Temporomandibular DisorderNCT03724032
Investigation and Modulation of the Mu-opioid Mechanisms in TMD (in Vivo)
A study testing HD-tDCS* in people with Temporomandibular Disorder, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In this study, this team of researchers will investigate the impact of chronic temporomandibular disorder suffering on the endogenous μ-opioid system in vivo, arguably one of the principal endogenous pain modulatory systems in the brain, and its modulation by 10 daily sessions of primary motor cortex stimulation using… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Temporomandibular Disorder
- What is being tested?
- HD-tDCS*
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Dec 2018to 17 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Provide signed and dated informed consent form;
- Male or female, aged 18 to 65 (inclusive);
- tDCS naïve; and
- Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study.
- In addition, TMD subjects must qualify as:
- Diagnosed with chronic TMD as defined by the Diagnostic Criteria (DC) for TMD and the American Academy of Orofacial Pain (DC/TMD): "Chronic TMD pain and dysfunction for at least one year from the clinical exam session (DC/TMD: Masticatory myofacial pain with/without referral) not adequately controlled by previous therapies (eg, NSAIDs, muscle relaxants)"
Show all 14Show fewer
- TMJ open-surgery naïve;
- TMD maximum pain score pain of greater than or equal to 3 (moderate to severe) on a 0-10 VAS, despite existing treatment, for 3 days in the 7 days preceding study consent, based on report at the screening session;
- If taking pain medications, the dose regimen must be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to screening; and
- Willing to halt the introduction of new medications for chronic TMD symptoms during the study.
- Emphasis is therefore placed on generalizability and chronicity of symptoms.
- OR
- To qualify as a Healthy Volunteer, subjects must be:
- Without self-reported history of systemic disorders or other chronic pain disorders, including migraine.
Who cannot join
- Existence of chronic pain disorder(s) other than TMD
- History of a traumatic brain injury
- History or current evidence of a psychotic disorder (e.g. schizophrenia) or substance abuse (self-reported)
- Bipolar or severe major depression, as evidenced by a Beck Depression Inventory score of ≥ 30
- Ongoing, unresolved disability litigation (self-reported)
- History of neurological disorder (e.g. epilepsy, stroke, neuropathy, neuropathic pain; self-reported)
Show all 13Show fewer
- Opioid pain medications taken within the past 3 months
- Past allergic response to opioids or chemically related drugs (e.g., carfentanil)
- Excluded by MRI Center or PET Center safety screening checklist (as administered by study staff)
- Drug test positive for opioid or recreational drug (e.g., cannabis) at the time of the PET scan visits
- Pregnant or lactating (negative urine pregnancy test must be available before any PET procedures are initiated)
- Treatment with an investigational drug, device or other intervention within 30 days of study enrollment
- Anything that would place the individual at increased risk or preclude the individual's full compliance with or completion of the study (e.g., medical condition, laboratory finding, physical exam finding, logistical complication).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Michigan School of Dentistry
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
About this study
In this study, this team of researchers will investigate the impact of chronic temporomandibular disorder suffering on the endogenous μ-opioid system in vivo, arguably one of the principal endogenous pain modulatory systems in the brain, and its modulation by 10 daily sessions of primary motor cortex stimulation using high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).
