AzTrials
AzTrials

Treatment-resistant DepressionACOUSTIMNCT03701724

Cost-utility Analysis of Maintenance rTMS for Treatment-resistant Depression

A study testing Systematic maintenance rTMS and rTMS course in case of relapse in people with Treatment-resistant Depression, run by Nantes University Hospital at 19 sites in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is a frequent, debilitating condition mostly treated by antidepressants. Repeated magnetic transcranial stimulation (rTMS) has proven adjuvant efficacy in TRD in the acute phase of treatment with a very good tolerance and acceptability. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Treatment-resistant Depression
What is being tested?
Systematic maintenance rTMS and rTMS course in case of relapse
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
119 participants
Where
19 sitesFrance
Study dates
5 Nov 2018to 30 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Major depressive disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) 5 MADRS >19
  • Episode duration: 12 weeks to 3 years.
  • 2 to 4 unsuccessful treatment lines (including antidepressants, and potentialization agents lithium and quetiapine) despite adequate dosage and duration (6 weeks stable posology)
  • Ability to consent and express informed consent, to answer questionnaires and to go to follow-up visits.
  • Affiliation to social security

Who cannot join

  • Bipolar disorder
  • Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders
  • Mental retardation or developmental disorder
  • Substance abuse or dependence
  • Depression symptoms better explained by medical conditions
  • Neurologic conditions (e.g.,previous epilepsy or unexplained seizures, stroke, trauma, infection, metabolic disease, severe migraines, multiple sclerosis, brain tumor)
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Presence of at least one contra-indication to rTMS
  • Pregnancy/breast-feeding
  • Patient who previously received 5 lines or more pharmacological treatment for the current episode (excluding symptomatic psychotropic drugs, e.g. benzodiazepines and hypnotics)
  • Former use of electroconvulsive therapy or rTMS within the current episode.
  • Previous failure of adequate ECT (at least 12 well conducted sessions) or rTMS course (at least 20 well conducted sessions) in the medical history.
  • History of at least two courses of ECT, previous need for maintenance ECT.
  • Protection measure : maintenance of justice, tutelage, legal guardianship
  • Woman of childbearing age without effective contraception
  • Liberty deprivation (e.g. incarceration, therapeutic injunction)

Trial locations and contacts

19 sites in 1 country.

19 sites in 1 country

France19 sites
  • CHU d'Angers

    Angers, 49100

  • CHRU de Besançon

    Besançon, 25000

  • CH le Vinatier Lyon

    Bron

  • CHU de Caen

    Caen

  • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

    Clermont-Ferrand

  • CHU de Dijon

    Dijon

  • Clinique de Vontes

    Esvre-sur-Indre

  • EPSM de Lille

    Lille

  • CH Esquirol - Limoges

    Limoges

  • CHU de Montpellier

    Montpellier

  • Nantes University Hospital

    Nantes, 44000

  • EPS de Ville-Evrard

    Neuilly-sur-Marne

  • GH PItié Salpétrière

    Paris

  • GHU Psychiatrie Ste Anne

    Paris

  • CH Henri Laborit (Poitiers)

    Poitiers, 86000

  • Centre hospitalier Guillaume Regnier Rennes

    Rennes, 35000

  • CH du Rouvray - Rouen

    Rouen

  • CHU de Toulouse

    Toulouse

  • CHU de Tours / CHRU de Tours

    Tours, 37540

Other trials in France

About this study

Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is a frequent, debilitating condition mostly treated by antidepressants. Repeated magnetic transcranial stimulation (rTMS) has proven adjuvant efficacy in TRD in the acute phase of treatment with a very good tolerance and acceptability. Maintenance rTMS (mTMS) is a strategy consisting in adding regular single TMS sessions after response to an acute course in order to keep the benefit of initial treatment over several month or years. Demonstrating that rTMS is efficient to improve long-term prognosis and decrease economic burden would have a tremendous impact in clinical practice in psychiatry. Thus the investigator's aim is to analyze the long term impact of mTMS treatment on costs, but also quality of life and clinical issues.

