AzTrials
AzTrials

Pediatric Respiratory DiseasesNCT03744169

Use of Lung Ultrasound to Diagnose the Etiology of Respiratory Failure in a PICU.

An observational study of Pediatric Respiratory Diseases and Respiratory Failure, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the utility of point-of-care lung ultrasound (POC-LUS) in identifying the etiology of acute respiratory failure in pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 18 years
What is being tested?
Lung ultrasound, Clinical exam and Chest x-ray
How many people
88 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Dec 2018to 29 Feb 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: Pediatric patients age greater than 37 weeks gestational age and less than 18 years old with a clinical diagnosis of acute respiratory failure and the need for non-invasive (HFNC > 1 L/kg/min, CPAP, or BiPAP) or invasive mechanical ventilation.

Who may be able to join

  • Age greater than 37 weeks gestational age and less than 18 years
  • Admitted to PICU
  • Clinical diagnosis of acute respiratory failure
  • Requirement of non-invasive or invasive respiratory support (as defined by a clinical need for high flow nasal cannula >1L/kg/min; RAM cannula, nasal or full face mask delivered continuous positive airway pressure ventilation; RAM cannula, nasal or full face mask delivered bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation; or invasive mechanical ventilation); requirement of supplemental oxygen with FiO2 > 0.35 while on high flow nasal cannula <1L/kg/min to maintain saturations > 90%; continuous nebulized therapy; or chronic use of home oxygen or ventilator support AND any increase in home settings

Who cannot join

  • Hemodynamically unstable as defined by the initiation of or the need for increased vasopressor support within the previous 30 minutes
  • Known chronic respiratory disease such as primary ciliary dyskinesia, cystic fibrosis, or congenital pulmonary malformations.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Wisconsin, American Family Children's Hospital

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Use of Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound to Diagnose the Etiology of Acute Respiratory Failure in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

The purpose of this study is to determine the utility of point-of-care lung ultrasound (POC-LUS) in identifying the etiology of acute respiratory failure in pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit.

Read the detailed description

Respiratory failure is one of the most common conditions requiring admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). As such, chest radiography has emerged as the most commonly utilized tool in the assessment of lung pathology despite evidence that it may not be the most accurate. Since the seminal article by Lichtenstein in 2008, lung ultrasound has emerged as an alternative to chest radiography in the assessment of critically ill adults. Likewise, pediatric lung ultrasound has a growing body of research to support its use in commonly encountered lung pathology including pneumonia, asthma, bronchiolitis, acute chest syndrome, pleural effusions, and pneumothorax. Despite the rapidly growing body evidence, there remains little literature to support its use the diagnosis and management of acute respiratory failure in the PICU.

The proposed study will evaluate whether point-of-care lung ultrasound is accurate in determining the etiology of acute respiratory failure on admission to the PICU.

Specific aims include:

  • Aim 1: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of point-of-care lung ultrasound examination in identifying the etiology of acute pediatric respiratory failure on admission to the PICU.
  • Aim 2: To determine the inter-observer reliability of point-of-care lung ultrasound examination findings in acute pediatric respiratory failure among trainee and expert sonographers.
  • Aim 3: Compare point-of-care lung ultrasound with chest radiography in the rate of detection of consolidation, interstitial edema, pneumothorax, and pleural effusion.
  • Aim 4: Describe the POC-LUS findings in patients admitted to the PICU with acute respiratory failure
Being tested
Lung ultrasound, Clinical exam, Chest x-ray
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lung ultrasoundDiagnostic test

    A point-of-care lung ultrasound exam will be performed on admission (no later than 14 hours following admission, allowing for participant stabilization and care) to the PICU and within 6 hours of any escalation in mechanical ventilatory support without interrupting clinical care, by study investigators blinded to participant history, physical examination, and diagnostic testing/imaging and who are not involved in the clinical management of the participant. Investigators will use a six-zone standardized scanning protocol with pattern analysis to form a diagnosis for the cause of the participant's respiratory failure. Images will be acquired by pediatric critical care trainees and saved online; accuracy of diagnoses based on the ultrasound exam will be evaluated by a expert sonographer offline.

