Restless Legs SyndromePhase 2NCT03755310
Treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome With the Hypocretin Antagonist Suvorexant
A Phase 2 study testing Suvorexant in people with Restless Legs Syndrome, run by Diego García-Borreguero, MD, PhD at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Suvorexant improves sleep latency and wake after sleep onset in patients with primary insomnia, and is FDA approved for this condition. However, no data exist on its effects in RLS, so far. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Restless Legs Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Suvorexant
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 43 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- Feb 2019to Mar 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Idiopathic RLS, according to diagnostic criteria established by the International RLS Study Group (Allen et al., 2003).
- A history (if currently controlled on medication) or the presence of RLS symptoms causing insomnia/ sleep disturbance on 3 or more days per week for at least 12 months.
- Both treatment-naïve and treated patients without a sufficient response will be included. In both of these groups, the IRLS score ≥20 at the screening assessment (for the latter group, measured under current treatment), with an absence of significant RLS symptoms before 9PM (measured by diary)
- Aged 18 - 80 years.
- PSG at baseline containing:
- WASO≥ 60 minutes
Show all 10Show fewer
- PLMAI of ≥ 15
- TST<6.6hours
- Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screen and must agree not to become pregnant.
- Prior to any study-specific procedures, a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the trial.
Who cannot join
- Any secondary forms of RLS.
- History or current diagnosis of other clinically relevant diseases that may confound assessments or RLS symptoms.
- Serum ferritin <18 mcg/ml
- If the patient is currently being treated with drugs likely to influence sleep architecture or motor manifestations during sleep (such as neuroleptics, L-dopa, dopamine agonists, hypnotics, sedatives, antidepressants, anxiolytics, anticonvulsants, psychostimulant medications, steroids, barbiturates and opiates), a wash-out period of at least > 5 half-lives will be undertaken.
- Employed in shift work (for example, employment hours disruptive to the normal circadian sleep-wake cycle such as nighttime or variable rotating shifts) or irregular sleep-wake schedules.
- Patients who require prescription medication for concurrent conditions which could interfere with efficacy assessments such as dopamine antagonists, serotonin reuptake inhibitors or antihistamines.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Surgery within 180 days of baseline visit, which in the opinion of the investigator would negatively impact the patient's participation in the study.
- A significant medical or psychiatric disorder.
- Any other clinically significant condition or laboratory assay abnormality, which would interfere with the patient's ability to participate in the study.
- Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory assay abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study.
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding.
- Any disorders for which suvorexant is contraindicated, such as: narcolepsy, COPD, sleep apnea, depression, suicidal thoughts, severe hepatic illness.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site
Sleep Research Institute; Paseo de la Habana 151
Madrid, 28036
Diego García-Berreguero
About this study
Official title: Proof of Concept Study: Treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome With the Hypocretin Antagonist Suvorexant
Suvorexant improves sleep latency and wake after sleep onset in patients with primary insomnia, and is FDA approved for this condition.
However, no data exist on its effects in RLS, so far. The investigators consider that suvorexant might provide a stable therapeutic efficacy for the long treatment, avoiding the risk of augmentation of symptoms commonly seen under dopamine agonists.
Read the detailed description
Restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease (RLS/WED) is a common neurological disorder characterized by the presence of an urge to move the legs, usually accompanied by dysesthesias1. It is estimated that approx. 60-75% of the patients experience these symptoms just at bedtime and its main consequence is insomnia. RLS is not only a common differential diagnosis with Primary Insomnia, but independently of this it is also one of the most common sleep disorders. In Western countries the prevalence for the more severe forms is approximately 2-3% of the general adult population.
Over the last years, dopamine agonists (DAs) have been widely used for RLS/WED. However, there is growing concern about the long-term consequences of DAs, such as dopaminergic augmentation. This complication consists of an overall increase in symptom severity, with symptoms starting earlier in the afternoon and expanding to previously unaffected parts of the body. If not stopped, augmentation can develop into a serious complication, as it will eventually progress and can lead to discontinuation of treatment. Existing studies show that after a treatment period of approximately 10 years, which is the amount of time that has elapsed since the first DA agonists were approved, the prevalence of augmentation nears 50%. But since RLS is a chronic disease in many patients, it is likely that with longer treatment times the risk of augmentation will increase even further. In light of this, there is a clinical need for treatment alternatives to dopaminergic drugs. Furthermore, a recent consensus paper by three RLS expert organizations recommends treatment begin with drugs other than dopaminergic agonists.
