Giant Cell ArteritisPhase 3NCT03600805
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab in Patients With GCA
A Phase 3 study testing Sarilumab SAR153191 and Prednisone in people with Giant Cell Arteritis, run by Sanofi at 61 sites in 21 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of sarilumab in participants with giant cell arteritis (GCA) as assessed by the proportion of participants with sustained remission for sarilumab compared to placebo, in combination with a corticosteroid (CS) tapering course. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Giant Cell Arteritis
- What is being tested?
- Sarilumab SAR153191 and Prednisone
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 83 participants
- Where
- 61 sitesin 21 countries
- Study dates
- 20 Nov 2018to 24 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of GCA according to European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria.
- New onset active disease or refractory active disease.
- At least one of the symptoms of GCA within 6 weeks of baseline.
- Either erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than or equal to (>=) 30 millimeter per hour or C-reactive protein >=10 mg per liter within 6 weeks of baseline.
- Received or were able to receive prednisone 20-60 mg/day for the treatment of active GCA.
Who cannot join
- Organ transplantation recipient (except corneas, unless it is within 3 months prior to baseline visit).
- Major ischemic event, unrelated to GCA, within 12 weeks of screening.
- Any prior use of the following therapies, for the treatment of GCA:
- Janus kinase inhibitor (e.g., tofacitinib) within 4 weeks of baseline.
- Cell-depletion agents (e.g., anti CD20) without evidence of recovery of B cells to baseline level.
- Abatacept within 8 weeks of baseline.
Show all 27Show fewer
- Anakinra within 1 week of baseline.
- Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors within 2-8 weeks (etanercept within 2 weeks; infliximab, certolizumab, golimumab, or adalimumab within 8 weeks), or less than at least 5 half-lives had elapsed prior to baseline, whichever was longer.
- Therapeutic failure, including inadequate response or intolerance, or contraindication, to biological Interleukin 6 (IL-6) IL-6/(R) antagonist (prior experience with IL-6/(R) antagonist that was terminated for reasons unrelated to therapeutic failure at least 3 months before baseline was not exclusionary).
- Use of any alkylating agents including cyclophosphamide within 6 months of baseline.
- Use of immunosuppressant, such as hydroxychloroquine, cyclosporine, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or leflunomide within 4 weeks of baseline. (Use of methotrexate (MTX) not exceeding 25 mg per week and had been stable for at least 3 months prior to baseline was not exclusionary).
- Concurrent use of systemic CS for conditions other than GCA.
- Use of intervascular CS at a dose equivalent to 100 mg of methylprednisolone or higher within 8 weeks of baseline for GCA therapy.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman.
- Participants with active or untreated latent tuberculosis.
- Participants with history of invasive opportunistic infections.
- Participants with fever associated with infection or chronic, persistent or recurring infections requiring active treatment.
- Participants with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
- Participants with non-healed or healing skin ulcers.
- Participants who received any live, attenuated vaccine within 3 months of baseline.
- Participants who are positive for hepatitis B, hepatitis C and/or HIV.
- Participants with a history of active or recurrent herpes zoster.
- Participants with a history of or prior articular or prosthetic joint infection.
- Prior or current history of malignancy.
- Participants who have had surgery within 4 weeks of screening or planned surgery during study.
- Participants with a history of inflammatory bowel disease or severe diverticulitis or previous gastrointestinal perforation..
- The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
61 sites in 21 countries.
