Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicPhase 3SynBioSe-2NCT03747159
Synergetic B-cell Immunomodulation in SLE - 2nd Study.
A Phase 3 study testing Belimumab Injection in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 4 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
In follow-up of the previous SynBioSe Study the present study is a randomized controlled trial designed to further investigate the long-term clinical and imunological efficacy of combination B-cell targeting by starting treatment with belimumab (anti-BAFF) followed by rituximab(anti-CD20) in lupus nephritis patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- What is being tested?
- Belimumab Injection
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 71 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2018to 22 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have a clinical diagnosis of SLE according to the SLICC criteria 2012
- Severe, active SLE disease defined as a situation in which 1 or more of the following criteria are met:
- SELENA-SLEDAI (SLE Disease Activity Index) with 12 or more points
- New or worse SLE-related activity of major organs, i.e.: CNS-SLE (includes NPSLE), vasculitis, nephritis, pericarditis and/or myocarditis, myositis, thrombocytopenia < 60, hemolytic anemia < 4.4mmol/L (=7.0g/dL)
- high disease activity that requires or warrants induction treatment by switching to or increasing dosage of oral mycophenolate
- New, persisting or progressive disease activity despite the use of conventional maintenance immunosuppressive treatment (e.g. mycophenolate or azathioprine)
Show all 17Show fewer
- Positive for relevant SLE-specific autoantibodies defined as a situation in which 1 or more of the following criteria are met:
- ANA seropositivity, as defined by a positive ANA-titer ≥ 1:80, before and at screening :
- Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the study screening period; OR
- One positive historical test result and 1 positive result during the screening period. Historical documentation of a positive test of ANA (eg, ANA by HEp-2 titer, ANA by ELISA) must include the date of the test.
- Anti-DNA seropositivity, as defined by a positive anti-dsDNA serum antibody ≥ 30 IU/mL, before and at screening:
- Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the study screening period.
- One positive historical test result and 1 positive result during the screening period. Historical documentation of a positive test of anti-dsDNA (eg, anti-dsDNA by Farr assay or ELISA) must include the date of the test.
- Female subjects are eligible to enter the study if she is:
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Of non-child-bearing potential (i.e. after hysterectomy, postmenopausal, bilateral ovariectomy or documented bilateral tubal ligation or other permanent female sterilization procedure)
- in agreement to not become pregnant (if female subjects of childbearing potential) and therefore must be sexually inactive by abstinence or use contraceptive methods with a failure rate of < 1%.
Who cannot join
- Active pregnancy, as proven by a positive urine beta-HCG test or a positive serum beta-HCG
- Significant hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG < 4.0 g/L) or an IgA deficiency (IgA < 0.1 g/L)
- Immunization with a live vaccine 1 month before screening
- Active infection at time of screening, as follows:
- Hospitalization for treatment of infection within previous 60 days of day 0 of the study
- Use of parenteral (intravenous of intramuscular) antibiotics (including anti-bacterials, anti-virals, anti-fungals or anti-parasitic agents) within previous 60 days of day 0 of the study
Show all 17Show fewer
- Serological evidence of viral hepatitis defined as: patients positive for HbsAg test or HBcAb or a positive hepatitis C antibody not treated with antiviral medication
- Have a historically positive HIV test or test positive at screening for HIV
- Have a history of a primary immunodeficiency
- Have a neutrophil count of < 1.5x10E9/L
- Have a significant infection history that in the opinion of the investigator would make the candidate unsuitable for the study
- Have a history of an anaphylactic reaction to parenteral administration of contrast agents, human or murine proteins or monoclonal antibodies
- Have any other clinically significant abnormal laboratory value in the opinion of the investigator
- Have current drugs or alcohol abuse or dependence within 365 days prior to Day 0 of the study
- Have an active malignant neoplasm or one in the history of the last 5 years, except basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin treated with local resection only or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix treated locally and with no evidence of metastatic disease for 3 years
- Have evidence of serious suicide risk including any history of suicidal behavior in the last 6 months and/or any suicidal ideation in the last 2 months or who, in the investigator's opinion, poses a significant suicide risk
- Have any other clinically significant abnormal laboratory value, any intercurrent significant medical or psychiatric illness that in the opinion of the investigator would make the candidate unsuitable for the study
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Netherlands4 sites
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, 9713 GZ
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, 2333 ZC
Radboud University Medical Center
Nijmegen, 6525 GA
HagaZiekenhuis
The Hague, 2545 AA
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Trial to Investigate the Reset of Humoral Autoimmunity by Combining Belimumab With Rituximab in Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
In follow-up of the previous SynBioSe Study the present study is a randomized controlled trial designed to further investigate the long-term clinical and imunological efficacy of combination B-cell targeting by starting treatment with belimumab (anti-BAFF) followed by rituximab(anti-CD20) in lupus nephritis patients.
