AzTrials
AzTrials

Le Fort; INCT03636178

3D Evaluation of Nasolabial Changes Following Classic Versus Modified Alar Base Suture After Le Fort I Osteotomy

A study testing Classic alar base suture technique and Modified alar base suture technique in people with Le Fort; I, run by Cairo University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Three dimensional evaluation of nasolabial changes following classic versus modified alar cinch suture after Le Fort I osteotomy using cone beam computed tomography Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Le Fort; I
What is being tested?
Classic alar base suture technique and Modified alar base suture technique
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2018to Apr 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients with skeletal maxillomandibular deformity indicated for surgical correction by Le Fort I osteotomy.
  • Absence of clefts.
  • Absence of growth.
  • Patients must be willing for the surgical procedure and follow-up, with his informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • History of facial trauma with fractures of facial bones.
  • History of surgical operation in nasal region.
  • Facial asymmetry.
  • Patients with accompanying craniofacial syndromes.
  • Patients with any diseases that compromise bone or soft tissue healing.
  • Anterior open bite cases
  • Medically compromised patients not fit for general anaesthesia.

About this study

Official title: Three Dimensional Evaluation of Nasolabial Changes Following Classic Versus Modified Alar Base Suture After Le Fort I Osteotomy

Three dimensional evaluation of nasolabial changes following classic versus modified alar cinch suture after Le Fort I osteotomy using cone beam computed tomography

Read the detailed description

Intra operative procedures: (For all groups) All surgical operations will be performed or supervised by one of the authors (MdK). Intraoperative antibiotics will be given(1000 mg cefazolin and 500 mg metronidazole). After nasotracheal intubation, the mucobuccal fold of the maxilla will be infiltrated with local anaesthetic (articaine ; Ultracain DS Forte). The Le Fort I procedure will be started with an incision in the gingivobuccal sulcus from the canine on the one side to the canine on the other side. After elevation of the mucoperiosteum and nasal mucosa, the osteotomy line will be designed with a fine burr, after which the cut will be made with a reciprocal saw. The lateral nasal walls and nasal septum will be osteotomized with a nasal osteotome. The piriform aperture and when necessary the nasal spine will be rounded off. After mobilization of the maxilla, it will be positioned in the planned position using an acrylic wafer. Fixation will be performed with four 1.5-mm miniplates, one paranasal and one on the buttress on each side. The mucosa will be closed with a 4-0 Vicryl suture (Ethicon ; Johnson and Johnson Medical, Norderstedt, Germany).

The alar cinch procedure will be performed through the intraoral incision as follows:

In the comparator ( control ) group:

The classic method of alar cinching will be performed in the following manner: An index finger will be used to apply extraoral pressure on the alar base region, and a dentate forceps will grasp this tissue through the intraoral incision. A suture bite will be taken at this point through the tissue previously held by the forceps. The same procedure will be applied on the opposite side. After passing the suture on both sides, it will be tightened with attention to the alar base response. If the alar base suture will be judged to be adequate, the vestibular incision will then be closed in a routine fashion, with or without performing a V-Y lip closure.

In the intervention group:

The alar base will be marked with 3 landmarks: the nasofacial skin fold at the left alar base (point LAB), the middle of the columella (point C), and the nasofacial skin fold at the right alar base (point RAB). A needle will be inserted through the skin at the nasofacial skin fold and exited through the fibroareolar tissue. A nonabsorbable suture without a needle will be inserted through the needle from the oral cavity to the outside. The needle will be retracted through point RAB without leaving the skin point, then returned to the oral cavity in a medial position. Finally the needle will be retracted from point RAB, leaving the suture through the soft tissue. The same procedure will be repeated on the other side. The 2 free ends of the sutures will be then tied together after passing through a hole made in the nasal spine.

Conditions
Le Fort; I
Being tested
Classic alar base suture technique, Modified alar base suture technique
Keywords
alar base, le fort I osteotomy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Classic alar base suture techniqueProcedure or surgery

    An index finger will be used to apply extraoral pressure on the alar base region, and a dentate forceps will grasp this tissue through the intraoral incision. A suture bite will be taken at this point through the tissue previously held by the forceps. The same procedure will be applied on the opposite side. After passing the suture on both sides, it will be tightened with attention to the alar base response. If the alar base suture will be judged to be adequate, the vestibular incision will then be closed in a routine fashion, with or without performing a V-Y lip closure

  • Modified alar base suture techniqueProcedure or surgery

    The alar base will be marked with 3 landmarks: left alar base (point LAB), columella (point C), and right alar base (point RAB). A needle will be inserted through the skin at the nasofacial skin fold and exited through the fibroareolar tissue. A nonabsorbable suture without a needle will be inserted through the needle from the oral cavity to the outside. The needle will be retracted through point RAB without leaving the skin point, then returned to the oral cavity in a medial position. Finally the needle will be retracted from point RAB, leaving the suture through the soft tissue. The same procedure will be repeated on the other side. The 2 free ends of the sutures will be then tied together after passing through a hole made in the nasal spine.

Study groups in NCT03636178
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1st groupOther20 patients out of 40 will be enrolled into the study including males and females above 18 years old
Receives: Procedure: Classic alar base suture technique
2nd groupOther20 patients out of 40 will be enrolled in the study including males and females above 18 years old
Receives: Procedure: Modified alar base suture technique

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Widening of the alar base

    Postoperative increase in the alar base width in millimeters(mm) in comparison to the normal preoperative alar base width

    Measured: 6 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Nasal volume

    Postoperative increase or decrease in the nasal volume in cubic millimeters in comparison to the normal preoperative nasal volume

    Measured: 6 months postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Aug 2018
  2. Study startSep 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03636178
Sponsor's protocol ID
CEBD-CU-2018-07-01
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
12 Aug 2018
Last updated
4 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Classic alar base suture technique and Modified alar base suture technique in people with Le Fort; I, run by Cairo University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Widening of the alar base (time frame: 6 months postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in