Injury, BrainNCT03678064
Use of the LOK® Robotic Gait Trainer in the Early Rehabilitation of Children After an Acquired Brain Injury (ABI)
A study testing Lokomat in people with Injury, Brain, run by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
After an acquired brain injury (ABI), children often require extensive physiotherapy (PT) to help them relearn to walk. There is promising evidence in pediatric neuro-motor conditions of the possibility for brain activation pattern changes in response to repetitive, task-oriented functional gait training. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Injury, Brain
- What is being tested?
- Lokomat
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 7 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 5 Jun 2018to 15 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Be an inpatient or daypatient in the Brain Injury Rehabilitation program at Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital with moderate or severe ABI
- Be Gross Motor Function Classification System-equivalent III or IV with primary gait goals
- Have any limb distribution of involvement (spasticity or hypotonicity). The physiotherapist (PT) and Lokomat (LOK) sessions (both about 45-minutes in length) will employ a motor learning strategies approach.
- Have a femur length at least 21 cm (to fit robotic legs) and height no greater than 6' 3" to fit LOK frame
- Be no more than 12 months post-ABI (i.e., still active rehab stage), and
- Be expected by clinical team (confirmed by child's physician) to have at least 8 more weeks of inpatient or daypatient rehab
- Be able to follow Gross Motor Function Measure instructions and participate in > 45 minutes of active PT (as judged by the child's PT)
- Be able to reliably signal pain and discomfort using verbal or nonverbal signals (as assessed at the screening assessment) for LOK operation safety reasons.
Who cannot join
- A seizure in the last 12 months,
- Inability to tolerate full weightbearing
- A knee flexion contracture > 20 degrees, knee valgus >40 degrees, hip subluxation > 40% migration percentage
- Excessive tone or ataxic or dyskinetic movements may be an exclusion (would be determined at LOK set-up confirmation visit).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M4G2X3
About this study
Official title: Use of the LOK® Robotic Gait Trainer in the Early Rehabilitation of Children After an Acquired Brain Injury (ABI): A Feasibility Study - Part III
After an acquired brain injury (ABI), children often require extensive physiotherapy (PT) to help them relearn to walk. There is promising evidence in pediatric neuro-motor conditions of the possibility for brain activation pattern changes in response to repetitive, task-oriented functional gait training. Robotic-assisted gait training devices such as the Lokomat (LOK) allow this type of intensive walking retraining. The aim of this study is to assess the safety, feasibility and outcome possibilities linked to a LOK intervention given as 2 of the child's 4 PT weekly sessions over 8-weeks in the early stages of rehabilitation after an ABI.
Read the detailed description
This is Phase 3 of our three- year ABI Lokomat study . Phase 1 was conducted in 2016-2017 and was a single-group pre- and post-test feasibility study of the Lokomat in pediatric ABI inpatients and daypatients in which we enrolled 9 patient participants. The co-primary outcome measures for this first phase were the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) . Other measures of function (PEDI-CAT), gait (6 minute walk test and Timed up and GO) and individualized goals (Goal Attainment Scaling) were included. Study feasibility was evaluated via indicators such as enrollment, number of sessions completed, drop out rate, and adverse events. Phase 2 was conducted in 2017-2018 using the same core outcome set, and added a qualitative study component with child and parent and physiotherapist interviews for their perspective on the Lokomat experience and associated outcomes. The investigators enrolled 6 patient participants (quantitative and qualitative) and their caregivers (qualitative). Phase 3 will aim to enroll 6 to 8 more children to strengthen effect size estimates for the GMFM and COPM in particular (proposed co-primary outcome measures for future randomized controlled trial). The investigators will also add in a 10 metre fast walk test to allow children with lower walking tolerance to have a gait measure, and pilot a measure of children's self-efficacy that the investigators will design for this study. Finally, the investigators will take a close look at motor learning strategies (MLS) used by the PTs in both LOK and PT sessions using the validated Motor Learning Strategies Rating Instrument (MLSRI) to begin to get a profile of comparative MLS use in gym-based PT and LOK sessions. The investigators will continue to study feasibility and add to the data from the first 2 phases the ABI LOK project.
