Patients SatisfactionNCT03714074
Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure
A study testing PEEK implant abutment and Zirconia abutment in people with Patients Satisfaction, run by Cairo University.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate the patients' satisfaction, peri-implant parameters (bleeding on probing, probing depth and plaque index) and crestal bone resorption of implants restored with PEEK abutments restored with PEEK superstructure compared to implants restored with zirconia abutments with PEEK… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Patients Satisfaction
- What is being tested?
- PEEK implant abutment and Zirconia abutment
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2019to Jul 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients above 18 years old
- Patients able to read and sign the informed consent.
- Medically free patients or with controlled systemic condition.
- Missing tooth/teeth in the esthetic zone
- Minimum bucco-lingual bone width of 6mm, evaluated using CBCT.
- Good oral hygiene and favourable occlusion
- Cooperative and motivated Patients.
Who cannot join
- Under 18 years old
- Illiterate, unable of comprehending or signing the informed consent form
- Uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g. Diabetes or hypertension) or debilitated health condition
- Pregnancy
- Poor oral hygiene or unfavorable occlusion
- Uncooperative, not willing to return for follow up visits
- Insufficient bone quantity or quality for implant placement
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
Karim A Rabie, Phd contact
About this study
Official title: Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The aim of the study is to evaluate the patients' satisfaction, peri-implant parameters (bleeding on probing, probing depth and plaque index) and crestal bone resorption of implants restored with PEEK abutments restored with PEEK superstructure compared to implants restored with zirconia abutments with PEEK superstructure.the NULL HYPOTHESIS;There is no difference between the two groups
Read the detailed description
Trial design:
Randomized Controlled Trial., Parallel Design., Allocation ratio 1:1
This study will be carried out on patients enrolled from the Outpatient clinic in the Fixed Prosthodontics clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
First Visit: ( Diagnosis and records Making)
Patients will be recalled to the outpatient clinic, treatment will be discussed with the patient in details with the expected timeline and full duration of the treatment and a signed consent will be obtained from the patient.
Thorough medical history will be taken from the patient to identify any causes preventing the patient from undergoing the surgery and to eliminate any risk factors. Primary alginate impressions and bite registration will be made to obtain mounted study casts for case study, intra-oral photographs will be taken and the patient will be asked for a CBCT for the area of interest to be studied and discussed .
Second visit: (Implant insertion)
The patient will be locally anaesthetized using Articaine 4% (Septanest, France) , and patient will be left for 5 -10 minutes after which he/she will be examined for objective/subjective signs. If the patient shows any signs of pain or discomfort during examination, another carpule will be administrated.
A full thickness flap will be opened at the surgical site using #15 blade with a sub-crestal incision to expose the crest of the bone and two vertical releasing incisions. The flap will be reflected using a mucoperiosteal elevator. Sequential drilling will be performed according to the desired implant diameter using the drills provided by the surgical kit and the implant will be inserted manually into the osteotomy using the ratchet wrench and driver. The initial stability of the implant will be tested with the torque wrench and the implant opening will be closed using a cover screw. A peri-apical radiograph will be taken to confirm the implant position and assure it is away from vital structures by 2mm.
Flap will be repositioned using a tissue forceps and suturing will be done to secure the flap in position using a 4-0 silk suture material.
Patient will be given the post-operative instructions and hygiene measures and Augmentin 1gm / 12 hours for 7 days and analgesics ( Brufen 400 mg when needed)
Third visit: (Re-entry)
After three to four months, the patient will be recalled for the 2nd stage surgery and implant exposure. Peri-apical radiographs and intra-oral photographs will be taken. The patient will be anaesthetized and the implant will be exposed by a crestal incision using a #15 blade. The cover screw will be replaced with a healing collar which will be left for 2 weeks.
Fourth visit: (Impression making):
After 2 weeks the healing collar will be removed and the transfer copings will be placed for impression making, after setting the impression will be disinfected and send to the laboratory along with the implant replicas for fabrication of the abutments and the prosthesis. The healing collar is replaced till the next visit.
Fifth visit: ( Delivery of the final restoration)
The healing collar will be removed and the abutment and final restoration will be placed over the implant, a peri-apical radiographs will be taken to ensure tightening of the abutment screw and absence of any gaps. Patient will be given oral hygiene instructions
Relevant care/interventions that will be permitted or prohibited during the trial:
- Patients will receive antibiotics and pain killers after the implant insertion
- Patients will be educated with proper hygiene measures and motivated to keep good oral hygiene
- Patients will be advised to stop/ decrease the frequency of smoking to maximum one pack per day and will be prohibited from drinking alcohol.
