GlaucomaNCT03760055
Assessment of Visual Function With a Portable Brain-computer Interface
An observational study of Glaucoma and Age Related Macular Degeneration, run by NGoggle at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
1. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nGoggle's accuracy and repeatability in detecting visual function loss. In addition, the ability to stage glaucomatous damage and investigate the relationship between nGoggle metrics and neural damage in glaucoma will also be evaluated. 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Glaucoma, Age Related Macular Degeneration, Optic Neuropathy
- What is being tested?
- nGoggle
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 Feb 2019to Jan 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The following patients will be recruited from Dr. Tseng's clinic by verbal communication. Staff members at the Duke Eye Center will also be invited to recommend potential participants for the study, in conformance with the Duke Human Subjects Committee Guidelines. 1. Glaucoma; 2. Suspicion of having glaucoma; 3. Non-glaucomatous optic neuropathies; 4. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD); 5. Retinal degenerations; 6. Other diseases involving the visual pathways such as optic neuritis, tumors or ischemic neuropathy. 7. Healthy subjects
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must be between the ages of 18 and 90 years old;
- Both males and females will be included.
- Be able and willing to provide signed informed consent and follow study instructions
Who cannot join
- 1. Subjects will be excluded if they present with any systemic or ocular conditions that in the opinion of the Principal Investigator may prevent them from completing the tests (e.g. history of seizures or other coexistent ocular pathologies).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Duke University Eye Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
About this study
- The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nGoggle's accuracy and repeatability in detecting visual function loss. In addition, the ability to stage glaucomatous damage and investigate the relationship between nGoggle metrics and neural damage in glaucoma will also be evaluated.
- Longitudinal study, including 200 patients with: glaucoma, suspected of having glaucoma, nonglaucomatous optic neuropathies, AMD, retinal degenerations, other diseases involving the visual pathways, besides healthy controls. Subjects will perform standard ophthalmological exams, and the following research tests: electroencephalogram, visual evoked potentials, and questionnaires.
- Statistical analyses will be performed by the PI using the software Stata, MATLAB, and MPLUS. Risks are low, consisting of some discomfort, fatigue, dizziness or motion sickness.
Read the detailed description
Background \& Significance
Assessment of functional loss in glaucoma has been traditionally made with standard automated perimetry (SAP). Despite the significant progress achieved with the development of SAP, assessment of visual field loss still has significant drawbacks. SAP testing is limited by subjectivity of patient responses and high test-retest variability, frequently requiring many tests for effective detection of change over time. Moreover, as these tests are generally conducted in clinic-based settings, limited patient availability and health care resources often result in an insufficient number of tests acquired over time, with delayed diagnosis and detection of disease progression. The requirement for highly trained technicians, cost, complexity, and lack of portability of SAP also preclude its use for screening of visual field loss in underserved populations. Furthermore, current SAP testing as performed in clinical practice frequently results in delayed detection of progression, with potential late initiation/escalation of treatment and irreversible functional damage.
As a part of a funded Phase I project, the nGoggle (nGoggle Inc., San Diego, CA), the first device of its kind, allowed a portable and objective brain-based assessment of visual function deficits in glaucoma. The nGoggle integrates a wearable, wireless, no-prep EEG system and a head-mounted display (HMD) to allow users to routinely monitor electrical brain activities associated with visual field stimulation. A recent study comparing the diagnostic accuracies of an earlier version of the nGoggle and SAP in discriminating patients with glaucoma from healthy subjects found that the nGoggle performed at least as well, if not better than, SAP with the additional advantage of portability and objectivity.
The overall goal of this proposal is to test the nGoggle's accuracy and repeatability in detecting visual function loss. In addition, its ability to stage glaucomatous damage, by discriminating patients at different stages of the disease will be evaluated. Finally, the relationship between nGoggle metrics and neural damage in glaucoma as detected by other objective techniques such as optical coherence tomography will also be investigated. Patients with other diseases affecting the visual system will also be included in order to assess whether the nGoggle can differentiate glaucoma from them.
