Generalized Pustular PsoriasisPhase 2GPPNCT03619902
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in Adults With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
A Phase 2 study testing Imsidolimab in people with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, run by Vanda Pharmaceuticals at 13 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The main objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of imsidolimab in adults with active GPP. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- Imsidolimab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 8 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Jan 2019to 20 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of active GPP
- Japanese Dermatology Association (JDA) severity index total score of at least 6 and erythema with pustules accounting for at least 10% of body surface area or a moderate severity score on Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician's Global Assessment (GPPPGA)
- Must be candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy
Who cannot join
- Erythrodermic, guttate psoriasis, drug induced GPP
- Any other ongoing inflammatory disease that interfere with the Investigator's ability to evaluate the subject's response to therapy
- History of recurrent or chronic infection
- ongoing use of psoriasis prohibited medication
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 4 countries.
13 sites in 4 countries
United States5 sites
Site 100
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Site 102
Encino, California, 91436
Site 101
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250
Site 105
Largo, Florida, 33771
Site 104
Miami, Florida, 33316
Poland4 sites
Site 303
Lodz, 90-436
Site 302
Lodz
Site 304
Olsztyn, 10-229
Site 301
Rzeszów, 35-055
United Kingdom3 sites
Site 201
London
Site 203
Newcastle upon Tyne
Site 202
Salford
About this study
Official title: A Single Arm Multiple Dose Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of ANB019 in Subjects With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
The main objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of imsidolimab in adults with active GPP.
Read the detailed description
Single arm, multiple-dose study evaluating the use of imsidolimab for the treatment of GPP.
- Conditions
- Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
- Being tested
- Imsidolimab
- Keywords
- GPP
- Medical subject headings
- Psoriasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ImsidolimabBiological
Also called ANB019
Humanized monoclonal antibody
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Imsidolimab | Experimental | Participants received imsidolimab 750 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 followed by administration of 3 doses of subcutaneous (SC) imsidolimab 100 mg on Days 29, 57, and 85. Receives: Biological: Imsidolimab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale
Clinical response was defined as "Very much improved," "Much Improved," or "Minimally Improved" on the CGI scale according to the Modified Japanese Dermatological Association Severity Index (JDA-SI) total score.
The JDA-SI includes assessment of skin lesions (area of erythema with pustules, area of erythema total, and area of edema) and fever, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein and serum albumin levels. The total score ranges from 0 to 17 (severe).
CGI was assessed based on the JDA-SI according to the following:
- Very Much Improved: Reduction in JDA-SI total score by 3 or > points;
- Much improved: Reduction in JDA-SI total score by 1 or 2 points;
- Minimally improved: No change in JDA-SI total score and area of erythema with pustules reduced by <20% or clinically meaningful improvement in at least 1 other component of the modified JDA-SI.
Measured: Week 4 and Week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area of Erythema With Pustules at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Excluding palms and soles from 0% to 100%. The palmar surface of one hand (using the subject's hand and including the fingers) represents 1% of his or her total BSA.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Secondary outcomes (3)
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Japanese Dermatological Association - Severity Index (mJDA-SI) Total Skin Lesions Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
The area of erythema with pustules, area of total erythema and area of edema were assessed by the Investigator and scored from 0 to 3 on the following scale:
- 0: 0% body surface area (BSA) affected;
- 1: > 0%, < 10% BSA affected;
- 2: ≥ 10%, < 50% BSA affected;
- 3: ≥ 50% BSA affected.
The JDA-SI Total Skin Lesions Score is the sum of the area of erythema with pustules score, area of total erythema score and area of edema score and ranges between 0 and 9 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician's Global Assessment (GPPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
The GPPPGA scale was used to assess the impact and severity of GPP on the following scale:
- 0: Clear (normal skin or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, no visible pustules, no scaling or crusting).
- 1: Almost clear (faint, diffuse pink or slight red erythema, low density occasional small discrete pustules (noncoalescent), superficial focal scaling or crusting restricted to periphery of lesions).
