Ovarian Cancer Stage IIICPhase 3ROCOCONCT03693248
Reduction Of Cycles of neOadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian and Primary Peritoneal Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in people with Ovarian Cancer Stage IIIC and Ovarian Cancer Stage IV, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
Te hypothesized that two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery would improve survival in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian, and primary peritoneal cancer because reduction of one cycle of chemotherapy can lead to the removal of more tumor burden, compared with three cycles of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ovarian Cancer Stage IIIC, Ovarian Cancer Stage IV, Fallopian Tube Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 298 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 19 Dec 2018to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: 20-80 years old
- Advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer diagnosed with the following methods
- Histologic confirmation by diagnostic laparoscopic or laparotomy ② Histologic malignancy originated from female genital tract on fine needle aspiration if histological confirmation is difficult or cytologic confirmation of adenocarcinoma in ascites if fine needle aspiration is difficult, meeting the following criteria
- Existence of the pelvic or ovarian mass
- Identification of tumor >2 cm beyond the pelvis on CT, malignant pleural effusion by thoracentesis, extraperitoneal lymph node metastasis (cardio-phrenic, internal mammary, mediastinal, para-tracheal, supraclavicular lymph nodes or inguinal lymph nodes)
- Cancer antigen 125 (CA-125, kU/L)/carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, ng/ml) >25
Show all 16Show fewer
- if CA-125 (kU/L)/CEA (ng/ml) is 25 or less, no primary lesion on colonoscopy, gastroscopy and mammography within six weeks before randomization.
- International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC to IVB disease
- World Health Organization performance status 0-2
- The following criteria should be met if synchronous or metachronous tumors exists.
- ① Complete remission of metachronous malignancy for at least 5 years
- ② Follicular or papillary thyroid cancer treated completely with only surgery as a synchronous tumor
- ③ Early gastric or colon cancer treated completely with only endoscopic mucosal resection as a synchronous tumor
- Normal hematologic, renal and liver function with the following criteria White blood cell (WBC) ≥3,000/ul Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,500/ul Platelet ≥100×103/ul Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤100 IU/L Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤100 IU/L Serum total bilirubin ≤1.5 mg/dL Serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL
- Absence of psychological, and socioeconomic limitations affecting participation to this trial
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of metachronous malignancy within five years before enrollment
- Synchronous tumors except follicular or papillary thyroid cancer treated completely with only surgery and early gastric or colon cancer treated completely with only endoscopic mucosal resection
- Carcinoma in situ, non-epithelial, or borderline tumor in ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum
- Pregnancy
- Medical conditions (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, infectious or cardiac disease etc.) influencing on survival
- Clinical evidence of brain or leptomeningeal metastasis, bone metastasis
- Other treatments affecting clinical outcomes during participation to this trial (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, onco-thermia, herbal medicine, etc.)
- No informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul
Moon Kyoung Bae, 82-2-2072-2643, mose79bmk@naver.com
Soo Jin Park, MD, MD, soojin.mdpark@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Multi-center, Randomized Controlled, Phase III Trials to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness After Cycles Reduction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian and Primary Peritoneal Cancer
Te hypothesized that two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery would improve survival in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian, and primary peritoneal cancer because reduction of one cycle of chemotherapy can lead to the removal of more tumor burden, compared with three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
So the investigators aim to compare survival, rate of successful optimal cytoreductive surgery, post-operative complications, and quality of life between two and three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian, and primary peritoneal cancer.
Read the detailed description
Primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian and primary peritoneal cancer. However, three or four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) has been introduced in clinical setting because four randomized controlled trials related have shown a lower rate of complications in NAC followed by IDS despite the similar efficacy between PDS and NAC followed by IDS in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian and primary peritoneal cancers. However, these trials have some limitations that the rate of optimal cytoreduction defined as the size of residual tumor <1 cm was about 40%, which was a disappointed result not showing the surgical effect improving survival. Nevertheless, more treatment strategies using NAC followed by IDS should be investigated because NAC followed by IDS has been already known as another standard treatment due to the safety.