  • Clinical examDiagnostic test

    Following morning ICU rounds, the PICU fellow or attending physician caring for the participant will be asked for his/her interpretation of the most recent chest radiograph and his/her diagnosis concerning the etiology of the participant's acute respiratory failure. This clinical diagnosis will be compared to ultrasound findings.

  • Chest x-rayDiagnostic test

    Results of chest x-ray will be collected for comparison with ultrasound findings.

Study groups in NCT03744169
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Children with acute respiratory failurePoint-of-care lung ultrasound on admission to the PICU to determine the cause of respiratory failure.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Lung ultrasound; Diagnostic Test: Clinical exam; Diagnostic Test: Chest x-ray

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity of point-of-care lung ultrasound examination in identifying the etiology of acute pediatric respiratory failure on admission to the PICU

    The sensitivity of the lung ultrasound in identifying the etiology of acute pediatric respiratory failure will be determined by comparison with the final criterion or "gold standard" diagnosis generated by a blinded review of the chart after discharge by a study investigator blinded to the case. The hypothesis is that the lung ultrasound performed on admission to the PICU will have a sensitivity of > 90% in determining the etiology of acute respiratory failure in children (as determined by an independent review of the participant's medical record following hospital discharge).

    Measured: up to one month

  2. Specificity of point-of-care lung ultrasound examination in identifying the etiology of acute pediatric respiratory failure on admission to the PICU

    The specificity of the lung ultrasound in identifying the etiology of acute pediatric respiratory failure will be determined by comparison with the final criterion or "gold standard" diagnosis generated by a blinded review of the chart after discharge by a study investigator blinded to the case. The hypothesis is that the lung ultrasound performed on admission to the PICU will have a specificity of > 90% in determining the etiology of acute respiratory failure in children (as determined by an independent review of the participant's medical record following hospital discharge).

    Measured: up to one month

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Inter-observer reliability of point-of-care lung ultrasound examination findings in acute pediatric respiratory failure among trainee and expert sonographers

    Ultrasound images obtained by a critical care trainee will be saved online for review by an expert sonographer. The expert sonographer will overread the images; findings will be compared at all ultrasound points to determine percent agreement in interpreting ultrasound exam findings between the trainee and expert sonographer. Additionally final ultrasonographic diagnosis will be compared between trainee and expert sonographers. Interpretation of exam findings and determination of exam diagnosis will be compared to determine the inter-observer reliability of point-of-care lung ultrasound exams in acute pediatric respiratory failure. The hypothesis is that the inter-observer reliability between trainee and expert sonographers for point-of-care lung ultrasound findings will be >80%.

    Measured: Following acquisition and interpretation of ultrasound images, an average of less than one week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Nov 2018
  2. Study start1 Dec 2018
  3. Primary completion29 Feb 2020
  4. Study completion29 Feb 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
88 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03744169
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-0711
Other IDs
A534285, SMPH/MEDICINE/PULMON MED, Protocol Version 4/7/2020
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
8 Nov 2018
Last updated
23 Jun 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Namachivayam P, Shann F, Shekerdemian L, Taylor A, van Sloten I, Delzoppo C, Daffey C, Butt W. Three decades of pediatric intensive care: Who was admitted, what happened in intensive care, and what happened afterward. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep;11(5):549-55. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181ce7427.

    PubMed 20124947
  • Krmpotic K, Lobos AT. Clinical profile of children requiring early unplanned admission to the PICU. Hosp Pediatr. 2013 Jul;3(3):212-8. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2012-0081.

    PubMed 24313089
  • Gurney JW. Why chest radiography became routine. Radiology. 1995 Apr;195(1):245-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.195.1.7892479. No abstract available.

    PubMed 7892479
  • Price MB, Grant MJ, Welkie K. Financial impact of elimination of routine chest radiographs in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1588-93. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00033.

