Atopic DermatitisPhase 2NCT03738423
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of REGN3500 Administered to Adult Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
A Phase 2 study testing REGN3500 in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 89 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of REGN3500 monotherapy in Atopic dermatitis (AD), as well as understand the dose-response relationship, compared with placebo treatment, in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- REGN3500
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 129 participants
- Where
- 89 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 13 Nov 2018to 24 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic AD, according to American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria (Eichenfield, 2014), that has been present for at least 3 years before the screening visit
- Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥16 at the screening and baseline visits
- IGA score ≥3 (on the 0 to 4 IGA scale, in which 3 is moderate and 4 is severe) at screening and baseline visits
- ≥10% Body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the screening and baseline visits
- Documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to topical AD medication(s) or for whom topical treatments are medically inadvisable
Who cannot join
- Participation in a prior anti-Interleukin (IL)-33 medication clinical study
- Treatment with an investigational drug within 8 weeks or within 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer, before the baseline visit
- Having used any of the following treatments within 4 weeks before the baseline visit or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to require such treatment(s) during the first 4 weeks of study treatment:
- Immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drugs (eg, systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, mycophenolate-mofetil, Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), Janus kinase inhibitors, azathioprine, methotrexate, etc)
- Phototherapy for AD
- Regular use (more than 2 visits per week) of a tanning booth/parlor within 4 weeks of the baseline visit
Show all 13Show fewer
- Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 12 weeks before the baseline visit
- Active chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the baseline visit
- Known or suspected history of immunosuppression
- History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive HIV serology at screening
- Positive with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb), or hepatitis C virus antibody (HCV Ab) at the screening visit
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study
- Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria apply
Trial locations and contacts
89 sites in 11 countries.
89 sites in 11 countries
United States31 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209
Regeneron Study Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45231
Regeneron Study Site
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Regeneron Study Site
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Regeneron Study Site
Fremont, California, 94538
Regeneron Study Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Regeneron Study Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148
Regeneron Study Site
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Regeneron Study Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Regeneron Study Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Regeneron Study Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40217
Regeneron Study Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40241
Regeneron Study Site
Macon, Georgia, 31217
Regeneron Study Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402
Regeneron Study Site
New York, New York, 10022
Regeneron Study Site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Regeneron Study Site
Norman, Oklahoma, 73071
Regeneron Study Site
North Charleston, South Carolina, 29420
Regeneron Study Site
Oceanside, California, 92056
Regeneron Study Site
Overland Park, Kansas, 66215
Regeneron Study Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Regeneron Study Site
Sacramento, California, 95815
Regeneron Study Site
Saint Joseph, Michigan, 49085
Regeneron Study Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78218
Regeneron Study Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Regeneron Study Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
Regeneron Study Site
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Regeneron Study Site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259
Regeneron Study Site
Skokie, Illinois, 60077
Regeneron Study Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85718
Regeneron Study Site
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405
Germany13 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Bad Bentheim, 48455
Regeneron Study Site
Berlin, 10117
Regeneron Study Site
Berlin, 12459
Regeneron Study Site
Frankfurt, 60590
Regeneron Study Site
Hamburg, 20537
Regeneron Study Site
Hanau, 63450
Regeneron Study Site
Ibbenbueren, 49477
Regeneron Study Site
Leipzig, 04103
Regeneron Study Site
Lübeck, 23538
Regeneron Study Site
München, 80337
Regeneron Study Site
Münster, 48149
Regeneron Study Site
Tübingen, 72076
Regeneron Study Site
Witten, 58453
Japan9 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Chūō, 409-3898
Regeneron Study Site
Hiroshima, 734-8551
Regeneron Study Site
Kanagawa, 252-0392
Regeneron Study Site
Kyoto, 602-8566
Regeneron Study Site
Kyoto, 606-8507
Regeneron Study Site
Shizuoka, 420-8630
Regeneron Study Site
Shizuoka, 430-0929
Regeneron Study Site
Wakayama, 641-8510
Regeneron Study Site
Yamanashi, 400-8506
South Korea9 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Bucheon-si, 14584
Regeneron Study Site
Busan, 49241
Regeneron Study Site
Gyeonggi-do, 16499
Regeneron Study Site
Incheon, 21431
Regeneron Study Site
Incheon, 21565
Regeneron Study Site
Seoul, 02841
Regeneron Study Site
Seoul, 06591
Regeneron Study Site
Seoul, 06973
Regeneron Study Site
Seoul, 07441
Poland7 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Krakow, 30-033
Regeneron Study Site
Lodz, 90-436
Regeneron Study Site
Szczecin, 71-434
Regeneron Study Site
Warsaw, 01-817
Regeneron Study Site
Warsaw, 02-953
Regeneron Study Site
Wroclaw, 51-318
Regeneron Study Site
Wroclaw, 51-685
Canada6 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Calgary, Alberta, T2G 1B1
Regeneron Study Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 1G5
Regeneron Study Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1
Regeneron Study Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5N 1E3
Regeneron Study Site
Verdun, Quebec, H4G 3E7
Regeneron Study Site
Windsor, Ontario, N8X 2G1
Czechia4 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Brno, 602 00
Regeneron Study Site
Náchod, 547 01
Regeneron Study Site
Ostrava, 702 00
Regeneron Study Site
Prague, 130 00
Spain4 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Barakaldo, 48903
Regeneron Study Site
Córdoba, 14004
Regeneron Study Site
Madrid, 28041
Regeneron Study Site
