AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeIRM-DUNCT03660852

Impact of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scanner Exclusively Dedicated to Emergency in the Clinical Management of Patients Presenting With Diplopia or Dizziness

An observational study of Stroke and Dizziness, run by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

IRM-DU is a prospective observational single center study conducted in an emergency department to evaluate the impact of a MRI scanner exclusively dedicated to emergency in the clinical management of patients presenting with dizziness or diplopia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Dizziness, Diplopia
How many people
119 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
24 Jul 2018to 24 Jan 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Primary care All patients presented in ED with dizziness or diplopia are eligible to the study protocol

Who may be able to join

  • age over 18 years
  • non opponent to participate
  • dizziness or diplopia requiring brain imaging in order to eliminate stroke

Who cannot join

  • opponent to participate
  • pregnant women
  • recent cerebral trauma
  • potentially eligible to thrombolysis
  • impaired consciousness
  • unable to give consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg

    Strasbourg, 67091

Other trials in France

About this study

IRM-DU is a prospective observational single center study conducted in an emergency department to evaluate the impact of a MRI scanner exclusively dedicated to emergency in the clinical management of patients presenting with dizziness or diplopia.

The study will compare 2 strategies : after and before availability of a MRI scanner dedicated to emergency.

Read more

The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with a diagnosis of stroke confirmed by imaging (MRI or Computed tomography (CT)) in the group "before implementation of the emergency MRI scanner" and the group "after implementation of the emergency MRI scanner".

The hypothesis is that the availability of a MRI scanner dedicated to emergency will improve the diagnosis of stroke in patients presenting with dizziness or diplopia, and will reduce Emergency Department stay, hospital stay and hospitalisation costs.

Medical subject headings
Stroke, Dizziness, Diplopia, Emergencies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03660852
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Before dedicated MRINot described
After dedicated MRINot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnosis is established on the positive signs of stroke highlighted on the CT scan or brain MRI according to the examination performed

    Proportion of patients with a diagnosis of stroke confirmed by cerebral radiology (MRI or scan according to examination) in the pre- and post-MRI groups.

    Measured: 18 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Evaluate the time of care

    Evaluate the time of care: time of realization of the examination of radiology (scanner or brain MRI), delay of passage in emergencies

    Measured: 18 months

  2. Number of CT and brain MRI requested by the emergency physician in the before / after groups

    Number of CT and brain MRI requested by the emergency physician in the before / after groups

    Measured: 18 months

  3. Evaluate the usual management of vertigo and diplopia

    Evaluate the usual management of vertigo and diplopia: number of CT and brain MRI requested by the emergency physician in the "before / after" groups; number of cerebral CT and MRI performed by the radiologist in the "before / after" groups

    Measured: 18 months

  4. Evaluate the rate of new consultations in emergencies

    Evaluate the rate of new consultations in emergencies for a neurological reason in the month following the initial care in emergencies, and the rate of new hospitalizations for the same reason

    Measured: 18 months

  5. Rate of new emergency department visits for neurological

    Rate of new emergency department visits for neurological reasons in the month following initial emergency care

    Measured: the month following initial emergency care

  6. Evaluate the irradiation rate

    Evaluate the irradiation rate related to the initial radiological examination performed during emergency care

    Measured: 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Sep 2018
  2. Study start24 Jul 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion24 Jan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
119 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03660852
Sponsor's protocol ID
7015
Acronym
IRM-DU
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
23 Jul 2018
Last updated
14 Jul 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Kepka S, Zarca K, Lersy F, Moris M, Godet J, Deur J, Stoessel M, Muller J, Le Borgne P, Baloglu S, Fleury MC, Anheim M, Bilbault P, Bierry G, Durand Zaleski I, Kremer S. MRI dedicated to the emergency department for diplopia or dizziness: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur Radiol. 2022 Nov;32(11):7344-7353. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08791-7. Epub 2022 May 13.

    PubMed 35554653

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stroke and Dizziness, run by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnosis is established on the positive signs of stroke highlighted on the CT scan or brain MRI according to the examination performed (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03660852, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in