Study Design \& Procedures
This will be a longitudinal study in which patients will be examined approximately biannually. The following patients will be recruited:
- Glaucoma;
- Suspicion of having glaucoma;
- Non-glaucomatous optic neuropathies;
- Age-related macular degeneration (AMD);
- Retinal degenerations;
- Other diseases involving the visual pathways such as optic neuritis, tumors or ischemic neuropathy.
- Healthy subjects
General evaluation:
As part of the study all participants will undergo the following general evaluation:
- Review of medical history;
- Comprehensive ophthalmologic examination
- Questionnaires: a. Cognitive function using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); b. A short structured interview to obtain vision-related quality of life information using the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25); c. A questionnaire to assess patient's satisfaction with the nGoggle testing, including easiness of placement, comfort, and user-interface.
- Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP): Visual evoked potentials (VEP) will be evaluated with Diopsys NOVA (Diopsys, Inc.), which is a well-established conventional multifocal VEP device to assess brain functioning following visual stimuli from a computer screen. Subjects will also be monitored with an EEG system integrated with a head-mounted display (nGoggle, Inc.). The nGoggle is a portable visual evoked potential system that uses an EEG to acquire visual evoked potentials in response to visual stimuli presented on a virtual reality goggle.
Risk/Benefit Assessment
Risks:
Risks from participating in the study are very low. The primary risks for all participants are some discomforts, which are similar to those encountered in any complete eye examination. Participants will undergo non-invasive procedures used for diagnostic purposes that are used in standard clinical care. Eventually, it will be necessary to use numbing or dilating drops for fundus examination, as is done in standard clinical care. Some risks of those drops include: dry eye, mild headache, blurred vision, drowsiness, burning eyes, tearing, light sensitivity, redness, and allergy reactions. The only non-FDA approved device used in this study is the nGoggle (nGoggle Inc.), which is an investigational diagnostic device qualified as a non-significant risk device. The subject may experience mild discomfort due to drying of the eye during the study. Should a patient note drying, a drop of artificial tears will be placed over the eye by the study key personnel. In very rare cases, artificial eye tear drops may cause irritation or allergy. There are no known risks associated with the EEG test other than discomfort and fatigue. Subjects might become bored, fatigued or distressed while participating. To minimize these potential effects, the tasks will be kept short and subjects will be instructed that they may request to interrupt the test anytime. All assessments, software, instruments that are not FDA approved will be used as tools to assess disability and device efficacy, and will not be used as a diagnostic procedure without confirmation of the diagnosis by another, medically established diagnostic product or procedure. There is, however, the potential risk of loss of confidentiality. Every effort will be made to keep the information confidential; however, this cannot be guaranteed. Some of the questions that will be asked as part of this study may make the patients feel uncomfortable. Patients may refuse to answer any of the questions and may take a break at any time during the study. Patient may stop their participation in this study at any time.
Unknown/unforeseeable risks
In addition to the risks and discomforts listed here, there may be other risks that are currently not known. Subjects will be informed if any other potential risk becomes known through the duration of the study. Also, the risks and discomforts may occur more often or be more severe than have been seen before and written in this form.
Benefits:
Subjects will be referred from the Duke Eye Center care providers after a comprehensive clinical eye examination from a routine visit. If the last clinical eye examination is not within 6 months of the study visit, the participant will be examined by the PI, with no additional cost to the patient.
Participants will also undergo tests that will allow the validation and development of a transformative device for diagnosing and monitoring ocular diseases, and could be suited for home-based testing of visual function in the future, which could benefit patients with eye diseases.
