AzTrials
AzTrials

Giant Cell ArteritisPhase 3NCT03600805

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab in Patients With GCA

A Phase 3 study testing Sarilumab SAR153191 and Prednisone in people with Giant Cell Arteritis, run by Sanofi at 61 sites in 21 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of sarilumab in participants with giant cell arteritis (GCA) as assessed by the proportion of participants with sustained remission for sarilumab compared to placebo, in combination with a corticosteroid (CS) tapering course. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Giant Cell Arteritis
What is being tested?
Sarilumab SAR153191 and Prednisone
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
83 participants
Where
61 sitesin 21 countries
Study dates
20 Nov 2018to 24 Nov 2020
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of GCA according to European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria.
  • New onset active disease or refractory active disease.
  • At least one of the symptoms of GCA within 6 weeks of baseline.
  • Either erythrocyte sedimentation rate greater than or equal to (>=) 30 millimeter per hour or C-reactive protein >=10 mg per liter within 6 weeks of baseline.
  • Received or were able to receive prednisone 20-60 mg/day for the treatment of active GCA.

Who cannot join

  • Organ transplantation recipient (except corneas, unless it is within 3 months prior to baseline visit).
  • Major ischemic event, unrelated to GCA, within 12 weeks of screening.
  • Any prior use of the following therapies, for the treatment of GCA:
  • Janus kinase inhibitor (e.g., tofacitinib) within 4 weeks of baseline.
  • Cell-depletion agents (e.g., anti CD20) without evidence of recovery of B cells to baseline level.
  • Abatacept within 8 weeks of baseline.
Show all 27Show fewer
  • Anakinra within 1 week of baseline.
  • Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors within 2-8 weeks (etanercept within 2 weeks; infliximab, certolizumab, golimumab, or adalimumab within 8 weeks), or less than at least 5 half-lives had elapsed prior to baseline, whichever was longer.
  • Therapeutic failure, including inadequate response or intolerance, or contraindication, to biological Interleukin 6 (IL-6) IL-6/(R) antagonist (prior experience with IL-6/(R) antagonist that was terminated for reasons unrelated to therapeutic failure at least 3 months before baseline was not exclusionary).
  • Use of any alkylating agents including cyclophosphamide within 6 months of baseline.
  • Use of immunosuppressant, such as hydroxychloroquine, cyclosporine, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or leflunomide within 4 weeks of baseline. (Use of methotrexate (MTX) not exceeding 25 mg per week and had been stable for at least 3 months prior to baseline was not exclusionary).
  • Concurrent use of systemic CS for conditions other than GCA.
  • Use of intervascular CS at a dose equivalent to 100 mg of methylprednisolone or higher within 8 weeks of baseline for GCA therapy.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman.
  • Participants with active or untreated latent tuberculosis.
  • Participants with history of invasive opportunistic infections.
  • Participants with fever associated with infection or chronic, persistent or recurring infections requiring active treatment.
  • Participants with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
  • Participants with non-healed or healing skin ulcers.
  • Participants who received any live, attenuated vaccine within 3 months of baseline.
  • Participants who are positive for hepatitis B, hepatitis C and/or HIV.
  • Participants with a history of active or recurrent herpes zoster.
  • Participants with a history of or prior articular or prosthetic joint infection.
  • Prior or current history of malignancy.
  • Participants who have had surgery within 4 weeks of screening or planned surgery during study.
  • Participants with a history of inflammatory bowel disease or severe diverticulitis or previous gastrointestinal perforation..
  • The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

61 sites in 21 countries.

