Hematoma, Subdural, ChronicCORRECT-SCARNCT03755349
Covers to Improve Esthetic Outcome After Surgery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma
A study testing Placement of burr-hole covers and No placement of burr-hole covers in people with Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic and Hematoma, Subdural, Intracranial, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The clinical-functional result after frontal and parietal burr-hole trepanation for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is effective with regards to control of the hematoma and regression of symptoms (headache, decreased vigilance and neurological deficits). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic, Hematoma, Subdural, Intracranial, Haematoma;Subdural;Traumatic
- What is being tested?
- Placement of burr-hole covers and No placement of burr-hole covers
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 83 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 29 Jan 2019to 31 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Participants fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study:
- Patients with first-time cSDH (hypodense, isodense, hyperdense or mixed-type in CT-imaging), scheduled for uni- or bilateral double burr hole trepanation under general anesthesia
- Patient age ≥ 18 years
- Patient non-comatose at time of inclusion (GCS > 8 points)
- Patient able to communicate (in terms of ability to hear, see, speak and understand)
The presence of any one of the following exclusion criteria will lead to exclusion of the participant:
- Patient with recurrent cSDH or previous surgery for cSDH
- Patient with cSDH treated by craniotomy or by single burr hole trepanation
- Patient with cSDH treated in local anesthesia
- Patient unlikely to attend the follow-up (due to reasons of residency, dismal prognosis, etc.)
- Pregnancy
- Known allergy against or incompatibility with Titanium
- Known or suspected non-compliance
- Inability to follow the study procedures, e.g. due to psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
University Hospital Zurich & University of Zurich
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8091
About this study
Official title: COveRs to impRove EsthetiC ouTcome After Surgery for Chronic Subdural hemAtoma by buRr Hole Trepanation (CORRECT-SCAR) - a Single-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
The clinical-functional result after frontal and parietal burr-hole trepanation for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is effective with regards to control of the hematoma and regression of symptoms (headache, decreased vigilance and neurological deficits). However, in patients the treatment may leave visible depressions of the scalp, just above the trepanation sites, that typically develop gradually after weeks - months after the procedure. A considerable proportion of patients find this aesthetically, functionally and psychologically disturbing; the skin depressions may even cause pain or interfere with activities of daily living, such as combing, etc.
An effective method would exist to avoid this undesired treatment effect: Before the skin is closed, a permeable titanium burr-hole plate could be attached above the trepanation site in order to prevent the skin from sinking into the bony defect. However, this is rarely done today, likely because there is no evidence that this treatment modification is effective and safe. Moreover, as material is implanted, this causes additional costs.
Read more
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate whether the application of burr-hole plates on both the frontal and parietal burr-hole in the context of burr-hole trepanation for the treatment of cSDH can improve patient satisfaction with the aesthetic result of the surgery.
In addition, the study is intended to demonstrate that this additional measure will not result in poorer hematoma control, poorer clinical/neurological outcomes, or additional complications for the patient.
In a prospective, single-blind and controlled approach, we randomize 80 patients with uni- or bilateral cSDH into an intervention group (with burr-hole plates) or into a control group (without burr-hole plates).
The primary end result of the study is the patient's reported satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome of the surgical scar. Secondary results are pain, functionality, neurological status, health-related quality of life, residual hematoma volume, and complications (according to Clavien-Dindo scale; especially re-operation rate for recurring cSDH and infections).
The study corresponds to a modern approach, since today's patients not only expect favorable treatment results for their disease, but the therapy should also avoid permanent undesired side-effects, if possible.