- Being tested
- nGoggle
- Medical subject headings
- Glaucoma, Macular Degeneration, Optic Nerve Diseases, Retinal Degeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
nGoggleDevice
Also called Portable brain-computer interface
The nGoggle is a portable visual evoked potential system that uses an EEG to acquire visual evoked potentials in response to visual stimuli presented on a virtual reality goggle. The investigators will assess the ability of the nGoggle to detect visual field loss in patients with glaucoma, as well as to discriminate among the different stages of the disease, its repeatability and reliability for patient self-testing and patient satisfaction compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP), optical coherence tomography (OCT) metrics and Diopsys NOVA (Diopsys, Inc.). In addition, patients with other diseases affecting the visual system will also be tested in order to assess whether the nGoggle can differentiate glaucoma from them.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Glaucoma and glaucoma suspects | Patients with at least two consecutive and reliable standard automated perimetry (SAP) examinations with either a pattern standard deviation (PSD) outside the 95% normal limits or a glaucoma hemifield test (GHT) result outside the 99% normal limits. Patients considered suspects for glaucoma must have an intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 21 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or suspicious appearance of the optic nerve head but with reliable normal visual fields, defined as a PSD within 95% confidence limits and a GHT result within normal limits. Receives: Device: nGoggle | |
| Age-related macular degeneration | Patients will be considered as having AMD if one or more of the following are present on posterior biomicroscopy (fundoscopy), indirect ophthalmoscopy or Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) exams:
1. Presence of at least intermediate-size drusen (63µm or larger in diameter)
2. Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) abnormalities such as hypopigmentation or hyperpigmentation
3. Reticular pseudodrusen (also called sub retinal drusenoid deposit)
4. Presence of any of the following features: geographic atrophy of the RPE, choroidal neovascularization (exudative, wet), polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, or retinal angiomatous proliferation. Receives: Device: nGoggle | |
| Other eye diseases | Patients with other retinal degenerations such as retinitis pigmentosa or with other diseases affecting the visual pathways such as tumors, ischemic neuropathy or optic neuritis may also be included. Their diagnosis will be extracted from their clinical visits. Receives: Device: nGoggle | |
| Healthy subjects | To be considered healthy, subjects have to have IOP < 22 mmHg with no history of elevated IOP and with at least two reliable normal visual fields, defined as a PSD within 95% confidence limits and a GHT result within normal limits. Receives: Device: nGoggle |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Device accuracy to detect visual field loss
Comparison of diagnostic accuracies will be performed by analyzing areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each nGoggle and SAP metric by assessment of partial areas under the ROC curves (targeting high specificity>90% region), sensitivities at matched specificities and diagnostic likelihood ratios (LRs). The investigators will also evaluate the correlation between nGoggle multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials (mfSSVEP) metrics and SAP parameters throughout the disease spectrum.
Measured: from date of enrollment and every 6 months, up to 5 years
Device accuracy to detect structural neural loss
Comparison of diagnostic accuracies will be performed by analyzing areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each nGoggle and OCT parameters, as well as by assessment of partial areas under the ROC curves (targeting high specificity>90% region), sensitivities at matched specificities and diagnostic likelihood ratios (LRs). The investigators will also evaluate the correlation between nGoggle mfSSVEP metrics and SDOCT parameters throughout the disease spectrum. SDOCT testing will be performed with Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). SDOCT parameters to be investigated will include retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, minimum rim width (MRW) and macular thickness.
Measured: from date of enrollment and every 6 months, up to 5 years
Device accuracy to detect objective functional loss
Comparison of diagnostic accuracies will be performed by analyzing areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each nGoggle and Diopsys NOVA parameters, as well as by assessment of partial areas under the ROC curves (targeting high specificity>90% region), sensitivities at matched specificities and diagnostic likelihood ratios (LRs). The investigators will also evaluate the correlation between nGoggle mfSSVEP metrics and those parameters throughout the disease spectrum. SDOCT testing will be performed with Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). SDOCT parameters to be investigated will include retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, minimum rim width (MRW) and macular thickness.
Measured: from date of enrollment and every 6 months, up to 5 years
Assessment of repeatability
Assessment of repeatability of the device parameters will be evaluated through intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A subgroup of subjects will undergo 5 visits over a short period of time (6 weeks). A sample size of 35 subjects will provide a width of 0.1 for the 95% for ICC, allowing assessment of repeatability of the devices parameters.
Measured: 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Patients' satisfaction
The investigators will obtain a survey regarding patients' satisfaction with testing, including easiness of placement, comfort, and user-interface.
