Feeding BehaviorNCT03664154
Stress and Feeding (SAFE): A Pilot Intervention for Mothers and Their Preterm Infants
A study testing Stress and Feeding (SAFE) in people with Feeding Behavior and Preterm Infant, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
A majority of mothers experience high stress levels and associated symptoms of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep disruption during the NICU hospitalization and continuing after hospital discharge. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Feeding Behavior, Preterm Infant, Stress
- What is being tested?
- Stress and Feeding (SAFE)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 May 2019to 14 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Maternal Inclusion Criteria:
- English-speaking and reading
- Given birth to preterm infant < 35-weeks gestation
- Has access to internet
- Lives within 50-mile radius of hospital
Infant Inclusion Criteria:
- Born less than 35 week gestation
- No congenital anomalies that could interfere with feeding (e.g., diaphragmatic hernia, cleft lip/palate tracheoesophageal fistula, and cardiac anomalies
Maternal Exclusion Criteria:
- Chronic neuroendocrine or immunologic condition
- Currently using guided imagery or other mind-body techniques such as meditation
- Psychiatric disorder involving a history of dissociative disorders, borderline personalities, and psychotic pathology
Infant Exclusion Criteria:
- Grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage
- Surgical necrotizing enterocolitis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
About this study
A majority of mothers experience high stress levels and associated symptoms of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep disruption during the NICU hospitalization and continuing after hospital discharge. Given preterm infant feeding is one of the most stressful things the new mother will face and given the harmful nature of stress on maternal and infant health, it is important an intervention focuses on both of these concerns: infant feeding and maternal stress. Therefore, the purpose of this research study is two-fold. First, the investigators will examine how practical and acceptable it is for mothers of preterm infants to participate in Stress And FEeding (SAFE) intervention and collect biological stress measures from mothers and their preterm infant's saliva (spit). The intervention is designed to reduce stress and improve maternal feeding interaction. The second purpose of this study is to examine changes before and after using the intervention on mother and infant outcomes over 16-weeks.
Read the detailed description
Descriptive statistics will be computed for demographic and outcome variables. The number of mother/infant dyads recruited but not enrolled will be tracked. If provided, reasons for non-participation will be noted. Enrolled dyads will be tracked and monitored for the number of times the interventions are used and completeness of study data. Acceptability and burden will be assessed by theme analysis of the responses to the interview by the mPI's using traditional strategies of reading and re-reading the transcripts, coding participant responses using their language, and developing categories and subcategories to create a structure for considering acceptability will be completed.. Finally, perceptions of usefulness and satisfaction of the mothers will be assessed by looking at frequencies of Likert responses.
Means and standard errors of the maternal stress and feeding behavior variables will be estimated and graphed across the data collection time points. Although the sample size is small, it is anticipated the mixed effects linear model will be used to assess and quantify changes across time. This model will include a random effect for participant and a fixed effect for time. The model is flexible enough to model potential cofactors, such as age at birth. The study will track the number of successfully obtained, transported, processed and stored samples and compare those number to the proposed maternal and infant cortisol collections.
- Conditions
- Feeding Behavior, Preterm Infant, Stress, Mother-Infant Interaction
- Being tested
- Stress and Feeding (SAFE)
- Medical subject headings
- Feeding Behavior, Premature Birth
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Stress and Feeding (SAFE)Behavioural
The Stress Management component of the intervention acknowledges the mind-body connection between stress and adverse outcomes and consists of four web-based modules based on Lazarus and Folkman's Transactional Model of Stress and Coping designed to improve health outcomes.
The Guided Feeding component of the intervention is based on the synactive theory of development. The synactive theory of development provides insight in to reading the physiological and behavioral cues of infants born preterm and involves weekly viewing of video clips of adaptive and maladaptive feeding behaviors of mothers and infants, practice opportunities, and follow-up phone calls.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stress and Feeding (SAFE) | Experimental | The SAFE intervention is grounded in a general theory of guided participation (GP) that posits learning will be facilitated by an emotionally regulated state of the mother. Efforts to help mothers manage stress will better position them to learn and attend to feeding their infants. GP links the two components: stress management (SM) and guided feeding (GF). SM provides skills to manage perceived stress and regulate emotion. GF provides education with skill building to help mothers become more sensitive and responsive to their infant. SAFE is delivered through a secure, password-protected responsive website with practice opportunities. Receives: Behavioral: Stress and Feeding (SAFE) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ease of recruitment of participants
Number of mother-infant dyads recruited, with a goal of 15
Measured: 12-months after study opens to enrollment
Track non-participation
Track reasons for non-participation via self-report
Measured: 16-weeks after start of intervention
Adherence
Adherence will be assessed by tracking the number of times the interventions are used
Measured: 16-weeks after start of intervention
Data collection completeness
Percent of participants with complete data collection at end of study, with a goal of >75% of patients
Measured: 16-weeks after start of intervention
Appraisal of SAFE's degree of inconvenience
The participants appraisal of inconvenience will be measured through a semi-structured interview and will be described qualitatively
Measured: 16-weeks after start of intervention
Satisfaction with intervention
The participants satisfaction with the intervention will be measured using a 26-item Likert scale where 1 represents being not at all satisfied to 5 being very much satisfied.