- Conditions
- Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic, Hematoma, Subdural, Intracranial, Haematoma;Subdural;Traumatic
- Being tested
- Placement of burr-hole covers, No placement of burr-hole covers
- Keywords
- Burr hole cover, Chronic subdural hematoma, Trepanation, Aesthetic outcome, Complications, Patient satisfaction, Burr hole plate, Scar, Skin depression
- Medical subject headings
- Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic, Hematoma, Subdural, Intracranial, Patient Satisfaction, Cicatrix
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Placement of burr-hole coversDevice
Also called Stryker® UN3 BURR HOLE COVER, 20mm, W/TAB, Item code 53-34520, Stryker® UNIII AXS SCREWS, SELF-DRILLING, 1.5 x 4MM, Item code 56-15934
Placement of a burr-hole cover (Stryker® UN3 BURR HOLE COVER, 20mm, W/TAB, Item code 53-34520) fixed with 2 screws (Stryker® UNIII AXS SCREWS, SELF-DRILLING, 1.5 x 4MM, Item code 56-15934) on each of two burr-holes
No placement of burr-hole coversOther
In the control group, none of the burr-holes is covered, representing our current standard of care. In patients with bilateral cSDH, none of the burr-holes on the control side are covered with burr-hole covers.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Both burr-holes are covered by burr-hole covers in patients with unilateral cSDH. In patients with bilateral cSDH, both burr-holes of the intervention side are covered by burr-hole covers. Receives: Device: Placement of burr-hole covers |
| Control group | Active comparator | None of the burr-holes are covered by burr-hole covers in patients with unilateral cSDH. In patients with bilateral cSDH, both burr-holes on the control side are left uncovered. Receives: Other: No placement of burr-hole covers |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient satisfaction with the aesthetic result of the scar
For the primary outcome, patient satisfaction with the aesthetic results of the scars is determined using a patient-rated outcome measure (PROM), the Aesthetic Numeric Analogue (ANA) scale ranging from 0 (dissatisfied) - 10 (very satisfied). Here, on each side, the frontal and parietal scars are measured separately, and the mean scar satisfaction score per side is built by adding the two values and dividing the sum by two in each patient.
Measured: 90 days postoperative +/- 10 days
Secondary outcomes (7)
Patient satisfaction with the aesthetic result of the scar
Patient satisfaction with the aesthetic results of the scars is determined using the ANA scale ranging from 0 (dissatisfied) - 10 (very satisfied)
Measured: 12 months postoperative +/- 30 days
Impairment in activities of daily living
Impairment in activities of daily living (ADLs), rated as yes vs. no, with the following options: a) hairdressing, b) combing, c) washing, d) other
Measured: 90 days and 12 months postoperative
Skin depression
Rate of skin depression, rated as yes vs. no
Measured: 90 days and 12 months postoperative
EQ-5D Index
Health-related Quality of Life (HrQoL) - as PROM on the EQ-5D - allowing the calculation of the EQ-5D index that ranges from -0.074 (worst hrQoL) - 1.00 (best hrQoL) using European norms
Measured: 90 days and 12 months postoperative
EQ-5D VAS
HrQoL - as PROM on the EQ-5D - allowing the calculation of the EQ-5D VAS (ranging from 0 (worst hrQoL) - 100 mm (best hrQoL))
Measured: 90 days and 12 months postoperative
Neurological outcome
Neurological outcome - as physician-rated outcome measure by the NIHSS (ranging from 0 (no neurological deficit) - 42 (severe neurological deficits)), performed by a physician who was trained in the use of the scale (certified)
Measured: 90 days postoperative
Disability
Disability, determined by the mRS (ranging from 0 (no disability) to 6 (dead)
Measured: 90 days postoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2018
- Study start29 Jan 2019
- Primary completion19 Sep 2021
- Study completion31 Jan 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hematoma, Subdural, ChronicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ZurichThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- As the evacuation of a cSDH encompasses trepanation of the skull with 2 burr-holes per side (each one in the frontal and parietal skull region), we will perform the study as follows: 1. In patients with unilateral cSDH, we will cover either both (intervention group) or none of the burr holes with a burr hole cover (control group). 2. In patients with bilateral cSDH, we will cover one side with burr hole covers (intervention side), while on the other side no burr hole covers are applied (control side).
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 83 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Zurich
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Stryker Orthopaedics
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Martin N Stienen, MD, FEBNS, Principal investigator, University of Zurich & University Hospital ZurichLuca Regli, MD, Study chair, University of Zurich & University Hospital ZurichMenno R Germans, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Universitätsspital Zürich
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03755349
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BASEC 2018-01180
- Acronym
- CORRECT-SCAR
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD will be made available on reasonable request, once the results are published and if approved by the institutional review board (KEK-ZH).
Publications
Vasella F, Akeret K, Smoll NR, Germans MR, Jehli E, Bozinov O, Regli L, Stienen MN; CORRECT SCAR study group. Improving the aesthetic outcome with burr hole cover placement in chronic subdural hematoma evacuation-a retrospective pilot study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Nov;160(11):2129-2135. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3659-9. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
PubMed 30155645Velz J, Vasella F, Akeret K, Dias SF, Jehli E, Bozinov O, Regli L, Germans MR, Stienen MN; CORRECT-SCAR study group. Patterns of care: burr-hole cover application for chronic subdural hematoma trepanation. Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Nov 1;47(5):E14. doi: 10.3171/2019.8.FOCUS19245.
