Endometrial Endometrioid AdenocarcinomaNCT03677024
Evaluation of the Efficacy for Sentinel Lymph Node Policy in Intermediate-risk Endometrial Carcinomas
A study testing SLN arm in people with Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma, run by Fudan University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
To evaluate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node policy in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial carcinomas Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma
- What is being tested?
- SLN arm
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 6 Feb 2020to 7 Oct 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- No contraindication to surgery.
- Signed and dated informed consent.
- Intermediate-risk endometrioid cancer with grade 1-2, superficial myometrial invasion and tumor diameter ≥ 2cm (in intraoperative frozen section examinations).
- Without any suspicious pelvic, paraaortic or distant lymph node metastasis in preoperative imaging tests including MRI/CT/PET-CT.
Who cannot join
- Low-risk endometrioid cancer with grade 1-2, superficial myometrial invasion and tumor diameter < 2cm (in intraoperative frozen section examinations).
- Grade 3 endometrioid cancer (in preoperative pathological diagnosis or in intraoperative frozen section examinations).
- Deep muscular infiltration (in intraoperative frozen section examinations).
- Cervical invasion and/or ovarian/tubal invasion (in intraoperative frozen section examinations).
- With suspicious pelvic, paraaortic or distant lymph node metastasis in preoperative imaging tests including MRI/CT/PET-CT.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200011
About this study
To evaluate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node policy in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial carcinomas
Read the detailed description
Surgical assessment for staging of endometrial carcinoma during primary surgery remains one of the most varied practices worldwide, as it may include no nodal assessment, sentinel node mapping, and complete pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy up to the renal vessels. Since lymphadenectomy is significantly associated with longer operating time, higher surgical costs, greater rate of infection, as well as the occurrence of lymphocysts and lymphedema, gynecologists agree that pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy should be routinely performed in high-risk patients (grade 3, deep myometrial invasion, type 2 cancer). However, whether lymphadenectomy is required in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancers of grade 1 or 2 and with less than 50% myometrial invasion is controversial. Then, the investigators conducted this prospective cohort study to investigate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node policy in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial carcinomas (grade 1 or 2, < 50% myometrial invasion, and a tumor diameter ≥ 2 cm) as well as their outcomes.
Surgery should be performed within a maximum of 4 weeks from the patient's first consultation.
- Conditions
- Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma
- Being tested
- SLN arm
- Keywords
- Sentinel lymph node policy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SLN armProcedure or surgery
Intra-operative SN mapping with indocyanin green: Intracervical injection will be performed by the surgeon. Sub-mucous injections will be performed with 50% diluted dye at 3 and 9 o'clock positions. 1ml injection contained infracyanine green will be injected deeply into the stroma of the cervix (1cm-depth), and another 1ml will be injected superficially (2mm-depth). The time between the injection and the search for SLN must be as soon as possible.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SLN arm | Experimental | Experimental:
1. Intra-operative sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping with indocyanin green injected into the stroma of the cervix.
2. Full bilateral laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and hysterectomy:
If bilateral SLN are detected, all positive SLN will be removed. Then the surgeons proceeds to a total hysterectomy.
If only unilateral SLN are detected, surgeons will proceed to pelvic lymphadenectomy on the opposite side.
If non SLN are detected, surgeons will proceed to a total hysterectomy, a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, a complete and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Receives: Procedure: SLN arm |
| Lymphadenectomy arm | No intervention | Surgeons will proceed to a total hysterectomy, a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, a complete and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Performance Analysis
Using the final pathological diagnosis as the Gold Standard, the investigators will calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of mapping and detection of SLN with metastatic disease.
Measured: Within 14 days after the surgery
Secondary outcomes (4)
Postoperative complications
Comparison of the incidence of complications such as lymph cysts, lymph edema, and postoperative fever etc.
Measured: 1 years after the surgery
Recurrence rate
The recurrence rate of different groups will be followed up.
Measured: 5 years after the surgery
Adjuvant therapy rate
The adjuvant therapy rate of different groups will be followed up.
Measured: 5 years after the surgery
5-year survival rate
The 5-year survival rate of different groups will be followed up.
