Atopic DermatitisPhase 3Heads UpNCT03738397
A Study to Compare Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib to Dupilumab in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
A Phase 3 study testing Upadacitinib and Dupilumab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by AbbVie at 159 sites in 23 countries.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate upadacitinib compared to dupilumab (Dupixent®) in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are candidates for systemic therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 76 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Upadacitinib and Dupilumab
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 673 participants
- Where
- 159 sitesin 23 countries
- Study dates
- 21 Feb 2019to 9 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 76 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant has active moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) defined by Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥ 16, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) ≥ 3, ≥ 10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the Screening and Baseline Visits, and Baseline weekly average of daily Worst Pruritus NRS ≥ 4.
- Participant is a candidate for systemic therapy or have recently required systemic therapy for AD.
Who cannot join
- Participant has prior exposure to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor.
- Participant has prior exposure to dupilumab.
- Participant is unable or unwilling to discontinue current AD treatments prior to the study.
- Participant has requirement of prohibited medications during the study.
- Participant has other active skin diseases or skin infections requiring systemic treatment or would interfere with appropriate assessment of AD lesions.
- Female participant who is pregnant, breastfeeding, or considering pregnancy during the study.
Trial locations and contacts
159 sites in 23 countries.
159 sites in 23 countries
United States52 sites
Georgia Pollens Clinical Research Centers, Inc /ID# 211092
Albany, Georgia, 31707-1282
Orion Clinical Research /ID# 208765
Austin, Texas, 78759-4100
Clinical Research Center AL /ID# 210277
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209-6802
DiscoveResearch, Inc. /ID# 213171
Bryan, Texas, 77802
Medical University of South Carolina /ID# 211054
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine /ID# 208680
Chicago, Illinois, 60611-2927
Medical Dermatology Associates of Chicago /ID# 210265
Chicago, Illinois, 60654-6903
Clarkston Skin Research /ID# 208739
Clarkston, Michigan, 48346
Univ Hosp Cleveland /ID# 208852
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
The Ohio State University /ID# 209254
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1257
Henry Ford Health System /ID# 208741
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Epiphany Dermatology - Fort Worth /ID# 211187
Fort Worth, Texas, 76244-6548
Tien Q Nguyen MD, Inc /ID# 208934
Fountain Valley, California, 92708-3701
UCSF Fresno /ID# 213253
Fresno, California, 93701-2302
The Community Research of South Florida /ID# 211145
Hialeah, Florida, 33016-1897
Dawes Fretzin, LLC /ID# 209187
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46256
Clinical Research Solutions, LLC /ID# 212542
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305-2163
Sante Clinical Research /ID# 212970
Kerrville, Texas, 78028-9640
Forest Hills Dermatology Group /ID# 209249
Kew Gardens, New York, 11415
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center /ID# 213727
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Associates, PC /ID# 213481
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68505-2343
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences /ID# 211688
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Jonathan Corren, MD. INC /ID# 208987
Los Angeles, California, 90025-4749
California Allergy and Asthma Medical Group /ID# 213680
