Treatment-resistant DepressionACOUSTIMNCT03701724
Cost-utility Analysis of Maintenance rTMS for Treatment-resistant Depression
A study testing Systematic maintenance rTMS and rTMS course in case of relapse in people with Treatment-resistant Depression, run by Nantes University Hospital at 19 sites in France.
Trial summary
Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is a frequent, debilitating condition mostly treated by antidepressants. Repeated magnetic transcranial stimulation (rTMS) has proven adjuvant efficacy in TRD in the acute phase of treatment with a very good tolerance and acceptability. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Treatment-resistant Depression
- What is being tested?
- Systematic maintenance rTMS and rTMS course in case of relapse
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 119 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 5 Nov 2018to 30 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Major depressive disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) 5 MADRS >19
- Episode duration: 12 weeks to 3 years.
- 2 to 4 unsuccessful treatment lines (including antidepressants, and potentialization agents lithium and quetiapine) despite adequate dosage and duration (6 weeks stable posology)
- Ability to consent and express informed consent, to answer questionnaires and to go to follow-up visits.
- Affiliation to social security
Who cannot join
- Bipolar disorder
- Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders
- Mental retardation or developmental disorder
- Substance abuse or dependence
- Depression symptoms better explained by medical conditions
- Neurologic conditions (e.g.,previous epilepsy or unexplained seizures, stroke, trauma, infection, metabolic disease, severe migraines, multiple sclerosis, brain tumor)
Show all 15Show fewer
- Presence of at least one contra-indication to rTMS
- Pregnancy/breast-feeding
- Patient who previously received 5 lines or more pharmacological treatment for the current episode (excluding symptomatic psychotropic drugs, e.g. benzodiazepines and hypnotics)
- Former use of electroconvulsive therapy or rTMS within the current episode.
- Previous failure of adequate ECT (at least 12 well conducted sessions) or rTMS course (at least 20 well conducted sessions) in the medical history.
- History of at least two courses of ECT, previous need for maintenance ECT.
- Protection measure : maintenance of justice, tutelage, legal guardianship
- Woman of childbearing age without effective contraception
- Liberty deprivation (e.g. incarceration, therapeutic injunction)
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 1 country.
19 sites in 1 country
France19 sites
CHU d'Angers
Angers, 49100
CHRU de Besançon
Besançon, 25000
CH le Vinatier Lyon
Bron
CHU de Caen
Caen
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand
CHU de Dijon
Dijon
Clinique de Vontes
Esvre-sur-Indre
EPSM de Lille
Lille
CH Esquirol - Limoges
Limoges
CHU de Montpellier
Montpellier
Nantes University Hospital
Nantes, 44000
EPS de Ville-Evrard
Neuilly-sur-Marne
GH PItié Salpétrière
Paris
GHU Psychiatrie Ste Anne
Paris
CH Henri Laborit (Poitiers)
Poitiers, 86000
Centre hospitalier Guillaume Regnier Rennes
Rennes, 35000
CH du Rouvray - Rouen
Rouen
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse
CHU de Tours / CHRU de Tours
Tours, 37540
About this study
Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is a frequent, debilitating condition mostly treated by antidepressants. Repeated magnetic transcranial stimulation (rTMS) has proven adjuvant efficacy in TRD in the acute phase of treatment with a very good tolerance and acceptability. Maintenance rTMS (mTMS) is a strategy consisting in adding regular single TMS sessions after response to an acute course in order to keep the benefit of initial treatment over several month or years. Demonstrating that rTMS is efficient to improve long-term prognosis and decrease economic burden would have a tremendous impact in clinical practice in psychiatry. Thus the investigator's aim is to analyze the long term impact of mTMS treatment on costs, but also quality of life and clinical issues.
