AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaNCT03655392

Clinical, Functional and Inflammatory Evaluation in Asthmatic Patients After a Simple Short-Term Educational Program

A study testing Individualized educational program, Induced sputum collection and Spirometry in people with Asthma and Inflammation, run by University of Sao Paulo.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Patient education is one of the pillars of asthma treatment according to GINA guidelines. It has considered essential for adherence to treatment and for correct technique of inhaled devices. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 69 years
Conditions the study is for
Asthma, Inflammation, Patient Relations, Nurse
What is being tested?
Individualized educational program, Induced sputum collection and Spirometry
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
64 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jul 2015to 12 Dec 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 69 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Non-smokers or those who stopped smoking more than five years ago
  • Age between 18-69 years
  • Be legally capable
  • Response to the short-acting bronchodilator FEV1> 12% and> 200 mL
  • Absence of upper airway infection during 30 days and associated systemic diseases

Who cannot join

  • Smokers
  • Over 70 years old
  • Airway infection
  • Legally incapable persons
  • Diseases that may affect respiratory function

About this study

Background: Patient education is one of the pillars of asthma treatment according to GINA guidelines. It has considered essential for adherence to treatment and for correct technique of inhaled devices.

Read the detailed description

Objective: analyze clinical, functional and inflammatory features of adult patients with partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma, before and after an educational intervention. Methods: 58 adult asthmatic patients (18-70 years old) were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) (n=38) or control group (CG) (n=26). IG patients were submitted to three 30-minutes intervention of a shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse in 3 visits with a one-month interval. CG group did not receive educational intervention. All patients were submitted to a spirometry, induced sputum collection, nitric oxide measure, collecting exhaled condensed (cytokine analysis) air and it's ph measure, Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and answered a symptoms diary, Statistical analysis: repeated measures (Sigma Plot Software 3.0).

Being tested
Individualized educational program, Induced sputum collection, Spirometry, Nitric oxide measure, Questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDI
Keywords
asthma, inflammation, patients education, spirometry
Medical subject headings
Asthma, Inflammation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Individualized educational programBehavioural

    Also called Short term educational program

    IG patients were submitted to three 30-minutes intervention of a individualized shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse, were given explanations about general aspects of the disease, prevention methods and about the importance and correct use of inhaled corticosteroids, with an educational video showing the use of the device

  • Induced sputum collectionDiagnostic test

    Also called Induced sputum

    All participants performed induced sputum collection

  • SpirometryDiagnostic test

    Also called Lung function test

    All participants performed spirometry test using a Koko spirometer. Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry prebronchodilator, after withholding short-acting beta-agonists for ≥ 6 hours and long-acting beta-agonist for ≥ 24hours. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) % predicted was used as a proxy variable for overall lung function.

  • Nitric oxide measureDiagnostic test

    Also called NO measure

    All participants performed nitric oxide measure in three Mylar bags and measure was performed in a NOA280 Sievers equipment. For collection the patients blew in the balloons through a sterile nozzle in the equipment collector without prejudice or damage to the patient.

  • Questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDIOther

    All participants answered standardized questionnaires about asthma symptoms and depression: Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

  • Symptoms DiaryOther

    All participants were instructed to note in the morning and evening before the use of routine inhaled corticosteroids, asthma symptoms (coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath, use of emergency inhaled corticosteroids) and three measures of peak expiratory flow (individual, provided to patients) and to return this completed diary at each study visit

  • Peak flow measureDiagnostic test

    Also called Peak flow

    All participants registered three peak flow measures in the symptoms diary by morning and night before the use of routine inhaled corticosteroids. Peak flow was measured by the electronic peak flow meter (Mini-Wright).

  • Exhaled breath condensate air measurementDiagnostic test

    Also called EBC collection

    Exhaled breath condensate was collect during 15 to 20 minutes in a Turbo DECCS equipment (Medivac SRL, Italy) in a sterile buccal of the own apparatus with the aid of a nasal clip with the participant breathing normally without any effort or damage.

