AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatic TumorNCT03698643

Impact of New Interventional Imaging Modality Use on Patient Radiation Exposure in Transarterial Chemoembolization

An observational study of Hepatic Tumor, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most performed endovascular interventional radiology (IR) procedure. TACE procedures are performed in an IR suite, most of which are equipped with floor-based flat-panel robotic C-arm allowing two-dimensional imaging. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hepatic Tumor
How many people
145 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Apr 2018to 1 May 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: TACE sessions performed on adult patients with primary or secondary liver tumor(s) after multidisciplinary tumor meeting approval

Who may be able to join

  • Age > or = 18 years
  • primary or secondary liver tumor(s)
  • TACE approved by multidisciplinary tumor meeting

Who cannot join

  • TACE not performed

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Uhmontpellier

    Montpellier, 34295

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Impact of New Interventional Imaging Modality Use (Angio-CT) on Patient Radiation Exposure in Transarterial Chemoembolization

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most performed endovascular interventional radiology (IR) procedure. TACE procedures are performed in an IR suite, most of which are equipped with floor-based flat-panel robotic C-arm allowing two-dimensional imaging. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been developed to allow three-dimensional navigation but has several limitations such as reduced signal to noise ratio and small field-of-view, and seems to have negative impact on patient radiation exposure. Another option to perform 3D imaging is called angio-CT which combines a CT-scan and a floor-based flat-panel robotic C-arm in a single IR suite. Even if some publications have shown benefit of angio-CT in TACE procedures in Japan, no study about angio-CT in liver IR procedures has been conducted in the occidental world so far. The purpose of our study was to assess the impact of angio-CT use on patient radiation exposure and treatment quality in TACE procedures compared to CBCT.

This before-after study consisted of a review of consecutive TACE procedures performed between January 2016 and September 2017 in our institution with two different imaging modalities, defining two study groups (C-arm with CBCT versus angio-CT).

Conditions
Hepatic Tumor
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient effective radiation dose per TACE

    Patient effective radiation dose (mSv) per TACE :

    Dose-area product (in mGy/cm^2) and dose-length product (in mGy/cm) will be combined and converted to report effective dose (in mSv).

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Air kerma per TACE

    Air kerma (in mGy) per TACE

    Measured: 1 day

  2. Fluoroscopy time per TACE

    Fluoroscopy time (in sec) per TACE

    Measured: 1 day

  3. Number of CBCT acquisitions per TACE

    Number of CBCT acquisitions per TACE

    Measured: 1 day

  4. Number of CT acquisitions per TACE

    Number of CT acquisitions per TACE

    Measured: 1 day

  5. Treatment targeting

    Assessed on control CBCT or CT and graded into 3 classes : fully targeted, partially targeted or untargeted.

    Measured: 1 day

  6. Tumor response

    Assessed on follow-up CT or MRI and graded into 3 classes : response, tumor stability or progression.

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Oct 2018
  2. Study start1 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2018
  4. Study completion1 May 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
145 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03698643
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECHMPL18_0136
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
12 Sep 2018
Last updated
9 Oct 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: NC

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hepatic Tumor, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient effective radiation dose per TACE (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in