Read the detailed description
Approximately 10% of TMD patients will not experience an improvement of their symptoms and around 75% of patients who fail to respond to conservative treatments are also not suitable for TM joint surgery. Initial studies from NIH-NIDCR R56 project using positron emission tomography (PET) with [11C] Carfentanil, a selective radiotracer for μ-opioid receptor (μOR), have demonstrated that there is a decrease in thalamic μOR availability (non displaceable binding potential BPND) in the brains of TMD patients during masseteric pain compared to healthy controls. μ-opioid neurotransmission is arguably one of the mechanisms most centrally involved in pain regulation and experience. Moreover, the thalamus is the major relay structure in the forebrain for (non)-noxious inputs, which will be distributed subsequently to multiple cortical areas for discriminative, cognitive and affective processing. MRI-based reports have found that those findings co-localize with neuroplastic changes in trigeminal pain patients. Conventional therapies are unable to selectively target the thalamus and associated regions, and there is a paucity of data on how to reverse neuroplastic molecular mechanisms when available medications fail. Interestingly, several studies with motor cortex stimulation (MCS) have shown that epidural electrodes in the primary motor cortex (M1) are effective in providing analgesia in patients with central pain and that it occurs via indirect modulation of thalamic activity. Evidently, the invasive nature of such a procedure limits its indication to highly severe pain disorders. New non-invasive neuromodulatory methods for M1, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), can now safely modulate the μOR system, providing relatively lasting pain relief in pain patients. Recently, a novel high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) montage created by this research group was able to reduce exclusively "contralateral" sensory-discrimative clinical pain measures (intensity/area) in TMD patients by targeting precisely the M1 region. Therefore, the main goals of this study are: First, to exploit the μ-opioidergic dysfunction in vivo in TMD patients compared to healthy controls; Second, to determine whether 10 daily sessions of noninvasive and precise M1 HD-tDCS have a modulatory effect on clinical and experimental pain measures in TMD patients; and Third, to investigate whether repetitive active M1 HD-tDCS induces/reverts μOR BPND changes in the thalamus and other pain-related regions, and whether those changes are correlated with TMD pain measures. The studies above represent a change in paradigm in TMD research, as this research group directly investigates and modulates in vivo one of the most important endogenous analgesic mechanisms in the brain.
The IRB approved study protocol also includes secondary data sets to be used for analysis in study objective #6 only. The data sets are not part of the clinical trial as they were collected during a previous study (NIDCR-R56-DE022637 project [IRBMED #HUM00080911; Dr. Alexandre DaSilva, Principal Investigator]). Participants in HUM00080911 (both Healthy and TMD patients) received no intervention, but underwent the same Baseline, MRI and PET protocol. This secondary data will not be represented in the Adverse Event or final enrollment total for this clinical trial. However, the data will be analyzed in a meta-analysis addressing secondary objective #6 only. These data sets will not be used to analyze any primary study objectives, nor change the terms of the clinical trial. Manuscripts that include these secondary data sets will clearly indicate the use of this data and clarify that the data was collected separate from the clinical trial data.
- Conditions
- Temporomandibular Disorder
- Being tested
- HD-tDCS*, Sham HD-tDCS*
- Medical subject headings
- Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HD-tDCS*Device
Also called HD-tDCS (active protocol)
Non-invasive brain stimulation (active protocol)
Sham HD-tDCS*Device
Also called HD-tDCS (sham protocol)
Non-invasive brain stimulation (sham protocol)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TMD Patients Active Group: Active Comparator | Active comparator | 30 TMD patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 20 minute sessions, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). Receives: Device: HD-tDCS* |
| TMD Patients Sham Group: Sham Comparator | Sham comparator | 30 TMD patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 30-second administrations at the beginning and end of each 20 minute session, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). Receives: Device: Sham HD-tDCS* |
| Healthy Control Group | No intervention | 20 Healthy Volunteers will be asked to undergo baseline assessments only (including imaging, but no brain stimulation). Healthy volunteer data (n </= 10) may be used from a prior study (NIDCR-R56-DE022637 project [IRBMED #HUM00080911; Dr. Alexandre DaSilva, Principal Investigator]). Consent to use data for a future study was obtained in the informed consent document at the time of participation. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score From Baseline (Screening Day) to 4 Weeks After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions (Follow Up #2).
Change in clinical Visual Analog Scale pain score from baseline (Screening Day) to 4 weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions (Follow Up #2). Pain is measured on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the worst.
Measured: Screening (Baseline), 4 Weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score During Sustained Masseteric Pain Stress Challenge From Baseline PET (#1) Session to Follow-up PET (#2) Session, 1 Week After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions.
Change in clinical Visual Analog Scale pain score during sustained masseteric pain stress challenge from baseline PET (#1) session to follow-up PET (#2) session, 1 week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions.