61 sites in 21 countries
United States6 sites
Investigational Site Number 8400002
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
Investigational Site Number 8400011
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Investigational Site Number 8400017
Gainesville, Florida, 32608
Investigational Site Number 8400014
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Investigational Site Number 8400019
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Investigational Site Number 8400018
Portland, Oregon, 97239
France6 sites
Investigational Site Number 2500005
Brest, 29609
Investigational Site Number 2500002
Montivilliers, 76290
Investigational Site Number 2500003
Montpellier, 34295
Investigational Site Number 2500007
Mulhouse, 68100
Investigational Site Number 2500001
Paris, 75014
Investigational Site Number 2500006
Pessac, 33604
Canada5 sites
Investigational Site Number 1240007
Hamilton, L8N 4A6
Investigational Site Number 1240010
Montreal, H4A 3T2
Investigational Site Number 1240001
Rimouski, G5L 5T1
Investigational Site Number 1240005
Sherbrooke, J1G 2E8
Investigational Site Number 1240003
Trois-Rivières, G8Z 1Y2
Germany5 sites
Investigational Site Number 2760001
Berlin, 13125
Investigational Site Number 2760002
Dresden, 01307
Investigational Site Number 2760003
Kirchheim unter Teck, 73230
Investigational Site Number 2760004
München, 80336
Investigational Site Number 2760007
Tübingen, 72076
Spain5 sites
Investigational Site Number 7240011
A Coruña, 15006
Investigational Site Number 7240010
Bilbao, 48013
Investigational Site Number 7240014
Madrid, 28046
Investigational Site Number 7240016
Sabadell, 08208
Investigational Site Number 7240015
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38320
United Kingdom5 sites
Investigational Site Number 8260006
Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN
Investigational Site Number 8260004
Gateshead, NE9 6SX
Investigational Site Number 8260003
Leeds, LS7 4SA
Investigational Site Number 8260005
Manchester, M13 9WL
Investigational Site Number 8260011
Portsmouth, PO6 3LY
Netherlands4 sites
Investigational Site Number 5280005
Leeuwarden, 8934 AD
Investigational Site Number 5280009
Sittard-Geleen, 6162 BG
Investigational Site Number 5280007
The Hague, 2545 CH
Investigational Site Number 5280001
Venlo, 5912 BL
Australia3 sites
Investigational Site Number 0360003
Camberwell, 3124
Investigational Site Number 0360006
Clayton, 3168
Investigational Site Number 0360001
Kogarah, 2217
Portugal3 sites
Investigational Site Number 6200001
Almada, 2801-951
Investigational Site Number 6200005
Aveiro, 3810-501
Investigational Site Number 6200004
Ponte de Lima, 4990-041
Russia3 sites
Investigational Site Number 6430005
Kemerovo, 650000
Investigational Site Number 6430002
Moscow, 115404
Investigational Site Number 6430003
Moscow, 123182
Argentina2 sites
Investigational Site Number 0320001
Buenos Aires, C1015ABO
Investigational Site Number 0320002
Caba, C1181ACH
Denmark2 sites
Investigational Site Number 2080002
Aarhus C, 8000
Investigational Site Number 2080003
Svendborg, 5700
Israel2 sites
Investigational Site Number 3760006
Ashkelon, 78278
Investigational Site Number 3760004
Haifa, 34362
Italy2 sites
Investigational Site Number 3800001
Milan, 20132
Investigational Site Number 3800005
Rozzano, 20089
Sweden2 sites
Investigational Site Number 7520003
Örebro, 701 85
Investigational Site Number 7520001
Uppsala, 751 85
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of sarilumab in participants with giant cell arteritis (GCA) as assessed by the proportion of participants with sustained remission for sarilumab compared to placebo, in combination with a corticosteroid (CS) tapering course.
Read more
Secondary Objective:
- To demonstrate the efficacy of sarilumab in participants with GCA compared to placebo, in combination with CS taper with regards to:
- Clinical responses (such as responses based on disease remission rates, time to first disease flare) over time.
- Cumulative CS (including prednisone) exposure.
- To assess the safety (including immunogenicity) and tolerability of sarilumab in participants with GCA.
- To measure sarilumab serum concentrations in participants with GCA.
- To assess the effect of sarilumab on sparing glucocorticoid toxicity as measured by glucocorticoid toxicity index (GTI).
Read the detailed description
Study duration per participant was approximately 82 weeks, including an up to 6-week screening period, 52-week treatment period, and 24-week follow-up period.
