Congenital Heart DiseasePhase 4SUPPRESS-CHDNCT03667703
Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Versus Placebo in Critically Ill Infants With Congenital Heart Disease
A Phase 4 study testing Famotidine in people with Congenital Heart Disease and Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Infants with congenital heart disease often require an intervention during their first year of life. Infants are generally admitted to a cardiac intensive care unit and are routinely prescribed stress ulcer prophylaxis to decrease acid release from the stomach to prevent stress ulcer formation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 minute to 12 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Congenital Heart Disease, Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding, Stress Ulcer
- What is being tested?
- Famotidine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Mar 2019to 30 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 minute to 12 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- < 12 months of age (including premature newborns),
- diagnosed with congenital heart disease (including anatomic, myopathic and arrhythmic conditions),
- received ≤ 1 dose of SUP (including histamine-2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, and sucralfate) during current admission, AND
- anticipated to require respiratory support for > 24 hours during their CICU stay. Respiratory support includes mechanical ventilation, non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy.
Who cannot join
- prior use of antacids (including histamine-2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, or sucralfate) in the past month for > 7 days,
- active gastrointestinal bleeding,
- active Helicobacter pylori infection,
- administration of high-dose steroids (equivalent dosing to 15 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone),
- will receive ketorolac (intravenous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) during admission,
- exposed to specific anticoagulants (high-dose aspirin, direct thrombin inhibitors and GPIIbIIIa inhibitors),
Show all 13Show fewer
- planned to undergo or recently has undergone gastrointestinal surgery (i.e. repair of duodenal atresia)
- supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) or ventricular assist device (VAD),
- currently enrolled in another intervention trial,
- known to be allergic to H2RAs,
- admitted for palliative care,
- prior enrollment in the study, OR
- primary provider declines enrollment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
Official title: Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Versus Placebo - a Blinded Randomized Control Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Two Strategies in Critically Ill Infants With Congenital Heart Disease
Infants with congenital heart disease often require an intervention during their first year of life. Infants are generally admitted to a cardiac intensive care unit and are routinely prescribed stress ulcer prophylaxis to decrease acid release from the stomach to prevent stress ulcer formation. However, these medicines may not be safe and could put infants at increased risk for hospital-acquired infections, necrotizing enterocolitis and alteration to the infant's microbiome. The investigators plan to assess the feasibility of conducting a prospective, blinded randomized control trial to determine the safety of withholding stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill infants with congenital heart disease. In addition, the investigators plan to examine the changes to the infant's microbiome through oral, gastric and stool samples and compare hospital-acquired infections.
Read the detailed description
Background \& Significance. Approximately 36,000 infants are born with congenital heart disease (CHD) in the United States each year, often requiring surgical intervention in the first year of life. They are vulnerable to postoperative morbidities including infection, growth failure and neurodevelopmental delay. Upon admission to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU), infants are routinely prescribed stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) to decrease acid release from the stomach thus preventing ulcer-induced upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding. Although adopted from the adult literature, this practice is expensive and has not been shown to be effective in infants. More importantly, recent literature suggests that this may not be safe. Studies show an increased risk of hospital-acquired infections, necrotizing enterocolitis and alterations in the evolving healthy gut flora in infants. The study investigators have recently demonstrated an increased risk of infection in children receiving SUP and also reported differences in microbial diversity among children in the CICU. It is necessary to proceed with a prospective trial to determine the safety of withholding SUP in critically ill children with CHD.
Specific Aims \& Hypothesis. The overarching hypothesis of the proposal is withholding SUP from critically ill infants with CHD is safe and results in favorable microbial diversity, thus decreasing hospital-acquired infections. Primary Aim 1 of the study is to assess the feasibility of this pilot randomized, controlled clinical trial of SUP versus placebo in infants admitted to the CICU. The study investigators hypothesize that a priori feasibility measures will be achieved during the study period. Primary Aim 2 of the study is to examine the differences of UGI bleeding in critically ill infants with CHD receiving SUP versus those receiving placebo. The study investigators hypothesize that the rate of UGI bleeding will be no different between infants exposed to SUP and to placebo. Secondary Aim 1 of the study is to compare the differences in the abundance of microbial taxa and functional profiles of the aerodigestive tract microbiome between infants receiving SUP and those receiving placebo and before/after the start of SUP. The study investigators hypothesize that there will be significant differences in the abundance of microbial taxa and the functional profiles between the 2 groups - with a more favorable microbial profile present in infants in the placebo group. Secondary Aim 2 is to examine the difference in the incidence of hospital-acquired infections in critically ill infants with CHD receiving SUP versus placebo. The study investigators hypothesize the rate of hospital-acquired infections will be higher in patients exposed to SUP when compared to placebo.
