Atopic DermatitisPhase 3NCT03745651
TRuE AD2 - An Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents and Adults With Atopic Dermatitis
A Phase 3 study testing Ruxolitinib cream in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Incyte Corporation at 66 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ruxolitinib cream in adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis (AD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Ruxolitinib cream
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 618 participants
- Where
- 66 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 20 Dec 2018to 9 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adolescents aged ≥ 12 to 17 years, inclusive, and men and women aged ≥ 18 years.
- Participants diagnosed with atopic dermatitis (AD) as defined by the Hanifin and Rajka criteria.
- AD duration of at least 2 years.
- Participants with an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 2 to 3 at Screening and Baseline (VC Period) and 0 to 4 at Week 8 (LTS Period).
- Participants with percentage body surface area (%BSA) (excluding scalp) of AD involvement of 3% to 20% at Screening and Baseline (VC Period) and 0% to 20% at Week 8 (LTS Period).
- Participants who agree to discontinue all agents used to treat AD from Screening through the final follow-up visit.
- Participants who have at least 1 "target lesion" that measures approximately 10 cm^2 or more at Screening and Baseline. Lesion must be representative of the participant's disease state and not be located on the hands, feet, or genitalia.
- Willingness to avoid pregnancy or fathering of children.
Who cannot join
- Unstable course of AD (spontaneously improving or rapidly deteriorating) as determined by the investigator in the 4 weeks prior to Baseline.
- Concurrent conditions and history of other diseases:
- Immunocompromised.
- Chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before Baseline.
- Active acute bacterial, fungal, or viral skin infection within 1 week before Baseline.
- Any other concomitant skin disorder, pigmentation, or extensive scarring that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the evaluation of AD lesions or compromise participant safety.
Show all 21Show fewer
- Presence of AD lesions only on the hands or feet without prior history of involvement of other classical areas of involvement such as the face or the folds.
- Other types of eczema.
- Any serious illness or medical, physical, or psychiatric condition(s) that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with full participation in the study, including administration of study drug and attending required study visits; pose a significant risk to the participant; or interfere with interpretation of study data.
- Use of any of the following treatments within the indicated washout period before Baseline:
- 5 half-lives or 12 weeks, whichever is longer - biologic agents (e.g. dupilumab).
- 4 weeks - systemic corticosteroids or adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs, cyclosporin, methotrexate, azathioprine, or other systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating agents (e.g. mycophenolate or tacrolimus).
- 2 weeks - immunizations and sedating antihistamines, unless on long-term stable regimen (nonsedating antihistamines are permitted).
- 1 week - use of other topical treatments for AD (other than bland emollients). Diluted sodium hypochlorite "bleach" baths are allowed as long as they do not exceed 2 baths per week and their frequency remains the same throughout the study.
- Participants who have previously received Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, systemic or topical.
- Ultraviolet (UV) light therapy or prolonged exposure to natural or artificial sources of UV radiation within 2 weeks prior to Baseline and/or intention to have such exposure during the study, which is thought by the investigator to potentially impact the participant's AD.
- Positive serology test results at screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody.
- Liver function tests: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 2 × upper limit of normal (ULN); alkaline phosphatase and/or bilirubin > 1.5 × ULN (isolated bilirubin > 1.5 × ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin < 35%).
- Pregnant or lactating participants, or those considering pregnancy.
- History of alcoholism or drug addiction within 1 year before screening or current alcohol or drug use that, in the opinion of the investigator, will interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the administration schedule and study assessments.
- Current treatment or treatment within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before Baseline with another investigational medication or current enrollment in another investigational drug protocol.
Trial locations and contacts
66 sites in 7 countries.