Primary outcome:
Patients' satisfaction will be measured used the Visual analogue scale; a numerical scale from 0-10 with 0 being the lowest value (dis-satisfied) and 10 being the highest (highly satisfied). The patient will be asked to fill the VAS at time of crown delivery (0) , 3months, 6 months and 12 months
Secondary outcome: will be assessed at 0,3,6 and 12 months
- Bleeding on Probing Visual Inspection combined with Plastic Periodontal Probe 2 Binary (Yes or No)
- Probing Depth Graduated periodontal probe 2 Millimeters (m.m)
- Plaque accumulation Visually 2 Binary (Yes \& No)
Tertiary outcome:
Will be assessed at 0,3,6 and 12 months using the standardized peri-apical radiographs and image super-imposition on the software to measure the difference in bony crest height.
Where 0= time of prosthesis delievery.
- Conditions
- Patients Satisfaction
- Being tested
- PEEK implant abutment, Zirconia abutment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PEEK implant abutmentDevice
Also called Polyetheretherketone abutments
Implants will be restored with abutments made from polyetheretherketone (PEEK) abutments and a PEEK superstructure
Zirconia abutmentDevice
Also called esthetic abutment, hybrid abutment, all ceramic abutment
Imolants will be restored with zirconia abutments and a PEEK superstructure
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK abutment | Experimental | PEEK abutment restored with PEEK superstructure Receives: Device: PEEK implant abutment |
| Zirconia abutment | Experimental | zirconia abutment restored with PEEK superstructure Receives: Device: Zirconia abutment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
change in Patients satisfaction: VAS
Visual analogue scale (VAS) a numerical scale from 0 - 10 , 0 = not satisfied and 10 = highly satisfied
Measured: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months (1 year)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change in bleeding in probing
inserting periodontal probe in gingival sulcus to detect bleeding (yes or no)depth (millimeters)
Measured: baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
Change in periodontal probing depth
inserting a graduated periodontal probe to detect presence or absence of pockets (yes or No)
Measured: baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
Change in Plaque accumilation
visual inspection for plaque accumilation (yes or No)
Measured: baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2018
- Study startJan 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completionJan 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Patients SatisfactionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amr Ali youssef, Cairo University
- Investigators
- Amina Zaki, Professor, Study director, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03714074
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEBD-CU-2018-09-27
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 25 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Patient Satisfaction, Peri-implant Parameters and Crestal Bone Evaluation of PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) Abutments Versus Zirconium Abutments Restored With PEEK Based Superstructure: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03714074
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CEBD-CU-2018-09-27
- Conditions
- Patients Satisfaction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the patients' satisfaction, peri-implant parameters (bleeding on probing, probing depth and plaque index) and crestal bone resorption of implants restored with PEEK abutments restored with PEEK superstructure compared to implants restored with zirconia abutments with PEEK superstructure.the NULL HYPOTHESIS;There is no difference between the two groups
Detailed description
Trial design:
Randomized Controlled Trial., Parallel Design., Allocation ratio 1:1
This study will be carried out on patients enrolled from the Outpatient clinic in the Fixed Prosthodontics clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.
First Visit: ( Diagnosis and records Making)
Patients will be recalled to the outpatient clinic, treatment will be discussed with the patient in details with the expected timeline and full duration of the treatment and a signed consent will be obtained from the patient.
Thorough medical history will be taken from the patient to identify any causes preventing the patient from undergoing the surgery and to eliminate any risk factors. Primary alginate impressions and bite registration will be made to obtain mounted study casts for case study, intra-oral photographs will be taken and the patient will be asked for a CBCT for the area of interest to be studied and discussed .
Second visit: (Implant insertion)
The patient will be locally anaesthetized using Articaine 4% (Septanest, France) , and patient will be left for 5 -10 minutes after which he/she will be examined for objective/subjective signs. If the patient shows any signs of pain or discomfort during examination, another carpule will be administrated.
A full thickness flap will be opened at the surgical site using #15 blade with a sub-crestal incision to expose the crest of the bone and two vertical releasing incisions. The flap will be reflected using a mucoperiosteal elevator. Sequential drilling will be performed according to the desired implant diameter using the drills provided by the surgical kit and the implant will be inserted manually into the osteotomy using the ratchet wrench and driver. The initial stability of the implant will be tested with the torque wrench and the implant opening will be closed using a cover screw. A peri-apical radiograph will be taken to confirm the implant position and assure it is away from vital structures by 2mm.
