AzTrials
AzTrials

Healing Surgical WoundsNCT03741062

Effects of Laser Stimulation on Wound Healing of Human Palatal Tissue

A study testing J. Morita AdvErl Evo Er:YAG laser in people with Healing Surgical Wounds and Pain Measurement, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) with an Er:YAG laser on the palatal donor site following subepithelial connective tissue graft (SECTG) surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healing Surgical Wounds, Pain Measurement
What is being tested?
J. Morita AdvErl Evo Er:YAG laser
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
11 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
24 Jan 2019to 14 May 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ASA I or II
  • Full Mouth Plaque Score (FMPS) < 20%
  • Full Mouth Bleeding Score (FMBS) < 20%

Who cannot join

  • Any contraindications for periodontal surgery,
  • Anticoagulant usage
  • Corticosteroid usage
  • Smoking > 10 cigarettes/day.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site

  • Univerisity of Manitoba, College of Dentistry

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0W3

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Effects of Er:YAG Photobiomodulation Therapy on Wound Healing of Human Palatal Mucosa After Connective Tissue Graft Harvesting: A Pilot Study

The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) with an Er:YAG laser on the palatal donor site following subepithelial connective tissue graft (SECTG) surgery. Patient-centred outcomes and wound healing will be compared between a control group, who receives no laser treatment, and the test group receiving PBM therapy. It is hypothesized that laser stimulation will have a beneficial effect on the patient's post-operative experience as well as the healing of the tissues.

Read the detailed description

The study is a randomized clinical trial comparing palatal donor sites that receive PBM with an Er:YAG laser and palatal donor sites receiving no additional treatment, following SETG surgery. A computerized randomization program will assign patients to one of two groups. Participants will be block-randomized to ensure balance between the operators.

The palate is anesthetized with 2% lidocaine (1:100000 epinephrine) by greater palatine nerve block, nasopalatine nerve block, and local infiltration. The thickness of the tissue at donor site of the palate is measured by transgingival probing ("bone sounding"). The palatal tissue is harvested from the area bordered mesially by the root of the canine and distally by the palatal root of the first molar, extending laterally to approximately 2 mm from the gingival margin and medially far enough to obtain an adequate area of tissue for the required size of the graft while ensuring not to encroach on the palatal neurovascular bundle.

A horizontal incision, corresponding to the necessary length of the graft, is made at 90 degrees to the bone approximately 2 mm from the gingival margin. Within this first incision, the scalpel is angled at approximately 135 degrees and a split-thickness dissection of the palatal tissue is extended medially. As the scalpel is advanced, the angle of the blade is further flattened until it is nearly parallel to the surface of the bone. The incision is extended until the necessary dimensions of the graft tissue are reached. Incisions are then made to the bone at the mesial, distal, and medial borders of the graft. The donor tissue is detached from the bone with a periosteal elevator and placed on a saline-soaked gauze.

The length, width, and thickness of the graft, the thickness of the remaining flap of palatal tissue, and the length of the palatal incision will be measured with digital calipers to the nearest 0.1 mm. The palatal incision will be closed with cyanoacrylate. Immediately following completion of the surgical procedure, Group A will receive PBM of the donor site and Group B will receive sham treatment with the laser unit turned off. The parameters used for PBM will be those shown to induce maximal proliferation of gingival fibroblasts using an Er:YAG laser: Energy [80 mJ], Duration [30 s], and Pulse Rate [25 Hz].

Post-operatively, both groups receive 2 g of Amoxicillin (or 600 mg of Clindamycin in cases of penicillin allergies) and the standard post-surgical instructions given to patients at the Graduate Periodontics clinic. Patients are then provided a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire to rate their pain from 0-10 each night for 1 week and 30 Ibuprofen (200 mg) tablets.

Patients will be followed up with at 1-week, 2-week, and 6-week post-operative appointments. Photographs will be taken at all appointments. At the first appointment, participants will return their completed VAS and any remaining Ibuprofen tablets. The donor site will be examined by a clinician who did not perform the surgery and assessed according to Fickl's Modified Early-Wound Healing Index (MEHI) and Landry's Healing Index (HI). Patients will also answer a modified Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) questionnaire. At the 2-week appointment, the palate will again be evaluated by the same operator and assessed according to the MEHI and HI. At the 6-week appointment, the donor site will be anesthetized with local infiltration of 2% lidocaine (1:100000 epinephrine), ensuring not to inject anesthetic into the tissue overlying where the graft was harvested from. Tissue thickness at the donor site will be measured via transgingival probing, in the same method as was used pre-operatively, and a histological specimen of the tissue will be harvested and placed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Barring any ongoing post-surgical complications at this point, the patient's participation in the study is now complete.