Measured: from date of enrollment and every 6 months, up to 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Nov 2018
- Study start11 Feb 2019
- Primary completionJan 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GlaucomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NGoggle
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Duke University, National Eye Institute (NEI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Henry Tseng, PhD, Principal investigator, Duke University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03760055
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00100894
- Other IDs
- R42EY027651
- Status last verified
- Feb 2020
- First submitted
- 27 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Undecided.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Visual Function With a Portable Brain-computer Interface
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03760055
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00100894
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- NGoggleIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Duke University, National Eye Institute (NEI)
- Study start
- 11 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nGoggle's accuracy and repeatability in detecting visual function loss. In addition, the ability to stage glaucomatous damage and investigate the relationship between nGoggle metrics and neural damage in glaucoma will also be evaluated.
- Longitudinal study, including 200 patients with: glaucoma, suspected of having glaucoma, nonglaucomatous optic neuropathies, AMD, retinal degenerations, other diseases involving the visual pathways, besides healthy controls. Subjects will perform standard ophthalmological exams, and the following research tests: electroencephalogram, visual evoked potentials, and questionnaires.
- Statistical analyses will be performed by the PI using the software Stata, MATLAB, and MPLUS. Risks are low, consisting of some discomfort, fatigue, dizziness or motion sickness.
Detailed description
Background \& Significance
Assessment of functional loss in glaucoma has been traditionally made with standard automated perimetry (SAP). Despite the significant progress achieved with the development of SAP, assessment of visual field loss still has significant drawbacks. SAP testing is limited by subjectivity of patient responses and high test-retest variability, frequently requiring many tests for effective detection of change over time. Moreover, as these tests are generally conducted in clinic-based settings, limited patient availability and health care resources often result in an insufficient number of tests acquired over time, with delayed diagnosis and detection of disease progression. The requirement for highly trained technicians, cost, complexity, and lack of portability of SAP also preclude its use for screening of visual field loss in underserved populations. Furthermore, current SAP testing as performed in clinical practice frequently results in delayed detection of progression, with potential late initiation/escalation of treatment and irreversible functional damage.
As a part of a funded Phase I project, the nGoggle (nGoggle Inc., San Diego, CA), the first device of its kind, allowed a portable and objective brain-based assessment of visual function deficits in glaucoma. The nGoggle integrates a wearable, wireless, no-prep EEG system and a head-mounted display (HMD) to allow users to routinely monitor electrical brain activities associated with visual field stimulation. A recent study comparing the diagnostic accuracies of an earlier version of the nGoggle and SAP in discriminating patients with glaucoma from healthy subjects found that the nGoggle performed at least as well, if not better than, SAP with the additional advantage of portability and objectivity.
The overall goal of this proposal is to test the nGoggle's accuracy and repeatability in detecting visual function loss. In addition, its ability to stage glaucomatous damage, by discriminating patients at different stages of the disease will be evaluated. Finally, the relationship between nGoggle metrics and neural damage in glaucoma as detected by other objective techniques such as optical coherence tomography will also be investigated. Patients with other diseases affecting the visual system will also be included in order to assess whether the nGoggle can differentiate glaucoma from them.
Study Design \& Procedures
This will be a longitudinal study in which patients will be examined approximately biannually. The following patients will be recruited:
- Glaucoma;
- Suspicion of having glaucoma;
- Non-glaucomatous optic neuropathies;
- Age-related macular degeneration (AMD);
- Retinal degenerations;
- Other diseases involving the visual pathways such as optic neuritis, tumors or ischemic neuropathy.
- Healthy subjects
General evaluation:
As part of the study all participants will undergo the following general evaluation:
- Review of medical history;
- Comprehensive ophthalmologic examination
- Questionnaires: a. Cognitive function using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); b. A short structured interview to obtain vision-related quality of life information using the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25); c. A questionnaire to assess patient's satisfaction with the nGoggle testing, including easiness of placement, comfort, and user-interface.
- Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP): Visual evoked potentials (VEP) will be evaluated with Diopsys NOVA (Diopsys, Inc.), which is a well-established conventional multifocal VEP device to assess brain functioning following visual stimuli from a computer screen. Subjects will also be monitored with an EEG system integrated with a head-mounted display (nGoggle, Inc.). The nGoggle is a portable visual evoked potential system that uses an EEG to acquire visual evoked potentials in response to visual stimuli presented on a virtual reality goggle.