Study Design \& Methods. A single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial will be conducted as a feasibility study for a larger multicenter trial. Consecutive infants < 12 months of age with CHD admitted to the CICU and anticipated to require respiratory support for > 24 hours will be enrolled and randomized to receive a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) medication or study placebo. Patients will remain in the study until discontinuation of respiratory support, discharge from the CICU or study day 14. Oral, gastric and stool samples will be obtained prior to receiving the first dose of study drug and subsequently at the end of the study. The samples will be analyzed for 16S RNA and metagenomic shotgun sequencing for microbiome composition. Gastric pH will be recorded on all gastric samples. Demographics, nutrition variables, medications, and respiratory data will be collected for all patients while enrolled in the study. An independent Drug Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) will monitor patient safety every 6 months and after any significant adverse event.
Outcomes. The primary outcomes will be study feasibility and incidence of clinically significant UGI bleeding. Feasibility will be defined as: 1) > 80% screening of eligible patients, 2) > 20% consent rate, 3) > 80% receive timely first dose of study drug, and 4) > 80% protocol adherence. Clinically significant UGI bleeding will be defined as new-onset bleeding with subsequent pre-defined physiologic or hemodynamic changes. The secondary outcomes of the study will be observed differences in the aerodigestive microbial diversity between study groups, mortality, length of stay, duration of respiratory support, bleeding events, incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and incidence of hospital-acquired infections (ventilator-associated pneumonia, central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, superficial sternal infection or mediastinitis).
- Being tested
- Famotidine, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Defects, Congenital, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Duodenal Ulcer, Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FamotidineDrug
Also called Pepcid
Patients will be randomized to either receive a placebo or famotidine (study drug).
PlaceboDrug
Also called Normal saline or stevoside-free syrup
Patients will be randomized to either receive a placebo or famotidine (study drug).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Subjects randomized to placebo will receive an equivalent volume (mL) of normal saline intravenously or Ora-plus orally based on weight and age. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Study Drug | Active comparator | Subjects randomized to study drug will receive famotidine, a histamine-2 receptor antagonist. Dosing will be weight based and age-dependent. Infants < 90 days old will receive either 0.5mg/kg intravenously daily or 0.5mg/kg orally twice a day of famotidine. Infants ≥ 90 days or older will receive 0.25mg/kg intravenously every 12 hours or 0.5mg/kg orally twice a day. Receives: Drug: Famotidine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Predefined Feasibility Outcomes to Assess Trial Success
Feasibility will be defined by the following metrics: (1) if >80% of eligible patients are approached for consent (screening), (2) >20% of eligible patients are randomized (consent and enrollment), (3) >80% of enrolled patients received first dose of study drug within 48 hours (allocation), and (4) >80% compliance to protocol and treatment group (protocol adherence).
Measured: Through study completion, anticipated 2 years.
Rate of upper gastrointestinal bleeds
To examine the difference in the incidence of clinically significant upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in critically ill infants with CHD receiving SUP versus placebo to demonstrate safety.
Measured: Through study completion, anticipated 2 years.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Microbiome alterations
To compare the absolute and serial differences in the abundance of bacteria and functional microbial profiles in the aerodigestive tract between critically ill infants with CHD receiving SUP compared to placebo.
Measured: Through study completion, anticipated 2 years.
Rate of hospital-acquired infections
To examine the difference in the incidence of hospital-acquired infections in critically ill infants with CHD receiving SUP versus placebo. Hospital-acquired infections include ventilator-associated pneumonia, central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, superficial sternal infection, or mediastinitis.
Measured: Through study completion, anticipated 2 years.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2018
- Study start10 Mar 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2022
- Study completion30 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Congenital Heart DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Children's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled pilot feasibility trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Children's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Gerber Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kimberly I. Mills, MD, Boston Children's Hospital
- Investigators
- Kimberly I Mills, MD, Principal investigator, Boston Children's HospitalBen D Albert, MD, Principal investigator, Boston Children's HospitalNilesh M Mehta, MD, Principal investigator, Boston Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03667703
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-P00028715
- Acronym
- SUPPRESS-CHD
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 13 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mills KI, Albert BD, Bechard LJ, Chu S, Duggan CP, Kaza A, Rakoff-Nahoum S, Sleeper LA, Newburger JW, Priebe GP, Mehta NM. Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Versus Placebo-A Blinded Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Two Strategies in Critically Ill Infants With Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 1;25(2):118-127. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003384. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
PubMed 38240536Mills KI, Albert BD, Bechard LJ, Duggan CP, Kaza A, Rakoff-Nahoum S, Vlamakis H, Sleeper LA, Newburger JW, Priebe GP, Mehta NM. Stress ulcer prophylaxis versus placebo-a blinded randomized control trial to evaluate the safety of two strategies in critically ill infants with congenital heart disease (SUPPRESS-CHD). Trials. 2020 Jun 29;21(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04513-w.
