Lung Function TestingNCT03728712
Evaluation of Ventilation Homogeneity as a Marker of Small Airway Disease in Active Smokers
An observational study of Lung Function Testing and Cigarette Smoking, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Ventilation heterogeneity is a hallmark feature of most obstructive pulmonary diseases. In particular, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is pathologically and physiologically characterized by small airway destruction and marked airway cellular inflammation, which result in prominent expiratory airflow… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Function Testing, Cigarette Smoking, Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)
- What is being tested?
- SPECT/CT
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 30 Jan 2019to 9 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants will include non-obese adults with or without a history of cigarette smoking who performed normal lung function tests.
Who may be able to join
- Active tobacco smoking of at least 10 cigarettes/day AND total smoking history of at least 15 pack-years.
- Normal lung function testing, defined as: FVC/FEV1 ratio, FEV1 and FVC all greater than the lower limit of normal; mean forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75% of CVF (FEF25-75%) >80% of predicted value and absence of concavity on the forced expiratory flow curve, as evaluated by a trained respirologist; total lung capacity (TLC) greater than the lower limit of normal; residual volume (RV), functional residual capacity (FRC), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC) and VR/TLC ratio all >80% predicted value and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >80% predicted value when corrected for hemoglobin level.
- Body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2
- No history of tobacco-smoking.
- Normal lung function testing, defined as: FVC/FEV1 ratio, FEV1 and FVC all greater than the lower limit of normal; mean forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75% of CVF (FEF25-75%) >80% of predicted value and absence of concavity on the forced expiratory flow curve, as evaluated by a trained respirologist; total lung capacity (TLC) greater than the lower limit of normal; residual volume (RV), functional residual capacity (FRC), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC) and VR/TLC ratio all >80% predicted value and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >80% predicted value when corrected for hemoglobin level.
- Body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2
Who cannot join
- Post-bronchodilator change in FEV1 and FVC of more than 6% and/or 100 ml.
- For Non-smokers group:
- Post-bronchodilator change in FEV1 and FVC of more than 6% and/or 100 ml.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3E4
About this study
Official title: Quantitative Ventilation Lung Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography With CT Scan (Technegas SPECT/CT) to Assess Early Small Airway Disease in Smokers: a Pilot Study
Ventilation heterogeneity is a hallmark feature of most obstructive pulmonary diseases. In particular, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is pathologically and physiologically characterized by small airway destruction and marked airway cellular inflammation, which result in prominent expiratory airflow limitation, air trapping, hyperinflation and abnormal gas exchange. COPD is strongly linked with the exposition to inhaled irritants, most notably tobacco smoke, and is as such a potentially preventable disease. COPD-related morbidity, mortality and social costs are high: in Canada, COPD is the main cause of hospital admission among all chronic diseases and is the fourth leading cause of death.
Diagnosis of COPD requires the objective demonstration of expiratory airflow limitation using spirometry. In the right clinical context, a post-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (FVC) / forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ratio <0.70 is considered indicative of the presence of COPD, and therefore pulmonary function testing is required to make the diagnosis. However, the natural history of COPD represents a slowly-progressive continuum: active smokers that do not meet the criteria for COPD are still at risk of developing the disease. In fact, when compared to healthy non-smokers, active smokers without overt COPD can already show some pathological and clinical features of the disease. Notably, they report increased levels of resting dyspnea, chronic cough, lower exercise capacity, exercise-induced dynamic hyperinflation and marked airway inflammatory cellular infiltration, while conserving normal pulmonary function test values.
Read more
These findings highlight the negative, clinically-measurable effects of tobacco smoking on pulmonary function, but also the limitations of standard pulmonary function testing in identifying the presence of early, mild airway disease and quantifying physiological limitations in these subjects. As such, there is a need for a novel, simple and reliable method of quantifying airway disease in this population.
Quantitative lung ventilation single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) allows an objective quantification of the regional heterogeneity of ventilation in humans. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the distribution of a radioactive tracer, inhaled during the test, allows the generation of heterogeneity maps and density curves of small elements of the lung. These variables are sensitive to the presence of COPD, asthma, air trapping and are correlated to even slight anomalies in pulmonary function testing in otherwise healthy subjects. As such, SPECT could prove useful as an early marker of airway disease in active smokers at risk of developing COPD, but its use in this context has never been formally tested.