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Hungary3 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Budapest, 84-88
Regeneron Study Site
Debrecen, Hajdú-Bihar, 4032
Regeneron Study Site
Orosháza, Bekes County, 5900
Australia2 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Kogarah, 2217
Regeneron Study Site
Melbourne, 3002
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Study Investigating the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of REGN3500 Administered to Adult Patients With Moderate-to- Severe Atopic Dermatitis
The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of REGN3500 monotherapy in Atopic dermatitis (AD), as well as understand the dose-response relationship, compared with placebo treatment, in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD.
Secondary objectives are to:
- Assess the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous (SC) doses of REGN3500 monotherapy in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD
- Assess the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of REGN3500 in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD
- Assess the immunogenicity of REGN3500 in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- REGN3500, REGN3500-Matching Placebo
- Keywords
- Moderate, Severe
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic, Lymphoma, Follicular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
REGN3500Drug
Administered subcutaneous (SC)
REGN3500-Matching PlaceboDrug
Administered subcutaneous (SC)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: REGN3500; Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo |
| Treatment 2 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: REGN3500; Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo |
| Treatment 3 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: REGN3500; Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo |
| Treatment 4 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: REGN3500; Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo |
| Treatment 5 | Experimental | Matching placebo Receives: Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percent change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 was reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing.
Measured: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percent change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment was reported.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (23)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (Greater Than or Equal to [≥] 50 Percent [%] Improvement From Baseline) Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI-50 (≥50% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (Greater Than or Equal to [≥] 50% Improvement From Baseline) Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI-50 (≥50% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 were based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI-75 (≥75% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI-75 (≥75% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-90 (EASI-90) (≥90% Improvement From Baseline) Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI-90 (≥90% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing EASI score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-90 (EASI-90) (≥90% Improvement From Baseline) Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percentage of participants who achieved EASI-90 (≥90% Improvement from baseline) at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported.
Measured: Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Absolute change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment was reported.
Measured: Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Absolute change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment was reported.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Both Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score 0 or 1 (on 0 to 5 IGA Scale) and a Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
IGA was an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5 point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response was an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with both IGA score of "0" or "1" and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing IGA score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Both IGA Score 0 or 1 (on the 0 to 5 IGA Scale) and a Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
IGA was an assessment scale used to determine severity of AD and clinical response to treatment on a 5 point scale (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response was an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with both IGA score of "0" or "1" and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported.
Measured: Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Participants were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Absolute change from baseline in weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus NRS score at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment was reported.
Measured: Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Participants were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Measured: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Participants were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Percent change from baseline in weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS score at Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment was reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing NRS score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Measured: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Participants were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Percent change from baseline in weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS score at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment was reported.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS Score ≥4 Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Participants were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Percentage of participants with improvement of weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS score ≥4 from baseline to Week 16 based on observed values set to missing after rescue treatment were reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and participants with missing NRS score at Week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score ≥4 Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Pruritus NRS was an assessment tool used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch), both maximum and average intensity, using an electronic questionnaire (e-diary). Participants were asked the following question: how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours (for maximum itch intensity on a scale of 0 - 10 [0 = no itch; 10 = worst itch imaginable]). Percentage of participants with improvement of weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS score ≥4 from baseline to Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment were reported.
