Orthodontic Appliance ComplicationNCT03696511
Miniscrews Primary Stability
A study testing Orthodontic miniscrew insertion in people with Orthodontic Appliance Complication, run by University of Genova at 3 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Orthodontic Miniscrew primary stability is essential for success and long term results. The aim of the present study is to evaluate Bone Properties and Torque insertion values and how they could be related to primary stability and success rate of miniscrew. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Orthodontic Appliance Complication
- What is being tested?
- Orthodontic miniscrew insertion
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 29 Sep 2018to 30 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patient who need ortho treatment with miniscrew
- permanent dentition
Who cannot join
- bone pathologies
- systemic disease
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 2 countries.
3 sites in 2 countries
Italy2 sites
Orthodontic Departments
Brescia, 25121
Orthodontic Department
Genova, 16100
About this study
Official title: Multicentric Clinical Study Protocol on Primary Stability of STORM® Miniscrew
Orthodontic Miniscrew primary stability is essential for success and long term results.
The aim of the present study is to evaluate Bone Properties and Torque insertion values and how they could be related to primary stability and success rate of miniscrew.
Read the detailed description
Orthodontic miniscrews are intraoral anchorage devices designed to support biomechanics during orthodontic tooth movement. Also known as miniscrews, mini-implants, microscrews, or temporary anchorage devices, they are made of a head, a neck, and a threaded shank. The head may show different designs (bracket-like, rounded with slot, etc.) the threaded shank is generally cylindrical, tapered or a combination of the two, and may be self-tapping (i.e. requiring a pre-drilled pilot hole) and/or self-drilling (not requiring a pilot hole). Because of their small diameter, they may be implanted in a wide variety of anatomic sites, such as the alveolar interradicular spaces or the palatal cortical bone, in order to attend to treatment anchorage needs. The loading protocol for miniscrews loading can be as immediate as delayed; in the beginning in literature was indicated a non-specific period of healing and osseointegration before a screw inserted in the mandible could be loaded; the importance of a healing period was derived by several studies on Branemark protocol on implants. Further experimental studies on orthodontic load were not able to demonstrate loaded implant loosening, even when loads were applied immediately, so that an immediate loading protocol for orthodontic miniscrews appeared as reasonable. Costa and Melsen studied the tissue reaction around the immediately loaded screws in an animal model and suggested the use of immediately loaded screws as an intra-oral extra-dental anchorage. Histomorphometric analyses have shown that the immediate loading of miniscrew implants may help to activate bone remodeling and increase the mineral contents at the loaded region. Compared to traditional endosseous implants, orthodontic miniscrews have relatively high failure rates, varying from 16.4% to 39% ; according to recent reviews, the average failure rate is believed to be less than 20%. Many factors have been proposed to be associated to success rate; among these age, gender, jaw (maxilla or mandible), placement site, tissue mobility (firm or movable tissue), inflammation, distance to the root, insertion torque, loading time, type, length, and diameter of the miniscrew. Recently, an experimental study on primary stability found that bone properties are more important than the screw geometry in establishing primary mechanical retention. Thus the aim of this study is to deeply analyze the bone role related to the success of miniscrews analyzing both insertion/removal torque values, both bone characteristics by the mean of x-rays.
- Conditions
- Orthodontic Appliance Complication
- Being tested
- Orthodontic miniscrew insertion
- Keywords
- Miniscrew
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Orthodontic miniscrew insertionDevice
orthodontic treatment using miniscrews as anchorage reinforcement
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| group 1:maxillary insertion | Active comparator | Orthodontic miniscrew insertion; maxillary insertion. buccal Receives: Device: Orthodontic miniscrew insertion |
| group 2: mandible insertion | Active comparator | Orthodontic miniscrew insertion; mandible insertion. Receives: Device: Orthodontic miniscrew insertion |
| group 3: palatal insertion | Active comparator | Orthodontic miniscrew insertion; palatal insertion Receives: Device: Orthodontic miniscrew insertion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Success
How many screws don't fail. Success if the screw remain stable until the end of biomechanics applied.
Measured: From the moment the screw will be placed, measuring maximum insertion torque, through study completion, when the screws will be removed, measuring removal torque. An average duration of screw of 10-12 months is expected.