66 sites in 7 countries
United States35 sites
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Anderson
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
Delricht Clinical Research - Clinedge - PPDS Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Hassman Research Institute
Berlin, New Jersey, 08009
University Of Alabama At Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Northwest Clinical Trials Clinedge
Boise, Idaho, 83704
PI Coor Clinical Research LLC
Burke, Virginia, 22015
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. - Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45236
Ohio Pediatric Research Association
Dayton, Ohio, 45414
Hamzavi Dermatology
Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059
Epiphany Dermatology Fort Worth
Fort Worth, Texas, 76244
Center For Dermatology Cosmetic And Laser Surgery
Fremont, California, 94538
Skin Laser and Surgery specialists of New York and New Jersey LLC
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Marvel Clinical Research - Clinedge - PPDS
Huntington Beach, California, 92647
Olympian Clinical Research
Largo, Florida, 33770
Jubilee Clinical Research - BTC - PPDS
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Tanner Clinic
Layton, Utah, 84041
Derm Research LLC
Louisville, Kentucky, 40217
Dermatology Specialists PSC
Louisville, Kentucky, 40241
San Marcus Research Clinic Inc
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014
Allergy And Asthma Associates Of Southern California - CRN
Mission Viejo, California, 92691
International Clinical Research Tennessee LLC
Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 37130
Michael W Simon MD Office
Nicholasville, Kentucky, 40356
Advanced Research Institute
Ogden, Utah, 84405
ActivMed Practices & Research Inc
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801
Clinical Research Partners LLC
Richmond, Virginia, 23220
Dermatology Clinical Research Center of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Synexus Clinical Research US Inc. Santa Rosa
Santa Rosa, California, 95405
Well Pharma Medical Research Corporation
South Miami, Florida, 33143
Dermatology Specialists of Spokane
Spokane, Washington, 99202
Clinical Research Atlanta - ERN - PPDS
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281
Derm Research Center Of New York Inc
Stony Brook, New York, 11790
Forward Clinical Trials Inc
Tampa, Florida, 33624
Center for Clinical Studies
Webster, Texas, 77598
Randall Dermatology
West Lafayette, Indiana, 47906
Poland10 sites
Synexus Affiliate - Bialystok - ClinicMed Daniluk, Nowak Spółka Jawna
Bialystok, 15-879
Centrum Badan Klinicznych PI-House sp. z o.o.
Gdansk, 80-546
Synexus - Gdynia
Gdynia, 81-537
Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita
Katowice, 40-611
Synexus Affiliate - Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne
Krakow, 31-501
Twoja Przychodnia - Szczecińskie Centrum Medyczne
Szczecin, 71-434
Synexus - Warsaw
Warsaw, 01-192
Centrum Medyczne Matusiak
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 50-566
EMC Instytut Medyczny S.A.
Wroclaw, 50-220
Wro Medica
Wroclaw, 51-685
Bulgaria5 sites
Medical Center Unimed EOOD
Sevlievo, Gabrovo, 5400
Medical Center Excelsior OOD - PPDS
Sofia, 1421
Diagnostic Consultative Center XXVIII - Sofia - EOOD
Sofia, 1592
Synexus - Medical Center Synexus Sofia EOOD
Sofia, 1784
Synexus - Medical Centre Synexus Sofia EOOD (branch - Stara Zagora)
Stara Zagora, 6000
Czechia5 sites
Dermamedica, s.r.o. - Kozni Ambulance Nachod
Náchod, 547 01
CTCenter MaVe s.r.o.
Olomouc, 779 00
CCR Ostrava, s.r.o.
Ostrava, 702 00
Synexus Affiliate - CLINTRIAL s.r.o.
Prague, 100 00
Synexus Czech s.r.o.
Prague, 120 00
Spain5 sites
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
Alicante, 3010
Hospital de La Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025
Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofia
Córdoba, 14001
Hospital Universitario La Paz - PPDS
Madrid, 28046
Hospital de Manises
Manises, Valencia, 46940
Canada3 sites
The Centre For Clinical Trials Inc.
Oakville, L617W5
Dermatology Ottawa Research Centre
Ottawa, K2C 3N2
Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc.
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4
Germany3 sites
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117
Hautarztpraxis Mahlow
Brandenburg, 15831
Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
Kiel, 24105
About this study
Official title: Topical Ruxolitinib Evaluation in Atopic Dermatitis Study 2 (TRuE AD2) - A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, 8-Week, Vehicle-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream Followed by a Long-Term Safety Extension Period in Adolescents and Adults With Atopic Dermatitis
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ruxolitinib cream in adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis (AD).
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Ruxolitinib cream, Vehicle cream
- Keywords
- Atopic dermatitis, pruritus, eczema, topical therapy, JAK inhibitor
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic, Pruritus, Eczema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ruxolitinib creamDrug
Also called INCB018424 phosphate cream
Ruxolitinib 0.75% or 1.5% cream.
