AzTrials
AzTrials

Intubation, IntratrachealNCT03759561

Tracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope vs Fiberoptic Bronchoscope in Patients With Cervical Immobilization

A study testing intubation with videolaryngoscope vs fiberoptic bronchoscope in people with Intubation, Intratracheal, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In patients with suspected cervical spine injury, cervical immobilization, such as manual in-line stabilization or cervical collar has been adopted to prevent further neurologic injury due to cervical motion. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Intubation, Intratracheal
What is being tested?
intubation with videolaryngoscope vs fiberoptic bronchoscope
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
340 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
14 Dec 2018to 18 Jan 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who require tracheal intubation
  • Adult patients aged 20-80
  • American Society of anesthesiologists physical status classification Ⅰ-Ⅲ

Who cannot join

  • patient's refusal
  • patients had a high risk of aspiration, history of gastroesophageal reflux disease, coagulopathy, previous history of radiation therapy on the neck and airway surgery, and upper airway lesions (i.e., tumor, polyp, inflammation, trauma, abscess, and foreign body)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Randomized Trial on Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscope Versus Fiberoptic Bronchoscope in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery

In patients with suspected cervical spine injury, cervical immobilization, such as manual in-line stabilization or cervical collar has been adopted to prevent further neurologic injury due to cervical motion. In these patients, tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy is often challenging due to limited mouth opening, neck flexion, and head extension. In this situation, videolaryngoscope and fiberoptic bronchoscope have been used for tracheal intubation in such patients. In this study, the initial success rate of tracheal intubation and intubation time between the videolaryngoscope and fiberoptic bronchoscope will be compared.

Read the detailed description

Patients entered the operating room without premedication. Airway-related parameters (modified Mallampati score, interincisior gap, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, and retrognathia) were evaluated in the sitting position. After changing to the supine position, thyromental height was measured and patients were monitored with electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, non-invasive blood pressure measurement, and processed electroencephalography. Cotton towels were placed below the patient's head for horizontal alignment of the external auditory meatus and the suprasternal notch. After sufficient preoxygenation for > 3 min, total intravenous anaesthesia was induced using a target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil (effect site concentration: 4 µg/mL for propofol and 4 ng/mL for remifentanil). After confirming loss of consciousness, rocuronium (0.6-0.8 mg/kg) was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation, and mask ventilation was conducted. During mask ventilation, its difficulty was assessed and the use of the oropharyngeal airway was recorded. For invasive blood pressure measurement, a 20-gauge catheter was placed on the patient's radial artery. Thereafter, the patient's head was placed in the neutral position and an cervical collar was applied to minimise neck movement during intubation.

About 90 s after administrating rocuronium, tracheal intubation was attempted by one of five attending anaesthesiologists with a collective history of more than 30 successful videolaryngoscopic and fiberscopic intubations. A reinforced tracheal tube was used in both groups. Orotracheal intubation was performed using a videolaryngoscope with a disposable Macintosh-typed blade and a malleable stylet in the videolaryngoscope group, and using a flexible fiberscope with an eyepiece in the fiberscope group. A tracheal tube was mounted on the stylet and flexible fiberscope in the videolaryngoscope and fiberscope groups, respectively. The stylet was angulated about 60° at the proximal margin of the cuff. Tracheal intubation was initially attempted without any assistance, including airway manoeuvres and devices. If additional airway manoeuvres including external laryngeal manipulation (ELM), jaw thrust, and tongue traction were required during intubation attempts, they were performed by an assistant and noted. After confirming the glottis, the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score was recorded just before inserting the tracheal tube into the trachea. The tracheal tube was inserted into the trachea after removing the stylet and confirming the carina in the videolaryngoscope and fiberscope groups, respectively. Successful intubation was confirmed by waveform capnography. The time from oral insertion of the intubation device to obtainment of the glottis view (glottis visualisation time), to placement of the tracheal tube (tube placement time), and to detection of the waveform capnograph (capnograph detection time) were also measured.

A maximum of three intubation attempts were allowed for the same anaesthesiologist, with a 180-s time limit for each attempt. If the peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) decreased to below 90% during the intubation attempt, the attempt was considered to have failed, and rescue mask ventilation was conducted until SpO2 reached 100%. Cases where tracheal intubation was unsuccessful on all three attempts were recorded as intubation failure.

After surgery, intubation-related airway complications were investigated. Airway injuries (blood in the oral cavity, blood staining on the tracheal tube, gum bleeding, and dental trauma) were assessed at the end of surgery. In addition, hoarseness and sore throat were evaluated at 1 h and 24 h after surgery. The severity of sore throat was measured using a numeric rating scale (NRS; 0: no pain, 10: worst pain imaginable).

Mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), SpO2, and bispectral index (BIS) were recorded just before the intubation attempt and at 1 min after successful intubation. Other perioperative data (demographic, anaesthetic, and surgical data) were collected from electronic medical records.

Being tested
intubation with videolaryngoscope vs fiberoptic bronchoscope

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • intubation with videolaryngoscope vs fiberoptic bronchoscopeProcedure or surgery

    Tracheal intubation was performed using either videolaryngoscope or fiberoptic bronchoscope under cervical collar application according to the group allocations

Study groups in NCT03759561
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Videolaryngoscope groupActive comparatorIn the videolaryngoscope group, tracheal intubation was performed using videolaryngoscope under cervical collar application.
Receives: Procedure: intubation with videolaryngoscope vs fiberoptic bronchoscope
Fiberoptic bronchoscope groupActive comparatorIn the fiberoptic bronchoscope group, tracheal intubation was performed using fiberoptic bronchoscope via oral cavity under cervical collar application.
Receives: Procedure: intubation with videolaryngoscope vs fiberoptic bronchoscope

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The initial success rate

    The first-pass success was defined as successful tracheal intubation on a single attempt in all stages of tracheal intubation

    Measured: intraoperatively

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. intubation time

    Intubation time was defined as time interval between insertion of the device into the oral cavity and withdrawal of the device from the oral cavity.

    Measured: intraoperatively

  2. the incidence of complication

    The complications after the procedure included blood in the oral cavity, blood staining on the endotracheal tube, sore throat, and hoarseness. Blood in the oral cavity and blood staining on the endotracheal tube will be evaluated intraoperatively. Sore throat and hoarseness will be evaluated at 1 hour and 24 hours after the surgery

    Measured: intraoperatively to 1hour and 24 hours after the surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Nov 2018
  2. Study start14 Dec 2018
  3. Primary completion17 Jan 2022
  4. Study completion18 Jan 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
340 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03759561
Sponsor's protocol ID
VL_FOB
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
29 Nov 2018
Last updated
20 Oct 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing intubation with videolaryngoscope vs fiberoptic bronchoscope in people with Intubation, Intratracheal, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The initial success rate (time frame: intraoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in