PubMed 31675709Stienen MN, Akeret K, Vasella F, Velz J, Jehli E, Scheffler P, Voglis S, Bichsel O, Smoll NR, Bozinov O, Regli L, Germans MR; CORRECT-SCAR study group*. COveRs to impRove AesthetiC ouTcome after Surgery for Chronic subdural haemAtoma by buRr hole trepanation (CORRECT-SCAR): protocol of a Swiss single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 6;9(12):e031375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031375.
PubMed 31811007Stienen MN, Akeret K, Vasella F, Velz J, Jehli E, Voglis S, Bichsel O, Smoll NR, Bozinov O, Regli L, Germans MR; CORRECT-SCAR Study Group. COveRs to impRove EsthetiC ouTcome after Surgery for Chronic subdural hemAtoma by buRr hole trepanation-Results of a Swiss Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurosurgery. 2024 May 1;94(5):955-965. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002778. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
PubMed 38059611
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- COveRs to impRove EsthetiC ouTcome After Surgery for Chronic Subdural hemAtoma by buRr Hole Trepanation (CORRECT-SCAR) - a Single-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03755349
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CORRECT-SCAR / BASEC 2018-01180
- Conditions
- Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic, Hematoma, Subdural, Intracranial, Haematoma;Subdural;Traumatic
- Keywords
- Burr hole cover, Chronic subdural hematoma, Trepanation, Aesthetic outcome, Complications, Patient satisfaction, Burr hole plate, Scar
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 83 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ZurichUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Stryker Orthopaedics
- Study start
- 29 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The clinical-functional result after frontal and parietal burr-hole trepanation for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is effective with regards to control of the hematoma and regression of symptoms (headache, decreased vigilance and neurological deficits). However, in patients the treatment may leave visible depressions of the scalp, just above the trepanation sites, that typically develop gradually after weeks - months after the procedure. A considerable proportion of patients find this aesthetically, functionally and psychologically disturbing; the skin depressions may even cause pain or interfere with activities of daily living, such as combing, etc.
An effective method would exist to avoid this undesired treatment effect: Before the skin is closed, a permeable titanium burr-hole plate could be attached above the trepanation site in order to prevent the skin from sinking into the bony defect. However, this is rarely done today, likely because there is no evidence that this treatment modification is effective and safe. Moreover, as material is implanted, this causes additional costs.
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate whether the application of burr-hole plates on both the frontal and parietal burr-hole in the context of burr-hole trepanation for the treatment of cSDH can improve patient satisfaction with the aesthetic result of the surgery.
In addition, the study is intended to demonstrate that this additional measure will not result in poorer hematoma control, poorer clinical/neurological outcomes, or additional complications for the patient.
In a prospective, single-blind and controlled approach, we randomize 80 patients with uni- or bilateral cSDH into an intervention group (with burr-hole plates) or into a control group (without burr-hole plates).
The primary end result of the study is the patient's reported satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome of the surgical scar. Secondary results are pain, functionality, neurological status, health-related quality of life, residual hematoma volume, and complications (according to Clavien-Dindo scale; especially re-operation rate for recurring cSDH and infections).