Vehicle creamDrug
Ruxolitinib matching vehicle cream.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle Control (VC) Period: Vehicle Cream BID | Placebo comparator | Participants received ruxolitinib matching vehicle cream, applied topically to the affected areas as a thin film twice daily (BID) 8 hours apart from Day 1 up to Week 8. Participants applied cream BID to areas identified at Baseline even if the areas improved. Receives: Drug: Vehicle cream |
| VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BID | Experimental | Participants received ruxolitinib 0.75% cream, applied topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID 8 hours apart from Day 1 up to Week 8. Participants applied cream BID to areas identified at Baseline even if the areas improved. Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream |
| VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID | Experimental | Participants received ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, applied topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID 8 hours apart from Day 1 up to Week 8. Participants applied cream BID to areas identified at Baseline even if the areas improved. Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream |
| Long-Term Safety (LTS) Period: Vehicle Cream to Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BID | Experimental | Participants who applied vehicle cream during the VC Period were randomized at Week 8 to apply ruxolitinib 0.75% cream, topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID as needed from Week 8 up to Week 52. Participants stopped treatment 3 days after lesions disappeared and restarted at the first sign of recurrence. Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream |
| LTS Period: Vehicle Cream to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID | Experimental | Participants who applied vehicle cream during the VC Period were randomized at Week 8 to apply ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID as needed from Week 8 up to Week 52. Participants stopped treatment 3 days after lesions disappeared and restarted at the first sign of recurrence. Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream |
| LTS Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BID | Experimental | Participants who applied ruxolitinib 0.75% cream during the VC Period, continued applying ruxolitinib 0.75% cream, topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID as needed from Week 8 up to Week 52. Participants stopped treatment 3 days after lesions disappeared and restarted at the first sign of recurrence. Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream |
| LTS Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID | Experimental | Participants who applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream during the VC Period, continued applying ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID as needed from Week 8 up to Week 52. Participants stopped treatment 3 days after lesions disappeared and restarted at the first sign of recurrence. Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib cream |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment - Treatment Success (IGA-TS) at Week 8
The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting. The IGA-TS is defined as an IGA score of 0 (clear skin) or 1 (almost clear skin) with ≥ 2 grade improvement from Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to Week 8
Secondary outcomes (40)
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Week 8
EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of at least 8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 and the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. An EASI75 responder was defined as a participant achieving 75% or greater improvement from Baseline in EASI score.
Measured: Baseline to Week 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 4-Point Improvement in Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 8
The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants are asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best describes their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.
Measured: Baseline to Week 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful (≥ 6-Point) Improvement in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b - 24-Hour Recall) Score at Week 8
The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep. This questionnaire is completed in the morning by the participant where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep disturbance. It is a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance.
Measured: Baseline to Week 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful (≥ 6-Point) Improvement in the PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a - 24-Hour Recall) Score at Week 8
The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of alertness, sleepiness, and tiredness during usual waking hours and the perceived functional impairments during wakefulness associated with sleep problems or impaired alertness. The questionnaire is filled in the evening where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep impairment. It has 8 simple questions with a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep-related impairment. Each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep impairment.
Measured: Baseline to Week 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or an important medical event may be considered serious when, based on appropriate medical judgment, the event may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. A TEAE or treatment emergent SAE is any AE or SAE either reported for first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug.
Measured: From date of randomization up to Week 8
LTS Period: Percentage of Participants With at Least One TEAE and Treatment Emergent SAE
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or an important medical event may be considered serious when, based on appropriate medical judgment, the event may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. A TEAE or treatment emergent SAE is any AE or SAE either reported for first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug.
Measured: From first dose date in LTS Period (Week 8) until last follow-up visit (up to 52 weeks)
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA-TS at Weeks 2 and 4
The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting. The IGA-TS is defined as an IGA score of 0 (clear skin) or 1 (almost clear skin) with ≥ 2 grade improvement from Baseline.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA of 0 or 1
The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4 and 8
LTS Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA of 0 or 1
The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting.
Measured: Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4
The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants are asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best describes their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI50
EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of at least 8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 and the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. An EASI50 responder was defined as a participant achieving 50% or greater improvement from Baseline in EASI score.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI75 at Weeks 2 and 4
EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of at least 8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 and the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. An EASI75 responder was defined as a participant achieving 75% or greater improvement from Baseline in EASI score.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI90
EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of at least 8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 and the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. An EASI90 responder was defined as a participant achieving 90% or greater improvement from Baseline in EASI score.
Measured: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score
EASI scoring system examines 4 areas of the body (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs) and weights them for participants of at least 8 years of age. Each of the 4 body regions is assessed separately for erythema (E), induration/papulation/edema (I), excoriations (Ex), and lichenification (l) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2 and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 and the severity strata are as follows: 0 = clear; 0.1 to 1.0 = almost clear; 1.1 to 7.0 = mild; 7.1 to 21.0 = moderate; 21.1 to 50.0 = severe; 50.1 to 72.0 = very severe. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
The SCORAD is a tool to assess extent and severity of eczema. To determine the extent, the rule of nines or handprint method is used to assess eczema affected area (A). To determine disease severity (B) it evaluates 6 clinical characteristics: 1. redness, 2. swelling, 3. oozing/crusting, 4. scratch marks, 5. lichenification, and 6. dryness on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), added to give B with maximum score of 18. Subjective symptoms (C) of itch and sleeplessness are assessed using a visual analogue scale where 0 is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and 10 is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness), added to give C with maximum score of 20. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combined using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Itch NRS Score
The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants are asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best describes their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Time to Achieve Itch NRS Score Improvement of at Least 2, 3, or 4 Points
The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of itch intensity using a diary. Participants are asked to rate the itching severity because of their AD by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best describes their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. Kaplan-Meier estimation method was used for analyses.
