1 in 10 people and causing more disability than any other condition. In most people back pain resolves within a number of weeks without any healthcare input. For those whose pain does not improve physical and psychological treatments are recommended. These are provided by specialist services and are not available in Emergency Departments or via Ambulance Services (collectively referred to as Emergency Medical Services [EMS]). Thus, arguably only a very small minority of patients with back pain, where a severe medical pathology is indicated (e.g. cauda equina syndrome) should need to access EMS. However, anecdotally many people with back pain self-refer to EMS. The prevalence of people self-referring and their characteristics are currently unknown as these figures are not routinely reported although the information exists within the data collected by many trusts.

This study aims to analyse anonymised data from the Darlington Memorial Hospital (DMH) Emergency Department (ED) to establish the prevalence of those attending with back pain. The characteristics of people presenting over a 12-month period with back pain, along with characteristics of their contact (e.g.

administration of analgesia and the use of diagnostic imaging) will be described and compared to the general characteristics of those attending ED.

These characteristics may help to inform healthcare service design, both EMS and non-EMS, to better meet the needs of this patient group.

Research Methods

This study will be a secondary analysis of an existing NHS database. The study will request anonymised data from DMH ED. The data will cover all adults who have accessed their services in a 12-month period. The information requested will include data related to the attendance, patient demographics/characteristics, geographical location and clinical data.

Recruitment

The data being used for this study is from a currently existing Trust database and therefore there will be no recruitment of participants.

Inclusion/exclusion All individuals over the age of 16 will be included. Those aged under 16 will be excluded as they are not included in clinical guidelines.

Risks, Burdens and Benefits

The data has been collected for clinical care and not for research purposes. Therefore patients will not have explicitly consented for their information to be used for research. The Information Governance Officer at DMH has confirmed that the data will be in non-personally identifiable form when it is released to the research team and is compliant with Section 33 of the Data Protection Act 1998.

The main risk to patients is that their clinical data is being used for research purposes. However identifiable data will only be available to the usual clinical team. Anonymised information will be extracted by a DMH member of staff before it is securely transferred to the team at Teesside University where it will be analysed. Names and addresses will be completely removed from the database before it leaves the NHS.

Some publications require raw data to be supplied. This would be supplied but it will be a non-personally identifiable dataset.

Confidentiality

The Caldicott Principles will be followed:

  1. Justify the purpose(s) of obtaining the information
  2. Don't use person-identifiable information unless it is absolutely necessary
  3. Use the minimum necessary person-identifiable information
  4. Access to person-identifiable information should be on a strict need-to-know basis
  5. Everyone with access to person-identifiable information should be aware of their responsibilities
  6. Understand and comply with the law

Problems arising from the processing of identifiable data and how they will be handled

The database contains socioeconomic data in the form of patients' postcodes. This socioeconomic data is important as it has been linked to emergency medical service use. A postcode is identifiable data. To overcome this DMH will supply only the first four digits which covers a sufficiently large geographical area that this will no longer be identifiable data. The first four digits will be sufficient to identify a Lower Layer Super Output Area code (LSOA code) which is the equivalent index of socioeconomic status.

As the dataset will include all adults attending ED it will inevitably include members of vulnerable groups or others who would usually require additional ethical approval for inclusion in research (for example offenders) however this will not be known to the research team or be apparent in the non-personally identifiable data requested.

Conditions
Back Pain
Keywords
Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Department, Back Pain
Medical subject headings
Back Pain, Emergencies

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of people attending ED with back pain

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Age of people attending ED with back pain

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Gender of people attending ED with back pain

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Deprivation score of people attending ED with back pain

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Time of attendance of people attending ED with back pain

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Date of attendance of people attending ED with back pain

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Duration of attendance of people attending ED with back pain

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Drugs given to people attending ED with back pain

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Diagnostic tests used with people attending ED with back pain

    Measured: 1 year

  10. Disposal of people attending ED with back pain

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Dec 2018
  2. Study start1 Aug 2016
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2017
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
62,000 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03762174
Sponsor's protocol ID
147/17
Status last verified
Nov 2018
First submitted
30 Nov 2018
Last updated
3 Dec 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Back Pain, run by Matt Capsey.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of people attending ED with back pain (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in