Read the detailed description
Rationale:
The SynBioSe-1 study is the first study to comprehensively describe the clinical and immunological effects of combining rituximab (RTX) and belimumab (BLM) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). From the pioneering SynBioSe-1 study, we have learned that combining RTX+BLM was safe and well-tolerated with important clinical responses. Immunologically, we unexpectedly observed that long-term B-cell depletion was not achieved due to migration of mature B-cells triggered by depletion of BAFF serum levels. The latter observation was in contrast to the study's null-hypothesis that combination therapy would lead to long-term B-cell depletion. The contrary was demonstrated, namely the relative early recirculation of mature B-cells. As such, the immunological and clinical lessons from the SynBioSe-1 study in conjunction with accumulating data from several large studies on combination B-cell targeted treatment have led to the postulation that starting treatment with RTX+BLM would result in an improved B-cell targeting strategy, notably on tissue-resident autoreactive B-cells, associated with improved long-term clinical disease amelioration. Therefore, the present SynBioSe-2 study is designed to further investigate the long-term clinical and imunological efficacy of combination B-cell targeting by starting treatment with belimumab followed by rituximab.
Objectives:
The primary objective is to assess whether combination treatment BLM+RTX will lead to reduced treatment failure and the improvement of pivotal, SLE-specific autoimmune phenomena compared to SLE patients treated with standard of care.
Study design:
a multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label study
Study population:
SLE patients with a severe flare with major organ involvement or persistent high disease activity despite conventional treatment
Intervention:
In addition to standard therapy, SLE patients will receive self-administered, subcutaneous injections of belimumab every week for the entire study period and 2 infusions of rituximab 1000 mg on day 28 (week 4) and day 42 (week 6).
Main study parameters:
The primary clinical efficacy parameter is the treatment failure rate during the 2 years study period. Secondary endpoints are clinical and non-biased immunological effects of the treatment summarized as follows: reduction of disease relevant autoantibodies, in particular anti-dsDNA autoantibody production at 28 weeks, total renal response rate at 28 weeks, regression of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation at 28 weeks; sustained, long-term B-cell depletion during 104 weeks; sustained reduction of relevant anti-nuclear autoantibodies, including seroconversion during 104 weeks; and sustained regression of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation during 104 weeks. Additionally, the study will perform safety and toxicity monitoring according to Common toxicity Criteria (CTC) developed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) with the use of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and evaluate the reduction of concomitant immunosuppression and the number of moderate and severe flares during study follow-up.
Study duration: 104 weeks.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation and potential benefits:
The study will include SLE patients with a severe flare necessitating remission induction treatment with intensive immunosuppression. The use of belimumab followed by rituximab can ameliorate disease activity even more than conventional treatment in the short-term and contribute to the successful tapering of concomitant immunosuppressive treatment. The latter will possibly lead to the reduction of infectious complication as compared to conventional treatment. The risks are predominantly related to the side effect profile of rituximab and belimumab and infectious complications of long-term B-cell depletion.
- Conditions
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Being tested
- Belimumab Injection
- Keywords
- systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus nephritis, systemic autoimmune disease, glomerulonephritis, autoimmune glomerulonephritis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, renal insufficiency, renal failure
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Lupus Nephritis, Glomerulonephritis, Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative, Renal Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Belimumab InjectionDrug
Also called Benlysta subcutaneous injection of 200mg
Weekly injection of belimumab prior to two infusions of rituximab with continuation of the belimumab as maintenance therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BLM+RTX treatment arm | Experimental | Intervention 1 Belimumab injection: subcutaneous weekly injections with 200mg belimumab (BML) for the duration of the entire study period of two years.
Intervention 2 Rituximab infusion: Two intravenously infusions of 1000mg rituximab (RTX) at week 4 and week 6 after the start of belimumab.
