Analgesics, Antipyretics and Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic UseNCT03605966
Developing a Method to Objectively Measure Opioid Analgesia
An observational study of Analgesics, Antipyretics and Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use, run by Julia Finkel at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Inappropriate prescribing is the fundamental upstream driver of the opioid epidemic. Objective measures to determine the appropriateness of an opioid intervention, provide monitoring of the therapy for adequacy of dose and detection of tolerance or hyperalgesia would eliminate the subjective nature of opioid mediated… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Analgesics, Antipyretics and Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2018to 1 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: Participants who are receiving opioid as part of their standard care will be recruited from the Inpatient Pain at Children's National Medical Center (CNMC).
Who may be able to join
- The subject is 7 to 21 years of age
- The subject is receiving an opioid via bolus or a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) apparatus as part of treatment or fentanyl infusion in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) (generally postoperative patients).
- The subject is willing and able to provide written informed assent/parental consent to study participation
Who cannot join
- Eye pathology precluding pupillometry
- For patients in the PICU, patients who are hemodynamically unstable
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Children's National Health System
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
About this study
Official title: Developing a Method to Objectively Measure Opioid Analgesia: A Pilot Study
Inappropriate prescribing is the fundamental upstream driver of the opioid epidemic. Objective measures to determine the appropriateness of an opioid intervention, provide monitoring of the therapy for adequacy of dose and detection of tolerance or hyperalgesia would eliminate the subjective nature of opioid mediated pain management and obviate iatrogenic facilitation of opioid abuse. The present study is designed to objectively determine whether our device can pain type and determine analgesic efficacy thereby optimizing treatment selection and opioid management.
Read the detailed description
It is generally recognized that pain assessment and management in newborns and children is an unmet need. The Center for Disease Control found that in 2012, healthcare providers wrote 259 million prescriptions for opioid painkillers contributing to an epidemic of over prescription. At the same time, medical professionals still see large amounts of pain left untreated, particularly in pediatric populations. Children are often given minimal or no analgesia for procedures that are treated much more aggressively in adults. This issue stems from the lack of an effective method of assessing and monitoring patient analgesia. Recently attempts have been made to objectively quantify pain but as of now, no effective standard exists. This pilot study utilizes pupillary reflexes to characterize opioid analgesia in pediatrics with the purpose of synthesizing the data into algorithms that detect specific conditions and provide decision support.
Pupillometry is a useful, non-invasive clinical and research tool that can provide valuable insights into the autonomic nervous system. Pupillary tests provide a convenient and simple method for evaluation of autonomic function4. In normal pupillary responsiveness, pupils should be equal in size, approximately 3-4mm in size under average light conditions, and reactive to light at >1mm of movement. The sympathetic nervous system is activated during periods of pain and stress and creates relaxation of the ciliary muscles resulting in pupillary dilation, or mydriasis. In accommodation, the parasympathetic axons that innervate the iris muscle produce constriction, or miosis. This reflex is known as the pupillary reflex dilation (PRD) and has been shown in previous studies to occur in both awake and anesthetized participants following a noxious stimulus5. This protocol will utilize these known reactions to track the response to specific neurostimulation in participants receiving opioids to determine the effect and effectiveness of the treatment.
All mu opioid agonists cause miosis (constriction of the pupil) thus reducing the constriction amplitude and constriction velocity of the pupillary light reflex (PLR). This is the one opioid side effect to which tolerance does not occur. However, the pharmacologic impact is not consistent and will vary with different drugs in the class and duration of exposure. For example, morphine and Dilaudid (hydromorphone) each produce a neuro-excitatory metabolite that causes mydriasis or dilation of the pupil and also antagonizes the parent drug, producing the clinical appearance of tolerance, requiring more drug to achieve the same effect. With other drugs of this class such as fentanyl, which is commonly administered in ICUs, mydriasis may occur due to a phenomenon called opioid induced hyperalgesia (OIH) where there is an increased sensitivity to pain, often leading to an increased dose of drug. Increasing the dosing in this situation can potentially exacerbate the issue, having a method to monitor for OIH would provide decision support to physicians and allow them to recognize and properly reconcile this issue. Evaluation of PRD in response to a 5 Hz neuro-stimulus can differentiate between these drug-related issues and disease progression. This works because opioid receptors populate the C fibers, which are stimulated with a 5 Hz frequency6,7, allowing the investigators to determine dose response relationships as well as the optimized analgesic dose and precisely determine dosing with opioid rotation. This occurs empirically during standard of care based on a trial and error approach that risks under or overdosing patients and having tolerance, dependence and OIH occur.
