AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 3NCT03745651

TRuE AD2 - An Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents and Adults With Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 3 study testing Ruxolitinib cream in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Incyte Corporation at 66 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ruxolitinib cream in adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis (AD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Ruxolitinib cream
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
618 participants
Where
66 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
20 Dec 2018to 9 Nov 2020
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adolescents aged ≥ 12 to 17 years, inclusive, and men and women aged ≥ 18 years.
  • Participants diagnosed with atopic dermatitis (AD) as defined by the Hanifin and Rajka criteria.
  • AD duration of at least 2 years.
  • Participants with an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 2 to 3 at Screening and Baseline (VC Period) and 0 to 4 at Week 8 (LTS Period).
  • Participants with percentage body surface area (%BSA) (excluding scalp) of AD involvement of 3% to 20% at Screening and Baseline (VC Period) and 0% to 20% at Week 8 (LTS Period).
  • Participants who agree to discontinue all agents used to treat AD from Screening through the final follow-up visit.
  • Participants who have at least 1 "target lesion" that measures approximately 10 cm^2 or more at Screening and Baseline. Lesion must be representative of the participant's disease state and not be located on the hands, feet, or genitalia.
  • Willingness to avoid pregnancy or fathering of children.

Who cannot join

  • Unstable course of AD (spontaneously improving or rapidly deteriorating) as determined by the investigator in the 4 weeks prior to Baseline.
  • Concurrent conditions and history of other diseases:
  • Immunocompromised.
  • Chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before Baseline.
  • Active acute bacterial, fungal, or viral skin infection within 1 week before Baseline.
  • Any other concomitant skin disorder, pigmentation, or extensive scarring that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the evaluation of AD lesions or compromise participant safety.
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Presence of AD lesions only on the hands or feet without prior history of involvement of other classical areas of involvement such as the face or the folds.
  • Other types of eczema.
  • Any serious illness or medical, physical, or psychiatric condition(s) that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with full participation in the study, including administration of study drug and attending required study visits; pose a significant risk to the participant; or interfere with interpretation of study data.
  • Use of any of the following treatments within the indicated washout period before Baseline:
  • 5 half-lives or 12 weeks, whichever is longer - biologic agents (e.g. dupilumab).
  • 4 weeks - systemic corticosteroids or adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs, cyclosporin, methotrexate, azathioprine, or other systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents (e.g. mycophenolate or tacrolimus).
  • 2 weeks - immunizations and sedating antihistamines, unless on long-term stable regimen (nonsedating antihistamines are permitted).
  • 1 week - use of other topical treatments for AD (other than bland emollients). Diluted sodium hypochlorite "bleach" baths are allowed as long as they do not exceed 2 baths per week and their frequency remains the same throughout the study.
  • Participants who have previously received Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, systemic or topical.
  • Ultraviolet (UV) light therapy or prolonged exposure to natural or artificial sources of UV radiation within 2 weeks prior to Baseline and/or intention to have such exposure during the study, which is thought by the investigator to potentially impact the participant's AD.
  • Positive serology test results at screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody.
  • Liver function tests: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 2 × upper limit of normal (ULN); alkaline phosphatase and/or bilirubin > 1.5 × ULN (isolated bilirubin > 1.5 × ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin < 35%).
  • Pregnant or lactating participants, or those considering pregnancy.
  • History of alcoholism or drug addiction within 1 year before screening or current alcohol or drug use that, in the opinion of the investigator, will interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the administration schedule and study assessments.
  • Current treatment or treatment within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before Baseline with another investigational medication or current enrollment in another investigational drug protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

66 sites in 7 countries.