Read the detailed description

TRD is associated with enormous social, economic, and personal costs. In literature, psychosocial and pharmacological interventions showed limited one year long-term efficacy in terms of relapse (only 10% of sustained remission at one-year follow-up actually) and quality of life due to refractoriness, observance and adverse effects. In the recent years the field of non-invasive brain stimulation became more mature with an increasing level of evidence reaching Level 1 for rTMS as curative treatment for depression in international guidelines. It is a safe and well tolerated treatment but with still high relapse rate at 6 month and one year (comparable to those former described for ECT). mTMS is a promising tool (as it was proven for ECT) to achieve sustained response several month after treatment in a significant proportion of patients. Little is known about its long-term economic and social benefit which is a crucial question given its time consuming nature. To date there is no large Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) assessing the long-term health economic interest or adjuvant mTMS compared to treatment as usual (TAU) alone in unipolar TRD . This study is a double-blind randomized controlled trial aiming at determining a 12 month cost-utility analysis, according to collective perspective, of two different modalities of rTMS (systematic mTMS or curative rTMS in case of relapse) for TRD compared to TAU alone. The secondary aims are to describe 24 month cost-utility, longitudinal clinical issues in terms of mood and quality of life, prognosis factors, as well as TAU actual strategies in that population.

Being tested
Systematic maintenance rTMS, rTMS course in case of relapse, sham rTMS
Keywords
Major Depressive Disorder, Unipolar depression, Chronic depression, Recurrent depression, Depressive disorder, Magnetic stimulation, Non-invasive brain stimulation, 1 Hertz (Hz) rTMS, Maintenance rTMS, Cost-utility, Efficiency, Medico-economic, Antidepressants
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant, Depressive Disorder, Major, Depressive Disorder, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Systematic maintenance rTMSDevice

    Same parameters as the initial course (session of 8,5 minutes, at 1 Hz, on the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) targeting with either neuronavigation or the Beam). The frequency is : 2 sessions / week during 1 month, then 1 session / week during 2 months and finally 1 session every 2 weeks during 8 months.

  • rTMS course in case of relapseDevice

    Same parameters as the initial course. The frequency is the same as the initial course: one daily session on 5 consecutive working days from Monday to Friday for at least 20 to 30 sessions over 4 to 6 weeks.

  • sham rTMSDevice

    The sham stimulation consists of the identical rTMS procedure at the identical location using a commercial figure-eight sham coil. However, it does not produce the identical tactile sensation. A local electrical stimulation will be delivered with two disposable Electromyogram (EMG) electrodes using a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) Stimulator.

Study groups in NCT03701724
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Systematic maintenance rTMS (arm A)ExperimentalActive rTMS treatment followed, for responders, by systematic maintenance rTMS Depression usual medical treatment (psychosocial approach and/or pharmacotherapy and/or, ECT…)
Receives: Device: Systematic maintenance rTMS
rTMS course in case of relapse (arm B)ExperimentalActive rTMS treatment followed, for responders, by additional rTMS courses, in case of relapse Depression usual medical treatment (psychosocial approach and/or pharmacotherapy and/or, ECT…)
Receives: Device: rTMS course in case of relapse
Sham rTMS (arm C)Sham comparatorsham rTMS followed, for responders, by either systematic sham mTMS (50%) or additional sham rTMS course in case of relapse(50%) Depression usual medical treatment (psychosocial approach and/or pharmacotherapy and/or, ECT…)
Receives: Device: sham rTMS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cost-utility ratio, according to collective perspective of rTMS use in TRD compared to conventional therapeutic approaches without active rTMS.

    The utility will be measured by :

    Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALYs) as estimated from responses to the Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) health-related quality of life questionnaire. The questionnaire focuses on 5 dimensions: mobility, personal autonomy, current activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each of these dimensions, 3 answers are possible.

    The costs will be measured by the addition of the following costs:

    Drugs dispensing via Health insurance database "National system of information of the French health insurance" (SNIIRAM), hospitalizations, work stoppages and care consumption collected in a declarative patient questionnaire.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (27)
  1. Cost-utility ratio, according to collective perspective of rTMS use in TRD compared to conventional therapeutic approaches without active rTMS.

    Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALYs) as estimated from responses to the Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) health-related quality of life questionnaire

    The costs will be measured by the additional of the following costs:

    Drugs dispensing via Health insurance database SNIIRAM, hospitalizations, work stoppages and care consumption collected in a declarative patient questionnaire

    Measured: 24 months

  2. Budget impact analysis of spreading the most efficient strategy for using rTMS (systematic mTMS or rTMS course in case of relapse).

    Comparison of intervention costs on the study sample and projection of these costs over 5 years, from the health insurance and hospital perspectives

    Measured: 5 years

  3. Major depressive disorder history

    This outcome will be assessed by patient interview, with the following data (not exhaustive): date of initial symptoms, length of the current episode, family antecedents of mood disorders.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Level of depression treatment-resistance

    Maudsley Staging model score: a multidimensional tool to quantify treatment resistance in depression. It evaluates 5 dimensions: 1) length of the current depressive episode, 2) symptomatic intensity, 3) failure of the antidepressant drugs, 4) Increase treatment 5) use of Electro-convulsive therapy. The total score ranges from 3 to 15. 15 being the highest level of treatment resistance.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. professional status

    patient's professional status (active, unemployed, retired...)