61 sites in 21 countries

United States6 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 8400002

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • Investigational Site Number 8400011

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Investigational Site Number 8400017

    Gainesville, Florida, 32608

  • Investigational Site Number 8400014

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

  • Investigational Site Number 8400019

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Investigational Site Number 8400018

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

Other trials in United States

France6 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 2500005

    Brest, 29609

  • Investigational Site Number 2500002

    Montivilliers, 76290

  • Investigational Site Number 2500003

    Montpellier, 34295

  • Investigational Site Number 2500007

    Mulhouse, 68100

  • Investigational Site Number 2500001

    Paris, 75014

  • Investigational Site Number 2500006

    Pessac, 33604

Other trials in France

Canada5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 1240007

    Hamilton, L8N 4A6

  • Investigational Site Number 1240010

    Montreal, H4A 3T2

  • Investigational Site Number 1240001

    Rimouski, G5L 5T1

  • Investigational Site Number 1240005

    Sherbrooke, J1G 2E8

  • Investigational Site Number 1240003

    Trois-Rivières, G8Z 1Y2

Other trials in Canada

Germany5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 2760001

    Berlin, 13125

  • Investigational Site Number 2760002

    Dresden, 01307

  • Investigational Site Number 2760003

    Kirchheim unter Teck, 73230

  • Investigational Site Number 2760004

    München, 80336

  • Investigational Site Number 2760007

    Tübingen, 72076

Other trials in Germany

Spain5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 7240011

    A Coruña, 15006

  • Investigational Site Number 7240010

    Bilbao, 48013

  • Investigational Site Number 7240014

    Madrid, 28046

  • Investigational Site Number 7240016

    Sabadell, 08208

  • Investigational Site Number 7240015

    Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38320

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 8260006

    Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN

  • Investigational Site Number 8260004

    Gateshead, NE9 6SX

  • Investigational Site Number 8260003

    Leeds, LS7 4SA

  • Investigational Site Number 8260005

    Manchester, M13 9WL

  • Investigational Site Number 8260011

    Portsmouth, PO6 3LY

Other trials in United Kingdom

Netherlands4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 5280005

    Leeuwarden, 8934 AD

  • Investigational Site Number 5280009

    Sittard-Geleen, 6162 BG

  • Investigational Site Number 5280007

    The Hague, 2545 CH

  • Investigational Site Number 5280001

    Venlo, 5912 BL

Other trials in Netherlands

Australia3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 0360003

    Camberwell, 3124

  • Investigational Site Number 0360006

    Clayton, 3168

  • Investigational Site Number 0360001

    Kogarah, 2217

Other trials in Australia

Portugal3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 6200001

    Almada, 2801-951

  • Investigational Site Number 6200005

    Aveiro, 3810-501

  • Investigational Site Number 6200004

    Ponte de Lima, 4990-041

Other trials in Portugal

Russia3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 6430005

    Kemerovo, 650000

  • Investigational Site Number 6430002

    Moscow, 115404

  • Investigational Site Number 6430003

    Moscow, 123182

Other trials in Russia

Argentina2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 0320001

    Buenos Aires, C1015ABO

  • Investigational Site Number 0320002

    Caba, C1181ACH

Other trials in Argentina

Denmark2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 2080002

    Aarhus C, 8000

  • Investigational Site Number 2080003

    Svendborg, 5700

Other trials in Denmark

Israel2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 3760006

    Ashkelon, 78278

  • Investigational Site Number 3760004

    Haifa, 34362

Other trials in Israel

Italy2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 3800001

    Milan, 20132

  • Investigational Site Number 3800005

    Rozzano, 20089

Other trials in Italy

Sweden2 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 7520003

    Örebro, 701 85

  • Investigational Site Number 7520001

    Uppsala, 751 85

Other trials in Sweden

Belgium1 site
  • Investigational Site Number 0560001

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Croatia1 site
  • Investigational Site Number 1910001

    Zagreb, 10000

Other trials in Croatia

Estonia1 site
  • Investigational Site Number 2330001

    Tallinn, 13419

Other trials in Estonia

Hungary1 site
  • Investigational Site Number 3480001

    Debrecen, 4032

Other trials in Hungary

Slovenia1 site
  • Investigational Site Number 7050001

    Ljubljana, 1000

Other trials in Slovenia

Switzerland1 site
  • Investigational Site Number 7560002

    Sankt Gallen, 9007

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of sarilumab in participants with giant cell arteritis (GCA) as assessed by the proportion of participants with sustained remission for sarilumab compared to placebo, in combination with a corticosteroid (CS) tapering course.

