Effects of Motor Imagery Intervention on Functional Recovery Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

TKA is widely considered to have a successful outcomes, comparing pre and postoperative scores on pain and both subjective and objective functional measures. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients report continuing pain, functional limitations, and dissatisfaction up to three years after the surgery. Thus we planed to conduct intervention study.

OBJECTIVES:

• Primary goal of the research is to determine how the MI practice intervention will influences on the recovery of neuromuscular and locomotor function following TKA.

Specific goals of the research are as follows:

• To examine effects of MI practice intervention to other measured parameters as follows:

1. maximal isometric strength of knee extensors,
2. maximal voluntary activation level
3. spatio-temporal gait parameters during different gait velocities under single- and dual-task conditions,
4. contractile muscle parameters,
5. electromechanical efficiency index,
6. self-reported measure of knee function (OKS and LEFS),
7. and pain level assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). HYPOTHESIS: The main hypothesis of this dissertation is that the group, which will perform motor imagery practice intervention will have fewer decline in motor functions following TKA surgery. H1: Motor imagery (MI) leads to lower functional decline at one-month period after surgery as compared to control group (CON). H1.1: Patients in MI intervention group have fewer decline in maximal isometric knee extensors strength. H1.2: Patients in MIp intervention group have fewer decline in spatio-temporal gait parameters during different gait velocities under single- and dual-task conditions. H1.3: Patients in MI intervention group have fewer decline in voluntary muscle activation level. H1.4: Patients in MI intervention group will not experience significantly greater decline in contractile muscle parameters as compared to CON group. H1.5: Patients in MI intervention group have fewer decline in electromechanical efficiency index. H1.6: Patients in MI intervention group have better self-reported knee function assessed by self-reported questionnaires. H1.7: Patients in MI intervention group have fewer pain level assessed by VAS.
8. Methods Participants: N = 26 (man/woman) of which: <!-- -->
9. Symptomatic population / n = 26; have already determined date for TKA surgery Participants will be recruited from Valdoltra orthopedic hospital (Ankaran, Slovenia). Inclusion criteria: scheduled for unilateral TKA secondary to osteoarthritis; age from 50 to 80 years old; participants were not engaged in preoperative treatments; Exclusion criteria: participants who had a previous history of TKA on the same side as the surgery; body mass index of 40 kg/m2 or higher; bilateral TKA's; patients with a history of any neurological disorder including Cerebral Vascular Attack, Multiple Sclerosis, or Parkinson's disease; patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis or active cancer; thrombose; bleeding after surgery; previously participation in imagery training. Sample Size: Isometric knee extension strength of the surgical leg was defined as the primary outcome variable for the power analysis. The sample size was calculated based on Hopkins recommendations (W. G. Hopkins, 2006) using online available spreadsheet (http://sportsci.org/resource/stats/index.html). Raw mean difference in change (RDC) was calculated based on pilot study of my own (RDC = 48,51 Nm) (unpublished data). Further, minimal clinically important change (MCIC) (MCIC = 21,89 Nm) (van der Roer, Ostelo, Bekkering, van Tulder, \& de Vet, 2006) was calculated based on standard error of measurement (SEM) (SEM = 7,9 Nm) from study of Lienhard (Lienhard et al., 2013) that assessed reliability of isometric knee extensor strength of TKA patients. Given that in clinical practice the drop out of subjects is common because of many reasons (aging process, comorbidities, post-surgery complications), we adjusted originally calculated sample size by following formula: N1 = n/(1-d) (Sakpal, 2010) where N1 is adjusted sample size, n is the sample size required as per proposed formula ( N = 7 per group) and d is the drop-out rate (d = 0,25). This resulted in a target sample size of 10 in each of two groups (Mip and control). The recruitment of the patients will continue until the target sample size is achieved.
10. Procedure

