Trigeminal NeuralgiaPhase 3SURGE-2NCT03637387
802NP302 Efficacy and Safety Study of BIIB074 in Participants With Trigeminal Neuralgia
A Phase 3 study testing BIIB074 in people with Trigeminal Neuralgia, run by Biogen.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of BIIB074 in treating pain experienced by participants with trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The secondary objectives are to investigate the safety and tolerability of BIIB074 in participants with TN and to evaluate the population pharmacokinetic(s) (PK) of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Trigeminal Neuralgia
- What is being tested?
- BIIB074
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2023to 29 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) for at least 3 months based on International Headache Society (IHS) diagnostic criteria.
- Participant must have failed at least 1 prior standard of care pharmacologic treatment for TN (defined as an inadequate response or intolerance to treatment), as determined by the Investigator based on medical history.
- Age ≥18 years at the time of informed consent.
- Participants must have recorded their pain score in their eDiary on at least 5 days during the run-in period (Days -7 to -1).
- Allowed concomitant medications must have been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to Day 1 of the dose-optimization period. The maximum dosage of carbamazepine allowed on Day 1 is 400 mg/day (or 600 mg/day for oxcarbazepine).
Who cannot join
- History or positive test result at Screening for hepatitis C virus antibody or current hepatitis B infection (defined as positive for hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] and/or hepatitis B core antibody [HBcAb]).
- Positive history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or a positive HIV test at Screening.
- Participants with facial pain other than TN.
- Personal or family (first-degree relative) history of seizures (except for simple febrile convulsions) or clinically significant head injury.
- Positive drug screen for drugs of abuse at Screening (amphetamine [methamphetamines and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine], phencyclidine, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cocaine, opioids) except if explained by use of allowed prescription medicines. Prospective subjects with a positive screen for tetrahydrocannabinol must agree to discontinue use upon study enrollment and for the duration of the study.
- Known hypersensitivity to BIIB074 or components of the BIIB074 formulation or matching placebo.
- NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Randomized Withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BIIB074 in Subjects With Trigeminal Neuralgia
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of BIIB074 in treating pain experienced by participants with trigeminal neuralgia (TN).
The secondary objectives are to investigate the safety and tolerability of BIIB074 in participants with TN and to evaluate the population pharmacokinetic(s) (PK) of BIIB074.
- Conditions
- Trigeminal Neuralgia
- Being tested
- BIIB074, Placebo
- Keywords
- TGN, TN
- Medical subject headings
- Trigeminal Neuralgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BIIB074Drug
Administered as specified in the treatment arm
PlaceboDrug
Administered as specified in the treatment arm.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BIIB074 | Experimental | Administered orally three times daily (TID) Receives: Drug: BIIB074 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo matching BIIB074 Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Classified as Responders at Week 12 of the Double- Blind Period
A participant who meets all of the following criteria will be classified as a responder: (1) Has a reduction of >=30% in mean pain score compared with baseline; (2) Has not discontinued randomized treatment before the end of Week 12 of the double-blind period; (3) Has not taken prohibited pain medication before the end of Week 12 of the double-blind period.
Measured: Week 12
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; in the view of the Investigator, places the subject at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event; however, this does not include an event that, had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 52 of the LTE
Secondary outcomes (15)
Percentage of Participants Classified as Responders Achieving Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Response at Week 12 of the Double-Blind Period
A participant who meets all of the following criteria will be classified as a responder: (1) Achieving Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) response of "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" at Week 12 of the double-blind period; (2) has not discontinued randomized study treatment before the end of Week 12 of the double-blind period; (3) has not taken prohibited pain medication before the end of Week 12 of the double-blind period. PGIC is a 7-item self-report scale depicting a participant's rating of overall improvement. Participants rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Classified as Responders Achieving >=50 Percent Reduction From Baseline Mean Number of Paroxysms at Week 12
A participant who meets all of the following criteria will be classified as a responder: (1) Achieving >=50 percent reduction from baseline mean number of paroxysms at Week 12; (2) has not discontinued randomized study treatment before the end of Week 12 of the double-blind period; (3) has not taken prohibited pain medication before the end of Week 12 of the double-blind period. A paroxysm is a trigeminal neuralgia pain attack.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Classified as Responders Achieving >=50 Percent Reduction From Baseline Mean Pain Score at Week 12
A participant who meets all of the following criteria will be classified as a responder: (1) Achieving >=50 percent reduction from baseline mean pain score at Week 12; (2) has not discontinued randomized study treatment before the end of Week 12 of the double-blind period; (3) has not taken prohibited pain medication before the end of Week 12 of the double-blind period. Pain score is a 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 = no pain; 10 = maximum pain imaginable. Higher scores representing more pain.
