Mental HealthNCT03709537
Supporting the Mental Health Workforce
A study testing Mental Health Peer Workforce Support in people with Mental Health, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Emotional Health Association will engage Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health providers that employ peer workers in a training and technical assistance intervention designed to support, increase, and retain an effective peer workforce. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Mental Health
- What is being tested?
- Mental Health Peer Workforce Support
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 366 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 23 Oct 2018to 7 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All service providing sites within the Los Angeles Department of Mental Health will be invited to participate in the study. Sites not affiliated with the Los Angeles Department of Mental Health will be allowed to enroll in the study if they express interest but will not be actively recruited.
- Participants must be a peer worker or supervisor of peer workers at a site participating in the study.
Who cannot join
- Peers who do not receive pay and volunteer for less that 15 hours per week.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
SHARE! Self-Help and Recovery Exchance
Culver City, California, 90230
About this study
Official title: Local Organizational Support and Development Networks for Public Mental Health System Workforce With Lived Experience
Emotional Health Association will engage Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health providers that employ peer workers in a training and technical assistance intervention designed to support, increase, and retain an effective peer workforce. This intervention consists of a Co-Learning Collaborative, several training sessions, and the creation of Implementation Teams. Peer workers will also be encouraged to attend Recovery International, an established network of self-help support groups for mental health. Dr. Louis Brown will lead an evaluation of the efficacy of the intervention. This study will inform the use of peer workers as a component of the mental health workforce.
Read the detailed description
Evaluation of the the intervention with the peer workforce will be conducted through administration of web-based surveys of peer workers and peer supervisors at baseline and follow-up (10 months post-baseline). These two surveys will be administered to peer workers and peer supervisors at sites enrolled in the study. A letter of informational detailing the risks of participation will accompany the survey. Individuals who do not complete the web-based survey will be invited to complete a telephone interview with the same questions. Sites (where one or more peer supervisors and peer workers are located) will be randomized to either the intervention group or standard practice control group. The intervention group will engage in Co-Learning Collaborative, several training sessions, and the creation of Implementation Teams. Peer workers from the intervention group will also be encouraged to attend Recovery International, an established network of self-help support groups for mental health. Analysis of the surveys collected from both study groups will be conducted to assess the efficacy of the intervention and provide Emotional Health Association with a final report.
- Conditions
- Mental Health
- Being tested
- Mental Health Peer Workforce Support
- Medical subject headings
- Psychological Well-Being
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mental Health Peer Workforce SupportBehavioural
Supervisors and peer workers will participate in trainings covering effective peer services, trauma-informed effective peer supervision, and responsibilities of peer workers in a supervising relationship. A monthly Supervisors of Peer Workers meeting will support site change efforts. Sites will create an implementation team to work within their site to implement the training received.
Peer Workers will enroll in a peer mentoring program, where they serve as peer mentors matched with fellow peer mentors. Recovery International and the Los Angeles Department of Mental Health will encourage peer workers to attend Recovery International meetings. Emotional Health Association will refer Peer Workers and their Supervisors in the intervention group to self-help support groups that reduce stress and increase resiliency.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Peer Workforce Support | Experimental | Sites assigned to this group will engage in Co-Learning Collaborative, several trainings, and the creation of Implementation Teams--all part of the intervention and designed to support their peer workforce. Receives: Behavioral: Mental Health Peer Workforce Support |
| Control Group | No intervention | Sites assigned to this group will continue practice as usual and not receive any additional peer worker training or technical assistance. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Peer-supportive organizational climate
Peer-supportive organizational climate will be assessed by a set of 6 likert-scale questions that asks about the participant about his/her organization's administrative leadership and the support they provide.
1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about organization) 7= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about organization)
Measured: 10 months
Mental Health Stigma
This outcome will be assessed by asking the peer supervisor a set of 15 likert-scale questions about their feelings towards individuals with mental health issues.
1= Strongly Disagree 5= Strongly Agree
Measured: 10 months
Peer Worker Recovery
This outcome will be assessed by a set of 24 likert scale questions that ask the participants how they feel about themselves and their lives.
1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about self) 5= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about self)
Measured: 10 months
Secondary outcomes (14)
Recovery orientation of services
This outcome will be measured with 4 questions that ask the peer workers to rate their level of agreement with statements about their organization's treatment of service users (or clients)
1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about services) 7= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about services)
Measured: 10 Months
Supervisor's peer support attitudes
This outcome will be assessed by asking the peer supervisor a set of three likert-scale questions about the importance of peer support for mental health services.
1=Not important at all 10 =Extremely Important
Measured: 10 Months
Supervisor's job satisfaction
This outcome will be measured using one likert-scale question that asks how satisfied the supervisors are with their job- from 1 (highly unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied).