- 2: Mild (light red erythema, moderate density grouped discrete small pustules (noncoalescent), predominantly fine scaling or crusting).
- 3: Moderate (bright red erythema, high density pustules with some coalescence, moderate scaling or crusting covering most or all lesions).
- 4: Severe (deep fiery red erythema, very high density pustules with pustular lakes, severe scaling or crusting covering most or all lesions).
Measured: Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that asks participants to evaluate the degree that their skin problem has affected their quality of life in the last week in the following 6 aspects: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school activities, personal relationships and treatment related feelings. Participants answer the 10 questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the 10 questions, resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0 with higher scores indicating more impaired quality of life. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Aug 2018
- Study start30 Jan 2019
- Primary completion20 Jan 2021
- Study completion20 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Generalized Pustular PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Vanda PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vanda Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03619902
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ANB019-002
- Other IDs
- 2017-004021-33, 2017
- Acronym
- GPP
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 19 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single Arm Multiple Dose Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of ANB019 in Subjects With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03619902
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GPP / ANB019-002
- Conditions
- Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
- Keywords
- GPP
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vanda PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 29 Mar 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of imsidolimab in adults with active GPP.
Detailed description
Single arm, multiple-dose study evaluating the use of imsidolimab for the treatment of GPP.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Imsidolimab | Experimental | Biological: ImsidolimabParticipants received imsidolimab 750 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 followed by administration of 3 doses of subcutaneous (SC) imsidolimab 100 mg on Days 29, 57, and 85. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of active GPP
- Japanese Dermatology Association (JDA) severity index total score of at least 6 and erythema with pustules accounting for at least 10% of body surface area or a moderate severity score on Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician's Global Assessment (GPPPGA)
- Must be candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Erythrodermic, guttate psoriasis, drug induced GPP
- Any other ongoing inflammatory disease that interfere with the Investigator's ability to evaluate the subject's response to therapy
- History of recurrent or chronic infection
- ongoing use of psoriasis prohibited medication
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ImsidolimabAlso: ANB019Humanized monoclonal antibody | Biological | Imsidolimab |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale
Time frame: Week 4 and Week 16
Clinical response was defined as "Very much improved," "Much Improved," or "Minimally Improved" on the CGI scale according to the Modified Japanese Dermatological Association Severity Index (JDA-SI) total score. The JDA-SI includes assessment of skin lesions (area of erythema with pustules, area of erythema total, and area of edema) and fever, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein and serum albumin levels. The total score ranges from 0 to 17 (severe). CGI was assessed based on the JDA-SI according to the following: * Very Much Improved: Reduction in JDA-SI total score by 3 or > points; * Much improved: Reduction in JDA-SI total score by 1 or 2 points; * Minimally improved: No change in JDA-SI total score and area of erythema with pustules reduced by <20% or clinically meaningful improvement in at least 1 other component of the modified JDA-SI.
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area of Erythema With Pustules at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Excluding palms and soles from 0% to 100%. The palmar surface of one hand (using the subject's hand and including the fingers) represents 1% of his or her total BSA.
3 secondary outcomes
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Japanese Dermatological Association - Severity Index (mJDA-SI) Total Skin Lesions Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician's Global Assessment (GPPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Time frame: Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of SHR-1139 Injection in Adult Patients With Palmoplantar Pustulosis
Palmoplantar Pustulosis of Adults
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Samples From Subjects With Various Skin Conditions and Healthy Volunteers
Acne, Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 2
A 16-week Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Delgocitinib Cream 20 mg/g in Adult Participants With Mild to Severe Palmoplantar Pustulosis
Palmoplantar Pustulosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Study Comparing the Risk of Serious Infections and Malignancies With Deucravacitinib or Biologics in Japanese Patients With Psoriasis
Psoriasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis or Erythrodermic Psoriasis
Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, Erythrodermic Psoriasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
13 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Imsidolimab in people with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, run by Vanda Pharmaceuticals at 13 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in United States, Poland, United Kingdom, South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Mar 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale (time frame: Week 4 and Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2025.