Read the detailed description
TRD is associated with enormous social, economic, and personal costs. In literature, psychosocial and pharmacological interventions showed limited one year long-term efficacy in terms of relapse (only 10% of sustained remission at one-year follow-up actually) and quality of life due to refractoriness, observance and adverse effects. In the recent years the field of non-invasive brain stimulation became more mature with an increasing level of evidence reaching Level 1 for rTMS as curative treatment for depression in international guidelines. It is a safe and well tolerated treatment but with still high relapse rate at 6 month and one year (comparable to those former described for ECT). mTMS is a promising tool (as it was proven for ECT) to achieve sustained response several month after treatment in a significant proportion of patients. Little is known about its long-term economic and social benefit which is a crucial question given its time consuming nature. To date there is no large Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) assessing the long-term health economic interest or adjuvant mTMS compared to treatment as usual (TAU) alone in unipolar TRD . This study is a double-blind randomized controlled trial aiming at determining a 12 month cost-utility analysis, according to collective perspective, of two different modalities of rTMS (systematic mTMS or curative rTMS in case of relapse) for TRD compared to TAU alone. The secondary aims are to describe 24 month cost-utility, longitudinal clinical issues in terms of mood and quality of life, prognosis factors, as well as TAU actual strategies in that population.
- Conditions
- Treatment-resistant Depression
- Being tested
- Systematic maintenance rTMS, rTMS course in case of relapse, sham rTMS
- Keywords
- Major Depressive Disorder, Unipolar depression, Chronic depression, Recurrent depression, Depressive disorder, Magnetic stimulation, Non-invasive brain stimulation, 1 Hertz (Hz) rTMS, Maintenance rTMS, Cost-utility, Efficiency, Medico-economic, Antidepressants
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant, Depressive Disorder, Major, Depressive Disorder, Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Systematic maintenance rTMSDevice
Same parameters as the initial course (session of 8,5 minutes, at 1 Hz, on the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) targeting with either neuronavigation or the Beam). The frequency is : 2 sessions / week during 1 month, then 1 session / week during 2 months and finally 1 session every 2 weeks during 8 months.
rTMS course in case of relapseDevice
Same parameters as the initial course. The frequency is the same as the initial course: one daily session on 5 consecutive working days from Monday to Friday for at least 20 to 30 sessions over 4 to 6 weeks.
sham rTMSDevice
The sham stimulation consists of the identical rTMS procedure at the identical location using a commercial figure-eight sham coil. However, it does not produce the identical tactile sensation. A local electrical stimulation will be delivered with two disposable Electromyogram (EMG) electrodes using a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) Stimulator.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Systematic maintenance rTMS (arm A) | Experimental | Active rTMS treatment followed, for responders, by systematic maintenance rTMS Depression usual medical treatment (psychosocial approach and/or pharmacotherapy and/or, ECT…) Receives: Device: Systematic maintenance rTMS |
| rTMS course in case of relapse (arm B) | Experimental | Active rTMS treatment followed, for responders, by additional rTMS courses, in case of relapse Depression usual medical treatment (psychosocial approach and/or pharmacotherapy and/or, ECT…) Receives: Device: rTMS course in case of relapse |
| Sham rTMS (arm C) | Sham comparator | sham rTMS followed, for responders, by either systematic sham mTMS (50%) or additional sham rTMS course in case of relapse(50%) Depression usual medical treatment (psychosocial approach and/or pharmacotherapy and/or, ECT…) Receives: Device: sham rTMS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cost-utility ratio, according to collective perspective of rTMS use in TRD compared to conventional therapeutic approaches without active rTMS.
The utility will be measured by :
Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALYs) as estimated from responses to the Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) health-related quality of life questionnaire. The questionnaire focuses on 5 dimensions: mobility, personal autonomy, current activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each of these dimensions, 3 answers are possible.
The costs will be measured by the addition of the following costs:
Drugs dispensing via Health insurance database "National system of information of the French health insurance" (SNIIRAM), hospitalizations, work stoppages and care consumption collected in a declarative patient questionnaire.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (27)
Cost-utility ratio, according to collective perspective of rTMS use in TRD compared to conventional therapeutic approaches without active rTMS.
Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALYs) as estimated from responses to the Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) health-related quality of life questionnaire
The costs will be measured by the additional of the following costs:
Drugs dispensing via Health insurance database SNIIRAM, hospitalizations, work stoppages and care consumption collected in a declarative patient questionnaire
Measured: 24 months
Budget impact analysis of spreading the most efficient strategy for using rTMS (systematic mTMS or rTMS course in case of relapse).
Comparison of intervention costs on the study sample and projection of these costs over 5 years, from the health insurance and hospital perspectives
Measured: 5 years
Major depressive disorder history
This outcome will be assessed by patient interview, with the following data (not exhaustive): date of initial symptoms, length of the current episode, family antecedents of mood disorders.
