AzTrials
AzTrials

Substance Use DisorderNCT03681288

Mindful Self Compassion for Combat Deployed Veterans With Moral Injury and Co-occurring PTSD-SUD

A study testing Mindful Self-Compassion in people with Substance Use Disorder and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Veterans with co-occurring Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorder (PTSD-SUD) experience more severe symptomatology and poorer response to existing treatments than Veterans with either disorder alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Mindful Self-Compassion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
8 Jul 2019to 31 Mar 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • moral injury as captured by at least one "strongly agree" response on the Moral Injury Events Scale
  • diagnosis of PTSD (within the last 30 days) confirmed by the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) with a total symptom score of 22 or more
  • diagnosis of a substance use disorder confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5) Section E (SCID-E) within the last year
  • willing and able to provide informed consent
  • not currently receiving trauma-focused treatment

Who cannot join

  • individuals with an acute psychotic disorder or acute psychotic symptoms are not eligible if their symptoms are unstable and if they are not well connected with appropriate mental health services
  • patients with a psychiatric hospitalization or suicide attempt within the past month will be excluded
  • currently receiving trauma-focused treatment, e.g., (Prolonged Exposure (PE), Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for PTSD)
  • Patients currently enrolled in trauma-focused treatment may be enrolled when they have completed the treatment if they remain interested and continue to have PTSD
  • individuals with life-threatening or unstable medical illness. Diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment (e.g. mTBI) and other anxiety and depressive disorders will not be excluded because of their high comorbidity with PTSD and SUD

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02908

Other trials in United States

About this study

Veterans with co-occurring Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorder (PTSD-SUD) experience more severe symptomatology and poorer response to existing treatments than Veterans with either disorder alone. Guilt is a common posttraumatic reaction and has been implicated as a risk factor for the development and maintenance of PTSD and substance use. Combat Veterans often report experiencing moral injury defined as perpetrating, failing to prevent, or witnessing acts that violate the values they live by in their civilian lives, which can lead to feelings of guilt and shame. Accordingly, reduction in guilt and increase in self-compassion may lead to improved quality of life for Veterans. This project will conduct a pilot study to evaluate changes in self-compassion, guilt, and PTSD-SUD symptom severity in a sample of Veterans after receiving 8 sessions of Mindful Self Compassion treatment (via a telehealth modality during COVID-19 pandemic). Findings will have significant impact on effective treatment options and lead to improvements in Veterans' quality of life and posttraumatic symptoms.

Read the detailed description

PTSD-SUD is particularly common following combat exposure, affecting a rapidly increasing number of U.S. military Veterans. The co-occurrence of these disorders presents added challenges to the VA treatment delivery system, presently in need of effective integrated treatments. Veterans with PTSD-SUD experience more severe symptomatology, increased risk of suicidality, poorer quality of life, and poorer response to existing treatments than Veterans with either disorder alone. Furthermore, PTSD-SUD prevents Veterans from reintegrating into society and is associated with occupational and social dysfunction. These findings underscore the need to effectively and efficiently address comorbidity and the complex array of problems with which Veterans present to treatment.

One approach is to develop interventions that target mechanisms thought to underlie multiple highly prevalent disorders, such as guilt related to traumatic experiences. Combat Veterans often report experiencing moral injury defined as perpetrating, failing to prevent, or witnessing acts that violate the values they live by in their civilian lives. Veterans who negatively appraise their actions or inaction during combat may experience guilt, a common posttraumatic reaction. Moral injury suggests the inability to contextualize or justify actions and the unsuccessful accommodation of those morally challenging experiences into pre-existing moral schemas, resulting in guilt and shame. Posttraumatic guilt has been implicated as a risk factor for the development and maintenance of several forms of psychopathology including PTSD, SUD, depression, and suicidality. However, to date, treatments for posttraumatic psychological health issues have been primarily disorder specific, with a focus largely on symptom reduction. Therefore, greater understanding of modifiable factors that influence functional impairment and PTSD-SUD is needed to enhance treatment efforts.

Mindful Self Compassion (MSC) combines the skills of mindfulness and self-compassion, providing self-soothing skills to respond to difficult thoughts and feelings (including guilt) via meditation. Self-compassion (SC) emphasizes kindness towards one's self, a feeling of connectedness with others, and mindful awareness of distressing experiences. Furthermore, because SC is negatively associated with self-criticism, rumination, thought suppression, anxiety, and depression, and positively associated with healthy psychological functioning, it is well suited to addressing posttraumatic psychopathology, shame, and guilt.