Measured: 10 Months
Supervision quality (as rated by peer workers)
This outcome will be assessed with a set of 7 likert scale questions that ask about the peer worker's experience with their supervisor.
1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about supervisor) 7= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about supervisor)
Measured: 10 Months
Peer worker time spent on peer support activities
This outcome will be measured by asking the peer workers to rate how much time they spend on 9 different support activities on a typical week-- from "None" to "40 hours plus".
Measured: 10 Months
Peer worker discrimination experience
This will be measured with a set of 5 likert scale questions that asks the peer worker about their experience with discrimination due to their mental health.
1= Strongly Disagree (with statement about negative experience) 5= Strongly Agree (with statement about negative experience)
Measured: 10 Months
Supervisor/peer worker relationship (as rated by supervisor)
This outcome will be measured by a set of 12 likert scale questions from the Supervisory Relationship Measure developed by Pearce et al. 2012.
1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about peer worker) 5= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about peer worker)
Measured: 10 Months
Peer worker contributions (as rated by supervisor)
This outcome will be measured by a set of 12 likert scale questions.
1= Strongly Disagree 7= Strongly Agree
Measured: 10 Months
Peer worker job satisfaction
This outcome will be measured using one likert-scale question that asks how satisfied the peer workers are with their job- from 1 ("highly unsatisfied") to 5 ("very satisfied").
Measured: 10 Months
Peer worker sick leave and disability days
This outcome will be measured with the following question from the Stapelfeldt et al 2012 instrument:
"How many sick leave or disability days has _____ had within the last 6 months?"
Measured: 10 Months
Peer worker work-related burnout
This will assesses with a set of 7 likert scale questions that ask the peer worker for the frequency of certain experiences at their job.
1= Always 5= Never/Almost Never
Measured: 10 Months
Peer worker mental health problems
This outcome will be assessed by a set of 27 likert-scale questions that asks the participant how frequent they have experienced feelings of distress in the past 30 days.
1= Not all (pertaining to negative statement) 5= Extremely (pertaining to negative statement)
Measured: 10 Months
Peer worker social support
This outcome will be assessed by having the peer workers answer some questions about the people in their environment who provide them with help or support.
1= Very satisfied (with specific person's support) 6= Very dissatisfied (with specific person's support)
Measured: 10 Months
Peer worker stress
This outcome will be measured by a set of 6 likert scale questions that ask the peer worker to rate the frequency that they have had stressful experiences in the past 30 days.
1= Never (pertaining to negative statement) 5= Very Often (pertaining to negative statement)
Measured: 10 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Oct 2018
- Study start23 Oct 2018
- Primary completion7 Jan 2020
- Study completion7 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mental HealthStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study will draw participants from mental health sites where one or more peer supervisors and peer workers are located. These sites will be randomized to either the treatment or standard practice control group. The treatment group will receive the intervention, which consists of a Co-Learning Collaborative, several trainings, and the creation of Implementation Teams. The sites assigned as part of control group will not receive any training or additional technical assistance that is part of the intervention.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 366 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Emotional Health Association, California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Louis D. Brown, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Investigators
- Louis D Brown, PhD, Principal investigator, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03709537
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSC-SPH-18-0357
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 10 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Brown LD, Vasquez D, Wolf J, Robison J, Hartigan L, Hollman R. Supporting Peer Support Workers and Their Supervisors: Cluster-Randomized Trial Evaluating a Systems-Level Intervention. Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Jun 1;75(6):514-520. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230112. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
PubMed 38204374
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Local Organizational Support and Development Networks for Public Mental Health System Workforce With Lived Experience
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03709537
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HSC-SPH-18-0357
- Conditions
- Mental Health
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 366 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Emotional Health Association, California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development
- Study start
- 23 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Emotional Health Association will engage Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health providers that employ peer workers in a training and technical assistance intervention designed to support, increase, and retain an effective peer workforce. This intervention consists of a Co-Learning Collaborative, several training sessions, and the creation of Implementation Teams. Peer workers will also be encouraged to attend Recovery International, an established network of self-help support groups for mental health. Dr. Louis Brown will lead an evaluation of the efficacy of the intervention. This study will inform the use of peer workers as a component of the mental health workforce.