The pathophysiology of RLS/WED is not yet clear, but a number of findings link it to iron metabolism and to a mild dopaminergic dysfunction. Furthermore, it is not even clear whether the dopaminergic dysfunction plays a causal role at all, a fact that adds additional concerns about the use of dopaminergics. Drugs with non-dopaminergic mechanisms of action that have shown therapeutic efficacy for RLS/WED are alpha-2 delta ligands (pregabalin, gabapentin), opiates, benzodiazepines or clonidine. The only common mechanism through which these different agents might improve RLS symptoms is probably reduction of arousal. In fact, RLS even when moderate profoundly disturbs sleep, reducing sleep times to 5-6 hours or less. Patients report some daytime problems with alertness and cognitive clarity, but despite this reduction in sleep times untreated patients do not describe such profound episodes of sleepiness that occur for normal subjects maintained on such restricted sleep schedules. There is apparently some alerting mechanism partially compensating for the sleep loss. Such-hyperarousal-resembles the one found in Primary Insomnia. Indeed, RLS patients treated with dopaminergics over long periods frequently exhibit poor sleep despite the improvement of sensory and motor symptoms.
Increased glutamatergic activity has been discussed as one of the potential mechanisms leading to increased arousal in RLS. However, it is possible that the hypocretin system may also play a role in causing RLS-related hyperarousal. Hypocretins are well known to play a key role in the central regulation of both motor control and arousal. Two main studies have examined hypocretin levels in RLS patients. A first small study found increased evening hypocretin-1 levels in previously untreated patients with early onset RLS when compared to controls, but not in those treated. However, Stiasny-Kolster et al. were not able to replicate this finding, although the difference between both studies could be related to the treatment status and to the use of different extraction methods of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). No evidence exists so far in the literature regarding the effect of hypocretin antagonist drugs in the treatment of RLS-related sensory and motor symptoms. However, unpublished data have shown non-significant improvements of periodic limb movements (PLMs) during treatment with almorexant.
This study hypothesizes that treatment of RLS symptoms with the hypocretin antagonist suvorexant might lead to an improvement of sleep as well as to an improvement of both dysesthesias and motor symptoms (PLMs).
- Conditions
- Restless Legs Syndrome
- Being tested
- Suvorexant, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Restless Legs Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SuvorexantDrug
First week: 10 mg tabs; Second week: 10-20 mg tabs
PlaceboDrug
Equivalent dosage, route of administration and dose regimen
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Suvorexant | Experimental | 10mg tabs during the first week, 10-20 mg tabs on the second week. Receives: Drug: Suvorexant |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Equivalent dosage, route of administration and dose regimen. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO), as measured during polysomnography
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS)
IRLS is the main scale for rating the severity of restless legs syndrome. Scoring criteria: Mild (score 1-10); Moderate (score 11-20); Severe (score 21-30); Very severe (score 31-40)
Measured: 1 year
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)
Measured: 1 year
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Total Sleep Time (TST)
Measured: 1 year
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Periodic Leg Movement during Sleep-index (PLMS)
Measured: 1 year
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Periodic Leg movement while awake-index (PLMW-index)
Measured: 1 year
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Multiple Suggested Immobilization Test (mSIT).