Flap will be repositioned using a tissue forceps and suturing will be done to secure the flap in position using a 4-0 silk suture material.
Patient will be given the post-operative instructions and hygiene measures and Augmentin 1gm / 12 hours for 7 days and analgesics ( Brufen 400 mg when needed)
Third visit: (Re-entry)
After three to four months, the patient will be recalled for the 2nd stage surgery and implant exposure. Peri-apical radiographs and intra-oral photographs will be taken. The patient will be anaesthetized and the implant will be exposed by a crestal incision using a #15 blade. The cover screw will be replaced with a healing collar which will be left for 2 weeks.
Fourth visit: (Impression making):
After 2 weeks the healing collar will be removed and the transfer copings will be placed for impression making, after setting the impression will be disinfected and send to the laboratory along with the implant replicas for fabrication of the abutments and the prosthesis. The healing collar is replaced till the next visit.
Fifth visit: ( Delivery of the final restoration)
The healing collar will be removed and the abutment and final restoration will be placed over the implant, a peri-apical radiographs will be taken to ensure tightening of the abutment screw and absence of any gaps. Patient will be given oral hygiene instructions
Relevant care/interventions that will be permitted or prohibited during the trial:
- Patients will receive antibiotics and pain killers after the implant insertion
- Patients will be educated with proper hygiene measures and motivated to keep good oral hygiene
- Patients will be advised to stop/ decrease the frequency of smoking to maximum one pack per day and will be prohibited from drinking alcohol.
Primary outcome:
Patients' satisfaction will be measured used the Visual analogue scale; a numerical scale from 0-10 with 0 being the lowest value (dis-satisfied) and 10 being the highest (highly satisfied). The patient will be asked to fill the VAS at time of crown delivery (0) , 3months, 6 months and 12 months
Secondary outcome: will be assessed at 0,3,6 and 12 months
- Bleeding on Probing Visual Inspection combined with Plastic Periodontal Probe 2 Binary (Yes or No)
- Probing Depth Graduated periodontal probe 2 Millimeters (m.m)
- Plaque accumulation Visually 2 Binary (Yes \& No)
Tertiary outcome:
Will be assessed at 0,3,6 and 12 months using the standardized peri-apical radiographs and image super-imposition on the software to measure the difference in bony crest height.
Where 0= time of prosthesis delievery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK abutment | Experimental | Device: PEEK implant abutmentPEEK abutment restored with PEEK superstructure |
| Zirconia abutment | Experimental | Device: Zirconia abutmentzirconia abutment restored with PEEK superstructure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- patients above 18 years old
- Patients able to read and sign the informed consent.
- Medically free patients or with controlled systemic condition.
- Missing tooth/teeth in the esthetic zone
- Minimum bucco-lingual bone width of 6mm, evaluated using CBCT.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Under 18 years old
- Illiterate, unable of comprehending or signing the informed consent form
- Uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g. Diabetes or hypertension) or debilitated health condition
- Pregnancy
- Poor oral hygiene or unfavorable occlusion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK implant abutmentAlso: Polyetheretherketone abutmentsImplants will be restored with abutments made from polyetheretherketone (PEEK) abutments and a PEEK superstructure | Device | PEEK abutment |
| Zirconia abutmentAlso: esthetic abutment, hybrid abutment, all ceramic abutmentImolants will be restored with zirconia abutments and a PEEK superstructure | Device | Zirconia abutment |
Primary outcome
change in Patients satisfaction: VAS
Time frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months (1 year)
Visual analogue scale (VAS) a numerical scale from 0 - 10 , 0 = not satisfied and 10 = highly satisfied
3 secondary outcomes
Change in bleeding in probing
Time frame: baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
Change in periodontal probing depth
Time frame: baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
Change in Plaque accumilation
Time frame: baseline, 3 , 6 and 12 months (1 year)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Patients Satisfaction
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Hybrid mHealth and Telerehabilitation vs Conventional Physiotherapy for Subacromial Pain Syndrome
Subacromial Pain Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Recruiting
Effect of Mandala Coloring on Anxiety, Pain, Vital Signs, and Patient Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
Mandala Coloring
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Web-based Single-session Intervention Combined With Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention for Patients With Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Awaiting Inpatient Treatment
PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Depression
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Karim A Rabie, Phd contact
Amina Zaki, Professor study director
Cairo University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PEEK implant abutment and Zirconia abutment in people with Patients Satisfaction, run by Cairo University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Amr A Youssef, BDs (012-2489-5408, amr.youssef@dentistry.cu.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
change in Patients satisfaction: VAS (time frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months (1 year)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2018.