Measured: Baseline, 1 Week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions
Changes in GeoPain Measures (PAINS - Summation of Area and Intensity) From Baseline Daily Over the Treatment Period and Through Follow-up (4 Weeks After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions).
Short- and long-term changes in GeoPain measures (percentage of pain area extension in the head region, average of pain intensity in the affected region, and their summation, meaning percentage of combined pain area and intensity in the affected region) from baseline daily over the treatment period and through follow-up at 4 weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions).
Measured: Baseline to 4 weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions
Difference in µOR BPND Levels of Thalamus From Baseline PET (#1) Session to Follow-up PET (#2) Session, 1 Week After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions.
The difference in µOR BPND levels (a measure of receptor availability) between Baseline PET #1 and PET (#2) in TMD patients (active vs sham treatment groups).
The values indicate changes in the availability of mu-opioid receptors (µOR), referred to as the non-displaceable binding potential (BPND), which reflects the density or concentration of available µORs in a particular region of interest in the brain, specifically the left thalamus. These changes are assessed by conducting baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans prior to treatment and follow-up PET scans one week after the completion of HD-tDCS sessions. During each PET scan, µOR measurements are taken during an early resting phase. A positive value indicates increased µOR availability following treatment, while a negative value indicates decreased availability after treatment.
Measured: Baseline to 1 Week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions.
Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score at Rest From Baseline PET (#1) Session to Follow-up PET (#2) Session, 1 Week After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions.
Change in clinical Visual Analog Scale pain score at rest from baseline PET (#1) session to follow-up PET (#2) session, 1 week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions.
Measured: Baseline, 1 Week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions.
Difference in µOR BPND Levels at Rest During PET (#1) in Chronic TMD Patients as Compared to Healthy Subjects.
The difference in µOR BPND levels (a measure of receptor availability) at rest (5-40 mins after radiotracer injection) during baseline PET in TMD patients as compared to healthy subjects.
The values for each group the availability of mu-opioid receptors (µOR), referred to as the non-displaceable binding potential (BPND), which reflects the density or concentration of available µORs in a particular region of interest in the brain, specifically the left thalamus. It was assessed by conducting baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans. The outcome measure 6 was taken during an early-resting (outcome 6)
Measured: During PET #1, at rest (5-40 mins after radiotracer injection)
Difference in µOR BPND Levels During Experimental Sustained Masseteric Pain Stress Challenge During PET (#1) in Chronic TMD Patients as Compared to Healthy Subjects
Difference in µOR BPND levels (a measure of receptor availability) at experimental sustained masseteric pain stress challenge (45-90 mins after radiotracer injection) during baseline PET in TMD patients as compared to healthy subjects.
The values for each group the availability of mu-opioid receptors (µOR), referred to as the non-displaceable binding potential (BPND), which reflects the density or concentration of available µORs in a particular region of interest in the brain, specifically the left thalamus. It was assessed by conducting baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans. The outcome measure 7 was taken during a late pain stimulus (hypertonic saline infusion) phase.
Measured: PET (#1) during experimental sustained masseteric pain stress challenge (45-90 mins after radiotracer injection)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2018
- Study start13 Dec 2018
- Primary completion17 Jan 2022
- Study completion17 Jan 2022
Why it stopped: Low enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Temporomandibular DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MichiganThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alexandre DaSilva, DDS, DMedSc, University of Michigan
- Investigators
- Alexandre F DaSilva, DDS, DMedSc, Principal investigator, University of Michigan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03724032
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HUM00110179
- Other IDs
- U01DE025633
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 26 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kim DJ, Nascimento TD, Lim M, Danciu T, Zubieta JK, Scott PJH, Koeppe R, Kaciroti N, DaSilva AF. Exploring HD-tDCS Effect on mu-opioid Receptor and Pain Sensitivity in Temporomandibular Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial Study. J Pain. 2024 Apr;25(4):1070-1081. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
PubMed 37956741
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation and Modulation of the Mu-opioid Mechanisms in TMD (in Vivo)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03724032
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HUM00110179
- Conditions
- Temporomandibular Disorder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Low enrollment
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MichiganUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
- Study start
- 13 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Jun 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, this team of researchers will investigate the impact of chronic temporomandibular disorder suffering on the endogenous μ-opioid system in vivo, arguably one of the principal endogenous pain modulatory systems in the brain, and its modulation by 10 daily sessions of primary motor cortex stimulation using high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).