This pilot study is part of an ongoing effort to develop a method to objectively assess pain and its response to specific interventions. It specifically aims to develop profiles of the impact of a variety of opioids under a variety of conditions in a diverse patient population. It will allow researchers to understand better the specific impact of drugs in this class on the PLR and PRD. Data collected herein will help will evaluate the feasibility of using this approach to detect and monitor opioid analgesia and open new avenues for future research in this area.
- Pain assessment and baseline testing
- Standardized care where patient receives opioid dose per clinical team.
- Testing pupillary reflexes at regular intervals and repeated pain assessments
- Conditions
- Analgesics, Antipyretics and Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use
- Keywords
- analgesia, pain, nociception, pupillometry, analgesic, opioid
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia, Pain
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in Pupillary Dilation Reflex AUC
The primary measurable outcomes for this study are the changes in the PRD area under the curve (AUC) that occur as a response to an opioid exposure. The differences are calculated by comparing the parameters from before the opioid dose to various time points after the opioid dose.
Measured: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes
Secondary outcomes (5)
Pain Assessment by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Collection of the standard Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with scores of of 1-10. A score of 10 signifies maximal pain and a score of 1 signifies no pain.
Measured: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes
Pupillary Dilation Reflex Amplitude
A secondary measurable outcome for this study are the changes in the PRD amplitude that occur as a response to an opioid exposure. The differences are calculated by comparing the parameters from before the opioid dose to various time points after the opioid dose.
Measured: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes
Changes in Pupillary Light Reflex Amplitude
A secondary measurable outcome for this study are the changes in the PLR amplitude that occur as a response to an opioid exposure. The differences are calculated by comparing the parameters from before the opioid dose to various time points after the opioid dose.
Measured: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes
Changes in Pupillary Light Reflex Latency
A secondary measurable outcome for this study are the changes in the PLR latency that occur as a response to an opioid exposure. The differences are calculated by comparing the parameters from before the opioid dose to various time points after the opioid dose.
Measured: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes
Changes in Pupillary Light Reflex Constriction Velocity
A secondary measurable outcome for this study are the changes in the PLR constriction velocity that occur as a response to an opioid exposure. The differences are calculated by comparing the parameters from before the opioid dose to various time points after the opioid dose.
Measured: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2018
- Study start1 Jul 2018
- Primary completion1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Analgesics, Antipyretics and Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic UseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Julia Finkel
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Julia Finkel, Children's National Research Institute
- Investigators
- Julia C Finkel, MD, Principal investigator, Children's National Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03605966
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 6825
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Developing a Method to Objectively Measure Opioid Analgesia: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03605966
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 6825
- Conditions
- Analgesics, Antipyretics and Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use
- Keywords
- analgesia, pain, nociception, pupillometry, analgesic, opioid
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Julia FinkelUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Inappropriate prescribing is the fundamental upstream driver of the opioid epidemic. Objective measures to determine the appropriateness of an opioid intervention, provide monitoring of the therapy for adequacy of dose and detection of tolerance or hyperalgesia would eliminate the subjective nature of opioid mediated pain management and obviate iatrogenic facilitation of opioid abuse. The present study is designed to objectively determine whether our device can pain type and determine analgesic efficacy thereby optimizing treatment selection and opioid management.
Detailed description
It is generally recognized that pain assessment and management in newborns and children is an unmet need. The Center for Disease Control found that in 2012, healthcare providers wrote 259 million prescriptions for opioid painkillers contributing to an epidemic of over prescription. At the same time, medical professionals still see large amounts of pain left untreated, particularly in pediatric populations. Children are often given minimal or no analgesia for procedures that are treated much more aggressively in adults. This issue stems from the lack of an effective method of assessing and monitoring patient analgesia. Recently attempts have been made to objectively quantify pain but as of now, no effective standard exists. This pilot study utilizes pupillary reflexes to characterize opioid analgesia in pediatrics with the purpose of synthesizing the data into algorithms that detect specific conditions and provide decision support.
