AzTrials
AzTrials

Neonatal Respiratory Distress Related ConditionsNCT03711565

Oscillatory Versus Non-oscillatory Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure Neonatal Respiratory Support

A study testing Regular Nasal CPAP using a conventional ventilator and High Frequency Nasal CPAP in people with Neonatal Respiratory Distress Related Conditions, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Controlled randomized trial looking at Standard nasal continuous airway pressure (CPAP) respiratory support versus High Frequency CPAP in neonates who require respiratory support or who are being extubated and require support post extubation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 4 months
What is being tested?
Regular Nasal CPAP using a conventional ventilator and High Frequency Nasal CPAP
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
19 Sep 2016to Sep 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 4 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Newborn (0-28 days of age) admitted to Neonatal Intensive care unit (NICU)
  • Ordered Respiratory treatment of Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure (NCPAP) respiratory support

Who cannot join

  • Major congenital defect
  • Known or suspected chromosomal disorder

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UC Davis Health

    Sacramento, California, 95817

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Oscillatory Versus Non-Oscillatory Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure Neonatal Respiratory Support

Controlled randomized trial looking at Standard nasal continuous airway pressure (CPAP) respiratory support versus High Frequency CPAP in neonates who require respiratory support or who are being extubated and require support post extubation. Patients will be evaluated for need to be reintubated and oxygen requirement and PaCO2 levels

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing High Frequency nasal CPAP versus standard nasal CPAP. The patient population includes preterm newborns who require respiratory support but do not need to be initially intubated and preterm or term infants who are being extubated and will require support for the continued lung disease. After obtaining parental consent the patient will be randomized to one of the two treatments. Patients will be followed for requirement of level of oxygen and blood gases looking at acidity (pH) and PaCO2 and Bicarbonate(HCO3). A respiratory index score will be measured. Attending physician will determine the need for the patient to be intubated or reintubated depending on the patient selected. Additionally, frequency, duration and severity of Apnea, Bradycardia and Desaturation events will be recorded. Also safety issues to include pulmonary airleak, nasal injury, facial edema and scalp edema due to straps holding the device in place will be recorded. Also gaseous distension of the stomach and intestines will be assessed and compared between treatment arms. This study is not powered to look at long term outcomes.

Being tested
Regular Nasal CPAP using a conventional ventilator, High Frequency Nasal CPAP
Keywords
Nasal CPAP, High Frequency NCPAP

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Regular Nasal CPAP using a conventional ventilatorDevice

    The Nasal CPAP is connected to the patient via prongs in the nose. Pressure adjustments are made to improve lung inflation. The frequency and pressure can be adjusted as needed to improve the patient's oxygen and carbon dioxide levels

  • High Frequency Nasal CPAPDevice

    High Frequency Nasal CPAP for management of respiratory distress Patient will be connected to the high frequency device through nasal prongs. The Bronchotron produces a pressure that is variable with an adjustable frequency that is equal or greater than 500 times per minute connecting to prongs in the patient's nose. The pressure, frequency and amplitude of the pulsations will be adjusted as needed to provide acceptable oxygenation and ventilation.

Study groups in NCT03711565
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Regular Nasal CPAP using a conventional ventilatorActive comparatorRegular nasal CPAP for management of respiratory distress Patient will have regular nasal CPAP placed via nasal prongs with level of pressure adjusted and level of oxygen adjusted as needed for acceptable oxygenation and ventilation
Receives: Device: Regular Nasal CPAP using a conventional ventilator
High Frequency Nasal CPAPActive comparatorHigh Frequency Nasal CPAP for management of respiratory distress Patient will be connected to the high frequency device through nasal prongs. The pressure, frequency and amplitude of the pulsations will be adjusted as needed to provide acceptable oxygenation and ventilation
Receives: Device: High Frequency Nasal CPAP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Respiratory Index Score (RSI)

    The scale is scored based on Fio2 (0 = <30%, 1 = 30-39%, 2 = 40-49%, 3 = > or equal to 50%), CPAP/Paw (0 = <6, 1 = 6-7, 2 = 7-8, 3 = >8), Spontaneous Respiratory Rate(RR) (0 = <40, 1 = 40-59, 2 = 60-79, 3 = > or equal to 80), Retractions (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), and Apnea (0 = none, 1 = 1/2/2015, 2 = 3/4/2015, 3 = >4). Average index scores will be compared between conditions.

    Measured: 72 hours after initiation of support

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Oct 2018
  2. Study start19 Sep 2016
  3. Primary completionSep 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2026 (estimated)

Why it stopped: The research equipment was not available for more than a year after the study was submitted. A new trial was being done during delivery of patients that competed with the study.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03711565
Sponsor's protocol ID
828375
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
15 Oct 2018
Last updated
6 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Regular Nasal CPAP using a conventional ventilator and High Frequency Nasal CPAP in people with Neonatal Respiratory Distress Related Conditions, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Respiratory Index Score (RSI) (time frame: 72 hours after initiation of support). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in