Los Angeles, California, 90025-7014
Dermatology Research Associates /ID# 209097
Los Angeles, California, 90045
Los Angelos Cataract Center /ID# 208524
Los Angeles, California, 90056
Miami Dermatology and Laser Institute /ID# 212938
Miami, Florida, 33173-3570
Florida International Rsrch cr /ID# 211562
Miami, Florida, 33173
Clinical Research Institute, Inc /ID# 210852
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402-2606
Dermatology Clinical Trials /ID# 214622
Newport Beach, California, 92660-7853
Sneeze, Wheeze, & Itch Associates, LLC /ID# 212058
Normal, Illinois, 61761
Skin Specialists, PC /ID# 208843
Omaha, Nebraska, 68144
Progressive Medical Research /ID# 211994
Port Orange, Florida, 32127
Oregon Medical Res Center PC /ID# 208807
Portland, Oregon, 97223
Oregon Health and Science University /ID# 208809
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Beacon Clinical Research, LLC /ID# 209280
Quincy, Massachusetts, 02169
Clinical Research Partners, LLC /ID# 212262
Richmond, Virginia, 23220-4459
UC Davis Health /ID# 209285
Sacramento, California, 95816
University of Utah /ID# 209001
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112-5500
Stephen Miller, MD PA /ID# 210071
San Antonio, Texas, 78249
Ucsd /Id# 208990
San Diego, California, 92103
Clinical Science Institute /ID# 211022
Santa Monica, California, 90404-2102
Meridian Clinical Research Dermatology /ID# 213251
Savannah, Georgia, 31406-2632
West Virginia Research Inst /ID# 212730
South Charleston, West Virginia, 25309
Premier Clinical Research /ID# 212142
Spokane, Washington, 99202
GCP Research /ID# 216020
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705
Sugar Land Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Center /ID# 211153
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479-3153
Clinical Research Trials of Florida, Inc. /ID# 210751
Tampa, Florida, 33607
Montefiore Medical Center /ID# 209647
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Southside Dermatology /ID# 212004
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74132
Integrated Clinical Research LLC /ID# 208831
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33406-6063
Wake Forest Univ HS /ID# 208892
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Canada10 sites
Kirk Barber Research, CA /ID# 209504
Calgary, Alberta, T2G 1B1
Dermatology Research Institute Inc. /ID# 210942
Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7E1
Dr. Wei Jing Loo Medicine Prof /ID# 211400
London, Ontario, N6H 5L5
Lynderm Research Inc. /ID# 209505
Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X2
DermEdge Research Inc. /ID# 211122
Mississauga, Ontario, L5H 1G9
Dre Angelique Gagne-Henley M.D. inc. /ID# 209498
Saint-Jérôme, Quebec, J7Z 7E2
Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical Inc. /ID# 211032
Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7
Enverus Medical Research /ID# 209503
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 0C6
Niakosari Medicine Professional Corporation /ID# 211401
Toronto, Ontario, M2M 4J5
K. Papp Clinical Research /ID# 209509
Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4
France7 sites
CHRU Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez /ID# 209317
Lille, Hauts-de-France, 59045
Hopital de la Timone /ID# 211245
Marseille, 13385
CHU de Nantes - Hotel Dieu /ID# 208974
Nantes, Pays de la Loire Region, 44093
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice - Hopital l'Archet 2 /ID# 213374
Nice, 06202
Polyclinique Courlancy /ID# 208975
Reims, 51100
Charles Nicolle CHU Rouen /ID# 208973
Rouen, Seine-Maritime, 76031
Hopital Larrey - CHU de Toulouse /ID# 208976
Toulouse, 31059
Italy7 sites
A.O. Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi /ID# 209111
Bologna, 40138
A.O.U. di Brescia /ID# 209115
Brescia, 25123
Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio /ID# 209109
Cagliari, 9124
Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico /ID# 210632
