AzTrials
AzTrials

PainPhase 4NCT03682211

Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Morphine in the Treatment of Severe Painful Sickle Cell Crises in Children

A Phase 4 study testing Fentanyl Citrate and Morphine sulphate in people with Pain and Sickle Cell Disease, run by University College Dublin at 1 site in Ireland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Sickle cell anaemia is an inherited blood disorder which results in abnormal sickle shaped red blood cells which do not fit well through small blood vessels. These blockages prevent oxygen (in blood) from reaching different parts of the body resulting in painful crisis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 21 years
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Sickle Cell Disease
What is being tested?
Fentanyl Citrate and Morphine sulphate
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
31 participants
Where
1 siteIreland
Study dates
12 Dec 2012to 14 Nov 2013
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ages 1 - 21 years
  • Weight ≥10 kg and ≤70 kg
  • Known sickle cell disease presenting with severe pain
  • Written informed consent, ideally from both parents (and assent, where appropriate), obtained prior to painful crisis (for example, in Haematology clinic)
  • Verbal consent (and assent, where appropriate) obtained at the time of the painful crisis in the ED
  • Hospital admission required for painful crisis

Who cannot join

  • Patient has received parenteral narcotic analgesic within 4 hours of ED presentation
  • Oxygen saturations below 95% on initial assessment
  • Altered conscious state as defined by a Glasgow Coma score less than 15
  • Contraindications to fentanyl/morphine usage
  • Inability to secure IV access
  • Patient has participated in another clinical trial involving an Investigation Medicinal Product (IMP) within 4 weeks of dosing, or is currently enrolled in another clinical trial involving an IMP, or has been previously enrolled in this trial
  • Patients who have any condition that would make him/her, in the opinion of the Investigator or Sponsor, unsuitable for the study, or who are, in the opinion of the Investigator, not likely to complete the study for any reason
  • Blocked or traumatised nose

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ireland1 site
  • Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin

    Dublin

Other trials in Ireland

About this study

Official title: Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Morphine in the Emergency Department Treatment of Severe Painful Sickle Cell Crises in Children

Sickle cell anaemia is an inherited blood disorder which results in abnormal sickle shaped red blood cells which do not fit well through small blood vessels. These blockages prevent oxygen (in blood) from reaching different parts of the body resulting in painful crisis. This study will compare the effectiveness of two types of pain medication, one given through a vein and one squirted up the nose.

Read the detailed description

Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) frequently and unpredictably present to the emergency department (ED) with pain. The painful event is the hallmark acute clinical manifestation of SCD, characterised by sudden onset and is usually bony in origin. This study aims to establish if 1.5mcg/kg of intranasal fentanyl (INF; administered via a Mucosal Atomiser Device, MAD™) is non-inferior to intravenous morphine 0.1 mg/kg in severe SCD-associated pain.

This study is a randomised,double-blind, double-dummy active control trial of children (weighing more than 10 kg) between 1 year and 21 years of age with severe painful sickle cell crisis. Severe pain is defined as rated seven or greater on a 0 to 10 age-appropriate numeric pain scale or equivalent. The trial will be conducted in a single tertiary urban paediatric ED in Dublin, Ireland. Each patient will receive a single active agent and a single placebo via the intravenous and intranasal routes. All clinical and research staff, patients and parents will be blinded to the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint is severity of pain scored at 10 min from administration of the study medications. Secondary endpoints include pain severity measured at 0, 5, 15, 20, 30, 60 and 120 min after the administration of analgesia, proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia and incidence of adverse events. The trial ends at 120 min after the administration of the study drugs. A clinically meaningful difference in validated pain scores has been defined as 13 mm. Setting the permitted threshold to 50% of this limit (6 mm) and assuming both treatments are on average equal, a sample size of 30 patients (15 per group) will provide at least 80% power to demonstrate that INF is non-inferior to IV morphine with a level of significance of 0.05.

This clinical trial will inform of the role of INF 1.5mcg/kg via MAD in the acute treatment of severe painful sickle cell crisis in children in the ED setting.

Being tested
Fentanyl Citrate, Morphine sulphate
Keywords
Sickle cell disease, Paediatric, Pain, Analgesia, Intranasal, Fentanyl
Medical subject headings
Pain, Anemia, Sickle Cell, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fentanyl CitrateDrug

    Also called Fentanyl, Sublimaze

    50 μg/ml fentanyl citrate (Sublimaze, Janssen Cilag, Ltd, Marketing Authorisation No. PA 0748/044/001) administered intranasally using the MAD Nasal Intranasal Mucosal Atomiser Device

  • Morphine sulphateDrug

    Also called Morphine sulfate, Morphine

    10 mg/ml Morphine sulphate BP (Antigen Pharmaceuticals, Marketing Authorisation No.PA 73/20/1) administered intravenously.

Study groups in NCT03682211
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active Intranasal FentanylExperimentalSubjects will receive 50 μg/ml intranasal fentanyl citrate and a placebo matched to intravenous morphine (1 ml water for injection) at time 0
Receives: Drug: Fentanyl Citrate
Active IV MorphineActive comparatorSubjects will receive 10 mg/ml intravenous morphine sulphate and a placebo matched to intranasal fentanyl (2 ml water)
Receives: Drug: Morphine sulphate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain score as measured using the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and Manchester Pain Ruler.

    Severity of pain as measured using a validated pain score (visual analogue scale) at 10 minutes after administration of the intervention. The the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and Manchester Pain Ruler will be used as age-appropriate pain scales for pre-verbal/early verbal children and older verbal children respectively.

    Measured: 10 minutes

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Pain score as measured using the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and Manchester Pain Ruler.

    Severity of pain as measured using a validated pain score (visual analogue scale) at 0, 5, 15, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after administration of the intervention. The the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and Manchester Pain Ruler will be used as age-appropriate pain scales for pre-verbal/early verbal children and older verbal children respectively.

    Measured: 0, 5, 15, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes

  2. The proportion of participants requiring rescue opioid requirement.

    The proportion of patients requiring rescue opioid analgesia.

    Measured: 120 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Sep 2018
  2. Study start12 Dec 2012
  3. Primary completion14 Nov 2013
  4. Study completion14 Nov 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
randomised, double-blind, double-dummy active control trial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
31 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03682211
Sponsor's protocol ID
SCC01
Other IDs
2011-005161-20, ISRCTN67469672
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
11 Sep 2018
Last updated
24 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Barrett MJ, Cronin J, Murphy A, McCoy S, Hayden J, an Fhaili S, Grant T, Wakai A, McMahon C, Walsh S, O'Sullivan R. Intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in the emergency department treatment of severe painful sickle cell crises in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2012 May 30;13:74. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-74.

    PubMed 22647439

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Fentanyl Citrate and Morphine sulphate in people with Pain and Sickle Cell Disease, run by University College Dublin at 1 site in Ireland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain score as measured using the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and Manchester Pain Ruler. (time frame: 10 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03682211, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT03682211 | AzTrials