- Conditions
- Giant Cell Arteritis
- Being tested
- Sarilumab SAR153191, Sarilumab matching placebo, Prednisone, Prednisone matching placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Giant Cell Arteritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sarilumab SAR153191Drug
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection Route of administration: subcutaneous
Sarilumab matching placeboDrug
Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection Route of administration: subcutaneous
PrednisoneDrug
Pharmaceutical form: tablets or capsules Route of administration: oral administration
Prednisone matching placeboDrug
Pharmaceutical form: capsules Route of administration: oral administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo+52 Week Taper | Experimental | Participants received sarilumab-matching placebo as subcutaneous (SC) injection every 2 weeks (q2w) up to 52 weeks along with the combination of prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone/prednisone-matching placebo tapering oral daily doses for 52 weeks. Receives: Drug: Sarilumab matching placebo; Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Prednisone matching placebo |
| Placebo+26 Week Taper | Experimental | Participants received sarilumab-matching placebo as SC injection q2w up to 52 weeks along with the combination of prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone tapering oral daily doses during the first 26 weeks and prednisone-matching placebo from Week 26 up to Week 52. Receives: Drug: Sarilumab matching placebo; Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Prednisone matching placebo |
| Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week Taper | Placebo comparator | Participants received sarilumab 150 milligrams (mg) as SC injection q2w up to 52 weeks along with prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone tapering oral daily doses during the first 26 weeks and prednisone-matching placebo from Week 26 up to Week 52. Receives: Drug: Sarilumab SAR153191; Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Prednisone matching placebo |
| Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week Taper | Placebo comparator | Participants received sarilumab 200 mg as SC injection q2w up to 52 weeks along with prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone tapering oral daily doses during the first 26 weeks and prednisone-matching placebo from Week 26 up to Week 52. Receives: Drug: Sarilumab SAR153191; Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Prednisone matching placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 52
Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of giant cell arteries (GCA), and normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP) (<10 mg/L). Sustained remission was defined as meeting all of the following parameters: achievement of disease remission not later than Week 12, absence of disease flare (defined as recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in corticosteroid [CS] dose due to GCA or elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA) from Week 12 through Week 52, normalization of CRP (to <10 mg/L, with absence of successive elevations to >=10 mg/L) from Week 12 through Week 52, and successful adherence to prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 52.
Measured: At Week 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 24
Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP <10 mg/L. Sustained remission was defined as meeting all of the following parameters: achievement of disease remission not later than Week 12, absence of disease flare (defined as recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA) from Week 12 through Week 24, normalization of CRP (to <10 mg/L, with an absence of successive elevations to >=10 mg/L) from Week 12 through Week 24, and successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 24.
Measured: At Week 24
Secondary outcomes (20)
Number of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Week 52 Analysis Set
Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP (< 10 mg/L). The status of normalization of CRP (<10 mg/L) was determined based on the last two non-missing post-baseline CRP values measured up to Week 12. If at least one of the value was <10 mg/L, then it was considered as normalization of CRP. Participants who took rescue corticosteroid (CS) due to active GCA prior to Week 12 or who permanently withdrew from the study treatment prior to Week 12 were considered as not achieved disease remission by Week 12.
Measured: Up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population
Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP (< 10 mg/L). The status of normalization of CRP (<10 mg/L) was determined based on the last two non-missing post-baseline CRP values measured up to Week 12. If at least one of the value was <10 mg/L, then it was considered as normalization of CRP. Participants who took rescue CS due to active GCA prior to Week 12 or who permanently withdrew from the study treatment prior to Week 12 were considered as not achieved disease remission by Week 12.
Measured: Up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set
Disease flare was defined as either recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA. Number of participants with absence of disease flare from Week 12 through Week 52 were reported.
Measured: From Week 12 through Week 52
Number of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population
Disease flare was defined as either recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA. Number of participants with absence of disease flare from Week 12 through Week 24 were reported.
Measured: From Week 12 through Week 24
Number of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set
Normalization of CRP was defined as CRP levels <10 mg/L. If there were two or more consecutive visits with CRP >=10 mg/L, then it was categorized as no normalization of CRP.
Measured: From Week 12 through Week 52
Number of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population
Normalization of CRP was defined as CRP levels <10 mg/L. If there were two or more consecutive visits with CRP >=10 mg/L, then it was categorized as no normalization of CRP.
Measured: From Week 12 through Week 24
Number of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set
Successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 52 was defined as participants who did not take rescue therapy from Week 12 through Week 52 and might include the use of any excess prednisone (beyond the per protocol CS tapering regimen) with a cumulative dose of <=100 mg (or equivalent), such as those employed to manage adverse event (AE) not related to GCA.