Being tested
J. Morita AdvErl Evo Er:YAG laser, Control
Keywords
Laser Therapy, Low-Level Light Therapy, Periodontics, Oral Surgery, Palate, Palate, Hard

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • J. Morita AdvErl Evo Er:YAG laserDevice

    Er:YAG laser perimeters:

    Energy = 80 mJ Pulse Rate = 25 Hz Duration = 30 s

  • ControlDevice

    Sham treatment with laser unit turned off

Study groups in NCT03741062
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
J. Morita AdvErl Evo Er:YAG laserExperimentalImmediately following completion of the surgical procedure, this group will receive photobiomodulation treatment of the palatal tissue donor site with Er:YAG laser according to the parameters recommended by experts in this field and which have shown to induce maximal proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts (Energy Setting: 80 mJ, Pulse Rate: 25 Hz, Duration: 30 s).
Receives: Device: J. Morita AdvErl Evo Er:YAG laser
ControlSham comparatorThis group will receive sham treatment of the palatal tissue donor site. The laser unit will be turned off. The clinician will simulate usage of the Er:YAG laser in a manner that is indistinguishable to the patient from the experimental group.
Receives: Device: Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Self-Reported Patient Discomfort as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale

    At the end of their surgical appointment, patients will be given a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaire to rate their post-operative pain by making a mark along a 10-cm line (0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain) for each night of the first post-operative week. At the one-week post-operative appointment, the participants will return their VAS questionnaires and their reported post-operative discomfort for each night of the initial post-operative week will be tabulated.

    Measured: One week

  2. Patient Discomfort as Assessed by Analgesic Consumption

    At the end of their surgical appointment, patients will be provided with a bag of 30 200-mg Ibuprofen tablets. At the one-week post-operative appointment, the participants will return any remaining Ibuprofen tablets and their total analgesic consumption for the initial post-operative week will be tabulated.

    Measured: One week

  3. Self-Reported Patient Discomfort as Assessed by a Oral Impacts on Daily Performance Questionnaire

    At the one-week post-operative appointment, patients will complete a modified Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIDP) questionnaire to assess the effect of the palatal wound on their oral-health related quality of life during the first post-operative week. They will rate the overall frequency of disruptions that the palatal surgical site had on eating, speaking, oral hygiene, light physical work, participation in regular outings, sleeping, relaxing, smiling and laughing, their mood, and interpersonal interactions by making a mark along a 10-cm line (0 = never, 10 = constantly) for first post-operative week. When applicable, they will also rate the overall severity of the disruptions for these same categories by making a mark along a 10-cm line (0 = barely noticeable, 10 = extremely disruptive) for first post-operative week.

    Measured: One Week

Secondary outcomes (4)

  1. Healing of the Palatal Donor Site as Assessed by Histological Analysis

    At a six-week post-operative appointment, a histological specimen will be harvested with a tissue punch. Samples of laser-treated and non laser-treated palatal tissues will be histologically compared with respect to concentration of inflammatory cells, amount of Type I collagen present, and amount of Type III collagen present.

    Measured: Six weeks

  2. Healing of the Palatal Donor Site as Assessed by the Modified Early-Wound Healing Index

    At the one-week and two-week post-operative appointments, a clinician who did not perform the surgery and is blinded to which treatment group the patient belongs will assess the donor site according to the Modified Early-Wound Healing Index (MEHI) proposed by Fickl. The clinician will evaluate the palatal tissue donor site and rate it from 1 to 5 (1 = complete flap closure without fibrin line at the palate, 5 = incomplete flap closure with >50% necrosis of the palatal flap tissue). The progression of post-operative healing at one week and two weeks will be compared between experimental and control groups.

    Measured: One week, Two weeks

  3. Healing of the Palatal Donor Site as Assessed by the Healing Index

    At the one-week and two-week post-operative appointments, a clinician who did not perform the surgery and is blinded to which treatment group the patient belongs will assess the donor site according to the Healing Index (HI) proposed by Landry, Turnbull, and Howley. The clinician will evaluate the palatal tissue donor site and rate it from 1 to 5 (1 = very poor, 5 = excellent) based on the parameters of tissue colour, bleeding response to palpation, presence of granulation tissue, presence of suppuration, exposure of underlying connective tissue, and epithelialization along incision margins. The progression of post-operative healing at one week and two weeks will be compared between experimental and control groups.

    Measured: One week, Two weeks

  4. Healing of the Palatal Donor Site as Assessed by Tissue Thickness

    At a six-week post-operative appointment, tissue thickness at the donor site will be measured in millimetres via bone sounding with a periodontal probe. This will be compared to pre-operative measurements taken at the site.