Measured: Up to Week 8
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score
The Skin Pain NRS is a daily patient-reported measure (24-hour recall), of the worst level of pain intensity from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) using a diary. Participants will be asked, "Rate the pain severity from your atopic dermatitis skin changes by selecting a number that best describes your worst level of pain in the past 24 hours." A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful (≥ 6-Point) Improvement in the PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) 24-Hour Recall Score at Weeks 2 and 4
The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep. This questionnaire is completed in the morning by the participant where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep disturbance. It is a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance.
Measured: Weeks 2 and 4
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful (≥ 6-Point) Improvement in the PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) 24-Hour Recall Score at Weeks 2 and 4
The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of alertness, sleepiness, and tiredness during usual waking hours and the perceived functional impairments during wakefulness associated with sleep problems or impaired alertness. The questionnaire is filled in the evening where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep impairment. It has 8 simple questions with a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep-related impairment.
Measured: Weeks 2 and 4
VC Period: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) 24-Hour Recall Score
The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep. This questionnaire is completed in the morning by the participant where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep disturbance. It is a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) 24-Hour Recall Score
The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of alertness, sleepiness, and tiredness during usual waking hours and the perceived functional impairments during wakefulness associated with sleep problems or impaired alertness. The questionnaire is filled in the evening where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep impairment. It has 8 simple questions with a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep-related impairment. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) 7-Day Recall Score
The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of alertness, sleepiness, and tiredness during usual waking hours and the perceived functional impairments during wakefulness associated with sleep problems or impaired alertness. The questionnaire is filled in the evening where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep impairment. It has 8 simple questions with a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep-related impairment. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 52
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) 7-Day Recall Score
The PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) questionnaire assesses participant's self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep. This questionnaire is completed in the morning by the participant where each item asks the participant to rate the severity of the participant's sleep disturbance. It is a 5-point scale with a range in score from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 52
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Afflicted Percentage of Body Surface Area (%BSA)
Body surface area affected by AD was assessed for 4 separate body regions and is collected as part of the EASI assessment: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region was assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. The overall total percentage was reported based off of all 4 body regions combined, after applying specific multipliers to the different body regions to account for the percent of the total BSA represented by each of the 4 regions. Use the percentage of skin affected for each region (0 to 100%) in EASI as follows: BSA Total = 0.1*BSA head and neck + 0.3*BSA trunk + 0.2* BSA upper limbs + 0.4*BSA lower limbs. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Afflicted %BSA
Body surface area affected by AD was assessed for 4 separate body regions and is collected as part of the EASI assessment: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region was assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. The overall total percentage was reported based off of all 4 body regions combined, after applying specific multipliers to the different body regions to account for the percent of the total BSA represented by each of the 4 regions. Use the percentage of skin affected for each region (0 to 100%) in EASI as follows: BSA Total = 0.1*BSA head and neck + 0.3*BSA trunk + 0.2* BSA upper limbs + 0.4*BSA lower limbs. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score
The POEM is a 7-question quality-of-life assessment that asks how many days the participant has been bothered by various aspects of their skin condition during the past 7 days. It assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) on a scale ranging from 0-4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days, 4 = everyday). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). High scores are indicative of more severe disease and poor quality of life. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in POEM Score
The POEM is a 7-question quality-of-life assessment that asks how many days the participant has been bothered by various aspects of their skin condition during the past 7 days. It assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) on a scale ranging from 0-4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days, 4 = everyday). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). High scores are indicative of more severe disease and poor quality of life. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
The DLQI is a simple, 10 question (Q) validated quality-of-life questionnaire to measure how much the skin problem has affected the participant. It covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings (Q1 and Q2), daily activities (Q3 and Q4), leisure (Q5 and Q6), work and school (Q7), personal relationships (Q8 and Q9), and treatment(Q10). The recall Period of this scale is over the last week. Response categories include 0-not at all, 1-a little, 2-a lot, and 3-very much, and unanswered or not relevant responses scored as 0. Scores range from 0 ("no impact on participant's life") to 30 ("extremely large effect on participant's life"), and a 4-point change from Baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. A negative change from Baseline indicates less impact of the skin problem on participant's life.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in DLQI Score