66 sites in 7 countries

United States35 sites
  • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Anderson

    Anderson, South Carolina, 29621

  • Delricht Clinical Research - Clinedge - PPDS Baton Rouge

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809

  • Hassman Research Institute

    Berlin, New Jersey, 08009

  • University Of Alabama At Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Northwest Clinical Trials Clinedge

    Boise, Idaho, 83704

  • PI Coor Clinical Research LLC

    Burke, Virginia, 22015

  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516

  • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Cincinnati

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45236

  • Ohio Pediatric Research Association

    Dayton, Ohio, 45414

  • Hamzavi Dermatology

    Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059

  • Epiphany Dermatology Fort Worth

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76244

  • Center For Dermatology Cosmetic And Laser Surgery

    Fremont, California, 94538

  • Skin Laser and Surgery specialists of New York and New Jersey LLC

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • Marvel Clinical Research - Clinedge - PPDS

    Huntington Beach, California, 92647

  • Olympian Clinical Research

    Largo, Florida, 33770

  • Jubilee Clinical Research - BTC - PPDS

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106

  • Tanner Clinic

    Layton, Utah, 84041

  • Derm Research LLC

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40217

  • Dermatology Specialists PSC

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40241

  • San Marcus Research Clinic Inc

    Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014

  • Allergy And Asthma Associates Of Southern California - CRN

    Mission Viejo, California, 92691

  • International Clinical Research Tennessee LLC

    Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 37130

  • Michael W Simon MD Office

    Nicholasville, Kentucky, 40356

  • Advanced Research Institute

    Ogden, Utah, 84405

  • ActivMed Practices & Research Inc

    Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801

  • Clinical Research Partners LLC

    Richmond, Virginia, 23220

  • Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Synexus Clinical Research US Inc. Santa Rosa

    Santa Rosa, California, 95405

  • Well Pharma Medical Research Corporation

    South Miami, Florida, 33143

  • Dermatology Specialists of Spokane

    Spokane, Washington, 99202

  • Clinical Research Atlanta - ERN - PPDS

    Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281

  • Derm Research Center Of New York Inc

    Stony Brook, New York, 11790

  • Forward Clinical Trials Inc

    Tampa, Florida, 33624

  • Center for Clinical Studies

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Randall Dermatology

    West Lafayette, Indiana, 47906

Other trials in United States

Poland10 sites
  • Synexus Affiliate - Bialystok - ClinicMed Daniluk, Nowak Spółka Jawna

    Bialystok, 15-879

  • Centrum Badan Klinicznych PI-House sp. z o.o.

    Gdansk, 80-546

  • Synexus - Gdynia

    Gdynia, 81-537

  • Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita

    Katowice, 40-611

  • Synexus Affiliate - Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne

    Krakow, 31-501

  • Twoja Przychodnia - Szczecińskie Centrum Medyczne

    Szczecin, 71-434

  • Synexus - Warsaw

    Warsaw, 01-192

  • Centrum Medyczne Matusiak

    Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 50-566

  • EMC Instytut Medyczny S.A.

    Wroclaw, 50-220

  • Wro Medica

    Wroclaw, 51-685

Other trials in Poland

Bulgaria5 sites
  • Medical Center Unimed EOOD

    Sevlievo, Gabrovo, 5400

  • Medical Center Excelsior OOD - PPDS

    Sofia, 1421

  • Diagnostic Consultative Center XXVIII - Sofia - EOOD

    Sofia, 1592

  • Synexus - Medical Center Synexus Sofia EOOD

    Sofia, 1784

  • Synexus - Medical Centre Synexus Sofia EOOD (branch - Stara Zagora)

    Stara Zagora, 6000

Other trials in Bulgaria

Czechia5 sites
  • Dermamedica, s.r.o. - Kozni Ambulance Nachod

    Náchod, 547 01

  • CTCenter MaVe s.r.o.

    Olomouc, 779 00

  • CCR Ostrava, s.r.o.

    Ostrava, 702 00

  • Synexus Affiliate - CLINTRIAL s.r.o.

    Prague, 100 00

  • Synexus Czech s.r.o.

    Prague, 120 00

Other trials in Czechia

Spain5 sites
  • Hospital General Universitario de Alicante

    Alicante, 3010

  • Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08025

  • Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofia

    Córdoba, 14001

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz - PPDS

    Madrid, 28046

  • Hospital de Manises

    Manises, Valencia, 46940

Other trials in Spain

Canada3 sites
  • The Centre For Clinical Trials Inc.