Read more

Secondary Objective:

  • To demonstrate the efficacy of sarilumab in participants with GCA compared to placebo, in combination with CS taper with regards to:
  • Clinical responses (such as responses based on disease remission rates, time to first disease flare) over time.
  • Cumulative CS (including prednisone) exposure.
  • To assess the safety (including immunogenicity) and tolerability of sarilumab in participants with GCA.
  • To measure sarilumab serum concentrations in participants with GCA.
  • To assess the effect of sarilumab on sparing glucocorticoid toxicity as measured by glucocorticoid toxicity index (GTI).
Read the detailed description

Study duration per participant was approximately 82 weeks, including an up to 6-week screening period, 52-week treatment period, and 24-week follow-up period.

Being tested
Sarilumab SAR153191, Sarilumab matching placebo, Prednisone, Prednisone matching placebo
Medical subject headings
Giant Cell Arteritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sarilumab SAR153191Drug

    Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection Route of administration: subcutaneous

  • Sarilumab matching placeboDrug

    Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection Route of administration: subcutaneous

  • PrednisoneDrug

    Pharmaceutical form: tablets or capsules Route of administration: oral administration

  • Prednisone matching placeboDrug

    Pharmaceutical form: capsules Route of administration: oral administration

Study groups in NCT03600805
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Placebo+52 Week TaperExperimentalParticipants received sarilumab-matching placebo as subcutaneous (SC) injection every 2 weeks (q2w) up to 52 weeks along with the combination of prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone/prednisone-matching placebo tapering oral daily doses for 52 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Sarilumab matching placebo; Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Prednisone matching placebo
Placebo+26 Week TaperExperimentalParticipants received sarilumab-matching placebo as SC injection q2w up to 52 weeks along with the combination of prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone tapering oral daily doses during the first 26 weeks and prednisone-matching placebo from Week 26 up to Week 52.
Receives: Drug: Sarilumab matching placebo; Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Prednisone matching placebo
Sarilumab 150mg q2w+26 Week TaperPlacebo comparatorParticipants received sarilumab 150 milligrams (mg) as SC injection q2w up to 52 weeks along with prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone tapering oral daily doses during the first 26 weeks and prednisone-matching placebo from Week 26 up to Week 52.
Receives: Drug: Sarilumab SAR153191; Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Prednisone matching placebo
Sarilumab 200mg q2w+26 Week TaperPlacebo comparatorParticipants received sarilumab 200 mg as SC injection q2w up to 52 weeks along with prednisone and/or prednisone-matching placebo according to the protocol-defined schedule. Participants received prednisone tapering oral daily doses during the first 26 weeks and prednisone-matching placebo from Week 26 up to Week 52.
Receives: Drug: Sarilumab SAR153191; Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Prednisone matching placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 52

    Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of giant cell arteries (GCA), and normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP) (<10 mg/L). Sustained remission was defined as meeting all of the following parameters: achievement of disease remission not later than Week 12, absence of disease flare (defined as recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in corticosteroid [CS] dose due to GCA or elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA) from Week 12 through Week 52, normalization of CRP (to <10 mg/L, with absence of successive elevations to >=10 mg/L) from Week 12 through Week 52, and successful adherence to prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 52.

    Measured: At Week 52

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 24

    Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP <10 mg/L. Sustained remission was defined as meeting all of the following parameters: achievement of disease remission not later than Week 12, absence of disease flare (defined as recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA) from Week 12 through Week 24, normalization of CRP (to <10 mg/L, with an absence of successive elevations to >=10 mg/L) from Week 12 through Week 24, and successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 24.

    Measured: At Week 24

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Number of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Week 52 Analysis Set

    Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP (< 10 mg/L). The status of normalization of CRP (<10 mg/L) was determined based on the last two non-missing post-baseline CRP values measured up to Week 12. If at least one of the value was <10 mg/L, then it was considered as normalization of CRP. Participants who took rescue corticosteroid (CS) due to active GCA prior to Week 12 or who permanently withdrew from the study treatment prior to Week 12 were considered as not achieved disease remission by Week 12.