    PubMed 10470769
  • Lichtenstein D, Goldstein I, Mourgeon E, Cluzel P, Grenier P, Rouby JJ. Comparative diagnostic performances of auscultation, chest radiography, and lung ultrasonography in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jan;100(1):9-15. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200401000-00006.

    PubMed 14695718
  • Self WH, Courtney DM, McNaughton CD, Wunderink RG, Kline JA. High discordance of chest x-ray and computed tomography for detection of pulmonary opacities in ED patients: implications for diagnosing pneumonia. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;31(2):401-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.08.041. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

    PubMed 23083885
  • Lichtenstein DA, Meziere GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):117-25. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2800. Epub 2008 Apr 10.

    PubMed 18403664
  • Peris A, Tutino L, Zagli G, Batacchi S, Cianchi G, Spina R, Bonizzoli M, Migliaccio L, Perretta L, Bartolini M, Ban K, Balik M. The use of point-of-care bedside lung ultrasound significantly reduces the number of radiographs and computed tomography scans in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg. 2010 Sep;111(3):687-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e7cc42.

    PubMed 20733164
  • Zieleskiewicz L, Cornesse A, Hammad E, Haddam M, Brun C, Vigne C, Meyssignac B, Remacle A, Chaumoitre K, Antonini F, Martin C, Leone M. Implementation of lung ultrasound in polyvalent intensive care unit: Impact on irradiation and medical cost. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2015 Feb;34(1):41-4. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

    PubMed 25829314
  • Oks M, Cleven KL, Cardenas-Garcia J, Schaub JA, Koenig S, Cohen RI, Mayo PH, Narasimhan M. The effect of point-of-care ultrasonography on imaging studies in the medical ICU: a comparative study. Chest. 2014 Dec;146(6):1574-1577. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0728.

    PubMed 25144593
  • Inglis AJ, Nalos M, Sue KH, Hruby J, Campbell DM, Braham RM, Orde SR. Bedside lung ultrasound, mobile radiography and physical examination: a comparative analysis of diagnostic tools in the critically ill. Crit Care Resusc. 2016 Jun;18(2):124.

    PubMed 27242110
  • Expert Round Table on Ultrasound in ICU. International expert statement on training standards for critical care ultrasonography. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul;37(7):1077-83. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2246-9. Epub 2011 May 26.

    PubMed 21614639
  • Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW, Melniker L, Gargani L, Noble VE, Via G, Dean A, Tsung JW, Soldati G, Copetti R, Bouhemad B, Reissig A, Agricola E, Rouby JJ, Arbelot C, Liteplo A, Sargsyan A, Silva F, Hoppmann R, Breitkreutz R, Seibel A, Neri L, Storti E, Petrovic T; International Liaison Committee on Lung Ultrasound (ILC-LUS) for International Consensus Conference on Lung Ultrasound (ICC-LUS). International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Apr;38(4):577-91. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2513-4. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

    PubMed 22392031
  • Frankel HL, Kirkpatrick AW, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Desai H, Evans D, Summerfield DT, Slonim A, Breitkreutz R, Price S, Marik PE, Talmor D, Levitov A. Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Bedside General and Cardiac Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Critically Ill Patients-Part I: General Ultrasonography. Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2479-502. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001216.

    PubMed 26468699
  • Levitov A, Frankel HL, Blaivas M, Kirkpatrick AW, Su E, Evans D, Summerfield DT, Slonim A, Breitkreutz R, Price S, McLaughlin M, Marik PE, Elbarbary M. Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Bedside General and Cardiac Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Critically Ill Patients-Part II: Cardiac Ultrasonography. Crit Care Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1206-27. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001847.

    PubMed 27182849

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pediatric Respiratory Diseases and Respiratory Failure, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity of point-of-care lung ultrasound examination in identifying the etiology of acute pediatric respiratory failure on admission to the PICU (time frame: up to one month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03744169, which also lists 62 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in