Milan, Lombardy, 20122
AO Univ di Modena /ID# 209110
Modena, 41100
Policlinico Univ Tor Vergata /ID# 209112
Rome, 00133
IBD Center - IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas /ID# 215726
Rozzano, Milano, 20089
Germany6 sites
Gemeinschaftspraxis /ID# 211174
Blankenfeld-mahlow, 15831
Hautklinik Klinikum Darmstadt /ID# 210938
Darmstadt, 64283
Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt /ID# 210934
Frankfurt, 60590
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover /ID# 210939
Hanover, 30625
TU Uniklinik Munchen /ID# 210937
Munich, 80802
Universitatsklinikum Munster /ID# 210935
Munster, Lower Saxony, 48149
Malaysia6 sites
Hospital Pulau Pinang /ID# 210212
George Town, 10450
Hospital Sultan Ismail /ID# 211037
Johor Bahru, Johor, 81100
UKM Medical Centre /ID# 209178
Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, 56000
University Malaya Med Ctr /ID# 208861
Kuala Lumpur, 59100
Hospital Pakar Sultanah Fatimah /ID# 210185
Muar town, Johor, 84000
Hospital Putrajaya /ID# 209177
Putrajaya, 62250
Netherlands6 sites
Centrum Oosterwal /ID# 209641
Alkmaar, 1817 MS
Academisch Medisch Centrum /ID# 208578
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ
Bravis Ziekenhuis /ID# 208584
Bergen op Zoom, North Brabant, 4624 VT
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen /ID# 208583
Groningen, 9713 GZ
Erasmus Medisch Centrum /ID# 208582
Rotterdam, 3015 GD
Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht /ID# 208579
Utrecht, 3584 CX
Poland6 sites
ClinicMed Daniluk, Nowak Sp.j. /ID# 211112
Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship, 15-879
Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 1 im. dr. A. Jurasza w Bydgoszczy /ID# 211103
Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, 85-094
Pratia MCM Krakow /ID# 207444
Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 30-510
Dermoklinika Medical Center /ID# 211026
Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, 90-436
Klinika Ambroziak Sp. z o.o. /ID# 207443
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-758
Royalderm Agnieszka Nawrocka /ID# 211015
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-962
Spain6 sites
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge /ID# 207063
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrin /ID# 208969
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, 35010
Hospital de Manises /ID# 207062
Manises, Valencia, 46940
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra /ID# 207139
Pontevedra, 36071
Hospital Universitario Arnau Vilanova /ID# 207065
Valencia, 46015
Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe /ID# 207064
Valencia, 46026
United Kingdom6 sites
Royal Alex Childrens County Hospital /ID# 209709
Brighton, Brighton And Hove, BN2 5BE
Cardiff & Vale University Health Board /ID# 209745
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XN
Royal Hospital for Children /ID# 210451
Glasgow, Glasgow City, G51 4TF
Victoria Hospital /ID# 209853
Kirkcaldy, Fife, KY2 5AH
The Royal Free Hospital /ID# 208659
London, London, City of, NW3 2QG
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Found /ID# 208881
London, London, City of, SE1 9RT
Australia5 sites
Holdsworth House Medical Practice /ID# 214565
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010
The Skin Hospital /ID# 214401
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010
Sinclair Dermatology /ID# 209395
East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002
Burswood Dermatology /ID# 214875
Victoria Park, Western Australia, 6100
Veracity Clinical Research /ID# 211134
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
Czechia5 sites
Fakultni Nemocnice Brno /ID# 212968
Brno, 625 00
FN Hradec Kralove /ID# 209116
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Nemocnice Jihlava, prispevkova organizace /ID# 209131
Jihlava, 586 01
Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava /ID# 209117
Ostrava, 708 52