Pupillometry is a useful, non-invasive clinical and research tool that can provide valuable insights into the autonomic nervous system. Pupillary tests provide a convenient and simple method for evaluation of autonomic function4. In normal pupillary responsiveness, pupils should be equal in size, approximately 3-4mm in size under average light conditions, and reactive to light at >1mm of movement. The sympathetic nervous system is activated during periods of pain and stress and creates relaxation of the ciliary muscles resulting in pupillary dilation, or mydriasis. In accommodation, the parasympathetic axons that innervate the iris muscle produce constriction, or miosis. This reflex is known as the pupillary reflex dilation (PRD) and has been shown in previous studies to occur in both awake and anesthetized participants following a noxious stimulus5. This protocol will utilize these known reactions to track the response to specific neurostimulation in participants receiving opioids to determine the effect and effectiveness of the treatment.
All mu opioid agonists cause miosis (constriction of the pupil) thus reducing the constriction amplitude and constriction velocity of the pupillary light reflex (PLR). This is the one opioid side effect to which tolerance does not occur. However, the pharmacologic impact is not consistent and will vary with different drugs in the class and duration of exposure. For example, morphine and Dilaudid (hydromorphone) each produce a neuro-excitatory metabolite that causes mydriasis or dilation of the pupil and also antagonizes the parent drug, producing the clinical appearance of tolerance, requiring more drug to achieve the same effect. With other drugs of this class such as fentanyl, which is commonly administered in ICUs, mydriasis may occur due to a phenomenon called opioid induced hyperalgesia (OIH) where there is an increased sensitivity to pain, often leading to an increased dose of drug. Increasing the dosing in this situation can potentially exacerbate the issue, having a method to monitor for OIH would provide decision support to physicians and allow them to recognize and properly reconcile this issue. Evaluation of PRD in response to a 5 Hz neuro-stimulus can differentiate between these drug-related issues and disease progression. This works because opioid receptors populate the C fibers, which are stimulated with a 5 Hz frequency6,7, allowing the investigators to determine dose response relationships as well as the optimized analgesic dose and precisely determine dosing with opioid rotation. This occurs empirically during standard of care based on a trial and error approach that risks under or overdosing patients and having tolerance, dependence and OIH occur.
This pilot study is part of an ongoing effort to develop a method to objectively assess pain and its response to specific interventions. It specifically aims to develop profiles of the impact of a variety of opioids under a variety of conditions in a diverse patient population. It will allow researchers to understand better the specific impact of drugs in this class on the PLR and PRD. Data collected herein will help will evaluate the feasibility of using this approach to detect and monitor opioid analgesia and open new avenues for future research in this area.
- Pain assessment and baseline testing
- Standardized care where patient receives opioid dose per clinical team.
- Testing pupillary reflexes at regular intervals and repeated pain assessments
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Participants who are receiving opioid as part of their standard care will be recruited from the Inpatient Pain at Children's National Medical Center (CNMC).
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- The subject is 7 to 21 years of age
- The subject is receiving an opioid via bolus or a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) apparatus as part of treatment or fentanyl infusion in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) (generally postoperative patients).
- The subject is willing and able to provide written informed assent/parental consent to study participation
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Eye pathology precluding pupillometry
- For patients in the PICU, patients who are hemodynamically unstable
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Changes in Pupillary Dilation Reflex AUC
Time frame: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes
The primary measurable outcomes for this study are the changes in the PRD area under the curve (AUC) that occur as a response to an opioid exposure. The differences are calculated by comparing the parameters from before the opioid dose to various time points after the opioid dose.
5 secondary outcomes
Pain Assessment by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes
Pupillary Dilation Reflex Amplitude
Time frame: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes
Changes in Pupillary Light Reflex Amplitude
Time frame: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes
Changes in Pupillary Light Reflex Latency
Time frame: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes
Changes in Pupillary Light Reflex Constriction Velocity
Time frame: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2026.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Julia C Finkel, MD principal investigator
Children's National Research Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Analgesics, Antipyretics and Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use, run by Julia Finkel at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in Pupillary Dilation Reflex AUC (time frame: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2026.