Detailed description
Evaluation of the the intervention with the peer workforce will be conducted through administration of web-based surveys of peer workers and peer supervisors at baseline and follow-up (10 months post-baseline). These two surveys will be administered to peer workers and peer supervisors at sites enrolled in the study. A letter of informational detailing the risks of participation will accompany the survey. Individuals who do not complete the web-based survey will be invited to complete a telephone interview with the same questions. Sites (where one or more peer supervisors and peer workers are located) will be randomized to either the intervention group or standard practice control group. The intervention group will engage in Co-Learning Collaborative, several training sessions, and the creation of Implementation Teams. Peer workers from the intervention group will also be encouraged to attend Recovery International, an established network of self-help support groups for mental health. Analysis of the surveys collected from both study groups will be conducted to assess the efficacy of the intervention and provide Emotional Health Association with a final report.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study will draw participants from mental health sites where one or more peer supervisors and peer workers are located. These sites will be randomized to either the treatment or standard practice control group. The treatment group will receive the intervention, which consists of a Co-Learning Collaborative, several trainings, and the creation of Implementation Teams. The sites assigned as part of control group will not receive any training or additional technical assistance that is part of the intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Peer Workforce Support | Experimental | Behavioral: Mental Health Peer Workforce SupportSites assigned to this group will engage in Co-Learning Collaborative, several trainings, and the creation of Implementation Teams--all part of the intervention and designed to support their peer workforce. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Sites assigned to this group will continue practice as usual and not receive any additional peer worker training or technical assistance. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- All service providing sites within the Los Angeles Department of Mental Health will be invited to participate in the study. Sites not affiliated with the Los Angeles Department of Mental Health will be allowed to enroll in the study if they express interest but will not be actively recruited.
- Participants must be a peer worker or supervisor of peer workers at a site participating in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Peers who do not receive pay and volunteer for less that 15 hours per week.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Peer Workforce SupportSupervisors and peer workers will participate in trainings covering effective peer services, trauma-informed effective peer supervision, and responsibilities of peer workers in a supervising relationship. A monthly Supervisors of Peer Workers meeting will support site change efforts. Sites will create an implementation team to work within their site to implement the training received. Peer Workers will enroll in a peer mentoring program, where they serve as peer mentors matched with fellow peer mentors. Recovery International and the Los Angeles Department of Mental Health will encourage peer workers to attend Recovery International meetings. Emotional Health Association will refer Peer Workers and their Supervisors in the intervention group to self-help support groups that reduce stress and increase resiliency. | Behavioural | Mental Health Peer Workforce Support |
Primary outcome
Peer-supportive organizational climate
Time frame: 10 months
Peer-supportive organizational climate will be assessed by a set of 6 likert-scale questions that asks about the participant about his/her organization's administrative leadership and the support they provide. 1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about organization) 7= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about organization)
Mental Health Stigma
Time frame: 10 months
This outcome will be assessed by asking the peer supervisor a set of 15 likert-scale questions about their feelings towards individuals with mental health issues. 1= Strongly Disagree 5= Strongly Agree
Peer Worker Recovery
Time frame: 10 months
This outcome will be assessed by a set of 24 likert scale questions that ask the participants how they feel about themselves and their lives. 1= Strongly Disagree (with positive statement about self) 5= Strongly Agree (with positive statement about self)
14 secondary outcomes
Recovery orientation of services
Time frame: 10 Months
Supervisor's peer support attitudes
Time frame: 10 Months
Supervisor's job satisfaction
Time frame: 10 Months
Supervision quality (as rated by peer workers)
Time frame: 10 Months
Peer worker time spent on peer support activities
Time frame: 10 Months
Peer worker discrimination experience
Time frame: 10 Months
Supervisor/peer worker relationship (as rated by supervisor)
Time frame: 10 Months
Peer worker contributions (as rated by supervisor)
Time frame: 10 Months
Peer worker job satisfaction
Time frame: 10 Months
Peer worker sick leave and disability days
Time frame: 10 Months
Peer worker work-related burnout
Time frame: 10 Months
Peer worker mental health problems
Time frame: 10 Months
Peer worker social support
Time frame: 10 Months
Peer worker stress
Time frame: 10 Months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Apr 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38204374Brown LD, Vasquez D, Wolf J, Robison J, Hartigan L, Hollman R. Supporting Peer Support Workers and Their Supervisors: Cluster-Randomized Trial Evaluating a Systems-Level Intervention. Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Jun 1;75(6):514-520. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230112. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Mental Health
Recruiting
Postoperative Delirium and Analgesia in Elderly Patients
Postoperative Delirium, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Bone-Lead Level Associations With Brain and Mental Health
Lead Exposure
Active, not recruiting
Improving Emotional Wellbeing of University Students: Emotion Regulation
Emotion Regulation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Natural History of Cardiometabolic Disease Among US Bhutanese: Developing the Cross-Sectional Bhutanese Community of Central Ohio Health Study to Understand Acculturation as Synergizing Socioenvironmental and Biobehavioral Risk Factors Propagating ...
Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Mental Health
Active, not recruiting
Improving Emotional Wellbeing of University Students: Anxiety Management
Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Louis D Brown, PhD principal investigator
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mental Health Peer Workforce Support in people with Mental Health, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Peer-supportive organizational climate (time frame: 10 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03709537, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2024.