    Measured: Baseline,12 months and 24 months

  6. marital status

    patient's marital status (married, widow, single...)

    Measured: Baseline,12 months and 24 months

  7. Response rate

    Response is defined as follows: decrease of the MADRS score by at least 50% compared to baseline score. MADRS stands for Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. It is used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. A score from 0 to 6 being normal/symptom absent and a score >34 being severe depression.

    Measured: 12 months and 24 months

  8. Remission rate

    Remission is defined as follows: MADRS score ≤ 10 (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)

    Measured: 12 months and 24 months

  9. Relapse-free survival

    Number of patients with no relapse. Relapse is defined as follows: MADRS ≥ 20 (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)

    Measured: 12 months and 24 months

  10. MADRS score

    MADRS score (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)

    Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months

  11. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score

    The BDI is 13-item multiple-choice self-report inventory, for measuring the severity of depression. The global score is an addition of each item's score and ranges from 0 (minimal depression) to 39 (severe depression).

    Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months

  12. Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score

    The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) rating scales are measures of symptom severity, treatment response and the efficacy of treatments in treatment studies of patients with mental disorders. Each scale is rated from 0 to 7. 0 being the best level and 7 the worst level.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months

  13. Adverse events linked to the medical treatment for depression

    Number and types of adverse events linked to the medical treatment for depression

    Measured: 24 months

  14. Declarative drug compliance via the MARS (Medication Adherence Report Scale)

    MARS is the Medication Adherence Report Scale, including 10 questions, the global score ranges from 0 to 10, 0 corresponds to the worst drug compliance and 10 to an excellent drug compliance

    Measured: baseline, 12 months and 24 months

  15. Declarative drug compliance via the CRS (Clinician Rating Scale)

    CRS is the Clinician Rating Scale , including 7 questions, the global score ranges from 1 to 7, 7 being the worst level of drug compliance.

    Measured: baseline, 12 months and 24 months

  16. Treatment(s) switch(es)

    Number of treatment switches per patient

    Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months

  17. Treatment(s) dose increase

    Number of drug(s) dose(s) increases prescribed to the patient

    Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months

  18. Treatments combination(s)

    List of drugs (name) prescribed to the patient

    Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months

  19. Rate of suicide attempts and suicides

    number of suicide attempts and suicides per patient

    Measured: 12 months and 24 months

  20. Patient's quality of life

    Short-Form 36 (SF 36) questionnaire: instrument used to assess multidimensional health-related quality of life, which measures 8 health related parameters: physical function, social function, physical role, emotional role, mental health, energy, pain, general health perceptions

    Measured: baseline,12 months and 24 months

  21. Response rate at the end of rTMS courses

    Response is defined as follows: decrease of the MADRS score by at least 50% compared to baseline score (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)

    Measured: 1 month after each rTMS treatments

  22. Remission rate at the end of rTMS courses

    Remission is defined as follows: MADRS score ≤ 10 (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)

    Measured: 1 month after each rTMS treatments

  23. Number of days between the successive rTMS courses

    Number of days between end of rTMS course X and beginning of course X+1, for each patient

    Measured: 24 months

  24. Total number of rTMS sessions

    total number of rTMS sessions per patient

    Measured: 24 months

  25. Time between relapses

    Number of days between relapses, per patient

    Measured: 24 months

  26. Compliance with rTMS

    number of missed sessions over the number of planned sessions, per patient

    Measured: 24 months

  27. Patient acceptability of the rTMS technique: Analog Visual Scale

    Analog Visual Scale of acceptability of the rTMS completed by the patient, ranging from 0 to 10. 0 being "not acceptable" and 10 being "totally acceptable"

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Oct 2018
  2. Study start5 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
119 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03701724
Sponsor's protocol ID
RC17_0494
Acronym
ACOUSTIM
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
17 Sep 2018
Last updated
16 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Bulteau S, Laurin A, Volteau C, Dert C, Lagalice L, Schirr-Bonnans S, Bukowski N, Guitteny M, Simons L, Cabelguen C, Pichot A, Tessier F, Bonnin A, Lepage A; ACOUSTIM Investigators Group; HUGOPSY Network; Vanelle JM, Sauvaget A, Riche VP. Cost-utility analysis of curative and maintenance repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Trials. 2020 Apr 5;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04255-9.

    PubMed 32248820

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Systematic maintenance rTMS and rTMS course in case of relapse in people with Treatment-resistant Depression, run by Nantes University Hospital at 19 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 19 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cost-utility ratio, according to collective perspective of rTMS use in TRD compared to conventional therapeutic approaches without active rTMS. (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03701724, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in