Measured: Baseline
Level of depression treatment-resistance
Maudsley Staging model score: a multidimensional tool to quantify treatment resistance in depression. It evaluates 5 dimensions: 1) length of the current depressive episode, 2) symptomatic intensity, 3) failure of the antidepressant drugs, 4) Increase treatment 5) use of Electro-convulsive therapy. The total score ranges from 3 to 15. 15 being the highest level of treatment resistance.
Measured: Baseline
professional status
patient's professional status (active, unemployed, retired...)
Measured: Baseline,12 months and 24 months
marital status
patient's marital status (married, widow, single...)
Measured: Baseline,12 months and 24 months
Response rate
Response is defined as follows: decrease of the MADRS score by at least 50% compared to baseline score. MADRS stands for Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. It is used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. A score from 0 to 6 being normal/symptom absent and a score >34 being severe depression.
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
Remission rate
Remission is defined as follows: MADRS score ≤ 10 (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
Relapse-free survival
Number of patients with no relapse. Relapse is defined as follows: MADRS ≥ 20 (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
MADRS score
MADRS score (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)
Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score
The BDI is 13-item multiple-choice self-report inventory, for measuring the severity of depression. The global score is an addition of each item's score and ranges from 0 (minimal depression) to 39 (severe depression).
Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) rating scales are measures of symptom severity, treatment response and the efficacy of treatments in treatment studies of patients with mental disorders. Each scale is rated from 0 to 7. 0 being the best level and 7 the worst level.
Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Adverse events linked to the medical treatment for depression
Number and types of adverse events linked to the medical treatment for depression
Measured: 24 months
Declarative drug compliance via the MARS (Medication Adherence Report Scale)
MARS is the Medication Adherence Report Scale, including 10 questions, the global score ranges from 0 to 10, 0 corresponds to the worst drug compliance and 10 to an excellent drug compliance
Measured: baseline, 12 months and 24 months
Declarative drug compliance via the CRS (Clinician Rating Scale)
CRS is the Clinician Rating Scale , including 7 questions, the global score ranges from 1 to 7, 7 being the worst level of drug compliance.
Measured: baseline, 12 months and 24 months
Treatment(s) switch(es)
Number of treatment switches per patient
Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Treatment(s) dose increase
Number of drug(s) dose(s) increases prescribed to the patient
Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Treatments combination(s)
List of drugs (name) prescribed to the patient
Measured: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Rate of suicide attempts and suicides
number of suicide attempts and suicides per patient
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
Patient's quality of life
Short-Form 36 (SF 36) questionnaire: instrument used to assess multidimensional health-related quality of life, which measures 8 health related parameters: physical function, social function, physical role, emotional role, mental health, energy, pain, general health perceptions
Measured: baseline,12 months and 24 months
Response rate at the end of rTMS courses
Response is defined as follows: decrease of the MADRS score by at least 50% compared to baseline score (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)
Measured: 1 month after each rTMS treatments
Remission rate at the end of rTMS courses
Remission is defined as follows: MADRS score ≤ 10 (see detailed description of MADRS in outcome 8)
Measured: 1 month after each rTMS treatments
Number of days between the successive rTMS courses
Number of days between end of rTMS course X and beginning of course X+1, for each patient
Measured: 24 months
Total number of rTMS sessions
total number of rTMS sessions per patient
Measured: 24 months
Time between relapses
Number of days between relapses, per patient
Measured: 24 months
Compliance with rTMS
number of missed sessions over the number of planned sessions, per patient
Measured: 24 months
Patient acceptability of the rTMS technique: Analog Visual Scale
Analog Visual Scale of acceptability of the rTMS completed by the patient, ranging from 0 to 10. 0 being "not acceptable" and 10 being "totally acceptable"
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2018
- Study start5 Nov 2018
- Primary completion15 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Treatment-resistant DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nantes University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 119 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Samuel Bulteau, MD, Principal investigator, Nantes University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03701724
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RC17_0494
- Acronym
- ACOUSTIM
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Bulteau S, Laurin A, Volteau C, Dert C, Lagalice L, Schirr-Bonnans S, Bukowski N, Guitteny M, Simons L, Cabelguen C, Pichot A, Tessier F, Bonnin A, Lepage A; ACOUSTIM Investigators Group; HUGOPSY Network; Vanelle JM, Sauvaget A, Riche VP. Cost-utility analysis of curative and maintenance repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Trials. 2020 Apr 5;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04255-9.