• Ethical permission (already approved) - Ethics Committee of Valdoltra orthopedic hospital.
• Measurement assessment participants PRE-surgery (one day before surgery on average)
• MI practice intervention
• Measurement assessment participants POST-surgery 1 (one month after surgery on average)
• Measurement assessment participants POST-surgery 2 (one year after surgery on average) The patients will be randomized into two groups: the experimental MI practice group (MIp) and control group (CON), which will have common in patient and home-based physical therapy only. Subjects in both groups will receive one daily continuous passive motion (CPM) session (Kinetec Performa), beginning on the second day after TKA (immediately after intensive care) until discharge (5 to 7 days). Nurses will install the CPM device, by the standardized procedure. Identical installations will be performed for both groups: subjects laying supine in their bed, and the CPM device will be placed under the operated leg with the knee extended. For stability, one strap will surround the subject's thigh, another strap surrounds the subject's lower leg, and the apparatus will be prevented from sliding down by the edge of the bed. The CPM will be used for 45 minutes continuously, including a 5-minute warm-up period. Patients included in MI group will have intervention based on motor imagery technique with beginning immediately after intensive care. In detailed, they will be advised to imagine maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MViC). MViC imagery practice will be progressive. Thus, it will be performed in two sets of 25 repetitions with 2 minutes of inter-sets rest period, with 10 additional trials in week three and four. Each MViC repetition should be sustained for 5 seconds, followed by 5 seconds of inter-repetition rest periods. Additionally, after every five contractions, participants will have a 20 seconds of rest in order to minimize the onset of mental fatigue (Rozand, Lebon, Stapley, Papaxanthis, \& Lepers, 2016). Following 5 days of MIp the participants were advised to take a break from MIp for two days in a raw. After release from the hospital participants from MIp group will be supplied with audio description of exercise they need to perform in order to better concentrate to MIp task, rather than programme variables itself. Additionally, after release from hospital both groups will be supplied with a physical exercise program that they need to perform in home-based environment (like that one they will have in the hospital). In general, exercise programme considered active and passive knee flexion, abduction and adduction of the hip in the horizontal plane. Knee extensor muscle strengthening exercises such as unilateral knee extension with resistance of healthy leg, bilateral sit up from the higher chair/the high was adjusted by the pillow, unilateral weight bearing eccentric contraction supported with crutches etc. Next, functional exercises with weight bearing were adviced with attention of transferring the preasure (personal weight) on operated leg as much as possible. Each participant will be called by the phone every day in order to monitor their adherence to the prescribed exercise programme (lower than 80% of adherence will be excluded from the post analysis). Given that reported placebo effect in psychological outcomes of exercise training is small (ES = 0,20) (Lindheimer, O'Connor, \& Dishman, 2015), to control it and additional socio-psychological influence of MIp instructor on the MIp outcomes, we will ensure the same conditions for the other group and spend the same amount of time with them (approximately 15 minutes per day) with each patient (verbal communication on site/in hospital or by telephone call/after discharge) regardless of his randomization to the group. Measurement assessments: Measurement assessment will be conducted in period before TKA (BT), and 1 month after the surgery.We will evaluate:

1. Cognitive assessment:

• Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): cognitive screening tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment II. Anthropometry:
• Body weight and height (Stable stadiometer Seca, Birmingham, UK) and body composition (Bio-impedance system MALTRON BF-906). III. Functional status:
• flexibility of knee joint (flexion and extension ROM) - assessed by manual goniometer
• agility and dynamic balance (Timed "Up \& Go" Test)
• Sit to stand (30 seconds)
• spatio-temporal gait parameters (STGP) during different gait velocities will be measured by OPTOGAIT system (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) under single- and dual-task conditions.
• Hand grip strength along with both the knee extensors and flexors muscles maximal voluntary isometric strength (MViC) (isometric dynamometer S2P)
• Self - reported functional assessment (OKS and LEFS questionnaires) IV. Muscle function:
• contractile muscle parameters (Tensiomyography)
• electromechanical efficiency index (Tensiomyography and M-wave module)
• Voluntary activation level (using double interpolated twitch technique) V. Pain level - Visual analogue scale (VAS)