    Oakville, L617W5

  • Dermatology Ottawa Research Centre

    Ottawa, K2C 3N2

  • Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc.

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4

Other trials in Canada

Germany3 sites
  • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 10117

  • Hautarztpraxis Mahlow

    Brandenburg, 15831

  • Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein

    Kiel, 24105

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Topical Ruxolitinib Evaluation in Atopic Dermatitis Study 2 (TRuE AD2) - A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, 8-Week, Vehicle-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream Followed by a Long-Term Safety Extension Period in Adolescents and Adults With Atopic Dermatitis

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ruxolitinib cream in adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Being tested
Ruxolitinib cream, Vehicle cream
Keywords
Atopic dermatitis, pruritus, eczema, topical therapy, JAK inhibitor
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic, Pruritus, Eczema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ruxolitinib creamDrug

    Also called INCB018424 phosphate cream

    Ruxolitinib 0.75% or 1.5% cream.

  • Vehicle creamDrug

    Ruxolitinib matching vehicle cream.

Study groups in NCT03745651
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vehicle Control (VC) Period: Vehicle Cream BIDPlacebo comparatorParticipants received ruxolitinib matching vehicle cream, applied topically to the affected areas as a thin film twice daily (BID) 8 hours apart from Day 1 up to Week 8. Participants applied cream BID to areas identified at Baseline even if the areas improved.
Receives: Drug: Vehicle cream
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDExperimentalParticipants received ruxolitinib 0.75% cream, applied topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID 8 hours apart from Day 1 up to Week 8. Participants applied cream BID to areas identified at Baseline even if the areas improved.
Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream
VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDExperimentalParticipants received ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, applied topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID 8 hours apart from Day 1 up to Week 8. Participants applied cream BID to areas identified at Baseline even if the areas improved.
Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream
Long-Term Safety (LTS) Period: Vehicle Cream to Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDExperimentalParticipants who applied vehicle cream during the VC Period were randomized at Week 8 to apply ruxolitinib 0.75% cream, topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID as needed from Week 8 up to Week 52. Participants stopped treatment 3 days after lesions disappeared and restarted at the first sign of recurrence.
Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream
LTS Period: Vehicle Cream to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDExperimentalParticipants who applied vehicle cream during the VC Period were randomized at Week 8 to apply ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID as needed from Week 8 up to Week 52. Participants stopped treatment 3 days after lesions disappeared and restarted at the first sign of recurrence.
Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream
LTS Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BIDExperimentalParticipants who applied ruxolitinib 0.75% cream during the VC Period, continued applying ruxolitinib 0.75% cream, topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID as needed from Week 8 up to Week 52. Participants stopped treatment 3 days after lesions disappeared and restarted at the first sign of recurrence.
Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream
LTS Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BIDExperimentalParticipants who applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream during the VC Period, continued applying ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID as needed from Week 8 up to Week 52. Participants stopped treatment 3 days after lesions disappeared and restarted at the first sign of recurrence.
Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment - Treatment Success (IGA-TS) at Week 8

    The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting. The IGA-TS is defined as an IGA score of 0 (clear skin) or 1 (almost clear skin) with ≥ 2 grade improvement from Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 8

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Week 8

    EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of at least 8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 and the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. An EASI75 responder was defined as a participant achieving 75% or greater improvement from Baseline in EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 8

  2. VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 4-Point Improvement in Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 8

    The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants are asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best describes their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 8

  3. VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful (≥ 6-Point) Improvement in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b - 24-Hour Recall) Score at Week 8

    The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep. This questionnaire is completed in the morning by the participant where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep disturbance. It is a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 8

  4. VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful (≥ 6-Point) Improvement in the PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a - 24-Hour Recall) Score at Week 8

    The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of alertness, sleepiness, and tiredness during usual waking hours and the perceived functional impairments during wakefulness associated with sleep problems or impaired alertness. The questionnaire is filled in the evening where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep impairment. It has 8 simple questions with a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep-related impairment. Each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep impairment.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 8

  5. VC Period: Percentage of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or an important medical event may be considered serious when, based on appropriate medical judgment, the event may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. A TEAE or treatment emergent SAE is any AE or SAE either reported for first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug.