Measured: From Week 12 through Week 52
Number of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population
Successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 24 was defined as participants who did not take rescue therapy from Week 12 through Week 24 and might include the use of any excess prednisone (beyond the per protocol CS tapering regimen) with a cumulative dose of <=100 mg (or equivalent), such as those employed to manage AE not related to GCA.
Measured: From Week 12 through Week 24
Total Cumulative Corticosteroid (Including Prednisone) Dose
Cumulative dose of CS used for GCA disease was defined as the dose taken up to the end of treatment, including expected prednisone in tapering regimen per protocol, CS used in rescue therapy and the use of commercial prednisone (an excess of <=100 mg of prednisone during the study treatment period employed to manage AE not related to GCA). The total cumulative CS dose was based on the total number of days with complete or partial intake, no imputation was done on missed tablets.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Time to First Giant Cell Arteritis Disease Flare
Time to first GCA flare was defined as the duration (in days) from randomization to first GCA flare after clinical remission (defined as resolution of signs and symptoms and normalization of CRP [<10 mg/L]) and up to 52 weeks. Disease flare was defined as either the recurrence of signs or symptoms attributable to active plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Participants who never achieved remission were censored at randomization day; and those who achieved clinical remission and never flared were censored at the end of treatment assessment date up to Week 52.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Composite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT Population
GTI assessed glucocorticoid (GC) related morbidity and GC-sparing ability of other therapies; composed of 2 components: Composite GTI and Specific List. Composite GTI contained 9 domains and Specific List contained of 23 items (11 domains), used as complementary tool to C-GTI. Composite GTI score was the sum of 9 domain-specific scores at each visit and Cumulative GTI score was the sum of composite GTI scores across each visit. Two cumulative GTI scores: CWS and AIS at Week 24 are reported in this outcome measure (OM). CWS assessed cumulative GC toxicity regardless of whether toxicity had lasting effects or was transient. AIS assessed new therapy effectiveness in decreasing any Baseline GC toxicity over time. For CWS, composite score ranged from 0 to 439 and for AIS, composite score ranged from -346 to 439. For both CWS and AIS, the minimum score implies the least toxicity and the maximum score implies the most toxicity.
Measured: At Week 24
Composite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52
GTI assessed glucocorticoid (GC) related morbidity and GC-sparing ability of other therapies; composed of 2 components: Composite GTI and Specific List. Composite GTI contained 9 domains and Specific List contained of 23 items (11 domains), used as complementary tool to C-GTI. Composite GTI score was the sum of 9 domain-specific scores at each visit and Cumulative GTI score was the sum of composite GTI scores across each visit. Two cumulative GTI scores: CWS and AIS at Week 52 are reported in this OM. CWS assessed cumulative GC toxicity regardless of whether toxicity had lasting effects or was transient. AIS assessed new therapy effectiveness in decreasing any Baseline GC toxicity over time. For CWS, composite score ranged from 0 to 439 and for AIS, composite score ranged from -346 to 439. For both CWS and AIS, the minimum score implies the least toxicity and the maximum score implies the most toxicity.
Measured: At Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious AEs (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs were the AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) to the last dose of the SC IMP +60 days).
Measured: From first dose (i.e., Day 1) up to 60 days after last dose (i.e., up to Week 60)
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Sarilumab
Ctrough was pre dose concentration of drug. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for placebo arms (Placebo+52 Week Taper and Placebo+26 Week Taper) as pre-specified in the protocol.
Measured: Pre-dose on Week 0 (Baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 12, 16, 24 and 52
Pharmacokinetics: Serum Drug Concentration of Sarilumab Post-dose at Week 24
Serum concentrations of functional sarilumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.
Measured: post-dose at Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Response
ADA response categories: 1) Treatment-boosted ADA positive participant: Participant with a positive ADA assay response at Baseline and with at least a 4-fold increase in titer compared to Baseline during TEAE period. 2) Treatment-emergent ADA positive participant: Participant with non-positive assay (meaning negative or missing) response at Baseline but with a positive assay response during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of the IMP to the last dose of the SC IMP + 60 days). Titer values were categorized as low (titer <1,000); moderate (1,000<= titer <=10,000) and high (titer >10,000).