This pilot study addresses the question of whether lung SPECT could provide clinically relevant information on airway disease in active smokers without overt lung disease on pulmonary lung function testing.
- Conditions
- Lung Function Testing, Cigarette Smoking, Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT), Ventilation Homogeneity, Lung Disease Prevention
- Being tested
- SPECT/CT
- Medical subject headings
- Cigarette Smoking
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SPECT/CTDiagnostic test
Technegas-Tc99m is approved by Health Canada for the evaluation of ventilation. Technegas will be prepared with a Technegas Generator (Cyclomedica) according to the manufacturer recommendations with a simmer phase and a burning phase. 95% ethanol will be used to wet the carbon crucible. The crucible will be loaded with 20-30 mCi of Tc99m. Tc99m has a physical half-life of 6 hours.
Technegas will be administered to the patient within 10 minutes of its preparation, in a separate room than the scanning room. The inhalation technique will be rehearsed with the patient prior to the actual inhalation. The patient will be in supine position. A mouth piece and a nose clip will be used. The patient will be instructed to take 3 breaths of Technegas, starting after normal exhalation. A survey meter will be used to monitor the quality of the inhalation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Never smokers | Participants with no history of cigarette smoking Receives: Diagnostic Test: SPECT/CT | |
| Active smokers | Participants with an active history of cigarette smoking AND at least 10 pack-years total smoking history Receives: Diagnostic Test: SPECT/CT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
AUC-CV>20% values
Density curves with coefficient values >20% will be compared among the two groups of participants
Measured: Immediately after data acquisition
Secondary outcomes (2)
Relationship between AUC-CV>20% values and lung function data
Correlation between AUC-CV>20% values and forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, residual volume, lung clearance index and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide
Measured: Immediately after data acquisition
Relationship between AUC-CV>20% values and clinical symptoms
Correlation between AUC-CV>20% values and dyspnea severity (modified medical research council scale) and respiratory symptoms (COPD assessment test)
Measured: Immediately after data acquisition
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2018
- Study start30 Jan 2019
- Primary completion9 Nov 2022
- Study completion9 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung Function TestingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cyclomedica Australia PTY Limited
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bruno-Pierre Dubé, MD, Principal investigator, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03728712
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18.149
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 31 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 14 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Quantitative Ventilation Lung Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography With CT Scan (Technegas SPECT/CT) to Assess Early Small Airway Disease in Smokers: a Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03728712
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18.149
- Conditions
- Lung Function Testing, Cigarette Smoking, Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT), Ventilation Homogeneity, Lung Disease Prevention
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Cyclomedica Australia PTY Limited
- Study start
- 30 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Ventilation heterogeneity is a hallmark feature of most obstructive pulmonary diseases. In particular, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is pathologically and physiologically characterized by small airway destruction and marked airway cellular inflammation, which result in prominent expiratory airflow limitation, air trapping, hyperinflation and abnormal gas exchange. COPD is strongly linked with the exposition to inhaled irritants, most notably tobacco smoke, and is as such a potentially preventable disease. COPD-related morbidity, mortality and social costs are high: in Canada, COPD is the main cause of hospital admission among all chronic diseases and is the fourth leading cause of death.
Diagnosis of COPD requires the objective demonstration of expiratory airflow limitation using spirometry. In the right clinical context, a post-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (FVC) / forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ratio <0.70 is considered indicative of the presence of COPD, and therefore pulmonary function testing is required to make the diagnosis. However, the natural history of COPD represents a slowly-progressive continuum: active smokers that do not meet the criteria for COPD are still at risk of developing the disease. In fact, when compared to healthy non-smokers, active smokers without overt COPD can already show some pathological and clinical features of the disease. Notably, they report increased levels of resting dyspnea, chronic cough, lower exercise capacity, exercise-induced dynamic hyperinflation and marked airway inflammatory cellular infiltration, while conserving normal pulmonary function test values.
These findings highlight the negative, clinically-measurable effects of tobacco smoking on pulmonary function, but also the limitations of standard pulmonary function testing in identifying the presence of early, mild airway disease and quantifying physiological limitations in these subjects. As such, there is a need for a novel, simple and reliable method of quantifying airway disease in this population.