    Measured: Six weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Nov 2018
  2. Study start24 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion17 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion14 May 2020

Why it stopped: COVID-19

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
11 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03741062
Sponsor's protocol ID
B2018:100
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
3 Nov 2018
Last updated
10 Nov 2020
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Publications

  • Consensus report. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol. 1996 Nov;1(1):702-6. doi: 10.1902/annals.1996.1.1.702. No abstract available.

    PubMed 9118277

  • Zucchelli G, Mounssif I. Periodontal plastic surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2015 Jun;68(1):333-68. doi: 10.1111/prd.12059.

    PubMed 25867992

  • Chambrone L, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015 Feb;86(2 Suppl):S8-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.130674.

    PubMed 25644302

  • Aguirre-Zorzano LA, Garcia-De La Fuente AM, Estefania-Fresco R, Marichalar-Mendia X. Complications of harvesting a connective tissue graft from the palate. A retrospective study and description of a new technique. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Dec 1;9(12):e1439-e1445. doi: 10.4317/jced.54337. eCollection 2017 Dec.

    PubMed 29410760

  • Tonetti MS, Jepsen S; Working Group 2 of the European Workshop on Periodontology. Clinical efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures: consensus report of Group 2 of the 10th European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S36-43. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12219.

    PubMed 24640999

  • Mei CC, Lee FY, Yeh HC. Assessment of pain perception following periodontal and implant surgeries. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Dec;43(12):1151-1159. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12618. Epub 2016 Nov 2.

    PubMed 27554366

  • Del Pizzo M, Modica F, Bethaz N, Priotto P, Romagnoli R. The connective tissue graft: a comparative clinical evaluation of wound healing at the palatal donor site. A preliminary study. J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Sep;29(9):848-54. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290910.x.

    PubMed 12423299

  • Hurzeler MB, Weng D. A single-incision technique to harvest subepithelial connective tissue grafts from the palate. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999 Jun;19(3):279-87.

    PubMed 10635174

  • da Silva Neves FL, Silveira CA, Dias SB, Santamaria Junior M, de Marco AC, Kerbauy WD, de Melo Filho AB, Jardini MA, Santamaria MP. Comparison of two power densities on the healing of palatal wounds after connective tissue graft removal: randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(7):1371-8. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-1988-6. Epub 2016 Jun 25.

    PubMed 27344670

  • Dias SB, Fonseca MV, Dos Santos NC, Mathias IF, Martinho FC, Junior MS, Jardini MA, Santamaria MP. Effect of GaAIAs low-level laser therapy on the healing of human palate mucosa after connective tissue graft harvesting: randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Aug;30(6):1695-702. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1685-2. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

    PubMed 25373688

  • Pippi R. Post-Surgical Clinical Monitoring of Soft Tissue Wound Healing in Periodontal and Implant Surgery. Int J Med Sci. 2017 Jul 18;14(8):721-728. doi: 10.7150/ijms.19727. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28824306

  • Aoki A, Mizutani K, Schwarz F, Sculean A, Yukna RA, Takasaki AA, Romanos GE, Taniguchi Y, Sasaki KM, Zeredo JL, Koshy G, Coluzzi DJ, White JM, Abiko Y, Ishikawa I, Izumi Y. Periodontal and peri-implant wound healing following laser therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2015 Jun;68(1):217-69. doi: 10.1111/prd.12080.

    PubMed 25867988

  • Heidari M, Paknejad M, Jamali R, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Fekrazad R, Moslemi N. Effect of laser photobiomodulation on wound healing and postoperative pain following free gingival graft: A split-mouth triple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2017 Jul;172:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 18.

    PubMed 28549319

  • Amorim JC, de Sousa GR, de Barros Silveira L, Prates RA, Pinotti M, Ribeiro MS. Clinical study of the gingiva healing after gingivectomy and low-level laser therapy. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Oct;24(5):588-94. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.24.588.

    PubMed 17069488

  • Khan I, Arany P. Biophysical Approaches for Oral Wound Healing: Emphasis on Photobiomodulation. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015 Dec 1;4(12):724-737. doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0623.

    PubMed 26634185

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing J. Morita AdvErl Evo Er:YAG laser in people with Healing Surgical Wounds and Pain Measurement, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Nov 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Self-Reported Patient Discomfort as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (time frame: One week). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03741062, which also lists 24 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2020.

AzTrials uses cookies for analytics and advertising. You can accept or reject them; the site works either way. Privacy Policy.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in