PubMed 32248820
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cost-utility Analysis of Maintenance rTMS for Treatment-resistant Depression
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03701724
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACOUSTIM / RC17_0494
- Conditions
- Treatment-resistant Depression
- Keywords
- Major Depressive Disorder, Unipolar depression, Chronic depression, Recurrent depression, Depressive disorder, Magnetic stimulation, Non-invasive brain stimulation, 1 Hertz (Hz) rTMS
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 119 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is a frequent, debilitating condition mostly treated by antidepressants. Repeated magnetic transcranial stimulation (rTMS) has proven adjuvant efficacy in TRD in the acute phase of treatment with a very good tolerance and acceptability. Maintenance rTMS (mTMS) is a strategy consisting in adding regular single TMS sessions after response to an acute course in order to keep the benefit of initial treatment over several month or years. Demonstrating that rTMS is efficient to improve long-term prognosis and decrease economic burden would have a tremendous impact in clinical practice in psychiatry. Thus the investigator's aim is to analyze the long term impact of mTMS treatment on costs, but also quality of life and clinical issues.
Detailed description
TRD is associated with enormous social, economic, and personal costs. In literature, psychosocial and pharmacological interventions showed limited one year long-term efficacy in terms of relapse (only 10% of sustained remission at one-year follow-up actually) and quality of life due to refractoriness, observance and adverse effects. In the recent years the field of non-invasive brain stimulation became more mature with an increasing level of evidence reaching Level 1 for rTMS as curative treatment for depression in international guidelines. It is a safe and well tolerated treatment but with still high relapse rate at 6 month and one year (comparable to those former described for ECT). mTMS is a promising tool (as it was proven for ECT) to achieve sustained response several month after treatment in a significant proportion of patients. Little is known about its long-term economic and social benefit which is a crucial question given its time consuming nature. To date there is no large Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) assessing the long-term health economic interest or adjuvant mTMS compared to treatment as usual (TAU) alone in unipolar TRD . This study is a double-blind randomized controlled trial aiming at determining a 12 month cost-utility analysis, according to collective perspective, of two different modalities of rTMS (systematic mTMS or curative rTMS in case of relapse) for TRD compared to TAU alone. The secondary aims are to describe 24 month cost-utility, longitudinal clinical issues in terms of mood and quality of life, prognosis factors, as well as TAU actual strategies in that population.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Systematic maintenance rTMS (arm A) | Experimental | Device: Systematic maintenance rTMSActive rTMS treatment followed, for responders, by systematic maintenance rTMS Depression usual medical treatment (psychosocial approach and/or pharmacotherapy and/or, ECT…) |
| rTMS course in case of relapse (arm B) | Experimental | Device: rTMS course in case of relapseActive rTMS treatment followed, for responders, by additional rTMS courses, in case of relapse Depression usual medical treatment (psychosocial approach and/or pharmacotherapy and/or, ECT…) |
| Sham rTMS (arm C) | Sham comparator | Device: sham rTMSsham rTMS followed, for responders, by either systematic sham mTMS (50%) or additional sham rTMS course in case of relapse(50%) Depression usual medical treatment (psychosocial approach and/or pharmacotherapy and/or, ECT…) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Major depressive disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) 5 MADRS >19
- Episode duration: 12 weeks to 3 years.
- 2 to 4 unsuccessful treatment lines (including antidepressants, and potentialization agents lithium and quetiapine) despite adequate dosage and duration (6 weeks stable posology)
- Ability to consent and express informed consent, to answer questionnaires and to go to follow-up visits.
- Affiliation to social security
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Bipolar disorder
- Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders
- Mental retardation or developmental disorder
- Substance abuse or dependence
- Depression symptoms better explained by medical conditions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Systematic maintenance rTMSSame parameters as the initial course (session of 8,5 minutes, at 1 Hz, on the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) targeting with either neuronavigation or the Beam). The frequency is : 2 sessions / week during 1 month, then 1 session / week during 2 months and finally 1 session every 2 weeks during 8 months. | Device | Systematic maintenance rTMS (arm A) |
| rTMS course in case of relapseSame parameters as the initial course. The frequency is the same as the initial course: one daily session on 5 consecutive working days from Monday to Friday for at least 20 to 30 sessions over 4 to 6 weeks. | Device | rTMS course in case of relapse (arm B) |
| sham rTMSThe sham stimulation consists of the identical rTMS procedure at the identical location using a commercial figure-eight sham coil. However, it does not produce the identical tactile sensation. A local electrical stimulation will be delivered with two disposable Electromyogram (EMG) electrodes using a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) Stimulator. | Device | Sham rTMS (arm C) |
Primary outcome
Cost-utility ratio, according to collective perspective of rTMS use in TRD compared to conventional therapeutic approaches without active rTMS.