Measured: Week 12
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Double Blind Period
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; in the view of the Investigator, places the subject at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event; however, this does not include an event that, had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Measured: Up to Week 14 of Double blind period
Area Under the Plasma Concentration- Time Curve at Steady State (AUC,ss)
AUC,ss= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) at steady state.
Measured: Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99, 113, 127, 141, premature treatment discontinuation (if occurred)
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cmax,ss)
Cmax,ss= Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of BIIB074 at Steady State
Measured: Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99, 113, 127, 141, premature treatment discontinuation (if occurred)
Percentage of Participants with >=30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Pain Score During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Pain score is a 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 = no pain; 10 = maximum pain imaginable. Higher scores representing more pain.
Measured: Week 1 through Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Pain score is a 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 = no pain; 10 = maximum pain imaginable. Higher scores representing more pain.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Worst Pain Score During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Pain score is a 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 = no pain; 10 = maximum pain imaginable. Higher scores representing more pain.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 52
Percentage of Participants with >=50% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Number of Paroxysms During Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Paroxysms are trigeminal neuralgia pain attacks. They are short, severe, and sharp, shooting, stabbing, or shock-like.
Measured: Week 1 through Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Paroxysms During Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Paroxysms are trigeminal neuralgia pain attacks. They are short, severe, and sharp, shooting, stabbing, or shock-like.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 52
Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of "Much Improved or "Very Much Improved" by Visit During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
PGIC is a 7-point self-report scale depicting a participant's rating of overall improvement. Participants rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." Participants with "Much Improved or "Very Much Improved" will be reported.
Measured: Day 1, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, every 12 weeks up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in the PENN-FPS-R Score by Visit During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
The Penn-FPS-R is a new 12-item Health-Related Quality of Life outcome measure with content validity that can be used to assess and monitor the impact of Trigeminal Neuralgia and facial pain treatment interventions in both clinical practice and research. This scale uses the 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) to quantify the pain impact different activities and quality of life items, where 0 indicates no interference and 10 indicates complete interference. The sum of the rated NRS score will be calculated.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, every 12 weeks up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D-5L Score by Visit During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, subject-rated instrument for use as a measure of health outcomes. The EQ 5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each dimension, the participant is instructed to indicate whether he or she has no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 4, 8, every 12 weeks up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in the WPAI Neuropathic Pain (V2.0) Score by Visit During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
The WPAI questionnaire is a validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities. The WPAI yields four types of scores: 1. Absenteeism (percentage of work time missed) 2. Presenteeism (percentage of impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness) 3. Work productivity loss (percentage of overall work impairment [absenteeism plus presenteeism]) 4. Activity Impairment (percentage of overall activity impairment). WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline, Day 1, Week 4, 8, every 12 weeks up to Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2018
- Study start1 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion18 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion29 Sep 2026 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Sponsor Decision
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Trigeminal NeuralgiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BiogenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biogen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Biogen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03637387
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 802NP302
- Other IDs
- 2016-002473-35, 2016
- Acronym
- SURGE-2
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 6 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: In accordance with Biogen's Clinical Trial Transparency and Data Sharing Policy on https://www.biogentrialtransparency.com/
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Randomized Withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BIIB074 in Subjects With Trigeminal Neuralgia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03637387
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SURGE-2 / 802NP302
- Conditions
- Trigeminal Neuralgia
- Keywords
- TGN, TN
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Sponsor Decision
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BiogenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 18 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 29 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of BIIB074 in treating pain experienced by participants with trigeminal neuralgia (TN).