    Measured: From date of randomization up to Week 8

  6. LTS Period: Percentage of Participants With at Least One TEAE and Treatment Emergent SAE

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or an important medical event may be considered serious when, based on appropriate medical judgment, the event may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. A TEAE or treatment emergent SAE is any AE or SAE either reported for first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug.

    Measured: From first dose date in LTS Period (Week 8) until last follow-up visit (up to 52 weeks)

  7. VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA-TS at Weeks 2 and 4

    The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting. The IGA-TS is defined as an IGA score of 0 (clear skin) or 1 (almost clear skin) with ≥ 2 grade improvement from Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4

  8. VC Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA of 0 or 1

    The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  9. LTS Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA of 0 or 1

    The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting.

    Measured: Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52

  10. VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4

    The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants are asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best describes their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4

  11. VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI50

    EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of at least 8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 and the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. An EASI50 responder was defined as a participant achieving 50% or greater improvement from Baseline in EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  12. VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI75 at Weeks 2 and 4

    EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of at least 8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 and the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. An EASI75 responder was defined as a participant achieving 75% or greater improvement from Baseline in EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4

  13. VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI90

    EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of at least 8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 and the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. An EASI90 responder was defined as a participant achieving 90% or greater improvement from Baseline in EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  14. VC Period: Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score

    EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of at least 8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 and the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  15. VC Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score

    The SCORAD is a tool to assess extent and severity of eczema. To determine the extent, the rule of nines or handprint method is used to assess eczema affected area (A). To determine disease severity (B) it evaluates 6 clinical characteristics: 1. redness, 2. swelling, 3. oozing/crusting, 4. scratch marks, 5. lichenification, and 6. dryness on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), added to give B with maximum score of 18. Subjective symptoms (C) of itch and sleeplessness are assessed using a visual analogue scale where 0 is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and 10 is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness), added to give C with maximum score of 20. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combined using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  16. VC Period: Change From Baseline in Itch NRS Score

    The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants are asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best describes their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  17. VC Period: Time to Achieve Itch NRS Score Improvement of at Least 2, 3, or 4 Points

    The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants are asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best describes their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. Kaplan-Meier estimation method was used for analyses.

    Measured: Up to Week 8

  18. VC Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score

    The Skin Pain NRS is a daily patient-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of pain intensity from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) using a diary. Participants will be asked, "Rate the pain severity from your atopic dermatitis skin changes by selecting a number that best describes your worst level of pain in the past 24 hours." A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  19. VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful (≥ 6-Point) Improvement in the PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) 24-Hour Recall Score at Weeks 2 and 4

    The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep. This questionnaire is completed in the morning by the participant where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep disturbance. It is a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance.

    Measured: Weeks 2 and 4

  20. VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful (≥ 6-Point) Improvement in the PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) 24-Hour Recall Score at Weeks 2 and 4

    The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of alertness, sleepiness, and tiredness during usual waking hours and the perceived functional impairments during wakefulness associated with sleep problems or impaired alertness. The questionnaire is filled in the evening where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep impairment. It has 8 simple questions with a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep-related impairment.

    Measured: Weeks 2 and 4

  21. VC Period: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) 24-Hour Recall Score

    The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep. This questionnaire is completed in the morning by the participant where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep disturbance. It is a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  22. VC Period: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) 24-Hour Recall Score

    The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of alertness, sleepiness, and tiredness during usual waking hours and the perceived functional impairments during wakefulness associated with sleep problems or impaired alertness. The questionnaire is filled in the evening where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep impairment. It has 8 simple questions with a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep-related impairment. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  23. LTS Period: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) 7-Day Recall Score

    The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of alertness, sleepiness, and tiredness during usual waking hours and the perceived functional impairments during wakefulness associated with sleep problems or impaired alertness. The questionnaire is filled in the evening where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep impairment. It has 8 simple questions with a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep-related impairment. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 52