Detailed description
Approximately 10% of TMD patients will not experience an improvement of their symptoms and around 75% of patients who fail to respond to conservative treatments are also not suitable for TM joint surgery. Initial studies from NIH-NIDCR R56 project using positron emission tomography (PET) with [11C] Carfentanil, a selective radiotracer for μ-opioid receptor (μOR), have demonstrated that there is a decrease in thalamic μOR availability (non displaceable binding potential BPND) in the brains of TMD patients during masseteric pain compared to healthy controls. μ-opioid neurotransmission is arguably one of the mechanisms most centrally involved in pain regulation and experience. Moreover, the thalamus is the major relay structure in the forebrain for (non)-noxious inputs, which will be distributed subsequently to multiple cortical areas for discriminative, cognitive and affective processing. MRI-based reports have found that those findings co-localize with neuroplastic changes in trigeminal pain patients. Conventional therapies are unable to selectively target the thalamus and associated regions, and there is a paucity of data on how to reverse neuroplastic molecular mechanisms when available medications fail. Interestingly, several studies with motor cortex stimulation (MCS) have shown that epidural electrodes in the primary motor cortex (M1) are effective in providing analgesia in patients with central pain and that it occurs via indirect modulation of thalamic activity. Evidently, the invasive nature of such a procedure limits its indication to highly severe pain disorders. New non-invasive neuromodulatory methods for M1, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), can now safely modulate the μOR system, providing relatively lasting pain relief in pain patients. Recently, a novel high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) montage created by this research group was able to reduce exclusively "contralateral" sensory-discrimative clinical pain measures (intensity/area) in TMD patients by targeting precisely the M1 region. Therefore, the main goals of this study are: First, to exploit the μ-opioidergic dysfunction in vivo in TMD patients compared to healthy controls; Second, to determine whether 10 daily sessions of noninvasive and precise M1 HD-tDCS have a modulatory effect on clinical and experimental pain measures in TMD patients; and Third, to investigate whether repetitive active M1 HD-tDCS induces/reverts μOR BPND changes in the thalamus and other pain-related regions, and whether those changes are correlated with TMD pain measures. The studies above represent a change in paradigm in TMD research, as this research group directly investigates and modulates in vivo one of the most important endogenous analgesic mechanisms in the brain.
The IRB approved study protocol also includes secondary data sets to be used for analysis in study objective #6 only. The data sets are not part of the clinical trial as they were collected during a previous study (NIDCR-R56-DE022637 project [IRBMED #HUM00080911; Dr. Alexandre DaSilva, Principal Investigator]). Participants in HUM00080911 (both Healthy and TMD patients) received no intervention, but underwent the same Baseline, MRI and PET protocol. This secondary data will not be represented in the Adverse Event or final enrollment total for this clinical trial. However, the data will be analyzed in a meta-analysis addressing secondary objective #6 only. These data sets will not be used to analyze any primary study objectives, nor change the terms of the clinical trial. Manuscripts that include these secondary data sets will clearly indicate the use of this data and clarify that the data was collected separate from the clinical trial data.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TMD Patients Active Group: Active Comparator | Active comparator | Device: HD-tDCS*30 TMD patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 20 minute sessions, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). |
| TMD Patients Sham Group: Sham Comparator | Sham comparator | Device: Sham HD-tDCS*30 TMD patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 30-second administrations at the beginning and end of each 20 minute session, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). |
| Healthy Control Group | No intervention | –20 Healthy Volunteers will be asked to undergo baseline assessments only (including imaging, but no brain stimulation). Healthy volunteer data (n </= 10) may be used from a prior study (NIDCR-R56-DE022637 project [IRBMED #HUM00080911; Dr. Alexandre DaSilva, Principal Investigator]). Consent to use data for a future study was obtained in the informed consent document at the time of participation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Provide signed and dated informed consent form;
- Male or female, aged 18 to 65 (inclusive);
- tDCS naïve; and
- Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study.
