AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationPhase 3NEW-AFNCT03702582

Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin for Post Cardiac Surgery Atrial Fibrillation

A Phase 3 study testing Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective, randomized, active-controlled, parallel arm study compares the safety and financial benefits of arterial thromboembolism prophylaxis with Warfarin vs. Rivaroxaban (A novel oral anticoagulant) in patients with new onset atrial fibrillation after sternotomy for cardiac operations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke, Bleeding
What is being tested?
Rivaroxaban and Warfarin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
30 Apr 2019to 1 Oct 2023
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or Female ≥ 18 years
  • At least one of the following procedures: coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve repair, mitral valve repair, non-mechanical aortic valve replacement, any combination of these procedures
  • Two or more episodes of New Onset Atrial Fibrillation (each lasting > 20 minutes) or persistent atrial fibrillation lasting > 24 hours (Or for >18 hours over a 24-hour interval)
  • If female of child-bearing age, use of adequate contraception

Who cannot join

  • Pre-existing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation before cardiac surgery
  • Pre-existing indications for therapeutic anticoagulation (Including but not limited to PE, DVT, mechanical valve)
  • Moderate-to-severe mitral valve stenosis not surgically corrected
  • Pre-existing allergy to study medications
  • Recent (< 1 year) or ongoing pregnancy (Urine pregnancy test will be obtained for women of child bearing age at the time of enrollment into the study)
  • Stroke within 1 month prior to surgery or postoperatively prior to initiation of study drugs
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Postoperative bleeding episode prior to initiation of study drug
  • Severe dysfunction of another organ system including GFR < 30 ml/min, baseline INR > 1.7, ileus or other gastrointestinal pathology hindering ability to absorb oral medications, and known coagulation pathway deficiencies
  • Postoperative need for non-aspirin anti-platelet therapy that cannot be discontinued when therapeutic anticoagulation is initiated
  • Patient taking medications with known major interactions with study drugs with no therapeutic alternatives)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Trial of New Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin for Post Cardiac Surgery Atrial Fibrillation

This prospective, randomized, active-controlled, parallel arm study compares the safety and financial benefits of arterial thromboembolism prophylaxis with Warfarin vs. Rivaroxaban (A novel oral anticoagulant) in patients with new onset atrial fibrillation after sternotomy for cardiac operations.

Read the detailed description

New onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a common occurrence following cardiac surgery, occurring in 20-30% of patients post-operatively. Historically, Vitamin K antagonist therapy with Warfarin has been the treatment of choice for prophylaxis against stroke and systemic arterial thromboembolism in NOAF. Warfarin inhibits the Vitamin K dependent factors involved in both the intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation cascades, thus decreasing systemic clotting. However, Warfarin therapy comes with many challenges including prolonged titration, tedious monitoring requirements and in some cases, increased bleeding risk.

The limitations associated with Warfarin may be mitigated by using new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) like Rivaroxaban which have no routine monitoring requirements. Rivaroxaban is a direct inhibitor of Factor Xa, a central reactant in both the intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation cascades. Studies in non-operative patients with atrial fibrillation have shown that Rivaroxaban is non-inferior to Warfarin for stroke prophylaxis with similar risk profiles. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety and financial cost of these two drugs when used for the management of new onset atrial fibrillation that occurs after cardiac operations.

Being tested
Rivaroxaban, Warfarin
Keywords
Atrial Fibrillation, Rivaroxaban, Warfarin, Stroke, Anticoagulation, Bleeding
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke, Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RivaroxabanDrug

    Also called Xarelto, Database of Molecules (PubChem CID): 6433119

    Anticoagulant drug that works via direct inhibition of factor Xa. FDA approved for prophylaxis against stroke in non-valvular atrial fibrillation

  • WarfarinDrug

    Also called Coumadin, Database of Molecules (PubChem CID): 54678486

    Anticoagulation drug that works via inhibition of vitamin K dependent clotting factors. FDA approved for prophylaxis against stroke in atrial fibrillation

Study groups in NCT03702582
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RivaroxabanExperimentalRivaroxaban: Direct inhibitor of Factor Xa, an enzyme that stimulates the formation of thrombin from prothrombin (A critical step in both the intrinsic and extrinsic aspects of the coagulation cascade) Dosage form: Per Os (Oral) Dosage and Frequency: 20 mg every evening with the evening meal (No titration requirements). For patients with decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR between 15 ml/min and 50 ml/min), dosing will be decreased to 15 mg every evening with the evening meal. Duration: 30 days (Possibility of continuation after post-operative cardiology clinic visit)
Receives: Drug: Rivaroxaban
WarfarinActive comparatorWarfarin: Competitive inhibitor of vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1, an important enzyme in the activation pathway for vitamin K dependent coagulation factors Dosage form: Per Os (Oral) Dosage and Frequency: Initial dose of 2 - 5 mg nightly after the evening meal (QHS) with appropriate titration to goal INR 2.0 - 3.0 (Initial dose based on weight, age, gender, co-morbidities and concurrent medications). INR will be checked daily to weekly depending on stability of dosing and medication regimen. Duration: 30 days (Possibility of continuation after post-operative Cardiology clinic visit)
Receives: Drug: Warfarin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative Length of Stay