  24. LTS Period: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) 7-Day Recall Score

    The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep. This questionnaire is completed in the morning by the participant where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep disturbance. It is a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 52

  25. VC Period: Change From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Afflicted Percentage of Body Surface Area (%BSA)

    Body surface area affected by AD was assessed for 4 separate body regions and is collected as part of the EASI assessment: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region was assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. The overall total percentage was reported based off of all 4 body regions combined, after applying specific multipliers to the different body regions to account for the percent of the total BSA represented by each of the 4 regions. Use the percentage of skin affected for each region (0 to 100%) in EASI as follows: BSA Total = 0.1*BSA head and neck + 0.3*BSA trunk + 0.2* BSA upper limbs + 0.4*BSA lower limbs. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  26. LTS Period: Change From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Afflicted %BSA

    Body surface area affected by AD was assessed for 4 separate body regions and is collected as part of the EASI assessment: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region was assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. The overall total percentage was reported based off of all 4 body regions combined, after applying specific multipliers to the different body regions to account for the percent of the total BSA represented by each of the 4 regions. Use the percentage of skin affected for each region (0 to 100%) in EASI as follows: BSA Total = 0.1*BSA head and neck + 0.3*BSA trunk + 0.2* BSA upper limbs + 0.4*BSA lower limbs. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

  27. VC Period: Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score

    The POEM is a 7-question quality-of-life assessment that asks how many days the participant has been bothered by various aspects of their skin condition during the past 7 days. It assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) on a scale ranging from 0-4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days, 4 = everyday). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). High scores are indicative of more severe disease and poor quality of life. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  28. LTS Period: Change From Baseline in POEM Score

    The POEM is a 7-question quality-of-life assessment that asks how many days the participant has been bothered by various aspects of their skin condition during the past 7 days. It assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) on a scale ranging from 0-4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days, 4 = everyday). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). High scores are indicative of more severe disease and poor quality of life. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52

  29. VC Period: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score

    The DLQI is a simple, 10 question (Q) validated quality-of-life questionnaire to measure how much the skin problem has affected the participant. It covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings (Q1 and Q2), daily activities (Q3 and Q4), leisure (Q5 and Q6), work and school (Q7), personal relationships (Q8 and Q9), and treatment(Q10). The recall Period of this scale is over the last week. Response categories include 0-not at all, 1-a little, 2-a lot, and 3-very much, and unanswered or not relevant responses scored as 0. Scores range from 0 ("no impact on participant's life") to 30 ("extremely large effect on participant's life"), and a 4-point change from Baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. A negative change from Baseline indicates less impact of the skin problem on participant's life.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  30. LTS Period: Change From Baseline in DLQI Score

    The DLQI is a simple, 10 question (Q) validated quality-of-life questionnaire to measure how much the skin problem has affected the participant. It covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings (Q1 and Q2), daily activities (Q3 and Q4), leisure (Q5 and Q6), work and school (Q7), personal relationships (Q8 and Q9), and treatment(Q10). The recall Period of this scale is over the last week. Response categories include 0-not at all, 1-a little, 2-a lot, and 3-very much, and unanswered or not relevant responses scored as 0. Scores range from 0 ("no impact on participant's life") to 30 ("extremely large effect on participant's life"), and a 4-point change from Baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. A negative change from Baseline indicates less impact of the skin problem on participant's life.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 52

  31. VC Period: Change From Baseline in Children Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score

    CDLQI is the youth/children's version of the DLQI. The CDLQI is a simple 10 question (Q) validated quality-of-life questionnaire. It covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings (Q1 and Q2), leisure (Q4, Q5, and Q6), school or holidays (Q7), personal relationships (Q3 and Q8), sleep (Q9) and treatment (Q10). Response categories include 0-not at all, 1-a little, 2-a lot, and 3-very much, and unanswered or not relevant responses scored as 0. The total DLQI score is calculated by adding the score of each question resulting in a maximum score of 30 (extremely large effect on participant's life) and a minimum score of 0 (no impact on participant's life) and a 4-point change from Baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. A negative change from Baseline indicates less impact of the skin problem on participant's life.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  32. LTS Period: Change From Baseline in CDLQI Score