Measured: Week 16
Time to Onset of Effect on Pruritus (≥4-point Reduction of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS From Baseline)
Peak Pruritus NRS is an assessment tool used by participants to report intensity of pruritus (itch) during a 24-hour recall period. Participants were asked the following question: For maximum itch intensity: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable,' how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?"
Measured: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 16
The SCORAD index is a clinical tool for assessing the severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease).
Measured: Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) Involvement at Week 16
BSA affected by AD will be assessed for each section of the body using the rule of nines (the possible highest score for each region is: head and neck [9%], anterior trunk [18%], back [18%], upper limbs [18%], lower limbs [36%], and genitals [1%]) and will be reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined. The proportion assigned to different body regions is different in younger children as compared to older children (head and neck area is assigned a higher proportion in younger children as compared to older children).
Measured: Week 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) up to Week 16
Adverse Event (AE): any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug which may/may not have a causal relationship with study drug. Serious AE (SAE): any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. TEAE: AEs starting/worsening after first intake of study drug. TEAEs included: serious TEAEs and Non-serious TEAEs. AESI included: Anaphylactic or acute allergic reactions; Severe injection site reactions; Mycosis fungoides/other forms of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; severe infections; any clinical endoparasitosis; Conjunctivitis, keratitis, or blepharitis; significant Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation. Number of participants with TEAEs, Serious TEAES and AESIs from baseline up to Week 16 were reported.
Measured: Up to week 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) up to Week 36
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug which may/may not have a causal relationship with study drug. SAE: any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial/prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect/considered as medically important event. TEAE: AEs starting/worsening after first intake of study drug. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and Non-serious TEAEs. AESI included: Anaphylactic or acute allergic reactions; Severe injection site reactions; Mycosis fungoides/other forms of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; severe infections; any clinical endoparasitosis; Conjunctivitis, keratitis, or blepharitis; significant Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation. Number of participants with TEAEs, Serious TEAES and AESIs from baseline up to Week 36 were reported.
Measured: Up to week 36
Serum Concentration of Functional REGN3500
Serum Concentration of Functional REGN3500 was reported.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36
Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-Emergent Anti-REGN3500 Antibodies (ADA)
Treatment-Emergent (TE) ADA was defined as any positive post baseline assay response when baseline results were negative or missing. Treatment-Emergent ADA responses were further classified as: - persistent (treatment-emergent positive ADA response detected in at least 2 consecutive post baseline samples separated by at least a 16-week post baseline period [based on nominal sampling time], with no ADA-negative samples in-between, regardless of any missing samples or a positive response at the last ADA sampling time point),- indeterminate (a positive assay response at the last collection time point only, regardless of any missing samples), - transient (not persistent/indeterminate, regardless of any missing samples). Number of participants with positive treatment-emergent anti-REGN3500 antibodies (ADA) were reported. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this endpoint.
Measured: Up to week 36
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2018
- Study start13 Nov 2018
- Primary completion13 Mar 2020
- Study completion24 Jul 2020
Why it stopped: Lack of efficacy
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Regeneron PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 129 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trial Management, Study director, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03738423
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R3500-AD-1805
- Other IDs
- 2018-001544-64, 2018
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 8 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Kosloski MP, Guttman-Yassky E, Cork MJ, Worm M, Nahm DH, Zhu X, Ruddy MK, Harel S, Kamal MA, Goulaouic H, Xu CR, Avetisova E, Davis JD, Nivens MC, Shabbir A, Radin A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of itepekimab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from two terminated phase II trials. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Aug;17(8):e13874. doi: 10.1111/cts.13874.