Measured: From Day 1 (Baseline) up to last dose date of study drug + 60 days (i.e., up to Week 60)
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52
ESR is a laboratory test to provide non-specific measure of inflammation in the body. The test assessed the rate at which red blood cells fell in a test tube and was measured in millimeters per hour.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52
CRP is a protein made by the liver. CRP levels increase in blood when inflammation occurs in the body.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52
Interleukin-6 is a protein produced in the body. Levels of IL-6 often increase when there is inflammation (redness, warmth, swelling, and pain as a result of infection, irritation, or injury), either acute or chronic.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52
Interleukin-6 is a protein produced in the body. Levels of IL-6 often increase when there is inflammation (redness, warmth, swelling, and pain as a result of infection, irritation, or injury), either acute or chronic. sIL-6R is one of the receptors that bind IL-6.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2018
- Study start20 Nov 2018
- Primary completion24 Nov 2020
- Study completion24 Nov 2020
Why it stopped: Protracted recruitment timeline exacerbated by COVID-19 pandemic
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Giant Cell ArteritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 83 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03600805
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EFC15068
- Other IDs
- 2017-002988-18, U1111-1200-2184, 2017
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 28 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Publications
Schmidt WA, Dasgupta B, Sloane J, Giannelou A, Xu Y, Unizony SH, Mackie SL, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Spiera R, Warrington KJ, Villiger PM, Nivens MC, Akinlade B, Lin Y, Buttgereit F, Stone JH. A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in patients with giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2023 Oct 16;25(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03177-6.
PubMed 37840134
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03600805
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EFC15068
- Conditions
- Giant Cell Arteritis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Protracted recruitment timeline exacerbated by COVID-19 pandemic
- Enrolment
- 83 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Study start
- 20 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 14 Jan 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of sarilumab in participants with giant cell arteritis (GCA) as assessed by the proportion of participants with sustained remission for sarilumab compared to placebo, in combination with a corticosteroid (CS) tapering course.
Secondary Objective:
- To demonstrate the efficacy of sarilumab in participants with GCA compared to placebo, in combination with CS taper with regards to:
- Clinical responses (such as responses based on disease remission rates, time to first disease flare) over time.
- Cumulative CS (including prednisone) exposure.
- To assess the safety (including immunogenicity) and tolerability of sarilumab in participants with GCA.
- To measure sarilumab serum concentrations in participants with GCA.
- To assess the effect of sarilumab on sparing glucocorticoid toxicity as measured by glucocorticoid toxicity index (GTI).
Detailed description
Study duration per participant was approximately 82 weeks, including an up to 6-week screening period, 52-week treatment period, and 24-week follow-up period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo+52 Week Taper | Experimental | Drug: Sarilumab matching placebo, Drug: Prednisone, Drug: Prednisone matching placeboParticipants received sarilumab-matching placebo as subcutaneous (SC) injection every 2 weeks (q2w) up to 52 weeks along with the combination of prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone/prednisone-matching placebo tapering oral daily doses for 52 weeks. |
| Placebo+26 Week Taper | Experimental | Drug: Sarilumab matching placebo, Drug: Prednisone, Drug: Prednisone matching placeboParticipants received sarilumab-matching placebo as SC injection q2w up to 52 weeks along with the combination of prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone tapering oral daily doses during the first 26 weeks and prednisone-matching placebo from Week 26 up to Week 52. |
| Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week Taper | Placebo comparator | Drug: Sarilumab SAR153191, Drug: Prednisone, Drug: Prednisone matching placeboParticipants received sarilumab 150 milligrams (mg) as SC injection q2w up to 52 weeks along with prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone tapering oral daily doses during the first 26 weeks and prednisone-matching placebo from Week 26 up to Week 52. |
| Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week Taper | Placebo comparator | Drug: Sarilumab SAR153191, Drug: Prednisone, Drug: Prednisone matching placeboParticipants received sarilumab 200 mg as SC injection q2w up to 52 weeks along with prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone tapering oral daily doses during the first 26 weeks and prednisone-matching placebo from Week 26 up to Week 52. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of GCA according to European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria.
- New onset active disease or refractory active disease.
- At least one of the symptoms of GCA within 6 weeks of baseline.
- Either erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than or equal to (>=) 30 millimeter per hour or C-reactive protein >=10 mg per liter within 6 weeks of baseline.
