AzTrials
AzTrials

Financial ToxicityNCT03676920

Feasibility and Utilization of an Application-based Question Prompt List

A study testing Discussions of Cost App (DISCO App) in people with Financial Toxicity and Cancer, run by Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This trial studies how well an application-based question prompt list works in improving treatment cost discussion between patients with breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer and their oncologists. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Financial Toxicity, Cancer, Question Prompt List
What is being tested?
Discussions of Cost App (DISCO App)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
35 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
21 Aug 2018to 31 Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Medical oncologists or radiation oncologists at KCI McLaren Detroit, McLaren Flint, McLaren Macomb and McLaren Port Huron oncology centers
  • Oncologists will be eligible if they treat patients with prostate, breast, lung or colorectal cancers.
  • Oncologists will be consented
  • Patients must be 18 yrs. old or older
  • Patients will be consented
  • Patients must be able to read and write in English
  • Patients must have a confirmed diagnosis of breast, prostate, lung or colorectal cancer and are scheduled to see an oncologist for an initial treatment discussion.

Who cannot join

  • N/A

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Improving Treatment Cost Discussions Between Cancer Patients and Their Oncologists: Feasibility and Utilization of an Application-based Question Prompt List

This trial studies how well an application-based question prompt list works in improving treatment cost discussion between patients with breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer and their oncologists. An application-based question prompt list, called Discussion of Cost Application (DISCO App), may help to improve how patients and oncologists discuss cancer treatment costs.

Read the detailed description

The overall goal of this research is to reduce financial toxicity related to the cost of cancer treatment in a diverse patient population. The research tests the feasibility of an application-based ("app") communication intervention designed to improve the frequency and quality of patient-oncologist treatment cost discussions during clinical interactions, which, in turn, should improve other short- and longer-term patient outcomes, including referrals to economic support (e.g., social work); efficacy in managing treatment cost; treatment cost distress; financial toxicity; and treatment adherence. If successful, this study will result in an evidence-based tool that can reduce financial toxicity and improve medical outcomes for a diverse patient population.

Being tested
Discussions of Cost App (DISCO App)
Keywords
cancer treatment cost, patient-provider communication
Medical subject headings
Financial Stress, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Discussions of Cost App (DISCO App)Behavioural

    Also called DISCO App

    The DISCO App is an app-based and patient-focused intervention designed to improve the frequency and quality of patient-oncologist treatment cost discussions. The DISCO App allows patients to provide basic demographic information (e.g., employment status, insurance status, etc), and uses that information to provide patients with an individually-tailored list of treatment cost questions they can ask their provider.

Study groups in NCT03676920
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention ArmExperimentalThis feasibility study includes only one arm. All enrolled patients will be asked to use the intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Discussions of Cost App (DISCO App)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient-oncologist treatment cost discussions

    Observational measures using video-recorded patient-oncologist treatment discussions

    Measured: During the treatment discussions and observed via video recordings of those discussions.

  2. Patient-oncologist treatment cost discussions

    Self-report measures of if and how patients and oncologists discuss treatment cost.

    Measured: Collected immediately after the interaction with the oncologist

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Patient financial demographics

    Patient financial situation (e.g., income, perceived economic burden, etc.)

    Measured: Collected immediately prior to the interaction with the oncologist

  2. Change in patient treatment cost information desired and gained

    What cost treatment information patients want before the interaction and if they gained it during the interaction with their oncologist.

    Measured: Collected immediately prior to and immediately after the interaction with the oncologist

  3. Change in patient efficacy in managing treatment cost (10-item scale). This measure will assess any change in the patients' efficacy in paying for the cost of their cancer treatment before and after the intervention.

    If patients think they will be able to pay for the cost of their cancer treatment. This is adapted from a validated 10-item scale (Peterson AM, Harper FW, Albrecht TL, et al. Parent caregiver self-efficacy and child reactions to pediatric cancer treatment procedures. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2014;31(1):18-27.) An example item is: "I am confident I can pay for the costs of my treatment." Patients will respond to a scale from Strongly Disagree (1) to Strongly Agree (5) with higher values representing a better outcome.

    Measured: Collected immediately prior to and immediately after the interaction with the oncologist

  4. Satisfaction with treatment cost discussions (3-item scale). This will assess the extent to which patients are satisfied with any discussions of treatment cost they had with their oncologist.

    The extent to which patients are satisfied with any treatment cost discussion they had with their oncologist. This is an investigator-developed 3-item scale. An example item is: "I am satisfied with how my oncologist and I discussed treatment cost today." Patients will respond to a scale from Strongly Disagree (1) to Strongly Agree (5) with higher values representing a better outcome.

    Measured: Collected immediately after the interaction with the oncologist

  5. Length of the interaction

    Observer measure of the length of the patient-oncologist collected using video recordings.

    Measured: During the patient-oncologist interaction and observed via video recordings of the treatment discussions

  6. DISCO App use (observer measure)

    Observer measure of how patients use the DISCO App collected using video recordings

    Measured: Prior to and during the patient-oncologist interaction

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2018
  2. Study start21 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
The research tests the feasibility of an application-based ("app") communication intervention designed to improve the frequency and quality of patient-oncologist treatment cost discussions during clinical interactions, and associated measures.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
35 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03676920
Sponsor's protocol ID
2017-129
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
12 Sep 2018
Last updated
18 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Hamel LM, Dougherty DW, Hastert TA, Seymour EK, Kim S, Assad H, Phalore J, Soulliere R, Eggly S. The DISCO App: A pilot test of a multi-level intervention to reduce the financial burden of cancer through improved cost communication. PEC Innov. 2021 Oct 30;1:100002. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2021.100002. eCollection 2022 Dec.

    PubMed 37364004

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Discussions of Cost App (DISCO App) in people with Financial Toxicity and Cancer, run by Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient-oncologist treatment cost discussions (time frame: During the treatment discussions and observed via video recordings of those discussions.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03676920, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in