    CDLQI is the youth/children's version of the DLQI. The CDLQI is a simple 10 question (Q) validated quality-of-life questionnaire. It covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings (Q1 and Q2), leisure (Q4, Q5, and Q6), school or holidays (Q7), personal relationships (Q3 and Q8), sleep (Q9) and treatment (Q10). Response categories include 0-not at all, 1-a little, 2-a lot, and 3-very much, and unanswered or not relevant responses scored as 0. The total DLQI score is calculated by adding the score of each question resulting in a maximum score of 30 (extremely large effect on participant's life) and a minimum score of 0 (no impact on participant's life) and a 4-point change from Baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. A negative change from Baseline indicates less impact of the skin problem on participant's life.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 52

  33. VC Period: Mean Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8

    The PGIC is a participants' self-reporting measure that reflects their belief about the efficacy of treatment. It is a 7-point scale where participants rate the questions as: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse. The lower score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  34. VC Period: Percentage of Participants With Each Score on the PGIC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8

    The PGIC is a participants' self-reporting measure that reflects their belief about the efficacy of treatment. It is a 7-point scale where participants rate the questions as: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse. The lower score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  35. VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Score of Either 1 or 2 on the PGIC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8

    The PGIC is a participants' self-reporting measure that reflects their belief about the efficacy of treatment. It is a 7-point scale where participants rate the questions as: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse. The lower score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  36. VC Period: Change From Baseline in EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

    EQ-5D-5L questionnaire has 2 parts: EQ-5D-5L descriptive system \& EQ-VAS. EQ-5D is a validated, self-administered, generic utility questionnaire wherein participants rate their current health state based on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. 5L indicates that for each dimension, there are 5 levels:1=no problems,2=slight problems,3=moderate problems,4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L score is assessed using VAS that ranges from 0 to 100 millimetres (mm), where 0 indicates "worst health you can imagine" and 100 indicates "best health you can imagine". The participant was asked to indicate his/her health state over past 7 days in each of the 5 dimensions. Digits for the 5 dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the participant's health state. In the EQ-VAS, participants had to record their health state on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  37. VC Period: Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Version 2.0 (v2.0)

    The WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant questionnaire developed to measure the effect of overall health and specific symptoms on productivity at work and regular activities outside of it in the past 7 days. The WPAI-SHP consists of 6 questions as follows: 1=currently employed; 2=hours missed due to AD; 3=hours missed other reasons; 4=hours actually worked; 5=degree AD affected productivity while working; 6=degree AD affected regular activities and the computed percentage, range for each sub scale is from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  38. LTS Period: Change From Baseline in WPAI-SHP v2.0

    The WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant questionnaire developed to measure the effect of overall health and specific symptoms on productivity at work and regular activities outside of it in the past 7 days. The WPAI-SHP consists of 6 questions as follows: 1=currently employed; 2=hours missed due to AD; 3=hours missed other reasons; 4=hours actually worked; 5=degree AD affected productivity while working; 6=degree AD affected regular activities and the computed percentage, range for each sub scale is from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52

  39. VC Period: Trough Plasma Concentrations of Ruxolitinib

    Plasma samples were collected just before the morning application of study drug during each specified time point.

    Measured: Pre-dose at Weeks 2, 4 and 8

  40. LTS Period: Trough Plasma Concentrations of Ruxolitinib

    Plasma samples were collected just before the morning application of study drug during each specified time point.