    Measured: Up to Week 12

  2. Number of Participants With Achievement of Disease Remission up to Week 12: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population

    Disease remission was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms of GCA, and normalization of CRP (< 10 mg/L). The status of normalization of CRP (<10 mg/L) was determined based on the last two non-missing post-baseline CRP values measured up to Week 12. If at least one of the value was <10 mg/L, then it was considered as normalization of CRP. Participants who took rescue CS due to active GCA prior to Week 12 or who permanently withdrew from the study treatment prior to Week 12 were considered as not achieved disease remission by Week 12.

    Measured: Up to Week 12

  3. Number of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set

    Disease flare was defined as either recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA. Number of participants with absence of disease flare from Week 12 through Week 52 were reported.

    Measured: From Week 12 through Week 52

  4. Number of Participants With Absence of Disease Flare From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population

    Disease flare was defined as either recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA, or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA. Number of participants with absence of disease flare from Week 12 through Week 24 were reported.

    Measured: From Week 12 through Week 24

  5. Number of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set

    Normalization of CRP was defined as CRP levels <10 mg/L. If there were two or more consecutive visits with CRP >=10 mg/L, then it was categorized as no normalization of CRP.

    Measured: From Week 12 through Week 52

  6. Number of Participants With Normalization of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population

    Normalization of CRP was defined as CRP levels <10 mg/L. If there were two or more consecutive visits with CRP >=10 mg/L, then it was categorized as no normalization of CRP.

    Measured: From Week 12 through Week 24

  7. Number of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 52: Week 52 Analysis Set

    Successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 52 was defined as participants who did not take rescue therapy from Week 12 through Week 52 and might include the use of any excess prednisone (beyond the per protocol CS tapering regimen) with a cumulative dose of <=100 mg (or equivalent), such as those employed to manage adverse event (AE) not related to GCA.

    Measured: From Week 12 through Week 52

  8. Number of Participants With Successful Adherence to the Prednisone Taper From Week 12 Through Week 24: ITT Population

    Successful adherence to the prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 24 was defined as participants who did not take rescue therapy from Week 12 through Week 24 and might include the use of any excess prednisone (beyond the per protocol CS tapering regimen) with a cumulative dose of <=100 mg (or equivalent), such as those employed to manage AE not related to GCA.

    Measured: From Week 12 through Week 24

  9. Total Cumulative Corticosteroid (Including Prednisone) Dose

    Cumulative dose of CS used for GCA disease was defined as the dose taken up to the end of treatment, including expected prednisone in tapering regimen per protocol, CS used in rescue therapy and the use of commercial prednisone (an excess of <=100 mg of prednisone during the study treatment period employed to manage AE not related to GCA). The total cumulative CS dose was based on the total number of days with complete or partial intake, no imputation was done on missed tablets.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  10. Time to First Giant Cell Arteritis Disease Flare

    Time to first GCA flare was defined as the duration (in days) from randomization to first GCA flare after clinical remission (defined as resolution of signs and symptoms and normalization of CRP [<10 mg/L]) and up to 52 weeks. Disease flare was defined as either the recurrence of signs or symptoms attributable to active plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA or elevation of ESR attributable to active GCA plus an increase in CS dose due to GCA. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis. Participants who never achieved remission were censored at randomization day; and those who achieved clinical remission and never flared were censored at the end of treatment assessment date up to Week 52.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  11. Composite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (C-GTI): Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) and Aggregate Improvement Score (AIS) at Week 24: ITT Population

    GTI assessed glucocorticoid (GC) related morbidity and GC-sparing ability of other therapies; composed of 2 components: Composite GTI and Specific List. Composite GTI contained 9 domains and Specific List contained of 23 items (11 domains), used as complementary tool to C-GTI. Composite GTI score was the sum of 9 domain-specific scores at each visit and Cumulative GTI score was the sum of composite GTI scores across each visit. Two cumulative GTI scores: CWS and AIS at Week 24 are reported in this outcome measure (OM). CWS assessed cumulative GC toxicity regardless of whether toxicity had lasting effects or was transient. AIS assessed new therapy effectiveness in decreasing any Baseline GC toxicity over time. For CWS, composite score ranged from 0 to 439 and for AIS, composite score ranged from -346 to 439. For both CWS and AIS, the minimum score implies the least toxicity and the maximum score implies the most toxicity.