Measured: 16-weeks after start of intervention
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in maternal stress
Paper and pencil questions asking about degree to which situations in an individual's life are appraised as stressful and asking about common problems mothers with young children face daily, with higher scores indicating more stress
Measured: Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline
Changes in mother biological stress
Biological stress will be assessed by changes in salivary cortisol of mother (an indicator of mother and infant stress)
Measured: Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline
Changes in infant biological stress
Biological stress will be assessed by changes in salivary cortisol of infant (an indicator of mother and infant stress)
Measured: Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline
Changes in mother-infant feeding behaviors
Mother and infant feeding behaviors will be assessed using the Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA). The PCERA is scored on a 5-point Likert scale on quality, intensity, or amount, and duration of behavior where 1 represents negative behavior of clinical concern and 5 represents regulated, adaptive behavior
Measured: Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Sep 2018
- Study start15 May 2019
- Primary completion14 Dec 2020
- Study completion14 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Feeding BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Virginia Commonwealth UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- A one-group longitudinal repeated measures design. Data will be collected at baseline, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, and 16-weeks
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lisa F Brown, PhD, RN, Principal investigator, Virginia Commonwealth University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03664154
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HM20013532
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 6 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no plan to share IPD with other researchers.
Publications
Als, H. (1986). A synactive model of neonatal behavioral organization: framework for the assessment of neurobehavioral development in the premature infant and for support of infants and parents in the neonatal intensive care environment. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 6(2-3), 3-53. http://doi.org/10.1080/J006v06n03_02
Als H, Gilkerson L. The role of relationship-based developmentally supportive newborn intensive care in strengthening outcome of preterm infants. Semin Perinatol. 1997 Jun;21(3):178-89. doi: 10.1016/s0146-0005(97)80062-6.
PubMed 9205974Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
Pridham KF. Guided participation and development of care-giving competencies for families of low birth-weight infants. J Adv Nurs. 1998 Nov;28(5):948-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00814.x.
PubMed 9840866Pridham K, Brown R, Clark R, Limbo RK, Schroeder M, Henriques J, Bohne E. Effect of guided participation on feeding competencies of mothers and their premature infants. Res Nurs Health. 2005 Jun;28(3):252-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20073.
PubMed 15884024Jung JW. Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context (barbara rogoff). Korean J Med Educ. 2009 Jun;21(2):197-8. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2009.21.2.197. Epub 2009 Jun 30. No abstract available.
PubMed 25813118Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schroeder M, Pridham K. Development of relationship competencies through guided participation for mothers of preterm infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;35(3):358-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00049.x.
PubMed 16700685Wethington, E., Glanz, K., & Schwartz, M. (2015). Stress, coping and health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health Behavior: theory, Research & Practice (5th ed., pp. 223-242). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
PubMed 16204405
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Stress and Feeding (SAFE): A Pilot Intervention for Mothers and Their Preterm Infants
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03664154
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HM20013532
- Conditions
- Feeding Behavior, Preterm Infant, Stress, Mother-Infant Interaction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A majority of mothers experience high stress levels and associated symptoms of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep disruption during the NICU hospitalization and continuing after hospital discharge. Given preterm infant feeding is one of the most stressful things the new mother will face and given the harmful nature of stress on maternal and infant health, it is important an intervention focuses on both of these concerns: infant feeding and maternal stress. Therefore, the purpose of this research study is two-fold. First, the investigators will examine how practical and acceptable it is for mothers of preterm infants to participate in Stress And FEeding (SAFE) intervention and collect biological stress measures from mothers and their preterm infant's saliva (spit). The intervention is designed to reduce stress and improve maternal feeding interaction. The second purpose of this study is to examine changes before and after using the intervention on mother and infant outcomes over 16-weeks.
Detailed description
Descriptive statistics will be computed for demographic and outcome variables. The number of mother/infant dyads recruited but not enrolled will be tracked. If provided, reasons for non-participation will be noted. Enrolled dyads will be tracked and monitored for the number of times the interventions are used and completeness of study data. Acceptability and burden will be assessed by theme analysis of the responses to the interview by the mPI's using traditional strategies of reading and re-reading the transcripts, coding participant responses using their language, and developing categories and subcategories to create a structure for considering acceptability will be completed.. Finally, perceptions of usefulness and satisfaction of the mothers will be assessed by looking at frequencies of Likert responses.