The study corresponds to a modern approach, since today's patients not only expect favorable treatment results for their disease, but the therapy should also avoid permanent undesired side-effects, if possible.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- As the evacuation of a cSDH encompasses trepanation of the skull with 2 burr-holes per side (each one in the frontal and parietal skull region), we will perform the study as follows: 1. In patients with unilateral cSDH, we will cover either both (intervention group) or none of the burr holes with a burr hole cover (control group). 2. In patients with bilateral cSDH, we will cover one side with burr hole covers (intervention side), while on the other side no burr hole covers are applied (control side).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Device: Placement of burr-hole coversBoth burr-holes are covered by burr-hole covers in patients with unilateral cSDH. In patients with bilateral cSDH, both burr-holes of the intervention side are covered by burr-hole covers. |
| Control group | Active comparator | Other: No placement of burr-hole coversNone of the burr-holes are covered by burr-hole covers in patients with unilateral cSDH. In patients with bilateral cSDH, both burr-holes on the control side are left uncovered. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Placement of burr-hole coversAlso: Stryker® UN3 BURR HOLE COVER, 20mm, W/TAB, Item code 53-34520, Stryker® UNIII AXS SCREWS, SELF-DRILLING, 1.5 x 4MM, Item code 56-15934Placement of a burr-hole cover (Stryker® UN3 BURR HOLE COVER, 20mm, W/TAB, Item code 53-34520) fixed with 2 screws (Stryker® UNIII AXS SCREWS, SELF-DRILLING, 1.5 x 4MM, Item code 56-15934) on each of two burr-holes | Device | Intervention group |
| No placement of burr-hole coversIn the control group, none of the burr-holes is covered, representing our current standard of care. In patients with bilateral cSDH, none of the burr-holes on the control side are covered with burr-hole covers. | Other | Control group |
Primary outcome
Patient satisfaction with the aesthetic result of the scar
Time frame: 90 days postoperative +/- 10 days
For the primary outcome, patient satisfaction with the aesthetic results of the scars is determined using a patient-rated outcome measure (PROM), the Aesthetic Numeric Analogue (ANA) scale ranging from 0 (dissatisfied) - 10 (very satisfied). Here, on each side, the frontal and parietal scars are measured separately, and the mean scar satisfaction score per side is built by adding the two values and dividing the sum by two in each patient.
7 secondary outcomes
Patient satisfaction with the aesthetic result of the scar
Time frame: 12 months postoperative +/- 30 days
Impairment in activities of daily living
Time frame: 90 days and 12 months postoperative
Skin depression
Time frame: 90 days and 12 months postoperative
EQ-5D Index
Time frame: 90 days and 12 months postoperative
EQ-5D VAS
Time frame: 90 days and 12 months postoperative
Neurological outcome
Time frame: 90 days postoperative
Disability
Time frame: 90 days postoperative
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Oct 2022.
- Background: PubMed 30155645Vasella F, Akeret K, Smoll NR, Germans MR, Jehli E, Bozinov O, Regli L, Stienen MN; CORRECT SCAR study group. Improving the aesthetic outcome with burr hole cover placement in chronic subdural hematoma evacuation-a retrospective pilot study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Nov;160(11):2129-2135. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3659-9. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
- Background: PubMed 31675709Velz J, Vasella F, Akeret K, Dias SF, Jehli E, Bozinov O, Regli L, Germans MR, Stienen MN; CORRECT-SCAR study group. Patterns of care: burr-hole cover application for chronic subdural hematoma trepanation. Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Nov 1;47(5):E14. doi: 10.3171/2019.8.FOCUS19245.
- Background: PubMed 31811007Stienen MN, Akeret K, Vasella F, Velz J, Jehli E, Scheffler P, Voglis S, Bichsel O, Smoll NR, Bozinov O, Regli L, Germans MR; CORRECT-SCAR study group*. COveRs to impRove AesthetiC ouTcome after Surgery for Chronic subdural haemAtoma by buRr hole trepanation (CORRECT-SCAR): protocol of a Swiss single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 6;9(12):e031375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031375.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38059611Stienen MN, Akeret K, Vasella F, Velz J, Jehli E, Voglis S, Bichsel O, Smoll NR, Bozinov O, Regli L, Germans MR; CORRECT-SCAR Study Group. COveRs to impRove EsthetiC ouTcome after Surgery for Chronic subdural hemAtoma by buRr hole trepanation-Results of a Swiss Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurosurgery. 2024 May 1;94(5):955-965. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002778. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD will be made available on reasonable request, once the results are published and if approved by the institutional review board (KEK-ZH).
Related trials for Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Different Intravenous Fluids on Post-operative Chronic Subdural Hematoma Size and Recurrence
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Recruiting
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolisation in Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation During Chronic Subdural Hematoma Surgery Under Local Anesthesia
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
RecruitingObservational study
Study On Histoacryl Used For Embolization Of Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) In Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH)
Subdural Hematoma, Subdural Hematoma, Chronic
Recruiting
MMA Embolization With NeoCast for Subacute and Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Martin N Stienen, MD, FEBNS principal investigator
University of Zurich & University Hospital Zurich
Luca Regli, MD study chair
University of Zurich & University Hospital Zurich
Menno R Germans, MD, PhD principal investigator
Universitätsspital Zürich
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Placement of burr-hole covers and No placement of burr-hole covers in people with Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic and Hematoma, Subdural, Intracranial, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient satisfaction with the aesthetic result of the scar (time frame: 90 days postoperative +/- 10 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03755349, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2022.