A recent meta-analysis has reported that reduction of one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may increase overall survival of 4.1 months because it can induce surgical resection of more visible tumors with drug-resistant. Moreover, a related clinical trial has shown that hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may increase survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy because HIPEC can kill drug-resistant invisible tumor cells which were not resected during IDS. Thus, the investigators designed a phase 3, multicenter, randomized controlled trial for comparing survival, clinical outcomes and quality of life between two and three cycles of NAC followed by IDS, and thereby will investigate the efficacy and safety of reduction of one cycle of NAC.
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer Stage IIIC, Ovarian Cancer Stage IV, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Peritoneal Cancer
- Being tested
- Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- Keywords
- advanced ovarian cancer, advanced fallopian cancer, advanced peritoneal cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, cycles of chemotherapy, survival
- Medical subject headings
- Ovarian Neoplasms, Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapyDrug
Also called paclitaxel and carboplatin
Two and three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be administered in experimental and control groups, respectively
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy | Experimental | * Paclitaxel (175mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5.0 or 6.0) IV, D1, every three weeks.
* Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Receives: Drug: Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy |
| Three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy | No intervention | * Paclitaxel (175mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5.0 or 6.0) IV, D1, every three weeks. * Three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression free survival
the time interval from randomization date to disease recurrence or progression date
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death (by any cause, in the absence of disease progression) whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months
Secondary outcomes (21)
Overall survival
the time interval from randomization date to death or end of study date
Measured: From the date of randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to 60 months
Time to progression
the time interval from randomization date to disease recurrence or progression except death date
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression in the absence of death by any cause, assessed up to 60 months
Tumor response 1
Tumor response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Measured: 3 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, up to 6 weeks
Tumor response 2
Surgical response after interval debulking surgery
Measured: 3 weeks after completion of interval debulking surgery, up to 6 weeks
Tumor response 3
Tumor response after adjuvant chemotherapy
Measured: 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, up to 6 weeks
Radiologic evaluation of residual tumor
Size of post operative residual tumor on computed tomography (CT) after interval debulking surgery
Measured: 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery, up to 6 weeks
Functional assessment of residual tumor
Standardized uptake positron emission tomography (PET) CT
Measured: 3 weeks after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, up to 6 weeks
Assessment of quality of life1
Scoring of quality of life assessment using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Measured: From the date of screening to the date before treatment start, 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery within 6 weeks, 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 6 weeks, on date of visit at 6 months after completion of primary treatment
Assessment of quality of life2
Scoring of quality of life assessment using the EORTC ovarian cancer module (EORTC QLQ-Ov28)
Measured: From the date of screening to the date before treatment start, 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery within 6 weeks, 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 6 weeks, on date of visit at 6 months after completion of primary treatment
Assessment of quality of life3
Scoring of quality of life assessment using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-O)
Measured: From the date of screening to the date before treatment start, 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery within 6 weeks, 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 6 weeks, on date of visit at 6 months after completion of primary treatment
Assessment of quality of life4
Scoring of quality of life assessment using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L)
Measured: From the date of screening to the date before treatment start, 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery within 6 weeks, 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 6 weeks, on date of visit at 6 months after completion of primary treatment
Adverse events
Evaluation of chemotherapy induced toxicity
Measured: From the date of first day of chemotherapy to the day before starting next cycle. Each cycle is 21 days.
Success rate of optimal cytoreduction
Evaluation of optimal cytoreduction and extent of resection based on modified Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) operation record form and tumor burden index
Measured: On the date of completion of interval debulking surgery, up to 24 hours
Surgical complexity score (SCS)
Evaluation of difficulty of surgical skills based on surgical complexity score Minimal 0 to maxial 18 point. Each surgery will classified into low (point ≤3), intermediate (4-7), high (≥8) Higher value means more complex surgery.