Means and standard errors of the maternal stress and feeding behavior variables will be estimated and graphed across the data collection time points. Although the sample size is small, it is anticipated the mixed effects linear model will be used to assess and quantify changes across time. This model will include a random effect for participant and a fixed effect for time. The model is flexible enough to model potential cofactors, such as age at birth. The study will track the number of successfully obtained, transported, processed and stored samples and compare those number to the proposed maternal and infant cortisol collections.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- A one-group longitudinal repeated measures design. Data will be collected at baseline, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, and 16-weeks
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stress and Feeding (SAFE) | Experimental | Behavioral: Stress and Feeding (SAFE)The SAFE intervention is grounded in a general theory of guided participation (GP) that posits learning will be facilitated by an emotionally regulated state of the mother. Efforts to help mothers manage stress will better position them to learn and attend to feeding their infants. GP links the two components: stress management (SM) and guided feeding (GF). SM provides skills to manage perceived stress and regulate emotion. GF provides education with skill building to help mothers become more sensitive and responsive to their infant. SAFE is delivered through a secure, password-protected responsive website with practice opportunities. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Stress and Feeding (SAFE)The Stress Management component of the intervention acknowledges the mind-body connection between stress and adverse outcomes and consists of four web-based modules based on Lazarus and Folkman's Transactional Model of Stress and Coping designed to improve health outcomes. The Guided Feeding component of the intervention is based on the synactive theory of development. The synactive theory of development provides insight in to reading the physiological and behavioral cues of infants born preterm and involves weekly viewing of video clips of adaptive and maladaptive feeding behaviors of mothers and infants, practice opportunities, and follow-up phone calls. | Behavioural | Stress and Feeding (SAFE) |
Primary outcome
Ease of recruitment of participants
Time frame: 12-months after study opens to enrollment
Number of mother-infant dyads recruited, with a goal of 15
Track non-participation
Time frame: 16-weeks after start of intervention
Track reasons for non-participation via self-report
Adherence
Time frame: 16-weeks after start of intervention
Adherence will be assessed by tracking the number of times the interventions are used
Data collection completeness
Time frame: 16-weeks after start of intervention
Percent of participants with complete data collection at end of study, with a goal of >75% of patients
Appraisal of SAFE's degree of inconvenience
Time frame: 16-weeks after start of intervention
The participants appraisal of inconvenience will be measured through a semi-structured interview and will be described qualitatively
Satisfaction with intervention
Time frame: 16-weeks after start of intervention
The participants satisfaction with the intervention will be measured using a 26-item Likert scale where 1 represents being not at all satisfied to 5 being very much satisfied.
4 secondary outcomes
Change in maternal stress
Time frame: Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline
Changes in mother biological stress
Time frame: Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline
Changes in infant biological stress
Time frame: Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline
Changes in mother-infant feeding behaviors
Time frame: Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jun 2023.
- BackgroundAls, H. (1986). A synactive model of neonatal behavioral organization: framework for the assessment of neurobehavioral development in the premature infant and for support of infants and parents in the neonatal intensive care environment. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 6(2-3), 3-53. http://doi.org/10.1080/J006v06n03_02
- Background: PubMed 9205974Als H, Gilkerson L. The role of relationship-based developmentally supportive newborn intensive care in strengthening outcome of preterm infants. Semin Perinatol. 1997 Jun;21(3):178-89. doi: 10.1016/s0146-0005(97)80062-6.
- BackgroundLazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
- Background: PubMed 9840866Pridham KF. Guided participation and development of care-giving competencies for families of low birth-weight infants. J Adv Nurs. 1998 Nov;28(5):948-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00814.x.
- Background: PubMed 15884024Pridham K, Brown R, Clark R, Limbo RK, Schroeder M, Henriques J, Bohne E. Effect of guided participation on feeding competencies of mothers and their premature infants. Res Nurs Health. 2005 Jun;28(3):252-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20073.
- Background: PubMed 25813118Jung JW. Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context (barbara rogoff). Korean J Med Educ. 2009 Jun;21(2):197-8. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2009.21.2.197. Epub 2009 Jun 30. No abstract available.
- BackgroundRogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Background: PubMed 16700685Schroeder M, Pridham K. Development of relationship competencies through guided participation for mothers of preterm infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;35(3):358-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00049.x.
- BackgroundWethington, E., Glanz, K., & Schwartz, M. (2015). Stress, coping and health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health Behavior: theory, Research & Practice (5th ed., pp. 223-242). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Background: PubMed 16204405Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no plan to share IPD with other researchers.
Related trials for Feeding Behavior
Not yet recruiting
Compulsive Eating and Brain's Reward System in Different Pathologies
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Bipolar 1 Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessing the Impact of Perceptions of Unpredictability on Objective Measures of Food Consumption and Metabolism
Healthy Volunteer, Obestity
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of a 10-week Multicomponent Intervention Combined With Parent Education on Binge Eating Behavior in Children and Adolescents
Binge Eating Disorder, Binge Eating
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Environmental Comfort and Oral Motor Stimulation on Comfort and Oral Feeding Readiness in Preterm Infants
Prematurity, Feeding Behaviors
Recruiting
Momentary Coping Prompts and Hair Steroids in College Students
Emotional Regulation, Alcohol Drinking in College
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lisa F Brown, PhD, RN principal investigator
Virginia Commonwealth University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Stress and Feeding (SAFE) in people with Feeding Behavior and Preterm Infant, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ease of recruitment of participants (time frame: 12-months after study opens to enrollment). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03664154, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2023.