This proposal will begin to address a gap in the field's knowledge about MSC, and its role in the treatment of co-occurring disorders in Veterans with moral injury. The investigators will evaluate changes in self-compassion, post-traumatic guilt, shame, PTSD and substance use symptom severity. In addition to symptom reduction, the investigators will focus on functional outcomes (e.g., quality of life, suicidality). Participants will complete assessments at baseline, post-treatment, and 1-month follow-up. This project will allow us to 1) determine the feasibility of recruitment, 2) determine the acceptability of MSC, 3) provide preliminary evidence of the effects of MSC, and 4) refine study procedures and make adaptations to MSC based upon experience gained in the pilot in preparation for a fully powered randomized control trial (RCT) to test the effectiveness of MSC.

Being tested
Mindful Self-Compassion
Keywords
PTSD, substance use disorder, moral injury, self-compassion, mindfulness, Veterans
Medical subject headings
Substance-Related Disorders, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mindful Self-CompassionBehavioural

    Mindful Self-Compassion Intervention

Study groups in NCT03681288
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mindful Self-CompassionExperimentalMindful Self-Compassion Intervention
Receives: Behavioral: Mindful Self-Compassion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Self-Compassion Scale (SCS); Change From Baseline in Self-Compassion at Post-treatment

    The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) is a 26-item self-report questionnaire that measures the cognitions and emotions associated with compassionate and uncompassionate responses to feelings of personal inadequacy and general life difficulties. Scores for negative items representing uncompassionate self-responding are reverse-coded to indicate their absence. Responses are given on a 5-point scale from "1-Almost Never" to "5-Almost Always." A total mean score is generated with higher scores corresponding to higher levels of self-compassion. Consider scores 1.0-2.49 to be low, between 2.5-3.5 to be moderate, and 3.51-5.0 to be high.

    Measured: Post-Tx (8-10 weeks post baseline)

  2. Self-Compassion Scale (SCS); Change From Baseline in Self-Compassion at 1 Month Follow-up

    The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) is a 26-item self-report questionnaire that measures the cognitions and emotions associated with compassionate and uncompassionate responses to feelings of personal inadequacy and general life difficulties. Scores for negative items representing uncompassionate self-responding are reverse-coded to indicate their absence. Responses are given on a 5-point scale from "1-Almost Never" to "5-Almost Always." A total mean score is generated with higher scores corresponding to higher levels of self-compassion. Consider scores 1.0-2.49 to be low, between 2.5-3.5 to be moderate, and 3.51-5.0 to be high.

    Measured: 1-Month Follow-up (12-14 weeks post baseline)

  3. Trauma-Related Guilt Inventory (TRGI) - Distress Scale; Change From Baseline in Trauma-related Guilt Distress at Post-treatment

    The TRGI distress subscale is made up of 6 items (e.g., "I experience severe emotional distress when I think about what happened"). Respondents rate each statement using a 5-point Likert scale to indicate the degree to which they believe the statement is true about themselves (i.e., Extremely True=4, Very True=3, Somewhat True=2, Slightly True=1, or Never True=0). The items are summed and divided by 6 to create an average score raging from 0-4 with higher scores reflecting higher levels of distress.

    Measured: Post-Tx (8-10 weeks post baseline)

  4. Trauma-Related Guilt Inventory (TRGI) - Distress Scale; Change From Baseline in Trauma-related Guilt at 1-Month Follow-up

    The TRGI distress subscale is made up of 6 items (e.g., "I experience severe emotional distress when I think about what happened"). Respondents rate each statement using a 5-point Likert scale to indicate the degree to which they believe the statement is true about themselves (i.e., Extremely True=4, Very True=3, Somewhat True=2, Slightly True=1, or Never True=0). The items are summed and divided by 6 to create an average score raging from 0-4 with higher scores reflecting higher levels of distress.

    Measured: 1-Month Follow-up (12-14 weeks post baseline)

  5. Trauma-Related Shame Inventory (TRSI); Change From Baseline in Trauma-related Shame at Post-treatment Follow-up

    The TRSI is a 24-item self-report measure assessing trauma-related shame on a 4-point Likert scale (Not true of me=0, Somewhat true of me=1, Mostly true of me=2, Completely true of me=3). A total shame score is summed ranging from 0-72 which higher scores reflecting a greater level of trauma-related shame.

    Measured: Post-Tx (8-10 weeks post baseline)

  6. Trauma Related Shame Inventory (TRSI); Change From Baseline in Trauma-related Shame at 1-Month Follow-up

    The TRSI is a 24-item self-report measure assessing trauma-related shame on a 4-point Likert scale (Not true of me=0, Somewhat true of me=1, Mostly true of me=2, Completely true of me=3). A total shame score is summed ranging from 0-72 which higher scores reflecting a greater level of trauma-related shame.