- Conditions
- Injury, Brain
- Being tested
- Lokomat
- Keywords
- physical therapy, gait, pediatric rehabilitation, gross motor function, participation
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LokomatDevice
16 sessions total. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lokomat | Experimental | 16 sessions total. Provided by study PT twice weekly for 8 weeks. Receives: Device: Lokomat |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66)
Change from baseline in motor function on Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) at week 8
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Change from baseline in targeted goal abilities and satisfaction with performance as measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure at week 8
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Change from baseline in targeted goal abilities as measured by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) at week 8. Three to five individualized walking-based activity/participation goals are set with child/parent/treating PT at baseline. Goal achievement level (score of -2 to+2) evaluated by treating PT with child/parent input at post-intervention assessment. GAS outcome (achievement) is measured by a standardized T-score that is a summary score(calculated from individual goal -2 to +2 scores) for the child's set of goals . Goal accomplishment at the targeted level (averaged across the goal set) is reflected by a T score = 50.0 + 5 with range of scores from ~ 25 to 85.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks
Gait speed (10 minute fastest walk test )
Change from baseline in Gait Speed (10 minute fastest walk test) at week 8
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks
The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-CAT)
Change from baseline in PEDI-CAT at week 8.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks
Movement Ability Self-efficacy Questionnaire (MASQ)
Change from baseline in MASQ at week 8
Measured: Baseline, week 8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2018
- Study start5 Jun 2018
- Primary completion15 Mar 2020
- Study completion15 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Injury, BrainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ryan Hung, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalVirginia Wright, PT, PhD, Principal investigator, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03678064
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18-771
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 3 May 2018
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Beretta E, Romei M, Molteni E, Avantaggiato P, Strazzer S. Combined robotic-aided gait training and physical therapy improve functional abilities and hip kinematics during gait in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2015;29(7-8):955-62. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1005130. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
PubMed 25915458Levac D, Missiuna C, Wishart L, Dematteo C, Wright V. Documenting the content of physical therapy for children with acquired brain injury: development and validation of the motor learning strategy rating instrument. Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):689-99. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100415. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
PubMed 21415229Kamath T, Pfeifer M, Banerjee-Guenette P, Hunter T, Ito J, Salbach NM, Wright V, Levac D. Reliability of the motor learning strategy rating instrument for children and youth with acquired brain injury. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2012 Aug;32(3):288-305. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2012.672551. Epub 2012 May 11.
PubMed 22574628
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Use of the LOK® Robotic Gait Trainer in the Early Rehabilitation of Children After an Acquired Brain Injury (ABI): A Feasibility Study - Part III
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03678064
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18-771
- Conditions
- Injury, Brain
- Keywords
- physical therapy, gait, pediatric rehabilitation, gross motor function, participation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
After an acquired brain injury (ABI), children often require extensive physiotherapy (PT) to help them relearn to walk. There is promising evidence in pediatric neuro-motor conditions of the possibility for brain activation pattern changes in response to repetitive, task-oriented functional gait training. Robotic-assisted gait training devices such as the Lokomat (LOK) allow this type of intensive walking retraining. The aim of this study is to assess the safety, feasibility and outcome possibilities linked to a LOK intervention given as 2 of the child's 4 PT weekly sessions over 8-weeks in the early stages of rehabilitation after an ABI.