Fakultni Nemocnice v Motole /ID# 209209
Prague, 150 06
Hungary5 sites
Uno Medical Trials Kft /ID# 211177
Budapest XIII, 1135
Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont /ID# 210893
Debrecen, 4032
Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mor Oktat /ID# 210149
Kaposvár, 7400
Oroshazi Korhaz /ID# 210150
Orosháza, Bekes County, 5900
Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem Klinikai l.sz. Belgyogyaszati Klinika /ID# 210892
Pécs, 7624
Croatia4 sites
Naftalan - Specijalna bolnica za medicinsku rehabilitaciju /ID# 209937
Ivanić-Grad, Zagreb County, 10310
DermaPlus - Poliklinika za dermatologiju i venerologiju /ID# 209935
Zagreb, City of Zagreb, 10000
Djecja bolnica Srebrnjak /ID# 209939
Zagreb, City of Zagreb, 10000
Klinicki bolnicki centar Zagreb /ID# 209976
Zagreb, City of Zagreb, 10000
Finland4 sites
Keski-pohjanmaa Central Hospital /ID# 209534
Kokkola, Keski-Pohjanmaa, 67200
Mikkeli Central Hospital /ID# 210125
Mikkeli, 50100
Oulu University Hospital /ID# 208961
Oulu, North Ostrobothnia, 90220
Pihlajalinna Turku /ID# 209599
Turku, 20100
Israel4 sites
HaEmek Medical Center /ID# 210153
Afula, 1834111
Rabin Medical Center /ID# 210012
Petah Tikva, 4941492
Sheba Medical Center /ID# 210013
Ramat Gan, 5239424
Ichilov Medical Center /ID# 210014
Tel Aviv, 64239
Taiwan4 sites
China Medical University Hosp /ID# 209770
Taichung, Taichung, 40447
Chung Shan Medical University /ID# 208311
Taichung, 40201
Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital /ID# 209987
Taipei, 116
National Taiwan University Hospital /ID# 208309
Taipei City, Taipei, 100
New Zealand3 sites
Optimal Clinical Trials Ltd /ID# 209475
Auckland, 1010
Clinical Trials NZ /ID# 215590
Hamilton, 3206
Wellington Hospital (Capital and Coast District Health Board) /ID# 215001
Wellington, 6021
Norway3 sites
Universitetssykehuset N-Norge, Harstad /ID# 209105
Harstad, Troms, 9406
Universitetssykehuset N-Norge, Tromso /ID# 209103
Tromsø, Troms, 9019
St. Olavs Hospital HF /ID# 209137
Trondheim, Sor-Trondelag, 7006
Singapore3 sites
National Skin Centre /ID# 208775
Singapore, Central Singapore, 308205
National University Hospital /ID# 208774
Singapore, 119074
Singapore General Hospital /ID# 208776
Singapore, 169608
Ukraine3 sites
Kyiv City Clinical Skin and Venereal Hospital /ID# 210755
Kyiv, 04209
ME "Rivne Regional Dermatology and Venereology Dispensary" of RRC /ID# 210434
Rivne, 33028
Military Hospital of Military-Medical Clinical Center of Southern Region /ID# 210435
Zaporizhzhya, Zaporizhzhia Oblast, 69063
Ireland2 sites
St Vincent's University Hosp /ID# 208441
Dublin, D04 T6F4
University Hospital Waterford /ID# 208442
Waterford, X91 ER8E
Sweden2 sites
Skanes Universitetssjukhus /ID# 206783
Malmö, Skåne County, 214 28
Karolinska University Hospital /ID# 207909
Stockholm, SE-17176
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3b Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active Controlled Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib to Dupilumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
This study will evaluate upadacitinib compared to dupilumab (Dupixent®) in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are candidates for systemic therapy.
Read the detailed description
The study is comprised of a 35-day screening period, a 24-week double-blinded treatment period, and a follow-up visit 12 weeks after the last dose. Participants who complete Week 24 have the option to enroll into an open-label study (Study M19-850; NCT04195698) of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily and receive treatment with upadacitinib for an additional 52 weeks.
Participants who meet eligibility criteria will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either upadacitinib or dupilumab. Randomization will be stratified by Baseline disease severity (Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis [vIGA-AD] score of moderate [3] versus severe [4]) and age (<40, ≥ 40 to < 65, ≥ 65 years).