The secondary objectives are to investigate the safety and tolerability of BIIB074 in participants with TN and to evaluate the population pharmacokinetic(s) (PK) of BIIB074.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BIIB074 | Experimental | Drug: BIIB074Administered orally three times daily (TID) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo matching BIIB074 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- A diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) for at least 3 months based on International Headache Society (IHS) diagnostic criteria.
- Participant must have failed at least 1 prior standard of care pharmacologic treatment for TN (defined as an inadequate response or intolerance to treatment), as determined by the Investigator based on medical history.
- Age ≥18 years at the time of informed consent.
- Participants must have recorded their pain score in their eDiary on at least 5 days during the run-in period (Days -7 to -1).
- Allowed concomitant medications must have been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to Day 1 of the dose-optimization period. The maximum dosage of carbamazepine allowed on Day 1 is 400 mg/day (or 600 mg/day for oxcarbazepine).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- History or positive test result at Screening for hepatitis C virus antibody or current hepatitis B infection (defined as positive for hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] and/or hepatitis B core antibody [HBcAb]).
- Positive history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or a positive HIV test at Screening.
- Participants with facial pain other than TN.
- Personal or family (first-degree relative) history of seizures (except for simple febrile convulsions) or clinically significant head injury.
- Positive drug screen for drugs of abuse at Screening (amphetamine [methamphetamines and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine], phencyclidine, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cocaine, opioids) except if explained by use of allowed prescription medicines. Prospective subjects with a positive screen for tetrahydrocannabinol must agree to discontinue use upon study enrollment and for the duration of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BIIB074Administered as specified in the treatment arm | Drug | BIIB074 |
| PlaceboAdministered as specified in the treatment arm. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Classified as Responders at Week 12 of the Double- Blind Period
Time frame: Week 12
A participant who meets all of the following criteria will be classified as a responder: (1) Has a reduction of >=30% in mean pain score compared with baseline; (2) Has not discontinued randomized treatment before the end of Week 12 of the double-blind period; (3) Has not taken prohibited pain medication before the end of Week 12 of the double-blind period.
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 52 of the LTE
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; in the view of the Investigator, places the subject at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event; however, this does not include an event that, had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death); requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
15 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Classified as Responders Achieving Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Response at Week 12 of the Double-Blind Period
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Classified as Responders Achieving >=50 Percent Reduction From Baseline Mean Number of Paroxysms at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Classified as Responders Achieving >=50 Percent Reduction From Baseline Mean Pain Score at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Double Blind Period
Time frame: Up to Week 14 of Double blind period
Area Under the Plasma Concentration- Time Curve at Steady State (AUC,ss)
Time frame: Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99, 113, 127, 141, premature treatment discontinuation (if occurred)
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cmax,ss)
Time frame: Day 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99, 113, 127, 141, premature treatment discontinuation (if occurred)
Percentage of Participants with >=30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Pain Score During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Worst Pain Score During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 52
Percentage of Participants with >=50% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Number of Paroxysms During Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Time frame: Week 1 through Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Paroxysms During Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 through Week 52
Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of "Much Improved or "Very Much Improved" by Visit During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Time frame: Day 1, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, every 12 weeks up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in the PENN-FPS-R Score by Visit During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, every 12 weeks up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in the EQ-5D-5L Score by Visit During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 4, 8, every 12 weeks up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in the WPAI Neuropathic Pain (V2.0) Score by Visit During the Long Term Extension (LTE) Period
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Week 4, 8, every 12 weeks up to Week 52
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. In accordance with Biogen's Clinical Trial Transparency and Data Sharing Policy on https://www.biogentrialtransparency.com/
Related trials for Trigeminal Neuralgia
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Trigeminal Neuralgia Electrophysiology
Trigeminal Neuralgia
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Trigeminal Evoked Responses to Improve Rhizotomy
Trigeminal Neuralgia, Rhizotomy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Twenty-five Years of Advanced RadioTherapy at San Raffaele Hospital
Malignant Tumor, Benign Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1/2
RP-008 in Combination With Daily Oral Varenicline for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia
Trigeminal Neuralgia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director study director
Biogen
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing BIIB074 in people with Trigeminal Neuralgia, run by Biogen.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Classified as Responders at Week 12 of the Double- Blind Period (time frame: Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2023.