Study groups in NCT03655392
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention GroupExperimental64 adult asthmatic patients (18-70 years old) were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) (n=38) or control group (CG) (n=26). IG patients were submitted to a individualized educational program: three 30-minutes intervention of a shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse at 3 monthly visits. CG group did not receive educational intervention. All patients were submitted to a spirometry, induced sputum collection, nitric oxide measure, exhaled breath condensate air measurement, and answered the questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDI: Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). All participants also answered a symptoms diary about asthma symptoms and peak flow measure.
Receives: Behavioral: Individualized educational program; Diagnostic Test: Induced sputum collection; Diagnostic Test: Spirometry; Diagnostic Test: Nitric oxide measure; Other: Questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDI; Other: Symptoms Diary; Diagnostic Test: Peak flow measure; Diagnostic Test: Exhaled breath condensate air measurement
Control GroupExperimental64 adult asthmatic patients (18-70 years old) were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) (n=38) or control group (CG) (n=26). IG patients were submitted to three 30-minutes intervention of a shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse at 3 montly visits. CG group did not receive educational intervention. All patients were submitted to a spirometry, induced sputum collection, nitric oxide measure, exhaled breath condensate air measurement, and answered the questionnaires: Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). All participants also answered a symptoms diary about asthma symptoms and peak flow measure.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Induced sputum collection; Diagnostic Test: Spirometry; Diagnostic Test: Nitric oxide measure; Other: Questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDI; Other: Symptoms Diary; Diagnostic Test: Peak flow measure; Diagnostic Test: Exhaled breath condensate air measurement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Induced sputum samples to assess airway inflammation

    Induced sputum samples were collected in 3 visits with a one-month interval to assess the degree of airway inflammation. Markers of inflammation included eosinophils, neutrophils, macrophages, lymphocytes and total cell counts, as well as cytokines in the sputum supernatant. In the processing performed the subjects received up to three nebulizations with 3% hypertonic saline, the aerosol was generated by an ultrasonic nebulizer (Ultraneb 99; DeVilbiss, Somerset, PA) each challenge was monitored with peak flow before, after and between nebulizations.

    Measured: One day

  2. Pulmonary function by spirometry

    Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry pre and after bronchodilator (Salbutamol, short action beta-agonist), according to ATS guidelines, in 3 visits with a one-month interval after withholding short-acting beta-agonists for ≥ 6 hours and long-acting betaagonist for ≥ 24hours. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) % predicted was used as a proxy variable for overall lung function

    Measured: One day

  3. Asthma control by Asthma Control Test (ACT)

    Asthma Control Test (ACT) was used to assess clinical control of asthma in the last month; is a questionnaire composed of five questions (score varying from 5 to 25 points) assessing asthma in relation to physical activity limitation, nocturnal and diurnal symptoms, shortness of breath and use of rescue medication. The higher the overall score, the greater the asthma control, and a 3-point difference in the mean ACT score is considered a clinically relevant change.

    Measured: One day

  4. Depression symptoms by Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI II)

    To evaluate the symptoms of depression reported in the last 30 days, BDI II was used, a questionnaire composed of 21 items with scores ranging from 0 to 63 points, the higher the score the worse the severity of the symptoms

    Measured: One day

  5. Asthma quality of life by Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)

    Asthma quality of life was assessed using the AQLQ, which has four domains: activity limitations, symptoms, emotional function and environmental stimuli. A higher AQLQ score indicates a better quality of life.

    Measured: One day

  6. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)

    FeNO was collected also to assess airway inflammation in acoordance with the ATS recommendations; all measurements were determinad by chemiluminscence (Sievers 280). This analysis procedure was performed by a blinded investigator. The patients were advised to blow into a Mylar bag, with a breath pressure of 12 cmH20, monitored by the pressure gauge, reaching a flow rate of 200 mL/s.

    Measured: One day

  7. Exhaled breath condensate (EBC)

    A Turbo DECCS® condenser (Medivac SRL, Italy) (29) was used which was cooled to -20øC for at least thirty minutes prior to use. The subjects were instructed to perform oral breathing using the mouthpiece of the equipment and with the aid of a nasal clip. The EBC (exhaled breath condensate) was collected for 15 to 20 minutes in tidal volume for pH analysis and cytokine dosing.

    Measured: One day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Aug 2018
  2. Study start1 Jul 2015
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2016
  4. Study completion12 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
64 adult asthmatic patients (18-70 years old) were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) (n=38) or control group (CG) (n=26). IG patients were submitted to three 30-minutes intervention of a shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse at 3 mensal intervals. CG group did not receive educational intervention. All patients were submitted to a spirometry, induced sputum collection, nitric oxide measure, collecting exhaled condensed (cytokine analysis) air and it's ph measure, Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and answered a symptoms diary, Statistical analysis: repeated measures (Sigma Plot Software 3.0).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
64 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03655392
Sponsor's protocol ID
IAMSPE
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
28 Mar 2018
Last updated
5 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Felix SN, Agondi RC, Aun MV, Olivo CR, de Almeida FM, Amorim TS, Cezario JC, Giavina-Bianchi P, Tiberio IFLC, de Martins MA, Romanholo BMS. Clinical, functional and inflammatory evaluation in asthmatic patients after a simple short-term educational program: a randomized trial. Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):18267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97846-8.

    PubMed 34521963

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Individualized educational program, Induced sputum collection and Spirometry in people with Asthma and Inflammation, run by University of Sao Paulo.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Induced sputum samples to assess airway inflammation (time frame: One day). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03655392, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in