Detailed description
This is Phase 3 of our three- year ABI Lokomat study . Phase 1 was conducted in 2016-2017 and was a single-group pre- and post-test feasibility study of the Lokomat in pediatric ABI inpatients and daypatients in which we enrolled 9 patient participants. The co-primary outcome measures for this first phase were the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) . Other measures of function (PEDI-CAT), gait (6 minute walk test and Timed up and GO) and individualized goals (Goal Attainment Scaling) were included. Study feasibility was evaluated via indicators such as enrollment, number of sessions completed, drop out rate, and adverse events. Phase 2 was conducted in 2017-2018 using the same core outcome set, and added a qualitative study component with child and parent and physiotherapist interviews for their perspective on the Lokomat experience and associated outcomes. The investigators enrolled 6 patient participants (quantitative and qualitative) and their caregivers (qualitative). Phase 3 will aim to enroll 6 to 8 more children to strengthen effect size estimates for the GMFM and COPM in particular (proposed co-primary outcome measures for future randomized controlled trial). The investigators will also add in a 10 metre fast walk test to allow children with lower walking tolerance to have a gait measure, and pilot a measure of children's self-efficacy that the investigators will design for this study. Finally, the investigators will take a close look at motor learning strategies (MLS) used by the PTs in both LOK and PT sessions using the validated Motor Learning Strategies Rating Instrument (MLSRI) to begin to get a profile of comparative MLS use in gym-based PT and LOK sessions. The investigators will continue to study feasibility and add to the data from the first 2 phases the ABI LOK project.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lokomat | Experimental | Device: Lokomat16 sessions total. Provided by study PT twice weekly for 8 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Be an inpatient or daypatient in the Brain Injury Rehabilitation program at Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital with moderate or severe ABI
- Be Gross Motor Function Classification System-equivalent III or IV with primary gait goals
- Have any limb distribution of involvement (spasticity or hypotonicity). The physiotherapist (PT) and Lokomat (LOK) sessions (both about 45-minutes in length) will employ a motor learning strategies approach.
- Have a femur length at least 21 cm (to fit robotic legs) and height no greater than 6' 3" to fit LOK frame
- Be no more than 12 months post-ABI (i.e., still active rehab stage), and
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- A seizure in the last 12 months,
- Inability to tolerate full weightbearing
- A knee flexion contracture > 20 degrees, knee valgus >40 degrees, hip subluxation > 40% migration percentage
- Excessive tone or ataxic or dyskinetic movements may be an exclusion (would be determined at LOK set-up confirmation visit).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lokomat16 sessions total. Provided by study PT twice weekly for a period of 8 weeks | Device | Lokomat |
Primary outcome
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline in motor function on Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) at week 8
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline in targeted goal abilities and satisfaction with performance as measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure at week 8
4 secondary outcomes
Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Gait speed (10 minute fastest walk test )
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-CAT)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Movement Ability Self-efficacy Questionnaire (MASQ)
Time frame: Baseline, week 8
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2024.
- Background: PubMed 25915458Beretta E, Romei M, Molteni E, Avantaggiato P, Strazzer S. Combined robotic-aided gait training and physical therapy improve functional abilities and hip kinematics during gait in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2015;29(7-8):955-62. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1005130. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
- Background: PubMed 21415229Levac D, Missiuna C, Wishart L, Dematteo C, Wright V. Documenting the content of physical therapy for children with acquired brain injury: development and validation of the motor learning strategy rating instrument. Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):689-99. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100415. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
- Background: PubMed 22574628Kamath T, Pfeifer M, Banerjee-Guenette P, Hunter T, Ito J, Salbach NM, Wright V, Levac D. Reliability of the motor learning strategy rating instrument for children and youth with acquired brain injury. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2012 Aug;32(3):288-305. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2012.672551. Epub 2012 May 11.
- Beretta E, Storm FA, Strazzer S, Frascarelli F, Petrarca M, Colazza A, Cordone G, Biffi E, Morganti R, Maghini C, Piccinini L, Reni G, Castelli E. Effect of Robot-Assisted Gait Training in a Large Population of Children With Motor Impairment Due to CerebLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Injury, Brain
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Additional Effects on tDCS With AOT on Lower Limb Functions on Children With Diplegic CP
Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Sensory Integration Therapy vs Conventional Physical Therapy in Children With Mixed Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Telerehabilitation Compared With Clinic-Based Physiotherapy in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ryan Hung, MD, MSc principal investigator
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Virginia Wright, PT, PhD principal investigator
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Lokomat in people with Injury, Brain, run by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) (time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03678064, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.