Measured: 5 years after the surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2018
- Study start6 Feb 2020
- Primary completion7 Oct 2021
- Study completion7 Oct 2021
Why it stopped: This study was not approved by the Ethics Committee
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Endometrial Endometrioid AdenocarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fudan UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fudan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Xiaojun Chen, Fudan University
- Investigators
- Xiaojun Chen, PhD, Principal investigator, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03677024
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 53201012
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Zhu M, Jia N, Huang F, Liu X, Zhao Y, Tao X, Jiang W, Li Q, Feng W. Whether intermediate-risk stage 1A, grade 1/2, endometrioid endometrial cancer patients with lesions larger than 2 cm warrant lymph node dissection? BMC Cancer. 2017 Oct 23;17(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3671-0.
PubMed 29061125Yang B, Shan B, Xue X, Wang H, Shan W, Ning C, Zhou Q, Chen X, Luo X. Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer Using Serum CA125 Combined with Immunohistochemical Markers PR and Ki67, and a Comparison with Other Prediction Models. PLoS One. 2016 May 10;11(5):e0155145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155145. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27163153How J, Lau S, Press J, Ferenczy A, Pelmus M, Stern J, Probst S, Brin S, Drummond N, Gotlieb W. Accuracy of sentinel lymph node detection following intra-operative cervical injection for endometrial cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov;127(2):332-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.018. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
PubMed 22910695Barlin JN, Khoury-Collado F, Kim CH, Leitao MM Jr, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Alektiar K, DeLair DF, Barakat RR, Abu-Rustum NR. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):531-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.021. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
PubMed 22366409Vidal F, Leguevaque P, Motton S, Delotte J, Ferron G, Querleu D, Rafii A. Evaluation of the sentinel lymph node algorithm with blue dye labeling for early-stage endometrial cancer in a multicentric setting. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Sep;23(7):1237-43. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31829b1b98.
PubMed 23839245Ballester M, Dubernard G, Lecuru F, Heitz D, Mathevet P, Marret H, Querleu D, Golfier F, Leblanc E, Rouzier R, Darai E. Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):469-76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70070-5. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
PubMed 21489874
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Efficacy for Sentinel Lymph Node Policy in Intermediate-risk Endometrial Carcinomas
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03677024
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 53201012
- Conditions
- Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma
- Keywords
- Sentinel lymph node policy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: This study was not approved by the Ethics Committee
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fudan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Oct 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node policy in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial carcinomas
Detailed description
Surgical assessment for staging of endometrial carcinoma during primary surgery remains one of the most varied practices worldwide, as it may include no nodal assessment, sentinel node mapping, and complete pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy up to the renal vessels. Since lymphadenectomy is significantly associated with longer operating time, higher surgical costs, greater rate of infection, as well as the occurrence of lymphocysts and lymphedema, gynecologists agree that pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy should be routinely performed in high-risk patients (grade 3, deep myometrial invasion, type 2 cancer). However, whether lymphadenectomy is required in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancers of grade 1 or 2 and with less than 50% myometrial invasion is controversial. Then, the investigators conducted this prospective cohort study to investigate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node policy in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial carcinomas (grade 1 or 2, < 50% myometrial invasion, and a tumor diameter ≥ 2 cm) as well as their outcomes.
Surgery should be performed within a maximum of 4 weeks from the patient's first consultation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SLN arm | Experimental | Procedure: SLN armExperimental: 1. Intra-operative sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping with indocyanin green injected into the stroma of the cervix. 2. Full bilateral laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and hysterectomy: If bilateral SLN are detected, all positive SLN will be removed. Then the surgeons proceeds to a total hysterectomy. If only unilateral SLN are detected, surgeons will proceed to pelvic lymphadenectomy on the opposite side. If non SLN are detected, surgeons will proceed to a total hysterectomy, a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, a complete and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. |
| Lymphadenectomy arm | No intervention | –Surgeons will proceed to a total hysterectomy, a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, a complete and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- No contraindication to surgery.
- Signed and dated informed consent.
- Intermediate-risk endometrioid cancer with grade 1-2, superficial myometrial invasion and tumor diameter ≥ 2cm (in intraoperative frozen section examinations).
- Without any suspicious pelvic, paraaortic or distant lymph node metastasis in preoperative imaging tests including MRI/CT/PET-CT.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Low-risk endometrioid cancer with grade 1-2, superficial myometrial invasion and tumor diameter < 2cm (in intraoperative frozen section examinations).