    Length of inpatient stay in days from time of departure from the operating room

    Measured: Up to 6 months following the cardiac operation

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Episode of Major Bleeding (Defined as the Occurrence of Any of Several Events Listed in the Description. No Specific Scale, Questionnaire or Instrument Will be Used)

    Major bleeding defined as re-operation or other therapeutic intervention for bleeding (including but not limited to colonoscopy, upper endoscopy and urologic procedures for hematuria), development of any intracranial bleeding, cessation of study drug for bleeding concerns, reversal of study drug for bleeding concerns and/or new transfusion requirement > 2 units of blood after drug administration

    Measured: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization

  2. Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)

    Rates of cerebrovascular accident including stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA)

    Measured: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization

  3. Other Systemic Embolism

    Rates of non-neurological systemic arterial embolism involving any organ system

    Measured: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization

  4. Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) and/or Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

    Occurrence of pathologic venous thrombo-embolism including DVT and PE

    Measured: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization

  5. Minor Bleeding

    Minor bleeding defined as blood transfusions <= 2 units or drop in hemoglobin greater 3g/dL following administration of study drugs

    Measured: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization

  6. Performance on the EUROQOL (EQ-5D) Quality of Life Instrument

    Participants will be administered the EUROQOL-5D-3L (5 dimensions, 3 levels) questionnaire to derive an estimate of the health state. This is comprised of a 5 questions survey and a single visual analog scale highlighting perceived health levels

    For the 5 questions survey, each question related to mobility, selfcare, mood, pain and/or functionality is answered on a three point scale with higher number representing worse outcomes. The entire dataset is used to generate a health state based on the unique pattern of answers. These health states are then compared against standardized country-based value sets which provide an assessment of quality of life based on societal preferences.

    Measured: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization

  7. Performance on the EUROQOL (EQ-5D) Quality of Life Instrument - VAS

    Participants will be administered the EUROQOL-5D-3L (5 dimensions, 3 levels) questionnaire to derive an estimate of the health state. This is comprised of a 5 questions survey and a single visual analog scale highlighting perceived health levels

    For the 5 questions survey, each question related to mobility, selfcare, mood, pain and/or functionality is answered on a three point scale with higher number representing worse outcomes. The entire dataset is used to generate a health state based on the unique pattern of answers. These health states are then compared against standardized country-based value sets which provide an assessment of quality of life based on societal preferences.

    The visual analog scale is single answer between 0 and 100 representing the patient's perception of their health state. 0 represents the worst health imaginable and 100 represents the best.

    Measured: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization

  8. Average Score on the Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q2)

    Participants will be administered the PACT-Q2 questionnaire which is comprised of a convenience subscale and a satisfaction subscale.

    For the convenience subscale, each of 13 questions is answered on a 1-5 rating scale with higher numbers representing worse outcomes. A sub-scale score is generated by inverting the score from each element and calculating the sum. Range on the inverted scale is 13 - 65. Higher scores represent better outcomes.

    For the satisfaction subscale, each of 7 questions is answered on a 1-5 rating scale with higher numbers representing better outcomes. The total score on this subscale is generated by adding up scores from all elements. Range on this subscale is 7-35. Higher scores represent better outcomes.

    A composite score is generated by adding up scores from both subscales and recalibrating on a 0-100 scale by adding the scores together and applying the formula: COMPOSITE SCORE=100×(Sum-20)/80. Higher scores represent more favorable outcomes.

    Measured: Up to 30 days after discharge from the initial postoperative hospitalization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Oct 2018
  2. Study start30 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2023
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Cardiac surgery patients who meet study criteria and develop recurrent or persistent atrial fibrillation post-operatively will be randomized 1:1 to receive Warfarin or Rivaroxaban for prophylaxis against stroke or other systemic arterial embolism
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03702582
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018P002307
Acronym
NEW-AF
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
5 Oct 2018
Last updated
19 May 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: At this time there is no plan to make Individual Participant Data available to other researchers. As the study develops, investigators will consider making an individual participant data sharing plan if there is interest from other researchers.