Secondary outcomes (2)
MIT
miniscrew maximum insertion torque: The moment when the screw will be placed, the maximum insertion torque will be registered at the insertion time, with a analogical screwdriver, measured in Ncm
Measured: The date when, for each patient, the miniscrew will be inserted. Registered as the insertion date (day). Up to 12 months from orthodontic therapy beginning. The event is determined from date of randomization list creation until the day of screw insertion
MRT
maximum removal torque. Maximum removal torque will be recorded using an analogical screwdriver at the completion of screw insertion. MRT is a unique value expressed in Ncm measured when the screws will be removed.
Measured: The date when, for each patient,the miniscrew will be removed.Registered as the removal date (day).Up to 24 months after miniscrew insertion.The event is determined from date of randomization list creation until the day of screw removal, up to 48 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Oct 2018
- Study start29 Sep 2018
- Primary completion30 Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Orthodontic Appliance ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Genova
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Alfonso X El Sabio University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marco Migliorati, University of Genova
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03696511
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GE-BS-MA MRCT
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 18 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Migliorati M, Drago S, Dalessandri D, Lagazzo A, Gallo F, Capurro M, Silvestrini-Biavati A. On the stability efficiency of anchorage self-tapping screws: Ex vivo experiments on miniscrew implants used in orthodontics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 May;81:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
PubMed 29482179Watanabe T, Miyazawa K, Fujiwara T, Kawaguchi M, Tabuchi M, Goto S. Insertion torque and Periotest values are important factors predicting outcome after orthodontic miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Oct;152(4):483-488. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.01.026.
PubMed 28962732Inoue M, Kuroda S, Yasue A, Horiuchi S, Kyung HM, Tanaka E. Torque ratio as a predictable factor on primary stability of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Implant Dent. 2014 Oct;23(5):576-81. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000138.
PubMed 25192157Watanabe H, Deguchi T, Hasegawa M, Ito M, Kim S, Takano-Yamamoto T. Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2013 Feb;16(1):44-55. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12003. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
PubMed 23311659Migliorati M, Drago S, Gallo F, Amorfini L, Dalessandri D, Calzolari C, Benedicenti S, Silvestrini-Biavati A. Immediate versus delayed loading: comparison of primary stability loss after miniscrew placement in orthodontic patients-a single-centre blinded randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2016 Dec;38(6):652-659. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv095. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
PubMed 26728036
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicentric Clinical Study Protocol on Primary Stability of STORM® Miniscrew
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03696511
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GE-BS-MA MRCT
- Conditions
- Orthodontic Appliance Complication
- Keywords
- Miniscrew
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of GenovaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Università degli Studi di Brescia, Alfonso X El Sabio University
- Study start
- 29 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Orthodontic Miniscrew primary stability is essential for success and long term results.
The aim of the present study is to evaluate Bone Properties and Torque insertion values and how they could be related to primary stability and success rate of miniscrew.
Detailed description
Orthodontic miniscrews are intraoral anchorage devices designed to support biomechanics during orthodontic tooth movement. Also known as miniscrews, mini-implants, microscrews, or temporary anchorage devices, they are made of a head, a neck, and a threaded shank. The head may show different designs (bracket-like, rounded with slot, etc.) the threaded shank is generally cylindrical, tapered or a combination of the two, and may be self-tapping (i.e. requiring a pre-drilled pilot hole) and/or self-drilling (not requiring a pilot hole). Because of their small diameter, they may be implanted in a wide variety of anatomic sites, such as the alveolar interradicular spaces or the palatal cortical bone, in order to attend to treatment anchorage needs. The loading protocol for miniscrews loading can be as immediate as delayed; in the beginning in literature was indicated a non-specific period of healing and osseointegration before a screw inserted in the mandible could be loaded; the importance of a healing period was derived by several studies on Branemark protocol on implants. Further experimental studies on orthodontic load were not able to demonstrate loaded implant loosening, even when loads were applied immediately, so that an immediate loading protocol for orthodontic miniscrews appeared as reasonable. Costa and Melsen studied the tissue reaction around the immediately loaded screws in an animal model and suggested the use of immediately loaded screws as an intra-oral extra-dental anchorage. Histomorphometric analyses have shown that the immediate loading of miniscrew implants may help to activate bone remodeling and increase the mineral contents at the loaded region. Compared to traditional endosseous implants, orthodontic miniscrews have relatively high failure rates, varying from 16.4% to 39% ; according to recent reviews, the average failure rate is believed to be less than 20%. Many factors have been proposed to be associated to success rate; among these age, gender, jaw (maxilla or mandible), placement site, tissue mobility (firm or movable tissue), inflammation, distance to the root, insertion torque, loading time, type, length, and diameter of the miniscrew. Recently, an experimental study on primary stability found that bone properties are more important than the screw geometry in establishing primary mechanical retention. Thus the aim of this study is to deeply analyze the bone role related to the success of miniscrews analyzing both insertion/removal torque values, both bone characteristics by the mean of x-rays.