Intervention 3: Standard of care: induction therapy with three intravenously infusions methylprednisolone of 1000mg (or 500mg if weight is below 60kg), oral prednisolone 60mg with a quick tapering scheme to reach 5mg in 10 weeks and mycofenolate mofetil start dosis 500mg twice daily with maximum dosis of 2000mg twice daily depending on tolerance and area under curve (AUC) aimed at 60mg*hour/L. Receives: Drug: Belimumab Injection |
| Standard of Care treatment arm | No intervention | Intervention 1: Standard of care: induction therapy with three intravenously infusions methylprednisolone of 1000mg (or 500mg if weight is below 60kg), oral prednisolone 60mg with a quick tapering scheme to reach 5mg in 10 weeks and mycofenolate mofetil start dosis 500mg twice daily with maximum dosis of 2000mg twice daily depending on tolerance and area under curve (AUC) aimed at 60mg*hour/L. Optional intervention: (if patients flare or are non-responders on mycofenolate mofetil + prednisolone) : Two intravenously infusions of 1000mg rituximab at week 4 and week 6 after the start of belimumab. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment failure rate
The treatment failure rate will be measured at 104 weeks in both treatment arms with the hypothesis that lower treatment failure rates will be obtained in the RTX+BLM arm.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (14)
Change of disease relevant auto-antibodies present at baseline, in particular anti-dsDNA
All disease relevant auto-antibodies will be measured at 28 weeks and compared to baseline with the hypothesis that a better reduction will be obtained in the RTX+BLM arm.
Measured: 28 weeks
Sustained change of autoantibody production
The sustained reduction of pathogenic autoantibodies, in particular anti-dsDNA autoantibodies
Measured: 2 years
Seroconversion of disease relevant auto-antibodies
Seroconversion of pathogenic autoantibodies, in particular anti-dsDNA autoantibodies
Measured: 2 years
Change of memory B-cell numbers
The detection of (autoreactive) memory B-cells by standardized flowcytometry and in B-cell culture assays
Measured: 28 weeks
Sustained change of memory B-cell numbers
The detection of (autoreactive) memory B-cells by standardized flowcytometry and in B-cell culture assays
Measured: 2 years
Change of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation
The quantification of ex vivo NET induction with a 3-dimensional, confocal microscopy technique
Measured: 28 weeks
Sustained change of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation
The quantification of ex vivo NET induction with a 3-dimensional, confocal microscopy technique
Measured: 2 years
Evaluation of the renal response
The number of partial and complete renal responders in case of lupus nephritis
Measured: 2 years
Evaluation of the clinical response by SLEDAI
Patients will be monitored at frequent timepoints by the The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SELENA-SLEDAI), with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 105, with a higher score indicating a higher disease activity
Measured: 2 years
Evaluation of the clinical response by SLICC
SLICC damage score (System Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus) will be assesed at baseline, one year and two years, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 47, with a higher score indicating more damage
Measured: 2 years
Evaluation of the clinical response by QoL questionnaires
QoL questionnaires will be assessed at multiple time points by the SF-36 (ShortForm-36) questionnaire, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100, with a higher score indicating a higher quality of life
Measured: 2 years
Evaluation of the clinical response by the amount of moderate and severe flares.
Patients will be monitored at frequent timepoints
Measured: 2 years
Evaluation of the clinical response by the ability to reduce concomitant immunosuppression without flares
Patients will be monitored at frequent timepoints
Measured: 2 years
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Patients will be monitored at frequent timepoints
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Nov 2018
- Study start1 Oct 2018
- Primary completion22 Jun 2026
- Study completion22 Jun 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Multi-center
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Leiden University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dutch Kidney Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Y.K.Onno Teng, Leiden University Medical Center
- Investigators
- Dr. Y.K.O. Teng, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Leiden University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03747159
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL65720.058.18
- Acronym
- SynBioSe-2
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 12 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Arends EJ, Zlei M, Tipton CM, Cotic J, Osmani Z, de Bie FJ, Kamerling SWA, van Maurik A, Dimelow R, Gregan YI, Fox NL, Rabelink TJ, Roth DA, Sanz I, van Dongen JJM, van Kooten C, Teng YKO. Disruption of memory B-cell trafficking by belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Sep 1;63(9):2387-2398. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae286.
PubMed 38775637van Schaik M, Arends EJ, Soonawala D, van Ommen E, de Leeuw K, Limper M, van Paassen P, Huizinga TWJ, Toes REM, van Kooten C, Rotmans JI, Rabelink TJ, Teng YKO. Efficacy of belimumab combined with rituximab in severe systemic lupus erythematosus: study protocol for the phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label Synbiose 2 trial. Trials. 2022 Nov 12;23(1):939. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06874-w.
