AzTrials
AzTrials

HypertensionNCT03626506

Spironolactone Versus Indapamide in Obese and Hypertensive Patients

A study testing Spironolactone, Indapamide and Amlodipine in people with Hypertension, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Most recent guidelines continue to recommend thiazide diuretics as first-line agents for patients with hypertension in spite of the potential metabolic side effects, while mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), such as spironolactone or eplerenone, are mainly recommended to be used in patients with resistant… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Hypertension
What is being tested?
Spironolactone, Indapamide and Amlodipine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
400 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
13 Feb 2019to Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with essential hypertension aged between 18-80years
  • Office systolic blood pressure (SBP)≥140mmHg and <180mmHg without treatment or on one antihypertensive drug or SBP<140mmHg on two antihypertensive drugs
  • Waist circumference ≥90cm for males, ≥ 80cm for females

Who cannot join

  • Secondary hypertension.
  • Symptomatic congestive heart failure or history of heart failure.
  • History of ischemic stroke, unstable angina or myocardial infarction;
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Serum creatinine ≥ 2.0mg/dl or eGFR≤ 30 ml/min/1.73 m2
  • Serum K+ ≥ 5.0 mmol/L or ≤3.5 mmol/L

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191

    Guisong Wang, MD, 86-13701070359, guisongwang2007@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of spironolactoNe Versus Indapamide on Target Organ Damage in Patients With Obesity and hYpertension(ENVOY)

Most recent guidelines continue to recommend thiazide diuretics as first-line agents for patients with hypertension in spite of the potential metabolic side effects, while mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), such as spironolactone or eplerenone, are mainly recommended to be used in patients with resistant hypertension or heart failure.However,animal studies demonstrated that MRAs induce beneficial changes in left ventricular remodeling and prevent or partially reverse cardiac fibrosis and pathological hypertrophy that contribute to the development of diastolic heart failure. MRAs have also been shown to decrease inflammation and myocardial fibrosis in patients with obesity and the metabolic syndrome. In the proposed study, the investigators planned to randomize 400 patients with essential hypertension and increased waist circumference to receive spironolactone or indapamide in combination with amlodipine for 12 months. The effects of the two diuretics on target organ damage detected by changes in left atrial volume index(LAVI) by echocardiography reflecting left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or changes in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity(PWV) reflecting arterial stiffness will be compared. The potential role of MRAs as initial therapy for patients with essential hypertension and visceral obesity will be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

Thiazide diuretics have been widely used for the management of essential hypertension, especially in patients with salt-sensitive hypertension. Most recent guidelines continue to recommend thiazide diuretics as first-line agents for all patients with hypertension in spite of the potential metabolic side effects such as hypokalemia, hypertriglyceridemia, impaired glucose tolerance and increases in serum cholesterol and uric acid. However, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), such as spironolactone or eplerenone, are mainly recommended to be used in patients with resistant hypertension or heart failure because they have never been evaluated for efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events in uncomplicated patients with hypertension. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that MRAs reduced total mortality or cardiovascular death in patients with systolic heart failure with severe or mild symptoms and in patients undergoing hemodialysis for chronic renal dysfunction. Animal studies demonstrated that MRAs induce beneficial changes in left ventricular remodeling and prevent or partially reverse cardiac fibrosis and pathological hypertrophy that contribute to the development of diastolic heart failure. MRAs have also been shown to decrease inflammation and myocardial fibrosis in patients with obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Of interest is the recent finding in EMPHASIS-HF study in which almost all of the benefit of eplerenone was found in those patients with an increased waist circumference. Therefore, the investigators have reason to believe that MRAs will be more effective than thiazide diuretics in preventing target organ damage and can be used initially in patients with essential hypertension and visceral obesity. In the proposed study, the investigators planned to randomize 400 patients with essential hypertension and increased waist circumference to receive spironolactone or indapamide in combination with amlodipine for 12 months. The effects of the two diuretics on target organ damage detected by changes in left atrial volume index(LAVI) by echocardiography reflecting left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or changes in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity(PWV) reflecting arterial stiffness will be compared. If it proves that spironolactone as first-line antihypertensive medication is more effective than indapamide in target organ protection, the investigators would propose a large scale cardiovascular outcome trial to evaluate cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension and visceral obesity.

Conditions
Hypertension
Being tested
Spironolactone, Indapamide, Amlodipine
Keywords
spironolactone, Indapamide, Obesity, Hypertension, Target organ damage
Medical subject headings
Hypertension, Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SpironolactoneDrug

    After a 2-week run-in period on amlodipine, patients who still have SBP ≥ 140mmHg will take spironolactone 20mg once daily on top of amlodipine for 12 months. During the first two months after randomization, spironolactone can be titrated to 40mg if office SBP remains ≥ 140mmHg.

  • IndapamideDrug

    After a 2-week run-in period on amlodipine, patients who still have SBP ≥ 140mmHg will take extended-release indapamide 1.5mg once daily on top of amlodipine for 12 months. During the first two months after randomization, indapamide can be titrated to 3mg if office SBP remains ≥ 140mmHg.

  • AmlodipineDrug

    After a 2-week run-in period on amlodipine 5mg once daily, patients who still have SBP ≥ 140mmHg will be randomized to add spironolactone 20mg once daily or extended-release indapamide 1.5mg once daily to amlodipine for 12 months. During the first two months after randomization, amlodipine can be titrated to 10mg if office SBP remains ≥ 140mmHg.

Study groups in NCT03626506
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
spironolactoneExperimentalSubjects will take spironolactone 20~40mg once daily on top of amlodipine 5~10mg once daily.
Receives: Drug: Spironolactone; Drug: Amlodipine
indapamideActive comparatorSubjects will take indapamide 1.5~3.0mg once daily on top of amlodipine 5~10mg once daily.
Receives: Drug: Indapamide; Drug: Amlodipine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. left atrial volume index (LAVI)

    change in left atrial volume index (LAVI) from baseline to the end of study period of 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV)

    change in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) from baseline to the end of study period of 12 months

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2018
  2. Study start13 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completionAug 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
randomized, controlled, open-label trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
400 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03626506
Sponsor's protocol ID
BMUJI007
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
3 Aug 2018
Last updated
3 Dec 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Spironolactone, Indapamide and Amlodipine in people with Hypertension, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Guisong Wang, MD (86-13701070359, guisongwang2007@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

left atrial volume index (LAVI) (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in