- Diagnosed with chronic TMD as defined by the Diagnostic Criteria (DC) for TMD and the American Academy of Orofacial Pain (DC/TMD): "Chronic TMD pain and dysfunction for at least one year from the clinical exam session (DC/TMD: Masticatory myofacial pain with/without referral) not adequately controlled by previous therapies (eg, NSAIDs, muscle relaxants)"
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Existence of chronic pain disorder(s) other than TMD
- History of a traumatic brain injury
- History or current evidence of a psychotic disorder (e.g. schizophrenia) or substance abuse (self-reported)
- Bipolar or severe major depression, as evidenced by a Beck Depression Inventory score of ≥ 30
- Ongoing, unresolved disability litigation (self-reported)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HD-tDCS*Also: HD-tDCS (active protocol)Non-invasive brain stimulation (active protocol) | Device | TMD Patients Active Group: Active Comparator |
| Sham HD-tDCS*Also: HD-tDCS (sham protocol)Non-invasive brain stimulation (sham protocol) | Device | TMD Patients Sham Group: Sham Comparator |
Primary outcome
Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score From Baseline (Screening Day) to 4 Weeks After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions (Follow Up #2).
Time frame: Screening (Baseline), 4 Weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions
Change in clinical Visual Analog Scale pain score from baseline (Screening Day) to 4 weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions (Follow Up #2). Pain is measured on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the worst.
6 secondary outcomes
Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score During Sustained Masseteric Pain Stress Challenge From Baseline PET (#1) Session to Follow-up PET (#2) Session, 1 Week After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions
Changes in GeoPain Measures (PAINS - Summation of Area and Intensity) From Baseline Daily Over the Treatment Period and Through Follow-up (4 Weeks After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions).
Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions
Difference in µOR BPND Levels of Thalamus From Baseline PET (#1) Session to Follow-up PET (#2) Session, 1 Week After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions.
Time frame: Baseline to 1 Week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions.
Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score at Rest From Baseline PET (#1) Session to Follow-up PET (#2) Session, 1 Week After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions.
Difference in µOR BPND Levels at Rest During PET (#1) in Chronic TMD Patients as Compared to Healthy Subjects.
Time frame: During PET #1, at rest (5-40 mins after radiotracer injection)
Difference in µOR BPND Levels During Experimental Sustained Masseteric Pain Stress Challenge During PET (#1) in Chronic TMD Patients as Compared to Healthy Subjects
Time frame: PET (#1) during experimental sustained masseteric pain stress challenge (45-90 mins after radiotracer injection)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37956741Kim DJ, Nascimento TD, Lim M, Danciu T, Zubieta JK, Scott PJH, Koeppe R, Kaciroti N, DaSilva AF. Exploring HD-tDCS Effect on mu-opioid Receptor and Pain Sensitivity in Temporomandibular Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial Study. J Pain. 2024 Apr;25(4):1070-1081. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Temporomandibular Disorder
Recruiting
Photobiomodulation for Management of Temporomandibular Disorder Pain
Pain Related to TMD
Recruiting
Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Temporomandibular Disorders.
TMD, Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Dextrose Prolotherapy vs. Sodium Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Jaw Joint Internal Derangement
Temporomandibular Joint Internal Derangement, TMJ-ID
Recruiting
R01_Pilot Jaw Muscle Phenotypes
Chronic TMD Pain, Temporomandibular Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alexandre F DaSilva, DDS, DMedSc principal investigator
University of Michigan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HD-tDCS* in people with Temporomandibular Disorder, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jun 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score From Baseline (Screening Day) to 4 Weeks After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions (Follow Up #2). (time frame: Screening (Baseline), 4 Weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03724032, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2023.