PubMed 36371234
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Trial to Investigate the Reset of Humoral Autoimmunity by Combining Belimumab With Rituximab in Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03747159
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SynBioSe-2 / NL65720.058.18
- Conditions
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
- Keywords
- systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus nephritis, systemic autoimmune disease, glomerulonephritis, autoimmune glomerulonephritis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, renal insufficiency, renal failure
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Leiden University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dutch Kidney Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Jun 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In follow-up of the previous SynBioSe Study the present study is a randomized controlled trial designed to further investigate the long-term clinical and imunological efficacy of combination B-cell targeting by starting treatment with belimumab (anti-BAFF) followed by rituximab(anti-CD20) in lupus nephritis patients.
Detailed description
Rationale:
The SynBioSe-1 study is the first study to comprehensively describe the clinical and immunological effects of combining rituximab (RTX) and belimumab (BLM) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). From the pioneering SynBioSe-1 study, we have learned that combining RTX+BLM was safe and well-tolerated with important clinical responses. Immunologically, we unexpectedly observed that long-term B-cell depletion was not achieved due to migration of mature B-cells triggered by depletion of BAFF serum levels. The latter observation was in contrast to the study's null-hypothesis that combination therapy would lead to long-term B-cell depletion. The contrary was demonstrated, namely the relative early recirculation of mature B-cells. As such, the immunological and clinical lessons from the SynBioSe-1 study in conjunction with accumulating data from several large studies on combination B-cell targeted treatment have led to the postulation that starting treatment with RTX+BLM would result in an improved B-cell targeting strategy, notably on tissue-resident autoreactive B-cells, associated with improved long-term clinical disease amelioration. Therefore, the present SynBioSe-2 study is designed to further investigate the long-term clinical and imunological efficacy of combination B-cell targeting by starting treatment with belimumab followed by rituximab.
Objectives:
The primary objective is to assess whether combination treatment BLM+RTX will lead to reduced treatment failure and the improvement of pivotal, SLE-specific autoimmune phenomena compared to SLE patients treated with standard of care.
Study design:
a multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label study
Study population:
SLE patients with a severe flare with major organ involvement or persistent high disease activity despite conventional treatment
Intervention:
In addition to standard therapy, SLE patients will receive self-administered, subcutaneous injections of belimumab every week for the entire study period and 2 infusions of rituximab 1000 mg on day 28 (week 4) and day 42 (week 6).
Main study parameters:
The primary clinical efficacy parameter is the treatment failure rate during the 2 years study period. Secondary endpoints are clinical and non-biased immunological effects of the treatment summarized as follows: reduction of disease relevant autoantibodies, in particular anti-dsDNA autoantibody production at 28 weeks, total renal response rate at 28 weeks, regression of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation at 28 weeks; sustained, long-term B-cell depletion during 104 weeks; sustained reduction of relevant anti-nuclear autoantibodies, including seroconversion during 104 weeks; and sustained regression of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation during 104 weeks. Additionally, the study will perform safety and toxicity monitoring according to Common toxicity Criteria (CTC) developed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) with the use of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and evaluate the reduction of concomitant immunosuppression and the number of moderate and severe flares during study follow-up.