Measured: On the date of completion of interval debulking surgery, up to 24 hours
Postoperative complications 1
Incidence of early complications, and severity of complications based on Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Surgical Secondary Events Grading System
Measured: Early complications: after interval debulking surgery, up to 30 days
Postoperative complications 2
Incidence of late complications, and severity of complications based on Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Surgical Secondary Events Grading System
Measured: Late complications: 31 days after interval debulking surgery through study completion, an average of 1 year
Estimated blood loss
Estimated blood loss (ml) based on Modified KGOG Operation Record Form
Measured: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
Operation time
Operation time (min) based on Modified KGOG Operation Record Form
Measured: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
Transfusion
Transfusion (count by volume of transfused RBC) based on Modified KGOG Operation Record Form
Measured: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
days of hospitalization
days of hospitalization based on Modified KGOG Operation Record Form
Measured: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
days of management in intensive care unit
days of management in intensive care unit based on Modified KGOG Operation Record Form
Measured: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Oct 2018
- Study start19 Dec 2018
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ovarian Cancer Stage IIICStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Comparison of clinical outcomes between two and three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 298 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hee Seung Kim, Seoul National University Hospital
- Investigators
- Hee Seung Kim, MD/PhD, Principal investigator, Seoul National University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03693248
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018-0228
- Acronym
- ROCOCO
- Status last verified
- Dec 2019
- First submitted
- 13 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 10 Dec 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Park SJ, Shim SH, Ji YI, Kwon SH, Lee EJ, Lee M, Chang SJ, Park S, Kim SY, Lee SJ, Kim JW, Roh JW, Lee SH, Song T, Kim HS. Reduction of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer (ROCOCO): study protocol for a phase III randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2020 May 6;20(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06886-2.
PubMed 32375688
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Dec 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multi-center, Randomized Controlled, Phase III Trials to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness After Cycles Reduction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian and Primary Peritoneal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03693248
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ROCOCO / 2018-0228
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer Stage IIIC, Ovarian Cancer Stage IV, Fallopian Tube Cancer, Peritoneal Cancer
- Keywords
- advanced ovarian cancer, advanced fallopian cancer, advanced peritoneal cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, cycles of chemotherapy, survival
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 298 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Te hypothesized that two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery would improve survival in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian, and primary peritoneal cancer because reduction of one cycle of chemotherapy can lead to the removal of more tumor burden, compared with three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
So the investigators aim to compare survival, rate of successful optimal cytoreductive surgery, post-operative complications, and quality of life between two and three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian, and primary peritoneal cancer.
Detailed description
Primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian and primary peritoneal cancer. However, three or four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) has been introduced in clinical setting because four randomized controlled trials related have shown a lower rate of complications in NAC followed by IDS despite the similar efficacy between PDS and NAC followed by IDS in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian and primary peritoneal cancers. However, these trials have some limitations that the rate of optimal cytoreduction defined as the size of residual tumor <1 cm was about 40%, which was a disappointed result not showing the surgical effect improving survival. Nevertheless, more treatment strategies using NAC followed by IDS should be investigated because NAC followed by IDS has been already known as another standard treatment due to the safety.