    Measured: 1-Month Follow-up (12-14 weeks post baseline)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5); Change From Baseline in PTSD Symptoms at Post-Treatment

    The Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) is a semi-structured interview used to assess PTSD diagnostic criteria and severity. The CAPS assesses each of the 20 items from the DSM-5 criteria B, C, D, and E. The assessor combines information about frequency and intensity of an item into a single severity rating (0=Absent; 1=Mild/subthreshold; 2=Moderate/threshold; 3=Severe/markedly elevated; 4=Extreme/incapacitating). CAPS-5 total symptom severity score is calculated by summing severity scores for the 20 DSM-5 PTSD symptoms (range = 0-80). Similarly, CAPS-5 symptom cluster severity scores are calculated by summing the individual item severity scores for symptoms corresponding to a given DSM-5 cluster: Criterion B (items 1-5); Criterion C (items 6-7); Criterion D (items 8-14); and, Criterion E (items 15-20). Higher scores indicate worse PTSD symptoms.

    Measured: Post-Tx (8-10 weeks post baseline)

  2. Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5); Change From Baseline in PTSD Symptoms at 1-Month Follow-up

    The Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) is a semi-structured interview used to assess PTSD diagnostic criteria and severity. The CAPS assesses each of the 20 items from the DSM-5 criteria B, C, D, and E. The assessor combines information about frequency and intensity of an item into a single severity rating (0=Absent; 1=Mild/subthreshold; 2=Moderate/threshold; 3=Severe/markedly elevated; 4=Extreme/incapacitating). CAPS-5 total symptom severity score is calculated by summing severity scores for the 20 DSM-5 PTSD symptoms (range = 0-80). Similarly, CAPS-5 symptom cluster severity scores are calculated by summing the individual item severity scores for symptoms corresponding to a given DSM-5 cluster: Criterion B (items 1-5); Criterion C (items 6-7); Criterion D (items 8-14); and, Criterion E (items 15-20). Higher scores indicate worse PTSD symptoms.

    Measured: 1-Month Follow-up (12-14 weeks post baseline)

  3. Timeline Follow-back; Change From Baseline in Days Used Alcohol (Past 90 Days) at Post-treatment

    The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) is a drinking assessment method that obtains estimates of daily drinking. The TLFB evaluates alcohol and other substance use during the previous 90 days. Using a calendar, people provide retrospective estimates of their daily drinking over a specified time period. The TLFB was used to establish: days respondents used alcohol.

    Measured: Post-Tx (8-10 weeks)

  4. Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB); Change From Baseline in Days Used Alcohol (Past 90 Days) at 1 Month Follow Up

    The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) is a drinking assessment method that obtains estimates of daily drinking. The TLFB evaluates alcohol and other substance use during the previous 90 days. Using a calendar, people provide retrospective estimates of their daily drinking over a specified time period. The TLFB was used to establish: number of days respondents used alcohol.

    Measured: 1-Month Follow-up (12-14 weeks post baseline)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Sep 2018
  2. Study start8 Jul 2019
  3. Primary completion26 Feb 2021
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03681288
Sponsor's protocol ID
D2893-P
Other IDs
1I21RX002893-01A1
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
20 Sep 2018
Last updated
21 Jun 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: A de-identified, anonymized dataset will be created and shared. The principal investigator will share de-identified datasets, statistics, and results collected from this proposal by depositing these data at the National Library of Medicine (NLM) PubMed Central website repository as this is a VA supported data repository. Additional documentation including metadata that will include information about the methodology and study procedures used to collect the data, details about code, and 'definition of variables will also be included. Both scientists and the public will benefit from sharing these data because data sharing incentivizes researchers to produce and ensure higher quality data for sharing with peers, the scientific community, and the public. Further, data sharing encourages collaboration among researchers to share resources to produce new findings and reduces redundancy of data production in scientific research, which saves investment dollars and time.

Publications

  • Eaton E, Capone C, Reese S, Shea MT, Serpa JG, Germer C. Mindful Self-Compassion for Veterans with Morally Injurious Experiences and Co-Occurring Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorder: A Feasibility Study. J Dual Diagn. 2025 Apr;21(2):87-98. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2025.2474953. Epub 2025 Apr 1.

    PubMed 40168188

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mindful Self-Compassion in people with Substance Use Disorder and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Self-Compassion Scale (SCS); Change From Baseline in Self-Compassion at Post-treatment (time frame: Post-Tx (8-10 weeks post baseline)). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03681288, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in