AzTrials
AzTrials

Cutaneous LupusNCT03639857

Study of the Efficacy of 532nm Laser and 1064 nm Laser in the Treatment of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematous Versus Topical Corticosteroids Alone

A study testing 532nm laser, 1064nm laser and Topical corticosteroid in people with Cutaneous Lupus, run by David Weinstein at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to compare the efficacy of 532nm Potassium Titanyl Phosphate (KTP) laser and 1064 nm Neodymium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser as adjuncts to topical corticosteroids in the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus versus topical corticosteroids alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cutaneous Lupus
What is being tested?
532nm laser, 1064nm laser and Topical corticosteroid
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
17 Aug 2018to 31 Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female adult 18 years of age or older
  • Ability to rate level of pain
  • Ability to rate visual satisfaction
  • At least 2 active lesions of CLE

Who cannot join

  • New or change in systemic medication for cutaneous lupus in past 6 months
  • Allergy to triamcinolone or betamethasone dipropionate cream
  • Pregnancy
  • Currently a prisoner
  • Unable to read and speak English since consent will only be available in English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • UCF Health Lake Nona Office

    Orlando, Florida, 32827

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 532nm Laser and 1064 nm Laser in the Treatment of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematous Versus Topical Corticosteroids Alone

This study aims to compare the efficacy of 532nm Potassium Titanyl Phosphate (KTP) laser and 1064 nm Neodymium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser as adjuncts to topical corticosteroids in the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus versus topical corticosteroids alone.

Conditions
Cutaneous Lupus
Being tested
532nm laser, 1064nm laser, Topical corticosteroid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 532nm laserDevice

    532nm laser will be used to treat the lesion in this study arm.

  • 1064nm laserDevice

    1064nm laser will be used to treat the lesion in this study arm.

  • Topical corticosteroidDrug

    The topical corticosteroid will be used to treat the lesion in this study arm.

Study groups in NCT03639857
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
532nm laser and topical corticosteroidExperimental532nm laser is applied to the patient's lesion in-clinic in addition to a topical corticosteroid.
Receives: Device: 532nm laser; Drug: Topical corticosteroid
1064nm laser and topical corticosteroidExperimental1064nm laser is applied to the patient's lesion in-clinic in addition to a topical corticosteroid.
Receives: Device: 1064nm laser; Drug: Topical corticosteroid
Topical corticosteroid aloneActive comparatorTopical corticosteroid is applied to the patient's lesion.
Receives: Drug: Topical corticosteroid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Limited CLASI

    The investigators are using a limited Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) scoring system to classify specific lesions the investigators are measuring. The total limited CLASI reflects the sum of both active and damage CLASI, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 8. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Score is assessed by the investigators.

    The limited active CLASI for a lesion will include the following:

    • Erythema (ranging from 0 = absent to 3 = dark red/purple)
    • Scale/Hypertrophy (ranging from 0 = absent to 2 = verrucous/ hypertrophic)
    • The addition of these scores result in a total limited active CLASI score of the studied lesion, ranging from 0 to 5.

    The limited damage CLASI for a lesion will include the following:

    • Dyspigmentation (0 = absent or 1 = present)
    • Scarring/Atrophy/Panniculitis (ranging from 0 = absent to 2 = severely atrophic scarring or panniculitis).
    • The addition of these scores result in a

    Measured: 2 Months

  2. VAS for Appearance

    The investigators are using a VAS (visual analog scale) to measure patient assessment of the appearance of the lesion. The scale ranges from 0-10, with 10 being very satisfied and 0 being no satisfaction at all.

    A score of 0 will represent a cosmetically fully unsatisfactory result and 10 will represent cosmetically excellent result.

    Measured: 2 Months

  3. VAS for Pain

    The investigators are using a VAS (visual analog scale) to assess pain of the laser treatment. The participant rates the pain of the laser treatment. The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10(worse pain).

    A score of 0 will represent absence of pain and 10 will represent maximal pain.

    Measured: 1 Month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2018
  2. Study start17 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2019

Why it stopped: Time and resource constraints

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
3 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03639857
Sponsor's protocol ID
BIO-17-13680
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
17 Aug 2018
Last updated
21 Jul 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 532nm laser, 1064nm laser and Topical corticosteroid in people with Cutaneous Lupus, run by David Weinstein at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jul 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Limited CLASI (time frame: 2 Months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in