TeenagerNCT03662321
Quantitative Study of Prevalence and Vulnerability Factors of Active Cyber Sexuality Among Teenagers in West Normandy
An observational study of Teenager and Sex Behavior, run by University Hospital, Caen at 14 sites in France.
Trial summary
This study evaluates prevalence of active cybersexuality among teenagers (15-17 old) in West Normandy and find different factors of vulnerability that could induce this behaviour. Selection of teenagers in different schools (general, professional, agricultural, reintegration structure). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Teenager, Sex Behavior
- How many people
- 1,208 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 12 Feb 2018to 12 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 17 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Study population: population of teenagers of different school structures . make differences between the urban schools and the rural schools
Who may be able to join
- all of teenagers participate a sexual education session
Who cannot join
- <15 old and 18 old and more
- the school doesn't want to participate
- one parent refuses that his adolescent participate. If requested exclusion, the group to which belongs the child is excluded
- teenager refuses to participate
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
France14 sites
Lycée de navarre
Alençon, 61000
Cfai Uimm
Caen, 14000
CIFAC
Caen, 14000
EPEI
Caen, 14000
ICEP CFA
Caen, 14000
Lycée Allende
Caen, 14000
Lycée Laplace
Caen, 14000
Lycée Millet
Cherbourg, 50100
La roquelle
Coutances, 50200
IME
Démouville, 14840
Lycée jules verne
Mondeville, 14120
MFR TRUN
Trun, 61160
MFR
Vimoutiers, 61120
Lycée marie curie
Vire, 14500
About this study
Official title: Prevalence and Vulnerability Factors of Active Cybersexuality Among Teenagers (15 - 17 Olds) in West Normandy.
This study evaluates prevalence of active cybersexuality among teenagers (15-17 old) in West Normandy and find different factors of vulnerability that could induce this behaviour. Selection of teenagers in different schools (general, professional, agricultural, reintegration structure).
Read the detailed description
the teen completes a questionnaire at the beginning of sexual education session. This questionnaire put in an anonymous box. After, there is a debate on the subject with the speaker, teenager ask questions about sexuality.
- Conditions
- Teenager, Sex Behavior
- Keywords
- teenager, sexuality, internet
- Medical subject headings
- Sexual Behavior, Sexuality
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| sexual behavior on the internet | this group of teenagers use internet for sexuality | |
| not sexual behavior on the internet | this group of teenagers doesn't use internet for sexuality |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
prevalence of active cybersexuality
if teenagers send, receive or forward pictures or videos nude, use dedipix, participate to skin party, speak on chats. Evaluation by anonymous questionnaire distributed at the beginning of the session. They answered "yes" or "no" or "I don't want to answer" . If They answered "yes" to one question they were considered to be practicing cybersexuality
Measured: 20 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
factors of vulnerability that induce sexuality on the internet
factors of vulnerability are: gender, welfare, emotional bond with parents, accessibility of internet, use internet and social network, see pornography, addictive behavior, trauma in the past. Evaluation by anonymous questionnaire. Inside, Using an analog scale for the consumption of the internet and phone, more the number is important (the max was 10 hours and 200 sms) more the teenagers surfed in the internet. For the others questions , four answers are possible "yes very well", "yes, well", "not really" "not at all" more they answered not at all more it was a factor of vulnerability
Measured: 20 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Sep 2018
- Study start12 Feb 2018
- Primary completion12 Jun 2018
- Study completion12 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TeenagerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, CaenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 1,208 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Caen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- CHU Caen, Principal investigator, university hospital center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03662321
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17-192
- Status last verified
- Feb 2018
- First submitted
- 4 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 22 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Braun-Courville DK, Rojas M. Exposure to sexually explicit Web sites and adolescent sexual attitudes and behaviors. J Adolesc Health. 2009 Aug;45(2):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.004. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
PubMed 19628142Strassberg DS, McKinnon RK, Sustaita MA, Rullo J. Sexting by high school students: an exploratory and descriptive study. Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Jan;42(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9969-8. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
PubMed 22674035Temple JR, Paul JA, van den Berg P, Le VD, McElhany A, Temple BW. Teen sexting and its association with sexual behaviors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Sep;166(9):828-33. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.835.
