AzTrials
AzTrials

Articular Cartilage Disorder of KneeNCT03678948

Radiofrequency-Based Debridement vs. Mechanical Debridement for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Lesions

A study testing Radiofrequency-Based Debridement and Mechanical Debridement in people with Articular Cartilage Disorder of Knee, run by Christopher Kaeding at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the changes in clinical and imaging outcomes following arthroscopic treatment of chondral lesion(s) by Radiofrequency-Based debridement or Mechanical Debridement in subjects 18-50 years of age. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years
Conditions the study is for
Articular Cartilage Disorder of Knee
What is being tested?
Radiofrequency-Based Debridement and Mechanical Debridement
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
6 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
8 Nov 2018to 8 Feb 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Given written informed consent on the IRB approved consent form specific to the study, prior to study participation
  • 18-50 years old
  • Male or Female
  • Suspected chondral damage in the following locations where debridement is indicated:
  • Medial femoral condyle
  • Lateral femoral condyle
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Trochlea
  • Patella
  • < 30% joint space narrowing as seen on x-ray (merchant view, AP and PA Rosenberg)
  • 1 or more chondral lesion(s) as noted on MRI

Who cannot join

  • Previous chondral treatment in the same compartment (prior debridement and lavage performed more than three months prior to baseline are acceptable)
  • Focal chondral defect indicated for concomitant procedures (i.e., microfracture, ACI, MACI, OATs)
  • Concomitant procedures that are not allowed:
  • Lateral retinacular release
  • Excision of osteophytes
  • Subchondroplasty
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Manipulation under anesthesia
  • ACL reconstruction
  • Quad tendon repair
  • Patellar tendon repair
  • Patellar tendon debridement
  • Multiligament reconstruction
  • Pregnant and/or intending to become pregnant during this study period

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Jameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute

    Columbus, Ohio, 43202

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Radiofrequency-Based Debridement vs. Mechanical Debridement for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Lesions

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the changes in clinical and imaging outcomes following arthroscopic treatment of chondral lesion(s) by Radiofrequency-Based debridement or Mechanical Debridement in subjects 18-50 years of age.

Read the detailed description

This is a non-inferiority, prospective, single blinded, randomized, single-center study design with enrollment of 82 randomized subjects (to assure 70 subjects complete the study). The sample size of 82 participants was calculated from a power analysis. The study was powered to detect at least a seven point change in KOOS pain score based on achieving 80% statistical power to detect a non-inferiority margin. Study duration will be until the last subject enrolled reaches 52 weeks post-operative.

The 82 randomized subjects will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio into the Werewolf Coblation wand treatment group or mechanical debridement treatment group. Subjects will be blinded to their treatment assignment until they complete all study visits. Upon withdraw from the study, termination from the study, or new or recurrent symptoms requiring a subsequent arthroscopy, the blinded assignment will be revealed to the subject.

Being tested
Radiofrequency-Based Debridement, Mechanical Debridement

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Radiofrequency-Based DebridementDevice

    Also called Werewolf Coblation Wand

    In this process, radiofrequency energy is used to excite the water molecules in a conductive medium, such as an electrolyte (saline) solution, to generate excited radicals within precisely focused plasma. The energized particles in the plasma have sufficient energy to break molecular bonds (16-18), excising or dissolving (i.e. ablating) soft tissue at relatively low temperatures (typically 40ºC to 70ºC).

  • Mechanical DebridementDevice

    Arthroscopic chondroplasty used to remove loose and damaged cartilage which minimizes synovial irritation and mechanical impingement

Study groups in NCT03678948
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Radiofrequency-Based DebridementActive comparatorThe Smith and Nephew WEREWOLF COBLATION System is indicated for all soft tissue types in the knee. The WEREWOLF COBLATION System is a FDA cleared bipolar, radiofrequency electrosurgical system designed for use in orthopaedic/arthroscopic surgical procedures.
Receives: Device: Radiofrequency-Based Debridement
Mechanical DebridementActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Mechanical Debridement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Knee and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) activity subscale

    The previous week is the time period considered when answering the questions. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

    Measured: change from baseline at week 52 post-op

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Using a ruler, the score is determined by mea-suring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

    Measured: change from baseline at week 52 post-op

  2. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation

    Measured: change from baseline at week 52 post-op

  3. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective knee

    Measured: change from baseline at week 52 post-op

  4. Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS)

    MARS includes 4 items that assess the frequency of running, cutting, decelerating, and pivoting based on the subjects "healthiest and most active state in the past year." A higher score indicates more functional demand on the knee joint and potentially a higher risk of injury. Each item is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 (less than 1 time in a month) to 4 (4 or more times in a week), and the total scale score is obtained by summing the individual items' scores (range, 0-16).

    Measured: change from baseline at week 52 post-op

  5. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI V2.0)

    Asks about the effect of patient knee injury on their ability to work and perform normal daily activities

    Measured: change from 1 week post op to 6 weeks post-op

  6. MRI

    Baseline MRI will be compared to MRI at 52 weeks to evaluate knee morphology, cartilage signal, osteophytes, bone marrow edema, subarticular cysts, effusions and loose bodies. The international cartilage repair score will be used.

    Measured: change from baseline at week 52 post-op

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Sep 2018
  2. Study start8 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion8 Feb 2021
  4. Study completion8 Feb 2021

Why it stopped: Sponsor discontinuing research

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
6 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03678948
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018H0244
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
30 Aug 2018
Last updated
30 Sep 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Radiofrequency-Based Debridement and Mechanical Debridement in people with Articular Cartilage Disorder of Knee, run by Christopher Kaeding at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Sponsor discontinuing research). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Knee and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) activity subscale (time frame: change from baseline at week 52 post-op). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in