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Upadacitinib, Dupilumab, Placebo to dupilumab, Placebo to upadacitinib
- Keywords
- Upadacitinib, ABT-494, Dupilumab, Atopic Dermatitis
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
UpadacitinibBiological
Also called ABT-494, RINVOQ®
Extended release tablet
DupilumabBiological
Also called Dupixent®
Dupilumab is administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection
Placebo to dupilumabDrug
Placebo administered as a subcutaneous injection
Placebo to upadacitinibDrug
Tablet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Upadacitinib 30 mg QD | Experimental | Participants will receive 30 mg upadacitinib orally once a day (QD) up to Week 24 and placebo to dupilumab by subcutaneous injection every other week from Baseline to Week 22. Receives: Biological: Upadacitinib; Drug: Placebo to dupilumab |
| Dupilumab 300 mg EOW | Experimental | Participants will receive a loading dose of 600 mg dupilumab by subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 followed by 300 mg dupilumab SC every other week (EOW) until Week 22 and placebo to upadacitinib orally QD up to Week 24. Receives: Biological: Dupilumab; Drug: Placebo to upadacitinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Secondary outcomes (7)
Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16
The Worst Pruritus NRS is an assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus during a 24-hour recall period using an electronic hand-held device. Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
The percent change from Baseline was calculated from a rolling weekly average; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 100) at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 90) at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 4
The Worst Pruritus NRS is an assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus during a 24-hour recall period using an electronic hand-held device. Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
The percent change from Baseline was calculated from a rolling weekly average; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 4
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 2
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Measured: Baseline and Week 2
Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 1
The Worst Pruritus NRS is an assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus during a 24-hour recall period using an electronic hand-held device. Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
The percent change from Baseline was calculated from a rolling weekly average; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 1
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16
The Worst Pruritus NRS is an assessment tool that participants used to report the intensity of their pruritus during a 24-hour recall period using an electronic hand-held device. Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2018
- Study start21 Feb 2019
- Primary completion27 Aug 2020
- Study completion9 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AbbVieThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 673 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- ABBVIE INC., Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03738397
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M16-046
- Other IDs
- 2018-002264-57, 2018
- Acronym
- Heads Up
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 9 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 15 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Blauvelt A, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, Costanzo A, De Bruin-Weller M, Barbarot S, Prajapati VH, Lio P, Hu X, Wu T, Liu J, Ladizinski B, Chu AD, Eyerich K. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib vs Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Sep 1;157(9):1047-1055. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3023.
PubMed 34347860Blauvelt A, Simpson EL, Eyerich K, de Bruin-Weller M, Barbarot S, Lio PA, Hurst W, Tcherny-Lessenot S, Levy S, Bastian M. Benefit-risk profile comparison between dupilumab and upadacitinib: a structured benefit-risk assessment of the Heads Up trial. J Dermatolog Treat. 2026 Dec;37(1):2675726. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2026.2675726. Epub 2026 Jun 1.
PubMed 42223292Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Prajapati VH, Eyerich K, Katoh N, Boguniewicz M, Guttman-Yassky E, Song EJ, Lee WJ, Teixeira HD, Wu T, Sancho Sanchez C, Vigna N, Calimlim BM, de Bruin-Weller M. Rapid Itch Improvement and Skin Clearance with Upadacitinib Versus Placebo (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2) and Versus Dupilumab (Heads Up): Results from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Aug;15(8):2061-2076. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01443-w. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
PubMed 40457140Blauvelt A, Eyerich K, Irvine AD, de Bruin-Weller M, Kwatra SG, Gooderham M, Kim B, Calimlim BM, Lee WJ, Raymundo EM, Liu Y, Ofori S, Platt AM, Silverberg JI. More Time Spent with Clear Skin and No Itch with Upadacitinib versus Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Sep;14(9):2621-2630. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01242-9. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
PubMed 39110139
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3b Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active Controlled Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib to Dupilumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03738397
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Heads Up / M16-046
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Keywords
- Upadacitinib, ABT-494, Dupilumab, Atopic Dermatitis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 673 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVieIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 2 Feb 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate upadacitinib compared to dupilumab (Dupixent®) in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are candidates for systemic therapy.
Detailed description
The study is comprised of a 35-day screening period, a 24-week double-blinded treatment period, and a follow-up visit 12 weeks after the last dose. Participants who complete Week 24 have the option to enroll into an open-label study (Study M19-850; NCT04195698) of upadacitinib 30 mg once daily and receive treatment with upadacitinib for an additional 52 weeks.