PubMed 22751805Strassberg DS, Cann D, Velarde V. Sexting by High School Students. Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Aug;46(6):1667-1672. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0926-9. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
PubMed 28050742Rice E, Gibbs J, Winetrobe H, Rhoades H, Plant A, Montoya J, Kordic T. Sexting and sexual behavior among middle school students. Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e21-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2991.
PubMed 24982103
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevalence and Vulnerability Factors of Active Cybersexuality Among Teenagers (15 - 17 Olds) in West Normandy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03662321
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17-192
- Conditions
- Teenager, Sex Behavior
- Keywords
- teenager, sexuality, internet
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,208 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, CaenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates prevalence of active cybersexuality among teenagers (15-17 old) in West Normandy and find different factors of vulnerability that could induce this behaviour. Selection of teenagers in different schools (general, professional, agricultural, reintegration structure).
Detailed description
the teen completes a questionnaire at the beginning of sexual education session. This questionnaire put in an anonymous box. After, there is a debate on the subject with the speaker, teenager ask questions about sexuality.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Other
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| sexual behavior on the internet | – | –this group of teenagers use internet for sexuality |
| not sexual behavior on the internet | – | –this group of teenagers doesn't use internet for sexuality |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- population of teenagers of different school structures . make differences between the urban schools and the rural schools
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- all of teenagers participate a sexual education session
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- <15 old and 18 old and more
- the school doesn't want to participate
- one parent refuses that his adolescent participate. If requested exclusion, the group to which belongs the child is excluded
- teenager refuses to participate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
prevalence of active cybersexuality
Time frame: 20 minutes
if teenagers send, receive or forward pictures or videos nude, use dedipix, participate to skin party, speak on chats. Evaluation by anonymous questionnaire distributed at the beginning of the session. They answered "yes" or "no" or "I don't want to answer" . If They answered "yes" to one question they were considered to be practicing cybersexuality
1 secondary outcome
factors of vulnerability that induce sexuality on the internet
Time frame: 20 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Apr 2019.
- Background: PubMed 19628142Braun-Courville DK, Rojas M. Exposure to sexually explicit Web sites and adolescent sexual attitudes and behaviors. J Adolesc Health. 2009 Aug;45(2):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.004. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
- Background: PubMed 22674035Strassberg DS, McKinnon RK, Sustaita MA, Rullo J. Sexting by high school students: an exploratory and descriptive study. Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Jan;42(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9969-8. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
- Background: PubMed 22751805Temple JR, Paul JA, van den Berg P, Le VD, McElhany A, Temple BW. Teen sexting and its association with sexual behaviors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Sep;166(9):828-33. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.835.
- Background: PubMed 28050742Strassberg DS, Cann D, Velarde V. Sexting by High School Students. Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Aug;46(6):1667-1672. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0926-9. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
- Background: PubMed 24982103Rice E, Gibbs J, Winetrobe H, Rhoades H, Plant A, Montoya J, Kordic T. Sexting and sexual behavior among middle school students. Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e21-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2991.
Related trials for Teenager
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
An Open-Label Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety of Solriamfetol in Children and Adolescents With ADHD
ADHD
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruiting
A Pre-post Study of a Lethal Means Safety Planning Intervention for Youth at Elevated Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department
Suicidal Ideas, Suicidal Ideation
RecruitingObservational study
Structural Stressors, Reward Related Decision Making and Substance Use Risk
Substance Use Risk, Structural Stressors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
CHU Caen principal investigator
university hospital center
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Teenager and Sex Behavior, run by University Hospital, Caen at 14 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
prevalence of active cybersexuality (time frame: 20 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03662321, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2019.