    Measured: Pre-dose at Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Nov 2018
  2. Study start20 Dec 2018
  3. Primary completion18 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion9 Nov 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
618 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03745651
Sponsor's protocol ID
INCB 18424-304
Other IDs
2018-003713-18, 2018
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
15 Nov 2018
Last updated
28 Sep 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Blauvelt A, Kircik L, Simpson EL, Lio P, Eichenfield LF, Prajapati VH, Grewal P, Lynde C, Hong HC, Sturm D, Kallender H, Ren H, Paranagama D, Wong GKW, Geng B. Ruxolitinib Cream As-Needed Monotherapy Demonstrates Sustained Disease and Symptom Control in Patients with Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Analysis from Two Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Mar;16(3):1635-1646. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01639-0. Epub 2026 Feb 12.

    PubMed 41678112
  • Simpson EL, Augustin M, Thaci D, Misery L, Armstrong AW, Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Szepietowski JC, Boguniewicz M, Kwatra SG, Kallender H, Sturm D, Ren H, Kircik L. Ruxolitinib Cream Monotherapy Improved Symptoms and Quality of Life in Adults and Adolescents with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: Patient-Reported Outcomes from Two Phase III Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Jan;26(1):121-137. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00901-z. Epub 2024 Nov 15.

    PubMed 39546129
  • Blauvelt A, Kallender H, Sturm D, Li Q, Ren H, Eichenfield LF. Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Atopic Dermatitis Based on Previous Medication History. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;14(11):3161-3174. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01272-3. Epub 2024 Oct 7.

    PubMed 39375281
  • Simpson EL, Kircik L, Blauvelt A, Kallender H, Sturm D, Wang M, Eichenfield LF. Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents/Adults with Atopic Dermatitis Meeting Severity Thresholds for Systemic Therapy: Exploratory Analysis of Pooled Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;14(8):2139-2151. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01219-8. Epub 2024 Jul 12.

    PubMed 38995504
  • Eichenfield LF, Simpson EL, Papp K, Szepietowski JC, Blauvelt A, Kircik L, Silverberg JI, Siegfried EC, Kuligowski ME, Venturanza ME, Kallender H, Ren H, Paller AS. Efficacy, Safety, and Long-Term Disease Control of Ruxolitinib Cream Among Adolescents with Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Results from Two Randomized Phase 3 Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024 Jul;25(4):669-683. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00855-2. Epub 2024 May 2.

    PubMed 38698175
  • Papp K, Szepietowski JC, Kircik L, Toth D, Eichenfield LF, Forman SB, Kuligowski ME, Kallender H, Sun K, Ren H, Simpson EL. Long-term safety and disease control with ruxolitinib cream in atopic dermatitis: Results from two phase 3 studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 May;88(5):1008-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.09.060. Epub 2022 Nov 26.

    PubMed 36574595
  • Bloudek L, Eichenfield LF, Silverberg JI, Joish VN, Lofland JH, Sun K, Augustin M, Migliaccio-Walle K, Sullivan SD. Impact of Ruxolitinib Cream on Work Productivity and Activity Impairment and Associated Indirect Costs in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Results From Two Phase III Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Jan;24(1):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00734-8. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

    PubMed 36264430
  • Gong X, Chen X, Kuligowski ME, Liu X, Liu X, Cimino E, McGee R, Yeleswaram S. Pharmacokinetics of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Treated With Ruxolitinib Cream: Data from Phase II and III Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Jul;22(4):555-566. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00610-x. Epub 2021 May 12.

    PubMed 33982267
  • Papp K, Szepietowski JC, Kircik L, Toth D, Eichenfield LF, Leung DYM, Forman SB, Venturanza ME, Sun K, Kuligowski ME, Simpson EL. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: Results from 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Oct;85(4):863-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.04.085. Epub 2021 May 4.

    PubMed 33957195
  • Scuron MD, Fay BL, Connell AJ, Peel MT, Smith PA. Ruxolitinib Cream Has Dual Efficacy on Pruritus and Inflammation in Experimental Dermatitis. Front Immunol. 2021 Feb 15;11:620098. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.620098. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 33658996

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Ruxolitinib cream in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Incyte Corporation at 66 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 66 sites in United States, Poland, Bulgaria, Czechia, Spain and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Dec 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment - Treatment Success (IGA-TS) at Week 8 (time frame: Baseline to Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03745651, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in