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| group 1:maxillary insertion | Active comparator | Device: Orthodontic miniscrew insertionOrthodontic miniscrew insertion; maxillary insertion. buccal |
| group 2: mandible insertion | Active comparator | Device: Orthodontic miniscrew insertionOrthodontic miniscrew insertion; mandible insertion. |
| group 3: palatal insertion | Active comparator | Device: Orthodontic miniscrew insertionOrthodontic miniscrew insertion; palatal insertion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- patient who need ortho treatment with miniscrew
- permanent dentition
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- bone pathologies
- systemic disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Orthodontic miniscrew insertionorthodontic treatment using miniscrews as anchorage reinforcement | Device | group 1:maxillary insertion, group 2: mandible insertion, group 3: palatal insertion |
Primary outcome
Success
Time frame: From the moment the screw will be placed, measuring maximum insertion torque, through study completion, when the screws will be removed, measuring removal torque. An average duration of screw of 10-12 months is expected.
How many screws don't fail. Success if the screw remain stable until the end of biomechanics applied.
2 secondary outcomes
MIT
Time frame: The date when, for each patient, the miniscrew will be inserted. Registered as the insertion date (day). Up to 12 months from orthodontic therapy beginning. The event is determined from date of randomization list creation until the day of screw insertion
MRT
Time frame: The date when, for each patient,the miniscrew will be removed.Registered as the removal date (day).Up to 24 months after miniscrew insertion.The event is determined from date of randomization list creation until the day of screw removal, up to 48 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 29482179Migliorati M, Drago S, Dalessandri D, Lagazzo A, Gallo F, Capurro M, Silvestrini-Biavati A. On the stability efficiency of anchorage self-tapping screws: Ex vivo experiments on miniscrew implants used in orthodontics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 May;81:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 28962732Watanabe T, Miyazawa K, Fujiwara T, Kawaguchi M, Tabuchi M, Goto S. Insertion torque and Periotest values are important factors predicting outcome after orthodontic miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Oct;152(4):483-488. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.01.026.
- Results publication: PubMed 25192157Inoue M, Kuroda S, Yasue A, Horiuchi S, Kyung HM, Tanaka E. Torque ratio as a predictable factor on primary stability of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Implant Dent. 2014 Oct;23(5):576-81. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000138.
- Results publication: PubMed 23311659Watanabe H, Deguchi T, Hasegawa M, Ito M, Kim S, Takano-Yamamoto T. Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2013 Feb;16(1):44-55. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12003. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 26728036Migliorati M, Drago S, Gallo F, Amorfini L, Dalessandri D, Calzolari C, Benedicenti S, Silvestrini-Biavati A. Immediate versus delayed loading: comparison of primary stability loss after miniscrew placement in orthodontic patients-a single-centre blinded randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2016 Dec;38(6):652-659. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv095. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
Related trials for Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Recruiting
Bacterial Diversity Study Using 16S rRNA Sequencing of Periodontal Samples From Patients With Orthodontic Retainers
Fixed Orthodontic Retainer, Orthodontic Appliances, Removable
Recruiting
Comparison of MI Paste Plus and Resin Infiltration in White Spot Lesions Following Orthodontic Treatment
White Spot Lesions, Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Recruiting
The Effect of Intraoral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Orthodontics Pain
Orthodontic Appliance, Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of a 3-step Bonding System (Transbond™ XT) and a 2-step System (GC Ortho Connect™) on Demineralization Around Maxillary Orthodontic Brackets
Tooth Demineralization, White Spot Lesion
Recruiting
Microbial Adherence, Surface Roughness, Effectiveness and Impact on Patients Between Conventional and 3D Printed Twin Block Appliances
Orthodontic Appliances, Removable, Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Orthodontic miniscrew insertion in people with Orthodontic Appliance Complication, run by University of Genova at 3 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Italy, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Success (time frame: From the moment the screw will be placed, measuring maximum insertion torque, through study completion, when the screws will be removed, measuring removal torque. An average duration of screw of 10-12 months is expected.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03696511, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.