Quantitative lung ventilation single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) allows an objective quantification of the regional heterogeneity of ventilation in humans. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the distribution of a radioactive tracer, inhaled during the test, allows the generation of heterogeneity maps and density curves of small elements of the lung. These variables are sensitive to the presence of COPD, asthma, air trapping and are correlated to even slight anomalies in pulmonary function testing in otherwise healthy subjects. As such, SPECT could prove useful as an early marker of airway disease in active smokers at risk of developing COPD, but its use in this context has never been formally tested.
This pilot study addresses the question of whether lung SPECT could provide clinically relevant information on airway disease in active smokers without overt lung disease on pulmonary lung function testing.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Never smokers | – | Diagnostic Test: SPECT/CTParticipants with no history of cigarette smoking |
| Active smokers | – | Diagnostic Test: SPECT/CTParticipants with an active history of cigarette smoking AND at least 10 pack-years total smoking history |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants will include non-obese adults with or without a history of cigarette smoking who performed normal lung function tests.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Active tobacco smoking of at least 10 cigarettes/day AND total smoking history of at least 15 pack-years.
- Normal lung function testing, defined as: FVC/FEV1 ratio, FEV1 and FVC all greater than the lower limit of normal; mean forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75% of CVF (FEF25-75%) >80% of predicted value and absence of concavity on the forced expiratory flow curve, as evaluated by a trained respirologist; total lung capacity (TLC) greater than the lower limit of normal; residual volume (RV), functional residual capacity (FRC), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC) and VR/TLC ratio all >80% predicted value and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >80% predicted value when corrected for hemoglobin level.
- Body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2
- No history of tobacco-smoking.
- Normal lung function testing, defined as: FVC/FEV1 ratio, FEV1 and FVC all greater than the lower limit of normal; mean forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75% of CVF (FEF25-75%) >80% of predicted value and absence of concavity on the forced expiratory flow curve, as evaluated by a trained respirologist; total lung capacity (TLC) greater than the lower limit of normal; residual volume (RV), functional residual capacity (FRC), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC) and VR/TLC ratio all >80% predicted value and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >80% predicted value when corrected for hemoglobin level.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Post-bronchodilator change in FEV1 and FVC of more than 6% and/or 100 ml.
- Post-bronchodilator change in FEV1 and FVC of more than 6% and/or 100 ml.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SPECT/CTTechnegas-Tc99m is approved by Health Canada for the evaluation of ventilation. Technegas will be prepared with a Technegas Generator (Cyclomedica) according to the manufacturer recommendations with a simmer phase and a burning phase. 95% ethanol will be used to wet the carbon crucible. The crucible will be loaded with 20-30 mCi of Tc99m. Tc99m has a physical half-life of 6 hours. Technegas will be administered to the patient within 10 minutes of its preparation, in a separate room than the scanning room. The inhalation technique will be rehearsed with the patient prior to the actual inhalation. The patient will be in supine position. A mouth piece and a nose clip will be used. The patient will be instructed to take 3 breaths of Technegas, starting after normal exhalation. A survey meter will be used to monitor the quality of the inhalation. | Diagnostic test | Active smokers, Never smokers |
Primary outcome
AUC-CV>20% values
Time frame: Immediately after data acquisition
Density curves with coefficient values >20% will be compared among the two groups of participants
2 secondary outcomes
Relationship between AUC-CV>20% values and lung function data
Time frame: Immediately after data acquisition
Relationship between AUC-CV>20% values and clinical symptoms
Time frame: Immediately after data acquisition
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Nov 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lung Function Testing
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Box Breathing Exercise on Anxiety, Pain, and Pulmonary Function Tests in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing Lutetium Lu 177 Dotatate in Patients With Somatostatin Receptor Positive Advanced Bronchial Neuroendocrine Tumors
Advanced Lung Neuroendocrine Tumor, Functioning Lung Neuroendocrine Tumor
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Individuals With Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia and Healthy Controls
Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD)
RecruitingObservational study
Comparing Advanced Technologies to Standard Testing for the Diagnosis of Airway Disease in Hospital and Community Settings
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Airway Disease
Not yet recruiting
Novel Point-of-care Sweat Chloride Testing Device for Monitoring CFTR Function
Cystic Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bruno-Pierre Dubé, MD principal investigator
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Function Testing and Cigarette Smoking, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
AUC-CV>20% values (time frame: Immediately after data acquisition). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2022.