The DLQI is a simple, 10 question (Q) validated quality-of-life questionnaire to measure how much the skin problem has affected the participant. It covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings (Q1 and Q2), daily activities (Q3 and Q4), leisure (Q5 and Q6), work and school (Q7), personal relationships (Q8 and Q9), and treatment(Q10). The recall Period of this scale is over the last week. Response categories include 0-not at all, 1-a little, 2-a lot, and 3-very much, and unanswered or not relevant responses scored as 0. Scores range from 0 ("no impact on participant's life") to 30 ("extremely large effect on participant's life"), and a 4-point change from Baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. A negative change from Baseline indicates less impact of the skin problem on participant's life.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 52
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Children Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score
CDLQI is the youth/children's version of the DLQI. The CDLQI is a simple 10 question (Q) validated quality-of-life questionnaire. It covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings (Q1 and Q2), leisure (Q4, Q5, and Q6), school or holidays (Q7), personal relationships (Q3 and Q8), sleep (Q9) and treatment (Q10). Response categories include 0-not at all, 1-a little, 2-a lot, and 3-very much, and unanswered or not relevant responses scored as 0. The total DLQI score is calculated by adding the score of each question resulting in a maximum score of 30 (extremely large effect on participant's life) and a minimum score of 0 (no impact on participant's life) and a 4-point change from Baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. A negative change from Baseline indicates less impact of the skin problem on participant's life.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in CDLQI Score
CDLQI is the youth/children's version of the DLQI. The CDLQI is a simple 10 question (Q) validated quality-of-life questionnaire. It covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings (Q1 and Q2), leisure (Q4, Q5, and Q6), school or holidays (Q7), personal relationships (Q3 and Q8), sleep (Q9) and treatment (Q10). Response categories include 0-not at all, 1-a little, 2-a lot, and 3-very much, and unanswered or not relevant responses scored as 0. The total DLQI score is calculated by adding the score of each question resulting in a maximum score of 30 (extremely large effect on participant's life) and a minimum score of 0 (no impact on participant's life) and a 4-point change from Baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. A negative change from Baseline indicates less impact of the skin problem on participant's life.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 52
VC Period: Mean Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
The PGIC is a participants' self-reporting measure that reflects their belief about the efficacy of treatment. It is a 7-point scale where participants rate the questions as: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse. The lower score indicates improvement.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With Each Score on the PGIC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
The PGIC is a participants' self-reporting measure that reflects their belief about the efficacy of treatment. It is a 7-point scale where participants rate the questions as: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse. The lower score indicates improvement.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Score of Either 1 or 2 on the PGIC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
The PGIC is a participants' self-reporting measure that reflects their belief about the efficacy of treatment. It is a 7-point scale where participants rate the questions as: 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse. The lower score indicates improvement.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Change From Baseline in EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire has 2 parts: EQ-5D-5L descriptive system \& EQ-VAS. EQ-5D is a validated, self-administered, generic utility questionnaire wherein participants rate their current health state based on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. 5L indicates that for each dimension, there are 5 levels:1=no problems,2=slight problems,3=moderate problems,4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L score is assessed using VAS that ranges from 0 to 100 millimetres (mm), where 0 indicates "worst health you can imagine" and 100 indicates "best health you can imagine". The participant was asked to indicate his/her health state over past 7 days in each of the 5 dimensions. Digits for the 5 dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the participant's health state. In the EQ-VAS, participants had to record their health state on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Version 2.0 (v2.0)
The WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant questionnaire developed to measure the effect of overall health and specific symptoms on productivity at work and regular activities outside of it in the past 7 days. The WPAI-SHP consists of 6 questions as follows: 1=currently employed; 2=hours missed due to AD; 3=hours missed other reasons; 4=hours actually worked; 5=degree AD affected productivity while working; 6=degree AD affected regular activities and the computed percentage, range for each sub scale is from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in WPAI-SHP v2.0
The WPAI-SHP is a 6-item participant questionnaire developed to measure the effect of overall health and specific symptoms on productivity at work and regular activities outside of it in the past 7 days. The WPAI-SHP consists of 6 questions as follows: 1=currently employed; 2=hours missed due to AD; 3=hours missed other reasons; 4=hours actually worked; 5=degree AD affected productivity while working; 6=degree AD affected regular activities and the computed percentage, range for each sub scale is from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52
VC Period: Trough Plasma Concentrations of Ruxolitinib
Plasma samples were collected just before the morning application of study drug during each specified time point.
Measured: Pre-dose at Weeks 2, 4 and 8
LTS Period: Trough Plasma Concentrations of Ruxolitinib
Plasma samples were collected just before the morning application of study drug during each specified time point.