Risk/Benefit Assessment
Risks:
Risks from participating in the study are very low. The primary risks for all participants are some discomforts, which are similar to those encountered in any complete eye examination. Participants will undergo non-invasive procedures used for diagnostic purposes that are used in standard clinical care. Eventually, it will be necessary to use numbing or dilating drops for fundus examination, as is done in standard clinical care. Some risks of those drops include: dry eye, mild headache, blurred vision, drowsiness, burning eyes, tearing, light sensitivity, redness, and allergy reactions. The only non-FDA approved device used in this study is the nGoggle (nGoggle Inc.), which is an investigational diagnostic device qualified as a non-significant risk device. The subject may experience mild discomfort due to drying of the eye during the study. Should a patient note drying, a drop of artificial tears will be placed over the eye by the study key personnel. In very rare cases, artificial eye tear drops may cause irritation or allergy. There are no known risks associated with the EEG test other than discomfort and fatigue. Subjects might become bored, fatigued or distressed while participating. To minimize these potential effects, the tasks will be kept short and subjects will be instructed that they may request to interrupt the test anytime. All assessments, software, instruments that are not FDA approved will be used as tools to assess disability and device efficacy, and will not be used as a diagnostic procedure without confirmation of the diagnosis by another, medically established diagnostic product or procedure. There is, however, the potential risk of loss of confidentiality. Every effort will be made to keep the information confidential; however, this cannot be guaranteed. Some of the questions that will be asked as part of this study may make the patients feel uncomfortable. Patients may refuse to answer any of the questions and may take a break at any time during the study. Patient may stop their participation in this study at any time.
Unknown/unforeseeable risks
In addition to the risks and discomforts listed here, there may be other risks that are currently not known. Subjects will be informed if any other potential risk becomes known through the duration of the study. Also, the risks and discomforts may occur more often or be more severe than have been seen before and written in this form.
Benefits:
Subjects will be referred from the Duke Eye Center care providers after a comprehensive clinical eye examination from a routine visit. If the last clinical eye examination is not within 6 months of the study visit, the participant will be examined by the PI, with no additional cost to the patient.
Participants will also undergo tests that will allow the validation and development of a transformative device for diagnosing and monitoring ocular diseases, and could be suited for home-based testing of visual function in the future, which could benefit patients with eye diseases.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Glaucoma and glaucoma suspects | – | Device: nGogglePatients with at least two consecutive and reliable standard automated perimetry (SAP) examinations with either a pattern standard deviation (PSD) outside the 95% normal limits or a glaucoma hemifield test (GHT) result outside the 99% normal limits. Patients considered suspects for glaucoma must have an intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 21 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or suspicious appearance of the optic nerve head but with reliable normal visual fields, defined as a PSD within 95% confidence limits and a GHT result within normal limits. |
| Age-related macular degeneration | – | Device: nGogglePatients will be considered as having AMD if one or more of the following are present on posterior biomicroscopy (fundoscopy), indirect ophthalmoscopy or Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) exams: 1. Presence of at least intermediate-size drusen (63µm or larger in diameter) 2. Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) abnormalities such as hypopigmentation or hyperpigmentation 3. Reticular pseudodrusen (also called sub retinal drusenoid deposit) 4. Presence of any of the following features: geographic atrophy of the RPE, choroidal neovascularization (exudative, wet), polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, or retinal angiomatous proliferation. |
| Other eye diseases | – | Device: nGogglePatients with other retinal degenerations such as retinitis pigmentosa or with other diseases affecting the visual pathways such as tumors, ischemic neuropathy or optic neuritis may also be included. Their diagnosis will be extracted from their clinical visits. |
| Healthy subjects | – | Device: nGoggleTo be considered healthy, subjects have to have IOP < 22 mmHg with no history of elevated IOP and with at least two reliable normal visual fields, defined as a PSD within 95% confidence limits and a GHT result within normal limits. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The following patients will be recruited from Dr. Tseng's clinic by verbal communication. Staff members at the Duke Eye Center will also be invited to recommend potential participants for the study, in conformance with the Duke Human Subjects Committee Guidelines. 1. Glaucoma; 2. Suspicion of having glaucoma; 3. Non-glaucomatous optic neuropathies; 4. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD); 5. Retinal degenerations; 6. Other diseases involving the visual pathways such as optic neuritis, tumors or ischemic neuropathy. 7. Healthy subjects
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subjects must be between the ages of 18 and 90 years old;
- Both males and females will be included.