PubMed 32600393
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Versus Placebo - a Blinded Randomized Control Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Two Strategies in Critically Ill Infants With Congenital Heart Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03667703
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SUPPRESS-CHD / IRB-P00028715
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Children's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Gerber Foundation
- Study start
- 10 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Infants with congenital heart disease often require an intervention during their first year of life. Infants are generally admitted to a cardiac intensive care unit and are routinely prescribed stress ulcer prophylaxis to decrease acid release from the stomach to prevent stress ulcer formation. However, these medicines may not be safe and could put infants at increased risk for hospital-acquired infections, necrotizing enterocolitis and alteration to the infant's microbiome. The investigators plan to assess the feasibility of conducting a prospective, blinded randomized control trial to determine the safety of withholding stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill infants with congenital heart disease. In addition, the investigators plan to examine the changes to the infant's microbiome through oral, gastric and stool samples and compare hospital-acquired infections.
Detailed description
Background \& Significance. Approximately 36,000 infants are born with congenital heart disease (CHD) in the United States each year, often requiring surgical intervention in the first year of life. They are vulnerable to postoperative morbidities including infection, growth failure and neurodevelopmental delay. Upon admission to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU), infants are routinely prescribed stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) to decrease acid release from the stomach thus preventing ulcer-induced upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding. Although adopted from the adult literature, this practice is expensive and has not been shown to be effective in infants. More importantly, recent literature suggests that this may not be safe. Studies show an increased risk of hospital-acquired infections, necrotizing enterocolitis and alterations in the evolving healthy gut flora in infants. The study investigators have recently demonstrated an increased risk of infection in children receiving SUP and also reported differences in microbial diversity among children in the CICU. It is necessary to proceed with a prospective trial to determine the safety of withholding SUP in critically ill children with CHD.
Specific Aims \& Hypothesis. The overarching hypothesis of the proposal is withholding SUP from critically ill infants with CHD is safe and results in favorable microbial diversity, thus decreasing hospital-acquired infections. Primary Aim 1 of the study is to assess the feasibility of this pilot randomized, controlled clinical trial of SUP versus placebo in infants admitted to the CICU. The study investigators hypothesize that a priori feasibility measures will be achieved during the study period. Primary Aim 2 of the study is to examine the differences of UGI bleeding in critically ill infants with CHD receiving SUP versus those receiving placebo. The study investigators hypothesize that the rate of UGI bleeding will be no different between infants exposed to SUP and to placebo. Secondary Aim 1 of the study is to compare the differences in the abundance of microbial taxa and functional profiles of the aerodigestive tract microbiome between infants receiving SUP and those receiving placebo and before/after the start of SUP. The study investigators hypothesize that there will be significant differences in the abundance of microbial taxa and the functional profiles between the 2 groups - with a more favorable microbial profile present in infants in the placebo group. Secondary Aim 2 is to examine the difference in the incidence of hospital-acquired infections in critically ill infants with CHD receiving SUP versus placebo. The study investigators hypothesize the rate of hospital-acquired infections will be higher in patients exposed to SUP when compared to placebo.
Study Design \& Methods. A single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial will be conducted as a feasibility study for a larger multicenter trial. Consecutive infants < 12 months of age with CHD admitted to the CICU and anticipated to require respiratory support for > 24 hours will be enrolled and randomized to receive a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) medication or study placebo. Patients will remain in the study until discontinuation of respiratory support, discharge from the CICU or study day 14. Oral, gastric and stool samples will be obtained prior to receiving the first dose of study drug and subsequently at the end of the study. The samples will be analyzed for 16S RNA and metagenomic shotgun sequencing for microbiome composition. Gastric pH will be recorded on all gastric samples. Demographics, nutrition variables, medications, and respiratory data will be collected for all patients while enrolled in the study. An independent Drug Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) will monitor patient safety every 6 months and after any significant adverse event.