- Grade 3 endometrioid cancer (in preoperative pathological diagnosis or in intraoperative frozen section examinations).
- Deep muscular infiltration (in intraoperative frozen section examinations).
- Cervical invasion and/or ovarian/tubal invasion (in intraoperative frozen section examinations).
- With suspicious pelvic, paraaortic or distant lymph node metastasis in preoperative imaging tests including MRI/CT/PET-CT.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SLN armIntra-operative SN mapping with indocyanin green: Intracervical injection will be performed by the surgeon. Sub-mucous injections will be performed with 50% diluted dye at 3 and 9 o'clock positions. 1ml injection contained infracyanine green will be injected deeply into the stroma of the cervix (1cm-depth), and another 1ml will be injected superficially (2mm-depth). The time between the injection and the search for SLN must be as soon as possible. | Procedure or surgery | SLN arm |
Primary outcome
Performance Analysis
Time frame: Within 14 days after the surgery
Using the final pathological diagnosis as the Gold Standard, the investigators will calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of mapping and detection of SLN with metastatic disease.
4 secondary outcomes
Postoperative complications
Time frame: 1 years after the surgery
Recurrence rate
Time frame: 5 years after the surgery
Adjuvant therapy rate
Time frame: 5 years after the surgery
5-year survival rate
Time frame: 5 years after the surgery
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2024.
- Background: PubMed 29061125Zhu M, Jia N, Huang F, Liu X, Zhao Y, Tao X, Jiang W, Li Q, Feng W. Whether intermediate-risk stage 1A, grade 1/2, endometrioid endometrial cancer patients with lesions larger than 2 cm warrant lymph node dissection? BMC Cancer. 2017 Oct 23;17(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3671-0.
- Background: PubMed 27163153Yang B, Shan B, Xue X, Wang H, Shan W, Ning C, Zhou Q, Chen X, Luo X. Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer Using Serum CA125 Combined with Immunohistochemical Markers PR and Ki67, and a Comparison with Other Prediction Models. PLoS One. 2016 May 10;11(5):e0155145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155145. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 22910695How J, Lau S, Press J, Ferenczy A, Pelmus M, Stern J, Probst S, Brin S, Drummond N, Gotlieb W. Accuracy of sentinel lymph node detection following intra-operative cervical injection for endometrial cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov;127(2):332-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.018. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
- Background: PubMed 22366409Barlin JN, Khoury-Collado F, Kim CH, Leitao MM Jr, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Alektiar K, DeLair DF, Barakat RR, Abu-Rustum NR. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):531-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.021. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
- Background: PubMed 23839245Vidal F, Leguevaque P, Motton S, Delotte J, Ferron G, Querleu D, Rafii A. Evaluation of the sentinel lymph node algorithm with blue dye labeling for early-stage endometrial cancer in a multicentric setting. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Sep;23(7):1237-43. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31829b1b98.
- Background: PubMed 21489874Ballester M, Dubernard G, Lecuru F, Heitz D, Mathevet P, Marret H, Querleu D, Golfier F, Leblanc E, Rouzier R, Darai E. Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):469-76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70070-5. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Deficient Mismatch Repair System (dMMR) Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma
Endometrial Adenocarcinoma, Endometrial Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Molecular and ctDNA Characterization of High-Risk Endometrial Cancer
Endometrial Carcinoma, Endometrial High Grade Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing Different Amounts of the Combination of Drugs M1774 and ZEN-3694 for the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer
Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma, Recurrent Endometrial Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Tazemetostat in Treating Patients With Recurrent Ovarian or Endometrial Cancer
Recurrent Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma, Recurrent Malignant Uterine Corpus Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing the Combination of Olaparib and Durvalumab, Cediranib and Durvalumab, Olaparib and Capivasertib, and Cediranib Alone in Recurrent or Refractory Endometrial Cancer Following the Earlier Phase of the Study That Tested Olaparib and Cediranib in Comparison to Cediranib Alone, and Olaparib Alone
Endometrial Adenocarcinoma, Endometrial Mixed Cell Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Xiaojun Chen, PhD principal investigator
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SLN arm in people with Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma, run by Fudan University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Performance Analysis (time frame: Within 14 days after the surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03677024, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2024.