- Be able and willing to provide signed informed consent and follow study instructions
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Subjects will be excluded if they present with any systemic or ocular conditions that in the opinion of the Principal Investigator may prevent them from completing the tests (e.g. history of seizures or other coexistent ocular pathologies).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| nGoggleAlso: Portable brain-computer interfaceThe nGoggle is a portable visual evoked potential system that uses an EEG to acquire visual evoked potentials in response to visual stimuli presented on a virtual reality goggle. The investigators will assess the ability of the nGoggle to detect visual field loss in patients with glaucoma, as well as to discriminate among the different stages of the disease, its repeatability and reliability for patient self-testing and patient satisfaction compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP), optical coherence tomography (OCT) metrics and Diopsys NOVA (Diopsys, Inc.). In addition, patients with other diseases affecting the visual system will also be tested in order to assess whether the nGoggle can differentiate glaucoma from them. | Device | Age-related macular degeneration, Glaucoma and glaucoma suspects, Healthy subjects, Other eye diseases |
Primary outcome
Device accuracy to detect visual field loss
Time frame: from date of enrollment and every 6 months, up to 5 years
Comparison of diagnostic accuracies will be performed by analyzing areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each nGoggle and SAP metric by assessment of partial areas under the ROC curves (targeting high specificity>90% region), sensitivities at matched specificities and diagnostic likelihood ratios (LRs). The investigators will also evaluate the correlation between nGoggle multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials (mfSSVEP) metrics and SAP parameters throughout the disease spectrum.
Device accuracy to detect structural neural loss
Time frame: from date of enrollment and every 6 months, up to 5 years
Comparison of diagnostic accuracies will be performed by analyzing areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each nGoggle and OCT parameters, as well as by assessment of partial areas under the ROC curves (targeting high specificity>90% region), sensitivities at matched specificities and diagnostic likelihood ratios (LRs). The investigators will also evaluate the correlation between nGoggle mfSSVEP metrics and SDOCT parameters throughout the disease spectrum. SDOCT testing will be performed with Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). SDOCT parameters to be investigated will include retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, minimum rim width (MRW) and macular thickness.
Device accuracy to detect objective functional loss
Time frame: from date of enrollment and every 6 months, up to 5 years
Comparison of diagnostic accuracies will be performed by analyzing areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each nGoggle and Diopsys NOVA parameters, as well as by assessment of partial areas under the ROC curves (targeting high specificity>90% region), sensitivities at matched specificities and diagnostic likelihood ratios (LRs). The investigators will also evaluate the correlation between nGoggle mfSSVEP metrics and those parameters throughout the disease spectrum. SDOCT testing will be performed with Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). SDOCT parameters to be investigated will include retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, minimum rim width (MRW) and macular thickness.
Assessment of repeatability
Time frame: 6 weeks
Assessment of repeatability of the device parameters will be evaluated through intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A subgroup of subjects will undergo 5 visits over a short period of time (6 weeks). A sample size of 35 subjects will provide a width of 0.1 for the 95% for ICC, allowing assessment of repeatability of the devices parameters.
1 secondary outcome
Patients' satisfaction
Time frame: from date of enrollment and every 6 months, up to 5 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Undecided.
Related trials for Glaucoma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Impact of Glaucoma and Visual Field Loss on Life Space
Primary Open-angle Glaucoma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Glaucoma, Visual Field Loss, and Their Association With Life Space in Older Adults
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
VGFTe-(HD)-OD-2566: Adjunctive Aflibercept Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AAA) Study
Glaucoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Iopidine to Decrease Intraocular Pressure Rise After Injections
Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Retinopathy
Recruiting
Timing of Glaucoma Drainage Device With Boston Keratoprosthesis
Corneal Transplantation, Glaucoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Henry Tseng, PhD principal investigator
Duke University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Glaucoma and Age Related Macular Degeneration, run by NGoggle at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Device accuracy to detect visual field loss (time frame: from date of enrollment and every 6 months, up to 5 years). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2020.