Study duration: 104 weeks.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation and potential benefits:
The study will include SLE patients with a severe flare necessitating remission induction treatment with intensive immunosuppression. The use of belimumab followed by rituximab can ameliorate disease activity even more than conventional treatment in the short-term and contribute to the successful tapering of concomitant immunosuppressive treatment. The latter will possibly lead to the reduction of infectious complication as compared to conventional treatment. The risks are predominantly related to the side effect profile of rituximab and belimumab and infectious complications of long-term B-cell depletion.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Multi-center
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BLM+RTX treatment arm | Experimental | Drug: Belimumab InjectionIntervention 1 Belimumab injection: subcutaneous weekly injections with 200mg belimumab (BML) for the duration of the entire study period of two years. Intervention 2 Rituximab infusion: Two intravenously infusions of 1000mg rituximab (RTX) at week 4 and week 6 after the start of belimumab. Intervention 3: Standard of care: induction therapy with three intravenously infusions methylprednisolone of 1000mg (or 500mg if weight is below 60kg), oral prednisolone 60mg with a quick tapering scheme to reach 5mg in 10 weeks and mycofenolate mofetil start dosis 500mg twice daily with maximum dosis of 2000mg twice daily depending on tolerance and area under curve (AUC) aimed at 60mg*hour/L. |
| Standard of Care treatment arm | No intervention | –Intervention 1: Standard of care: induction therapy with three intravenously infusions methylprednisolone of 1000mg (or 500mg if weight is below 60kg), oral prednisolone 60mg with a quick tapering scheme to reach 5mg in 10 weeks and mycofenolate mofetil start dosis 500mg twice daily with maximum dosis of 2000mg twice daily depending on tolerance and area under curve (AUC) aimed at 60mg*hour/L. Optional intervention: (if patients flare or are non-responders on mycofenolate mofetil + prednisolone) : Two intravenously infusions of 1000mg rituximab at week 4 and week 6 after the start of belimumab. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Have a clinical diagnosis of SLE according to the SLICC criteria 2012
- Severe, active SLE disease defined as a situation in which 1 or more of the following criteria are met:
- New, persisting or progressive disease activity despite the use of conventional maintenance immunosuppressive treatment (e.g. mycophenolate or azathioprine)
- Positive for relevant SLE-specific autoantibodies defined as a situation in which 1 or more of the following criteria are met:
- Female subjects are eligible to enter the study if she is:
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Active pregnancy, as proven by a positive urine beta-HCG test or a positive serum beta-HCG
- Significant hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG < 4.0 g/L) or an IgA deficiency (IgA < 0.1 g/L)
- Immunization with a live vaccine 1 month before screening
- Active infection at time of screening, as follows:
- Have a historically positive HIV test or test positive at screening for HIV
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Belimumab InjectionAlso: Benlysta subcutaneous injection of 200mgWeekly injection of belimumab prior to two infusions of rituximab with continuation of the belimumab as maintenance therapy | Drug | BLM+RTX treatment arm |
Primary outcome
Treatment failure rate
Time frame: 2 years
The treatment failure rate will be measured at 104 weeks in both treatment arms with the hypothesis that lower treatment failure rates will be obtained in the RTX+BLM arm.
14 secondary outcomes
Change of disease relevant auto-antibodies present at baseline, in particular anti-dsDNA
Time frame: 28 weeks
Sustained change of autoantibody production
Time frame: 2 years
Seroconversion of disease relevant auto-antibodies
Time frame: 2 years
Change of memory B-cell numbers
Time frame: 28 weeks
Sustained change of memory B-cell numbers
Time frame: 2 years
Change of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation
Time frame: 28 weeks
Sustained change of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluation of the renal response
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluation of the clinical response by SLEDAI
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluation of the clinical response by SLICC
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluation of the clinical response by QoL questionnaires
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluation of the clinical response by the amount of moderate and severe flares.
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluation of the clinical response by the ability to reduce concomitant immunosuppression without flares
Time frame: 2 years
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38775637Arends EJ, Zlei M, Tipton CM, Cotic J, Osmani Z, de Bie FJ, Kamerling SWA, van Maurik A, Dimelow R, Gregan YI, Fox NL, Rabelink TJ, Roth DA, Sanz I, van Dongen JJM, van Kooten C, Teng YKO. Disruption of memory B-cell trafficking by belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Sep 1;63(9):2387-2398. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae286.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36371234van Schaik M, Arends EJ, Soonawala D, van Ommen E, de Leeuw K, Limper M, van Paassen P, Huizinga TWJ, Toes REM, van Kooten C, Rotmans JI, Rabelink TJ, Teng YKO. Efficacy of belimumab combined with rituximab in severe systemic lupus erythematosus: study protocol for the phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label Synbiose 2 trial. Trials. 2022 Nov 12;23(1):939. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06874-w.
Related trials for Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
RecruitingObservational study
Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRHa) in Ovarian Preservation in SLE Subjects Receiving Cyclophosphamide as Determined by Questionnaires
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Sle), Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (Poi)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Active, not recruiting
Fatigue in Lupus Intervention Programmes (FLIP)
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CLN-978, a Subcutaneously Administered CD19-directed T Cell Engager, in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
SLE, SLE (Systemic Lupus)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dr. Y.K.O. Teng, MD, PhD principal investigator
Leiden University Medical Center
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Belimumab Injection in people with Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 4 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment failure rate (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03747159, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2026.