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2018
- Study startFeb 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2020 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Restless Legs SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Diego García-Borreguero, MD, PhD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sleep Research Institute (Paseo de la Habana 151, Madrid 28036, SPAIN)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Diego García-Borreguero, MD, PhD, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03755310
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IISP-57325
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 10 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 29 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
1. Sleep Med 2014;15(8):860-73. 2. Sleep Med. 2013;14(7):675-84. 3. Sleep Med 2012;13:1280-5. 4. Sleep Med 2011;12:440-4. 5. Sleep Med 2015;16(10):1252-8. 6. Sleep Med. 2016;21:1-11. 7. Sleep Med Clin 2015;10:207-14, xi. 8. Sleep Med. 2009;10(1):134-8. 9. Neurology. 2013;80(22):2028-34 10. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;49:43-54. 11. Peptides. 2014;52:29-37. 12. Curr Biol. 2013;23(18):1719-25. 13. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23(5):752-9. 14. Neurosci Bull. 2013;29(3):355-65. 15. Neurology. 2002;59(4):639-
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Proof of Concept Study: Treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome With the Hypocretin Antagonist Suvorexant
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03755310
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IISP-57325
- Conditions
- Restless Legs Syndrome
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Diego García-Borreguero, MD, PhDUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sleep Research Institute (Paseo de la Habana 151, Madrid 28036, SPAIN)
- Study start
- Feb 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Suvorexant improves sleep latency and wake after sleep onset in patients with primary insomnia, and is FDA approved for this condition.
However, no data exist on its effects in RLS, so far. The investigators consider that suvorexant might provide a stable therapeutic efficacy for the long treatment, avoiding the risk of augmentation of symptoms commonly seen under dopamine agonists.
Detailed description
Restless legs syndrome/Willis-Ekbom disease (RLS/WED) is a common neurological disorder characterized by the presence of an urge to move the legs, usually accompanied by dysesthesias1. It is estimated that approx. 60-75% of the patients experience these symptoms just at bedtime and its main consequence is insomnia. RLS is not only a common differential diagnosis with Primary Insomnia, but independently of this it is also one of the most common sleep disorders. In Western countries the prevalence for the more severe forms is approximately 2-3% of the general adult population.
Over the last years, dopamine agonists (DAs) have been widely used for RLS/WED. However, there is growing concern about the long-term consequences of DAs, such as dopaminergic augmentation. This complication consists of an overall increase in symptom severity, with symptoms starting earlier in the afternoon and expanding to previously unaffected parts of the body. If not stopped, augmentation can develop into a serious complication, as it will eventually progress and can lead to discontinuation of treatment. Existing studies show that after a treatment period of approximately 10 years, which is the amount of time that has elapsed since the first DA agonists were approved, the prevalence of augmentation nears 50%. But since RLS is a chronic disease in many patients, it is likely that with longer treatment times the risk of augmentation will increase even further. In light of this, there is a clinical need for treatment alternatives to dopaminergic drugs. Furthermore, a recent consensus paper by three RLS expert organizations recommends treatment begin with drugs other than dopaminergic agonists.
The pathophysiology of RLS/WED is not yet clear, but a number of findings link it to iron metabolism and to a mild dopaminergic dysfunction. Furthermore, it is not even clear whether the dopaminergic dysfunction plays a causal role at all, a fact that adds additional concerns about the use of dopaminergics. Drugs with non-dopaminergic mechanisms of action that have shown therapeutic efficacy for RLS/WED are alpha-2 delta ligands (pregabalin, gabapentin), opiates, benzodiazepines or clonidine. The only common mechanism through which these different agents might improve RLS symptoms is probably reduction of arousal. In fact, RLS even when moderate profoundly disturbs sleep, reducing sleep times to 5-6 hours or less. Patients report some daytime problems with alertness and cognitive clarity, but despite this reduction in sleep times untreated patients do not describe such profound episodes of sleepiness that occur for normal subjects maintained on such restricted sleep schedules. There is apparently some alerting mechanism partially compensating for the sleep loss. Such-hyperarousal-resembles the one found in Primary Insomnia. Indeed, RLS patients treated with dopaminergics over long periods frequently exhibit poor sleep despite the improvement of sensory and motor symptoms.
Increased glutamatergic activity has been discussed as one of the potential mechanisms leading to increased arousal in RLS. However, it is possible that the hypocretin system may also play a role in causing RLS-related hyperarousal. Hypocretins are well known to play a key role in the central regulation of both motor control and arousal. Two main studies have examined hypocretin levels in RLS patients. A first small study found increased evening hypocretin-1 levels in previously untreated patients with early onset RLS when compared to controls, but not in those treated. However, Stiasny-Kolster et al. were not able to replicate this finding, although the difference between both studies could be related to the treatment status and to the use of different extraction methods of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). No evidence exists so far in the literature regarding the effect of hypocretin antagonist drugs in the treatment of RLS-related sensory and motor symptoms. However, unpublished data have shown non-significant improvements of periodic limb movements (PLMs) during treatment with almorexant.