A recent meta-analysis has reported that reduction of one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may increase overall survival of 4.1 months because it can induce surgical resection of more visible tumors with drug-resistant. Moreover, a related clinical trial has shown that hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may increase survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy because HIPEC can kill drug-resistant invisible tumor cells which were not resected during IDS. Thus, the investigators designed a phase 3, multicenter, randomized controlled trial for comparing survival, clinical outcomes and quality of life between two and three cycles of NAC followed by IDS, and thereby will investigate the efficacy and safety of reduction of one cycle of NAC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Comparison of clinical outcomes between two and three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy | Experimental | Drug: Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy* Paclitaxel (175mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5.0 or 6.0) IV, D1, every three weeks. * Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. |
| Three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy | No intervention | –* Paclitaxel (175mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5.0 or 6.0) IV, D1, every three weeks. * Three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Age: 20-80 years old
- Advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer diagnosed with the following methods
- International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC to IVB disease
- World Health Organization performance status 0-2
- The following criteria should be met if synchronous or metachronous tumors exists.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Diagnosis of metachronous malignancy within five years before enrollment
- Synchronous tumors except follicular or papillary thyroid cancer treated completely with only surgery and early gastric or colon cancer treated completely with only endoscopic mucosal resection
- Carcinoma in situ, non-epithelial, or borderline tumor in ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum
- Pregnancy
- Medical conditions (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, infectious or cardiac disease etc.) influencing on survival
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapyAlso: paclitaxel and carboplatinTwo and three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be administered in experimental and control groups, respectively | Drug | Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy |
Primary outcome
Progression free survival
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death (by any cause, in the absence of disease progression) whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months
the time interval from randomization date to disease recurrence or progression date
21 secondary outcomes
Overall survival
Time frame: From the date of randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to 60 months
Time to progression
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression in the absence of death by any cause, assessed up to 60 months
Tumor response 1
Time frame: 3 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, up to 6 weeks
Tumor response 2
Time frame: 3 weeks after completion of interval debulking surgery, up to 6 weeks
Tumor response 3
Time frame: 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, up to 6 weeks
Radiologic evaluation of residual tumor
Time frame: 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery, up to 6 weeks
Functional assessment of residual tumor
Time frame: 3 weeks after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, up to 6 weeks
Assessment of quality of life1
Time frame: From the date of screening to the date before treatment start, 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery within 6 weeks, 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 6 weeks, on date of visit at 6 months after completion of primary treatment
Assessment of quality of life2
Time frame: From the date of screening to the date before treatment start, 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery within 6 weeks, 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 6 weeks, on date of visit at 6 months after completion of primary treatment
Assessment of quality of life3
Time frame: From the date of screening to the date before treatment start, 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery within 6 weeks, 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 6 weeks, on date of visit at 6 months after completion of primary treatment
Assessment of quality of life4
Time frame: From the date of screening to the date before treatment start, 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery within 6 weeks, 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 6 weeks, on date of visit at 6 months after completion of primary treatment
Adverse events
Time frame: From the date of first day of chemotherapy to the day before starting next cycle. Each cycle is 21 days.
Success rate of optimal cytoreduction
Time frame: On the date of completion of interval debulking surgery, up to 24 hours
Surgical complexity score (SCS)
Time frame: On the date of completion of interval debulking surgery, up to 24 hours
Postoperative complications 1
Time frame: Early complications: after interval debulking surgery, up to 30 days
Postoperative complications 2
Time frame: Late complications: 31 days after interval debulking surgery through study completion, an average of 1 year
Estimated blood loss
Time frame: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
Operation time
Time frame: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
Transfusion
Time frame: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
days of hospitalization
Time frame: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
days of management in intensive care unit
Time frame: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Dec 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32375688Park SJ, Shim SH, Ji YI, Kwon SH, Lee EJ, Lee M, Chang SJ, Park S, Kim SY, Lee SJ, Kim JW, Roh JW, Lee SH, Song T, Kim HS. Reduction of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer (ROCOCO): study protocol for a phase III randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2020 May 6;20(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06886-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Ovarian Cancer Stage IIIC
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Surgery and Chemotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy After Surgery in Treating Patients With Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Uterine, or Peritoneal Cancer
FIGO Stage IVA Ovarian Cancer, FIGO Stage IVB Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IACS-6274 With or Without Bevacizumab and Paclitaxel for the Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma, Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Adavosertib Before Surgery in Treating Patients With Advanced High Grade Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
Advanced Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Infertility Survey Among Reproductive Age Women With Gynecological and Breast Cancer
Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Social Health, Activity Behaviors, and Quality of Life Among Young Adult Cancer Survivors
Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hee Seung Kim, MD/PhD principal investigator
Seoul National University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in people with Ovarian Cancer Stage IIIC and Ovarian Cancer Stage IV, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hee Seung Kim, MD/PhD (82-2-2072-4863, bboddi0311@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression free survival (time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death (by any cause, in the absence of disease progression) whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03693248, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2019.