Outcomes. The primary outcomes will be study feasibility and incidence of clinically significant UGI bleeding. Feasibility will be defined as: 1) > 80% screening of eligible patients, 2) > 20% consent rate, 3) > 80% receive timely first dose of study drug, and 4) > 80% protocol adherence. Clinically significant UGI bleeding will be defined as new-onset bleeding with subsequent pre-defined physiologic or hemodynamic changes. The secondary outcomes of the study will be observed differences in the aerodigestive microbial diversity between study groups, mortality, length of stay, duration of respiratory support, bleeding events, incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and incidence of hospital-acquired infections (ventilator-associated pneumonia, central line-associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, superficial sternal infection or mediastinitis).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective, double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled pilot feasibility trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboSubjects randomized to placebo will receive an equivalent volume (mL) of normal saline intravenously or Ora-plus orally based on weight and age. |
| Study Drug | Active comparator | Drug: FamotidineSubjects randomized to study drug will receive famotidine, a histamine-2 receptor antagonist. Dosing will be weight based and age-dependent. Infants < 90 days old will receive either 0.5mg/kg intravenously daily or 0.5mg/kg orally twice a day of famotidine. Infants ≥ 90 days or older will receive 0.25mg/kg intravenously every 12 hours or 0.5mg/kg orally twice a day. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 minute to 12 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- < 12 months of age (including premature newborns),
- diagnosed with congenital heart disease (including anatomic, myopathic and arrhythmic conditions),
- received ≤ 1 dose of SUP (including histamine-2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, and sucralfate) during current admission, AND
- anticipated to require respiratory support for > 24 hours during their CICU stay. Respiratory support includes mechanical ventilation, non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- prior use of antacids (including histamine-2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, or sucralfate) in the past month for > 7 days,
- active gastrointestinal bleeding,
- active Helicobacter pylori infection,
- administration of high-dose steroids (equivalent dosing to 15 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone),
- will receive ketorolac (intravenous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) during admission,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FamotidineAlso: PepcidPatients will be randomized to either receive a placebo or famotidine (study drug). | Drug | Study Drug |
| PlaceboAlso: Normal saline or stevoside-free syrupPatients will be randomized to either receive a placebo or famotidine (study drug). | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Predefined Feasibility Outcomes to Assess Trial Success
Time frame: Through study completion, anticipated 2 years.
Feasibility will be defined by the following metrics: (1) if >80% of eligible patients are approached for consent (screening), (2) >20% of eligible patients are randomized (consent and enrollment), (3) >80% of enrolled patients received first dose of study drug within 48 hours (allocation), and (4) >80% compliance to protocol and treatment group (protocol adherence).
Rate of upper gastrointestinal bleeds
Time frame: Through study completion, anticipated 2 years.
To examine the difference in the incidence of clinically significant upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in critically ill infants with CHD receiving SUP versus placebo to demonstrate safety.
2 secondary outcomes
Microbiome alterations
Time frame: Through study completion, anticipated 2 years.
Rate of hospital-acquired infections
Time frame: Through study completion, anticipated 2 years.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38240536Mills KI, Albert BD, Bechard LJ, Chu S, Duggan CP, Kaza A, Rakoff-Nahoum S, Sleeper LA, Newburger JW, Priebe GP, Mehta NM. Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Versus Placebo-A Blinded Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Two Strategies in Critically Ill Infants With Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 1;25(2):118-127. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003384. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32600393Mills KI, Albert BD, Bechard LJ, Duggan CP, Kaza A, Rakoff-Nahoum S, Vlamakis H, Sleeper LA, Newburger JW, Priebe GP, Mehta NM. Stress ulcer prophylaxis versus placebo-a blinded randomized control trial to evaluate the safety of two strategies in critically ill infants with congenital heart disease (SUPPRESS-CHD). Trials. 2020 Jun 29;21(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04513-w.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Congenital Heart Disease
Not yet recruiting
Autologous Thymus Transplant in Children With Congenital Heart Disease: A Pilot Study
Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of SGT-212 Gene Therapy in Friedreich's Ataxia
Friedreich's Ataxia (FA)
RecruitingObservational study
The CACHE Study: Coronary Artery Care in HaEmophilia
Haemophilia, Cardiovascular Diseases
RecruitingObservational study
Essen Amyloidosis Registry
Amyloidosis; Systemic, Amyloidosis Cardiac
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Lonapegsomatropin Compared to Daily Somatropin in Children and Adolescents With Short Stature or Growth Failure Due to Growth Hormone Sufficient Disorders
Turner Syndrome, Short Stature Homeobox Gene Mutation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kimberly I Mills, MD principal investigator
Boston Children's Hospital
Ben D Albert, MD principal investigator
Boston Children's Hospital
Nilesh M Mehta, MD principal investigator
Boston Children's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Famotidine in people with Congenital Heart Disease and Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Predefined Feasibility Outcomes to Assess Trial Success (time frame: Through study completion, anticipated 2 years.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03667703, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2022.