Measured: Pre-dose at Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Nov 2018
- Study start20 Dec 2018
- Primary completion18 Nov 2019
- Study completion9 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Incyte CorporationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 618 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Incyte Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael E. Kuligowski, MD, PhD, MBA, Study director, Incyte Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03745651
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INCB 18424-304
- Other IDs
- 2018-003713-18, 2018
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Blauvelt A, Kircik L, Simpson EL, Lio P, Eichenfield LF, Prajapati VH, Grewal P, Lynde C, Hong HC, Sturm D, Kallender H, Ren H, Paranagama D, Wong GKW, Geng B. Ruxolitinib Cream As-Needed Monotherapy Demonstrates Sustained Disease and Symptom Control in Patients with Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Analysis from Two Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Mar;16(3):1635-1646. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01639-0. Epub 2026 Feb 12.
PubMed 41678112Simpson EL, Augustin M, Thaci D, Misery L, Armstrong AW, Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Szepietowski JC, Boguniewicz M, Kwatra SG, Kallender H, Sturm D, Ren H, Kircik L. Ruxolitinib Cream Monotherapy Improved Symptoms and Quality of Life in Adults and Adolescents with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: Patient-Reported Outcomes from Two Phase III Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Jan;26(1):121-137. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00901-z. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
PubMed 39546129Blauvelt A, Kallender H, Sturm D, Li Q, Ren H, Eichenfield LF. Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Atopic Dermatitis Based on Previous Medication History. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;14(11):3161-3174. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01272-3. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
PubMed 39375281Simpson EL, Kircik L, Blauvelt A, Kallender H, Sturm D, Wang M, Eichenfield LF. Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents/Adults with Atopic Dermatitis Meeting Severity Thresholds for Systemic Therapy: Exploratory Analysis of Pooled Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;14(8):2139-2151. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01219-8. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
PubMed 38995504Eichenfield LF, Simpson EL, Papp K, Szepietowski JC, Blauvelt A, Kircik L, Silverberg JI, Siegfried EC, Kuligowski ME, Venturanza ME, Kallender H, Ren H, Paller AS. Efficacy, Safety, and Long-Term Disease Control of Ruxolitinib Cream Among Adolescents with Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Results from Two Randomized Phase 3 Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024 Jul;25(4):669-683. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00855-2. Epub 2024 May 2.
PubMed 38698175Papp K, Szepietowski JC, Kircik L, Toth D, Eichenfield LF, Forman SB, Kuligowski ME, Kallender H, Sun K, Ren H, Simpson EL. Long-term safety and disease control with ruxolitinib cream in atopic dermatitis: Results from two phase 3 studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 May;88(5):1008-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.09.060. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
PubMed 36574595Bloudek L, Eichenfield LF, Silverberg JI, Joish VN, Lofland JH, Sun K, Augustin M, Migliaccio-Walle K, Sullivan SD. Impact of Ruxolitinib Cream on Work Productivity and Activity Impairment and Associated Indirect Costs in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Results From Two Phase III Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Jan;24(1):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00734-8. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
PubMed 36264430Gong X, Chen X, Kuligowski ME, Liu X, Liu X, Cimino E, McGee R, Yeleswaram S. Pharmacokinetics of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Treated With Ruxolitinib Cream: Data from Phase II and III Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Jul;22(4):555-566. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00610-x. Epub 2021 May 12.
PubMed 33982267Papp K, Szepietowski JC, Kircik L, Toth D, Eichenfield LF, Leung DYM, Forman SB, Venturanza ME, Sun K, Kuligowski ME, Simpson EL. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: Results from 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Oct;85(4):863-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.04.085. Epub 2021 May 4.
PubMed 33957195Scuron MD, Fay BL, Connell AJ, Peel MT, Smith PA. Ruxolitinib Cream Has Dual Efficacy on Pruritus and Inflammation in Experimental Dermatitis. Front Immunol. 2021 Feb 15;11:620098. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.620098. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33658996
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Topical Ruxolitinib Evaluation in Atopic Dermatitis Study 2 (TRuE AD2) - A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, 8-Week, Vehicle-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream Followed by a Long-Term Safety Extension Period in Adolescents and Adults With Atopic Dermatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03745651
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INCB 18424-304
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Keywords
- Atopic dermatitis, pruritus, eczema, topical therapy, JAK inhibitor
