AzTrials
AzTrials

Hyperactive DeliriumNCT03621228

MindfulGarden in Treatment of Hyperactive Delirium in a Hospital Setting

A study testing MindfulGarden in people with Hyperactive Delirium, run by Simon Fraser University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This pilot study is designed to address feasibility for a larger randomized control clinical study that will determine the efficacy of exposure to the MindfulGarden - an interactive digital technology - in reducing hyperactive delirium in hospitalized older adults. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hyperactive Delirium
What is being tested?
MindfulGarden
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2018to Apr 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patients aged 65 years or older admitted to the Emergency Department who have a diagnosis of hyperactive delirium as defined by the short CAM

Who cannot join

  • Patients with severe vision impairment or who are legally blind
  • Patients for whom a bed in a medical ward was not available within 12 hours of a diagnosis of hyperactive delirium (i.e. who remained in the Emergency Department more than 12 hours)

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Gloria Gutman, PhD contact

778.782.5063

gutman@sfu.ca

Fabio Feldman, PhD contact

6045877850

fabio.feldman@fraserhealth.ca

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Study of an Interactive Digital Technology (MindfulGarden) in Treatment of Hyperactive Delirium in a Hospital Setting

This pilot study is designed to address feasibility for a larger randomized control clinical study that will determine the efficacy of exposure to the MindfulGarden - an interactive digital technology - in reducing hyperactive delirium in hospitalized older adults.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of the study is to establish whether the key components necessary for conducting a full randomized control study in the future, such as recruitment, consent, randomization, and treatment processes are working well and all function together. As a secondary objective, the investigators will determine trends in patients exposed to MindfulGarden (MG), for example:

  1. At the first and second administration of the Confusion Assessment Method - short form (CAM) after admission to a medical ward are there more, the same or fewer patients in the intervention group than in the control group whose CAM scores change from positive to negative?
  2. During the first 24 hours after admission to a medical ward, did fewer, the same, or a greater number of patients in the intervention than in the control group experience significant events/alerts (e.g. aggressive/violent behaviours, falls, code white)?
  3. During the first 24 hours after admission to a medical ward, were fewer, the same, or a greater number of patients in the intervention than in the control group administered psychotropic drugs (e.g. haloperidol, risperidone, quetiapine, lorazepam)? were more, the same, or fewer administered sleeping aids (e.g. trazodone, melatonin)?
  4. During the first 24 hours after admission to a medical ward, were fewer, the same, or a greater number of patients in the intervention than in the control group physically restrained?
  5. Was mean length of stay from time of admission to a medical ward until discharge due to death, return to place of residence before admission or to a different place of residence longer, the same or shorter in the intervention than in the control group?
  6. Were there more, the same or fewer deaths or discharges to a higher level of care (e.g. to assisted living, to a complex care facility in patients who previously lived at home) in the intervention than the control group?

Additionally, to the extent that movement and vocalization are reflective of anxiety, agitation and/or aggression (i.e. responsive behaviours) the investigators also want to determine whether there is a correlation between changes in these as recorded by the MG and any of the indicators listed in 1-6 above.

Being tested
MindfulGarden
Keywords
Delirium, Hyperactive, Aggression, Anxiety, Digital therapy
Medical subject headings
Delirium, Spasm, Aggression, Anxiety Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MindfulGardenDevice

    MindfulGarden (MG) is an interactive digital technology that combines use of a smart television with sensors to intelligently generate content based on patient voice and gesture input, triggering a multi-layered visual 'garden' on-screen to arrest and de-escalate anxiety and aggression in treatment of hospitalized elderly diagnosed with hyperactive delirium.

Study groups in NCT03621228
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MindfulGardenExperimentalStandard care + exposure to an interactive digital device
Receives: Device: MindfulGarden
ControlNo interventionStandard care only

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recruitment Rates

    Number of participants approached and their rate of consent

    Measured: Number enrolled within 12 hours of admission to Emergency Department

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Estimate the potential effect size

    MG association with reducing delirium duration as measured CAM - short

    Measured: 24-hour period following transfer from Emergency Department

  2. Adverse Outcomes (number of patients with aggressive/violent behaviours, falls, code white)

    Assess from patients medical chart

    Measured: 24-hour period following transfer from Emergency Department

  3. Psychotropic Drug Consumption

    Assess from patient's medical chart

    Measured: 24-hour period following transfer from Emergency Department

  4. Application of Physical Restraints

    Assess from patient's medical chart

    Measured: 24-hour period following transfer from Emergency Department

  5. Length of Stay

    Assess from patient's medical chart

    Measured: Date of study enrolment through to discharge from hospital, or date of study enrolment up to 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Aug 2018
  2. Study startSep 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMar 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
24 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03621228
Sponsor's protocol ID
MindfulGarden-H-Pilot
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
27 Jul 2018
Last updated
13 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MindfulGarden in people with Hyperactive Delirium, run by Simon Fraser University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Gloria Gutman, PhD (778.782.5063, gutman@sfu.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recruitment Rates (time frame: Number enrolled within 12 hours of admission to Emergency Department). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in