- Received or were able to receive prednisone 20-60 mg/day for the treatment of active GCA.
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- Organ transplantation recipient (except corneas, unless it is within 3 months prior to baseline visit).
- Major ischemic event, unrelated to GCA, within 12 weeks of screening.
- Any prior use of the following therapies, for the treatment of GCA:
- Janus kinase inhibitor (e.g., tofacitinib) within 4 weeks of baseline.
- Cell-depletion agents (e.g., anti CD20) without evidence of recovery of B cells to baseline level.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sarilumab SAR153191Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection Route of administration: subcutaneous | Drug | Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week Taper, Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week Taper |
| Sarilumab matching placeboPharmaceutical form: solution for injection Route of administration: subcutaneous | Drug | Placebo+26 Week Taper, Placebo+52 Week Taper |
| PrednisonePharmaceutical form: tablets or capsules Route of administration: oral administration | Drug | Placebo+26 Week Taper, Placebo+52 Week Taper, Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week Taper, Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week Taper |
| Prednisone matching placeboPharmaceutical form: capsules Route of administration: oral administration | Drug | Placebo+26 Week Taper, Placebo+52 Week Taper, Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week Taper, Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week Taper |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 52
Time frame: At Week 52
Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of giant cell arteries (GCA), and normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP) (<10 mg/L). Sustained remission was defined as meeting all of the following parameters: achievement of disease remission not later than Week 12, absence of disease flare (defined as recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in corticosteroid [CS] dose due to GCA or elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA) from Week 12 through Week 52, normalization of CRP (to <10 mg/L, with absence of successive elevations to >=10 mg/L) from Week 12 through Week 52, and successful adherence to prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 52.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 24
Time frame: At Week 24
Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP <10 mg/L. Sustained remission was defined as meeting all of the following parameters: achievement of disease remission not later than Week 12, absence of disease flare (defined as recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA) from Week 12 through Week 24, normalization of CRP (to <10 mg/L, with an absence of successive elevations to >=10 mg/L) from Week 12 through Week 24, and successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 24.
20 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Week 52 Analysis Set
Time frame: Up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population
Time frame: Up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set
Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 52
Number of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population
Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 24
Number of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set
Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 52
Number of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population
Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 24
Number of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set
Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 52
Number of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population
Time frame: From Week 12 through Week 24
Total Cumulative Corticosteroid (Including Prednisone) Dose
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Time to First Giant Cell Arteritis Disease Flare
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Composite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT Population
Time frame: At Week 24
Composite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52
Time frame: At Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Time frame: From first dose (i.e., Day 1) up to 60 days after last dose (i.e., up to Week 60)
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Sarilumab
Time frame: Pre-dose on Week 0 (Baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 12, 16, 24 and 52
Pharmacokinetics: Serum Drug Concentration of Sarilumab Post-dose at Week 24
Time frame: post-dose at Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Response
Time frame: From Day 1 (Baseline) up to last dose date of study drug + 60 days (i.e., up to Week 60)
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52
Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Mar 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37840134Schmidt WA, Dasgupta B, Sloane J, Giannelou A, Xu Y, Unizony SH, Mackie SL, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Spiera R, Warrington KJ, Villiger PM, Nivens MC, Akinlade B, Lin Y, Buttgereit F, Stone JH. A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in patients with giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2023 Oct 16;25(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03177-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Related trials for Giant Cell Arteritis
Recruiting
Using Personalized Rehabilitation to Reduce Disease and Increase Activity of Patients With Polymyalgia Rheumatica
Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Aspirin for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications in Giant Cell Arteritis
Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA), Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
RecruitingObservational study
Studies of the Natural History, Pathogenesis, and Outcome of Idiopathic Systemic Vasculitis
Takayasu's Arteritis, Giant Cell Arteritis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Applanation Tonometry in GCA Pilot
Giant Cell Arteritis
RecruitingObservational study
Early Temporal Dynamics of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter After Therapy in GCA
Giant Cell Arteritis, Temporal Arteritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
61 sites in 21 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Sarilumab SAR153191 and Prednisone in people with Giant Cell Arteritis, run by Sanofi at 61 sites in 21 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 61 sites in United States, France, Canada, Germany, Spain and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jan 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 52 (time frame: At Week 52). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03600805, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2022.