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 618 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Incyte CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 17 Dec 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of ruxolitinib cream in adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis (AD).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 7
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle Control (VC) Period: Vehicle Cream BID | Placebo comparator | Drug: Vehicle creamParticipants received ruxolitinib matching vehicle cream, applied topically to the affected areas as a thin film twice daily (BID) 8 hours apart from Day 1 up to Week 8. Participants applied cream BID to areas identified at Baseline even if the areas improved. |
| VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BID | Experimental | Drug: Ruxolitinib creamParticipants received ruxolitinib 0.75% cream, applied topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID 8 hours apart from Day 1 up to Week 8. Participants applied cream BID to areas identified at Baseline even if the areas improved. |
| VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID | Experimental | Drug: Ruxolitinib creamParticipants received ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, applied topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID 8 hours apart from Day 1 up to Week 8. Participants applied cream BID to areas identified at Baseline even if the areas improved. |
| Long-Term Safety (LTS) Period: Vehicle Cream to Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BID | Experimental | Drug: Ruxolitinib creamParticipants who applied vehicle cream during the VC Period were randomized at Week 8 to apply ruxolitinib 0.75% cream, topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID as needed from Week 8 up to Week 52. Participants stopped treatment 3 days after lesions disappeared and restarted at the first sign of recurrence. |
| LTS Period: Vehicle Cream to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID | Experimental | Drug: Ruxolitinib creamParticipants who applied vehicle cream during the VC Period were randomized at Week 8 to apply ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID as needed from Week 8 up to Week 52. Participants stopped treatment 3 days after lesions disappeared and restarted at the first sign of recurrence. |
| LTS Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BID | Experimental | Drug: Ruxolitinib creamParticipants who applied ruxolitinib 0.75% cream during the VC Period, continued applying ruxolitinib 0.75% cream, topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID as needed from Week 8 up to Week 52. Participants stopped treatment 3 days after lesions disappeared and restarted at the first sign of recurrence. |
| LTS Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID | Experimental | Drug: Ruxolitinib creamParticipants who applied ruxolitinib 1.5% cream during the VC Period, continued applying ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, topically to the affected areas as a thin film BID as needed from Week 8 up to Week 52. Participants stopped treatment 3 days after lesions disappeared and restarted at the first sign of recurrence. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Adolescents aged ≥ 12 to 17 years, inclusive, and men and women aged ≥ 18 years.
- Participants diagnosed with atopic dermatitis (AD) as defined by the Hanifin and Rajka criteria.
- AD duration of at least 2 years.
- Participants with an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 2 to 3 at Screening and Baseline (VC Period) and 0 to 4 at Week 8 (LTS Period).
- Participants with percentage body surface area (%BSA) (excluding scalp) of AD involvement of 3% to 20% at Screening and Baseline (VC Period) and 0% to 20% at Week 8 (LTS Period).
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Unstable course of AD (spontaneously improving or rapidly deteriorating) as determined by the investigator in the 4 weeks prior to Baseline.
- Concurrent conditions and history of other diseases:
- Any serious illness or medical, physical, or psychiatric condition(s) that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with full participation in the study, including administration of study drug and attending required study visits; pose a significant risk to the participant; or interfere with interpretation of study data.
- Use of any of the following treatments within the indicated washout period before Baseline:
- Participants who have previously received Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, systemic or topical.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib creamAlso: INCB018424 phosphate creamRuxolitinib 0.75% or 1.5% cream. | Drug | LTS Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BID, LTS Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID, LTS Period: Vehicle Cream to Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID, Long-Term Safety (LTS) Period: Vehicle Cream to Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BID, VC Period: Ruxolitinib 0.75% Cream BID, VC Period: Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream BID |
| Vehicle creamRuxolitinib matching vehicle cream. | Drug | Vehicle Control (VC) Period: Vehicle Cream BID |
Primary outcome
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment - Treatment Success (IGA-TS) at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
The IGA is an overall eczema severity rating on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, induration/papulation, and oozing/crusting. The IGA-TS is defined as an IGA score of 0 (clear skin) or 1 (almost clear skin) with ≥ 2 grade improvement from Baseline.