Time frame: 12 months
The utility will be measured by : Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALYs) as estimated from responses to the Euroqol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) health-related quality of life questionnaire. The questionnaire focuses on 5 dimensions: mobility, personal autonomy, current activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. For each of these dimensions, 3 answers are possible. The costs will be measured by the addition of the following costs: Drugs dispensing via Health insurance database "National system of information of the French health insurance" (SNIIRAM), hospitalizations, work stoppages and care consumption collected in a declarative patient questionnaire.
27 secondary outcomes
Cost-utility ratio, according to collective perspective of rTMS use in TRD compared to conventional therapeutic approaches without active rTMS.
Time frame: 24 months
Budget impact analysis of spreading the most efficient strategy for using rTMS (systematic mTMS or rTMS course in case of relapse).
Time frame: 5 years
Major depressive disorder history
Time frame: Baseline
Level of depression treatment-resistance
Time frame: Baseline
professional status
Time frame: Baseline,12 months and 24 months
marital status
Time frame: Baseline,12 months and 24 months
Response rate
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
Remission rate
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
Relapse-free survival
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
MADRS score
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Adverse events linked to the medical treatment for depression
Time frame: 24 months
Declarative drug compliance via the MARS (Medication Adherence Report Scale)
Time frame: baseline, 12 months and 24 months
Declarative drug compliance via the CRS (Clinician Rating Scale)
Time frame: baseline, 12 months and 24 months
Treatment(s) switch(es)
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Treatment(s) dose increase
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Treatments combination(s)
Time frame: Baseline, 2 months, 6 months , 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Rate of suicide attempts and suicides
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
Patient's quality of life
Time frame: baseline,12 months and 24 months
Response rate at the end of rTMS courses
Time frame: 1 month after each rTMS treatments
Remission rate at the end of rTMS courses
Time frame: 1 month after each rTMS treatments
Number of days between the successive rTMS courses
Time frame: 24 months
Total number of rTMS sessions
Time frame: 24 months
Time between relapses
Time frame: 24 months
Compliance with rTMS
Time frame: 24 months
Patient acceptability of the rTMS technique: Analog Visual Scale
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32248820Bulteau S, Laurin A, Volteau C, Dert C, Lagalice L, Schirr-Bonnans S, Bukowski N, Guitteny M, Simons L, Cabelguen C, Pichot A, Tessier F, Bonnin A, Lepage A; ACOUSTIM Investigators Group; HUGOPSY Network; Vanelle JM, Sauvaget A, Riche VP. Cost-utility analysis of curative and maintenance repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Trials. 2020 Apr 5;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04255-9.
Related trials for Treatment-resistant Depression
RecruitingPhase 4
Biomarker-Guided Antidepressant Selection
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD)
RecruitingPhase 2
ACP-211 Monotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder With Inadequate Antidepressant Response
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
Active, not recruiting
CET- REM (Correlating ECT Response to EEG Markers)
ECT, Treatment Resistant Depression
Active, not recruiting
rTMS to Target Neural Connectivity and Rumination in Treatment-Resistant Depression
Depression, Treatment Resistant
Recruiting
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Blinded Trial Demonstrating the Safety and Effectiveness of VNS Therapy® System as Adjunctive Therapy Versus a No Stimulation Control in Subjects With Treatment-Resistant Depression
Treatment Resistant Depression
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Samuel Bulteau, MD principal investigator
Nantes University Hospital
19 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Systematic maintenance rTMS and rTMS course in case of relapse in people with Treatment-resistant Depression, run by Nantes University Hospital at 19 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cost-utility ratio, according to collective perspective of rTMS use in TRD compared to conventional therapeutic approaches without active rTMS. (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03701724, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2022.