This study hypothesizes that treatment of RLS symptoms with the hypocretin antagonist suvorexant might lead to an improvement of sleep as well as to an improvement of both dysesthesias and motor symptoms (PLMs).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Suvorexant | Experimental | Drug: Suvorexant10mg tabs during the first week, 10-20 mg tabs on the second week. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboEquivalent dosage, route of administration and dose regimen. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Idiopathic RLS, according to diagnostic criteria established by the International RLS Study Group (Allen et al., 2003).
- A history (if currently controlled on medication) or the presence of RLS symptoms causing insomnia/ sleep disturbance on 3 or more days per week for at least 12 months.
- Both treatment-naïve and treated patients without a sufficient response will be included. In both of these groups, the IRLS score ≥20 at the screening assessment (for the latter group, measured under current treatment), with an absence of significant RLS symptoms before 9PM (measured by diary)
- Aged 18 - 80 years.
- PSG at baseline containing:
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Any secondary forms of RLS.
- History or current diagnosis of other clinically relevant diseases that may confound assessments or RLS symptoms.
- Serum ferritin <18 mcg/ml
- If the patient is currently being treated with drugs likely to influence sleep architecture or motor manifestations during sleep (such as neuroleptics, L-dopa, dopamine agonists, hypnotics, sedatives, antidepressants, anxiolytics, anticonvulsants, psychostimulant medications, steroids, barbiturates and opiates), a wash-out period of at least > 5 half-lives will be undertaken.
- Employed in shift work (for example, employment hours disruptive to the normal circadian sleep-wake cycle such as nighttime or variable rotating shifts) or irregular sleep-wake schedules.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SuvorexantFirst week: 10 mg tabs; Second week: 10-20 mg tabs | Drug | Suvorexant |
| PlaceboEquivalent dosage, route of administration and dose regimen | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO), as measured during polysomnography
Time frame: 1 year
6 secondary outcomes
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS)
Time frame: 1 year
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)
Time frame: 1 year
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Total Sleep Time (TST)
Time frame: 1 year
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Periodic Leg Movement during Sleep-index (PLMS)
Time frame: 1 year
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Periodic Leg movement while awake-index (PLMW-index)
Time frame: 1 year
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Multiple Suggested Immobilization Test (mSIT).
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Nov 2018.
- Background1. Sleep Med 2014;15(8):860-73. 2. Sleep Med. 2013;14(7):675-84. 3. Sleep Med 2012;13:1280-5. 4. Sleep Med 2011;12:440-4. 5. Sleep Med 2015;16(10):1252-8. 6. Sleep Med. 2016;21:1-11. 7. Sleep Med Clin 2015;10:207-14, xi. 8. Sleep Med. 2009;10(1):134-8. 9. Neurology. 2013;80(22):2028-34 10. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;49:43-54. 11. Peptides. 2014;52:29-37. 12. Curr Biol. 2013;23(18):1719-25. 13. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23(5):752-9. 14. Neurosci Bull. 2013;29(3):355-65. 15. Neurology. 2002;59(4):639-
Related trials for Restless Legs Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Lemborexant vs Clonidine vs Sedatives to Treat Insomnia in Chronic Pain Patients
Chronic Insomnia, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Neuromodulation to Overcome Severe Restless Legs Syndrome
Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS), Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Tolerability and Efficacy of CBD Extract for RLS Treatment
Restless Leg Syndrome
Recruiting
Functional Connectivity of the Interoceptive Network in RLS
Restless Legs Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Intravenous Iron in the Management of Drug-resistant Restless Legs syndromeI
Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Suvorexant in people with Restless Legs Syndrome, run by Diego García-Borreguero, MD, PhD at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Diego García-Borreguero, MD. PhD. (+34 913 454 129, dgb@iis.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change (differences between visits 2 and 5) in Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO), as measured during polysomnography (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03755310, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2018.