40 secondary outcomes
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 4-Point Improvement in Itch Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful (≥ 6-Point) Improvement in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b - 24-Hour Recall) Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful (≥ 6-Point) Improvement in the PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a - 24-Hour Recall) Score at Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time frame: From date of randomization up to Week 8
LTS Period: Percentage of Participants With at Least One TEAE and Treatment Emergent SAE
Time frame: From first dose date in LTS Period (Week 8) until last follow-up visit (up to 52 weeks)
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA-TS at Weeks 2 and 4
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA of 0 or 1
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and 8
LTS Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA of 0 or 1
Time frame: Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and 52
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 4-Point Improvement in Itch NRS Score From Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI50
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI75 at Weeks 2 and 4
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EASI90
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Itch NRS Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Time to Achieve Itch NRS Score Improvement of at Least 2, 3, or 4 Points
Time frame: Up to Week 8
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful (≥ 6-Point) Improvement in the PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) 24-Hour Recall Score at Weeks 2 and 4
Time frame: Weeks 2 and 4
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful (≥ 6-Point) Improvement in the PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) 24-Hour Recall Score at Weeks 2 and 4
Time frame: Weeks 2 and 4
VC Period: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) 24-Hour Recall Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) 24-Hour Recall Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Short Form - Sleep-Related Impairment (8a) 7-Day Recall Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 52
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in PROMIS Short Form - Sleep Disturbance (8b) 7-Day Recall Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 52
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Afflicted Percentage of Body Surface Area (%BSA)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Afflicted %BSA
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in POEM Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in DLQI Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 52
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Children Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in CDLQI Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 52
VC Period: Mean Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With Each Score on the PGIC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Percentage of Participants With a Score of Either 1 or 2 on the PGIC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Change From Baseline in EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
VC Period: Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) Version 2.0 (v2.0)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8
LTS Period: Change From Baseline in WPAI-SHP v2.0
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 52
VC Period: Trough Plasma Concentrations of Ruxolitinib
Time frame: Pre-dose at Weeks 2, 4 and 8
LTS Period: Trough Plasma Concentrations of Ruxolitinib
Time frame: Pre-dose at Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41678112Blauvelt A, Kircik L, Simpson EL, Lio P, Eichenfield LF, Prajapati VH, Grewal P, Lynde C, Hong HC, Sturm D, Kallender H, Ren H, Paranagama D, Wong GKW, Geng B. Ruxolitinib Cream As-Needed Monotherapy Demonstrates Sustained Disease and Symptom Control in Patients with Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Analysis from Two Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Mar;16(3):1635-1646. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01639-0. Epub 2026 Feb 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39546129Simpson EL, Augustin M, Thaci D, Misery L, Armstrong AW, Blauvelt A, Papp KA, Szepietowski JC, Boguniewicz M, Kwatra SG, Kallender H, Sturm D, Ren H, Kircik L. Ruxolitinib Cream Monotherapy Improved Symptoms and Quality of Life in Adults and Adolescents with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: Patient-Reported Outcomes from Two Phase III Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Jan;26(1):121-137. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00901-z. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39375281Blauvelt A, Kallender H, Sturm D, Li Q, Ren H, Eichenfield LF. Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Atopic Dermatitis Based on Previous Medication History. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;14(11):3161-3174. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01272-3. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38995504Simpson EL, Kircik L, Blauvelt A, Kallender H, Sturm D, Wang M, Eichenfield LF. Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents/Adults with Atopic Dermatitis Meeting Severity Thresholds for Systemic Therapy: Exploratory Analysis of Pooled Results from Two Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;14(8):2139-2151. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01219-8. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38698175Eichenfield LF, Simpson EL, Papp K, Szepietowski JC, Blauvelt A, Kircik L, Silverberg JI, Siegfried EC, Kuligowski ME, Venturanza ME, Kallender H, Ren H, Paller AS. Efficacy, Safety, and Long-Term Disease Control of Ruxolitinib Cream Among Adolescents with Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Results from Two Randomized Phase 3 Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024 Jul;25(4):669-683. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00855-2. Epub 2024 May 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36574595Papp K, Szepietowski JC, Kircik L, Toth D, Eichenfield LF, Forman SB, Kuligowski ME, Kallender H, Sun K, Ren H, Simpson EL. Long-term safety and disease control with ruxolitinib cream in atopic dermatitis: Results from two phase 3 studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 May;88(5):1008-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.09.060. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36264430Bloudek L, Eichenfield LF, Silverberg JI, Joish VN, Lofland JH, Sun K, Augustin M, Migliaccio-Walle K, Sullivan SD. Impact of Ruxolitinib Cream on Work Productivity and Activity Impairment and Associated Indirect Costs in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Results From Two Phase III Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Jan;24(1):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00734-8. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33982267Gong X, Chen X, Kuligowski ME, Liu X, Liu X, Cimino E, McGee R, Yeleswaram S. Pharmacokinetics of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Treated With Ruxolitinib Cream: Data from Phase II and III Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Jul;22(4):555-566. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00610-x. Epub 2021 May 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33957195Papp K, Szepietowski JC, Kircik L, Toth D, Eichenfield LF, Leung DYM, Forman SB, Venturanza ME, Sun K, Kuligowski ME, Simpson EL. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: Results from 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Oct;85(4):863-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.04.085. Epub 2021 May 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33658996Scuron MD, Fay BL, Connell AJ, Peel MT, Smith PA. Ruxolitinib Cream Has Dual Efficacy on Pruritus and Inflammation in Experimental Dermatitis. Front Immunol. 2021 Feb 15;11:620098. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.620098. eCollection 2020.
- Plain Language Summary of ResultsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of HSK60002 Tablets in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Dermatitis Atopic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael E. Kuligowski, MD, PhD, MBA study director
Incyte Corporation
66 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ruxolitinib cream in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Incyte Corporation at 66 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 66 sites in United States, Poland, Bulgaria, Czechia, Spain and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Dec 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
VC Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Investigator's Global Assessment - Treatment Success (IGA-TS) at Week 8 (time frame: Baseline to Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03745651, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2023.