Publications

  • Spyropoulos AC, Ageno W, Albers GW, Elliott CG, Halperin JL, Hiatt WR, Maynard GA, Steg PG, Weitz JI, Suh E, Spiro TE, Barnathan ES, Raskob GE; MARINER Investigators. Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis after Hospitalization for Medical Illness. N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 20;379(12):1118-1127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805090. Epub 2018 Aug 26.

    PubMed 30145946
  • Butt JH, Xian Y, Peterson ED, Olsen PS, Rorth R, Gundlund A, Olesen JB, Gislason GH, Torp-Pedersen C, Kober L, Fosbol EL. Long-term Thromboembolic Risk in Patients With Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA Cardiol. 2018 May 1;3(5):417-424. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0405.

    PubMed 29590304
  • Charlton B, Adeboyeje G, Barron JJ, Grady D, Shin J, Redberg RF. Length of hospitalization and mortality for bleeding during treatment with warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0193912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193912. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 29590141
  • Megens MR, Churilov L, Thijs V. New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft and Long-Term Risk of Stroke: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Dec 22;6(12):e007558. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007558.

    PubMed 29273637
  • Hawks MK, Bryce C. Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin for Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Ablation and Cardioversion. Am Fam Physician. 2016 Oct 1;94(7):Online. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27929207
  • Gillinov AM, Bagiella E, Moskowitz AJ, Raiten JM, Groh MA, Bowdish ME, Ailawadi G, Kirkwood KA, Perrault LP, Parides MK, Smith RL 2nd, Kern JA, Dussault G, Hackmann AE, Jeffries NO, Miller MA, Taddei-Peters WC, Rose EA, Weisel RD, Williams DL, Mangusan RF, Argenziano M, Moquete EG, O'Sullivan KL, Pellerin M, Shah KJ, Gammie JS, Mayer ML, Voisine P, Gelijns AC, O'Gara PT, Mack MJ; CTSN. Rate Control versus Rhythm Control for Atrial Fibrillation after Cardiac Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2016 May 19;374(20):1911-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602002. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

    PubMed 27043047
  • Anderson E, Johnke K, Leedahl D, Glogoza M, Newman R, Dyke C. Novel oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the management of postoperative atrial fibrillation: clinical outcomes and cost analysis. Am J Surg. 2015 Dec;210(6):1095-102; discussion 1102-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

    PubMed 26482512
  • Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Wiviott SD, Halperin JL, Waldo AL, Ezekowitz MD, Weitz JI, Spinar J, Ruzyllo W, Ruda M, Koretsune Y, Betcher J, Shi M, Grip LT, Patel SP, Patel I, Hanyok JJ, Mercuri M, Antman EM; ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Investigators. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2093-104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310907. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

    PubMed 24251359
  • Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, Al-Khalidi HR, Ansell J, Atar D, Avezum A, Bahit MC, Diaz R, Easton JD, Ezekowitz JA, Flaker G, Garcia D, Geraldes M, Gersh BJ, Golitsyn S, Goto S, Hermosillo AG, Hohnloser SH, Horowitz J, Mohan P, Jansky P, Lewis BS, Lopez-Sendon JL, Pais P, Parkhomenko A, Verheugt FW, Zhu J, Wallentin L; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):981-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107039. Epub 2011 Aug 27.

    PubMed 21870978
  • Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, Breithardt G, Halperin JL, Hankey GJ, Piccini JP, Becker RC, Nessel CC, Paolini JF, Berkowitz SD, Fox KA, Califf RM; ROCKET AF Investigators. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 8;365(10):883-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009638. Epub 2011 Aug 10.

    PubMed 21830957
  • Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, Pogue J, Reilly PA, Themeles E, Varrone J, Wang S, Alings M, Xavier D, Zhu J, Diaz R, Lewis BS, Darius H, Diener HC, Joyner CD, Wallentin L; RE-LY Steering Committee and Investigators. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1139-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905561. Epub 2009 Aug 30.

    PubMed 19717844
  • Osho AA, Moonsamy P, Ethridge BR, Leya GA, D'Alessandro DA, Jassar AS, Villavicencio MA, Melnitchouk SI, Tolis G, Langer NB, Funamoto M, Li SS, Colon KM, Mohan N, Locascio JJ, Lubitz SA, Akeju O, Sundt TM. Rationale and Design of the Randomized Controlled Trial of New Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin for Post Cardiac Surgery Atrial Fibrillation: The NEW-AF Trial. Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):200-204. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004459. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

    PubMed 32889881

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 May 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative Length of Stay (time frame: Up to 6 months following the cardiac operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03702582, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in