PubMed 39077906
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Study Investigating the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of REGN3500 Administered to Adult Patients With Moderate-to- Severe Atopic Dermatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03738423
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R3500-AD-1805
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Keywords
- Moderate, Severe
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Lack of efficacy
- Enrolment
- 129 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Study start
- 13 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 Jun 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of REGN3500 monotherapy in Atopic dermatitis (AD), as well as understand the dose-response relationship, compared with placebo treatment, in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD.
Secondary objectives are to:
- Assess the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous (SC) doses of REGN3500 monotherapy in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD
- Assess the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of REGN3500 in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD
- Assess the immunogenicity of REGN3500 in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment 1 | Experimental | Drug: REGN3500, Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo |
| Treatment 2 | Experimental | Drug: REGN3500, Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo |
| Treatment 3 | Experimental | Drug: REGN3500, Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo |
| Treatment 4 | Experimental | Drug: REGN3500, Drug: REGN3500-Matching Placebo |
| Treatment 5 | Experimental | Drug: REGN3500-Matching PlaceboMatching placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Chronic AD, according to American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria (Eichenfield, 2014), that has been present for at least 3 years before the screening visit
- Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥16 at the screening and baseline visits
- IGA score ≥3 (on the 0 to 4 IGA scale, in which 3 is moderate and 4 is severe) at screening and baseline visits
- ≥10% Body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the screening and baseline visits
- Documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to topical AD medication(s) or for whom topical treatments are medically inadvisable
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Participation in a prior anti-Interleukin (IL)-33 medication clinical study
- Treatment with an investigational drug within 8 weeks or within 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer, before the baseline visit
- Having used any of the following treatments within 4 weeks before the baseline visit or any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to require such treatment(s) during the first 4 weeks of study treatment:
- Regular use (more than 2 visits per week) of a tanning booth/parlor within 4 weeks of the baseline visit
- Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 12 weeks before the baseline visit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| REGN3500Administered subcutaneous (SC) | Drug | Treatment 1, Treatment 2, Treatment 3, Treatment 4 |
| REGN3500-Matching PlaceboAdministered subcutaneous (SC) | Drug | Treatment 1, Treatment 2, Treatment 3, Treatment 4, Treatment 5 |
Primary outcome
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percent change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 was reported. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing.
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, induration, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. Percent change from baseline in EASI score at Week 16 based on all observed values regardless of rescue treatment was reported.
23 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (Greater Than or Equal to [≥] 50 Percent [%] Improvement From Baseline) Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-50 (EASI-50) (Greater Than or Equal to [≥] 50% Improvement From Baseline) Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥75% Improvement From Baseline) Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-90 (EASI-90) (≥90% Improvement From Baseline) Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-90 (EASI-90) (≥90% Improvement From Baseline) Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Both Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score 0 or 1 (on 0 to 5 IGA Scale) and a Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Both IGA Score 0 or 1 (on the 0 to 5 IGA Scale) and a Reduction From Baseline of ≥2 Points Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) in Weekly Average of Peak Daily Pruritus NRS Score ≥4 Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction From Baseline) in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS Score ≥4 Based on All Observed Values Regardless of Rescue Treatment at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Time to Onset of Effect on Pruritus (≥4-point Reduction of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS From Baseline)
Time frame: Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Absolute Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) Involvement at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) up to Week 16
Time frame: Up to week 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) up to Week 36
Time frame: Up to week 36
Serum Concentration of Functional REGN3500
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36
Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-Emergent Anti-REGN3500 Antibodies (ADA)
Time frame: Up to week 36
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39077906Kosloski MP, Guttman-Yassky E, Cork MJ, Worm M, Nahm DH, Zhu X, Ruddy MK, Harel S, Kamal MA, Goulaouic H, Xu CR, Avetisova E, Davis JD, Nivens MC, Shabbir A, Radin A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of itepekimab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from two terminated phase II trials. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Aug;17(8):e13874. doi: 10.1111/cts.13874.
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
Effects of Treatments on Atopic Dermatitis
Eczema, Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 1
Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of Baricitinib in Patients With Job Syndrome With Lupus-Like Disease and/or Atopic Dermatitis
Hyper IgE Syndrome From STAT3 Mutation, Job s Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trial Management study director
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
89 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing REGN3500 in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 89 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 89 sites in United States, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Poland and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jun 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score Based on Observed Values Set to Missing After Rescue Treatment at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03738423, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2022.