Participants who meet eligibility criteria will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either upadacitinib or dupilumab. Randomization will be stratified by Baseline disease severity (Validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis [vIGA-AD] score of moderate [3] versus severe [4]) and age (<40, ≥ 40 to < 65, ≥ 65 years).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Upadacitinib 30 mg QD | Experimental | Biological: Upadacitinib, Drug: Placebo to dupilumabParticipants will receive 30 mg upadacitinib orally once a day (QD) up to Week 24 and placebo to dupilumab by subcutaneous injection every other week from Baseline to Week 22. |
| Dupilumab 300 mg EOW | Experimental | Biological: Dupilumab, Drug: Placebo to upadacitinibParticipants will receive a loading dose of 600 mg dupilumab by subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 followed by 300 mg dupilumab SC every other week (EOW) until Week 22 and placebo to upadacitinib orally QD up to Week 24. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 76 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Participant has active moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) defined by Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥ 16, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) ≥ 3, ≥ 10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the Screening and Baseline Visits, and Baseline weekly average of daily Worst Pruritus NRS ≥ 4.
- Participant is a candidate for systemic therapy or have recently required systemic therapy for AD.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Participant has prior exposure to Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor.
- Participant has prior exposure to dupilumab.
- Participant is unable or unwilling to discontinue current AD treatments prior to the study.
- Participant has requirement of prohibited medications during the study.
- Participant has other active skin diseases or skin infections requiring systemic treatment or would interfere with appropriate assessment of AD lesions.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| UpadacitinibAlso: ABT-494, RINVOQ®Extended release tablet | Biological | Upadacitinib 30 mg QD |
| DupilumabAlso: Dupixent®Dupilumab is administered as a subcutaneous (SC) injection | Biological | Dupilumab 300 mg EOW |
| Placebo to dupilumabPlacebo administered as a subcutaneous injection | Drug | Upadacitinib 30 mg QD |
| Placebo to upadacitinibTablet | Drug | Dupilumab 300 mg EOW |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema). The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
7 secondary outcomes
Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 100) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 90) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 4
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 4
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 2
Time frame: Baseline and Week 2
Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 1
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 1
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Mar 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 34347860Blauvelt A, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, Costanzo A, De Bruin-Weller M, Barbarot S, Prajapati VH, Lio P, Hu X, Wu T, Liu J, Ladizinski B, Chu AD, Eyerich K. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib vs Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Sep 1;157(9):1047-1055. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42223292Blauvelt A, Simpson EL, Eyerich K, de Bruin-Weller M, Barbarot S, Lio PA, Hurst W, Tcherny-Lessenot S, Levy S, Bastian M. Benefit-risk profile comparison between dupilumab and upadacitinib: a structured benefit-risk assessment of the Heads Up trial. J Dermatolog Treat. 2026 Dec;37(1):2675726. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2026.2675726. Epub 2026 Jun 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40457140Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Prajapati VH, Eyerich K, Katoh N, Boguniewicz M, Guttman-Yassky E, Song EJ, Lee WJ, Teixeira HD, Wu T, Sancho Sanchez C, Vigna N, Calimlim BM, de Bruin-Weller M. Rapid Itch Improvement and Skin Clearance with Upadacitinib Versus Placebo (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2) and Versus Dupilumab (Heads Up): Results from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Aug;15(8):2061-2076. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01443-w. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39110139Blauvelt A, Eyerich K, Irvine AD, de Bruin-Weller M, Kwatra SG, Gooderham M, Kim B, Calimlim BM, Lee WJ, Raymundo EM, Liu Y, Ofori S, Platt AM, Silverberg JI. More Time Spent with Clear Skin and No Itch with Upadacitinib versus Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Sep;14(9):2621-2630. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01242-9. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
- This clinical study may be evaluating a usage that is not currently FDA approved. Please see US Prescribing Information for approved uses.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of HSK60002 Tablets in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Dermatitis Atopic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
ABBVIE INC. study director
AbbVie
159 sites in 23 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Upadacitinib and Dupilumab in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by AbbVie at 159 sites in 23 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 159 sites in United States, Canada, France, Italy, Germany and 18 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Feb 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% Reduction From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline and Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03738397, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2024.