    Measured: At Week 24

  12. Composite Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: Cumulative Worsening Score and Aggregate Improvement Score at Week 52

    GTI assessed glucocorticoid (GC) related morbidity and GC-sparing ability of other therapies; composed of 2 components: Composite GTI and Specific List. Composite GTI contained 9 domains and Specific List contained of 23 items (11 domains), used as complementary tool to C-GTI. Composite GTI score was the sum of 9 domain-specific scores at each visit and Cumulative GTI score was the sum of composite GTI scores across each visit. Two cumulative GTI scores: CWS and AIS at Week 52 are reported in this OM. CWS assessed cumulative GC toxicity regardless of whether toxicity had lasting effects or was transient. AIS assessed new therapy effectiveness in decreasing any Baseline GC toxicity over time. For CWS, composite score ranged from 0 to 439 and for AIS, composite score ranged from -346 to 439. For both CWS and AIS, the minimum score implies the least toxicity and the maximum score implies the most toxicity.

    Measured: At Week 52

  13. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious AEs (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs were the AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) to the last dose of the SC IMP +60 days).

    Measured: From first dose (i.e., Day 1) up to 60 days after last dose (i.e., up to Week 60)

  14. Pharmacokinetics (PK): Serum Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Sarilumab

    Ctrough was pre dose concentration of drug. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for placebo arms (Placebo+52 Week Taper and Placebo+26 Week Taper) as pre-specified in the protocol.

    Measured: Pre-dose on Week 0 (Baseline), Weeks 2, 4, 12, 16, 24 and 52

  15. Pharmacokinetics: Serum Drug Concentration of Sarilumab Post-dose at Week 24

    Serum concentrations of functional sarilumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.

    Measured: post-dose at Week 24

  16. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Response

    ADA response categories: 1) Treatment-boosted ADA positive participant: Participant with a positive ADA assay response at Baseline and with at least a 4-fold increase in titer compared to Baseline during TEAE period. 2) Treatment-emergent ADA positive participant: Participant with non-positive assay (meaning negative or missing) response at Baseline but with a positive assay response during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of the IMP to the last dose of the SC IMP + 60 days). Titer values were categorized as low (titer <1,000); moderate (1,000<= titer <=10,000) and high (titer >10,000).

    Measured: From Day 1 (Baseline) up to last dose date of study drug + 60 days (i.e., up to Week 60)

  17. Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52

    ESR is a laboratory test to provide non-specific measure of inflammation in the body. The test assessed the rate at which red blood cells fell in a test tube and was measured in millimeters per hour.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52

  18. Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52

    CRP is a protein made by the liver. CRP levels increase in blood when inflammation occurs in the body.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 52

  19. Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52

    Interleukin-6 is a protein produced in the body. Levels of IL-6 often increase when there is inflammation (redness, warmth, swelling, and pain as a result of infection, irritation, or injury), either acute or chronic.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52

  20. Pharmacodynamics: Change From Baseline in Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Level at Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52

    Interleukin-6 is a protein produced in the body. Levels of IL-6 often increase when there is inflammation (redness, warmth, swelling, and pain as a result of infection, irritation, or injury), either acute or chronic. sIL-6R is one of the receptors that bind IL-6.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 12, 24, and 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2018
  2. Study start20 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion24 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion24 Nov 2020

Why it stopped: Protracted recruitment timeline exacerbated by COVID-19 pandemic

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
83 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03600805
Sponsor's protocol ID
EFC15068
Other IDs
2017-002988-18, U1111-1200-2184, 2017
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
17 Jul 2018
Last updated
28 Mar 2022
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

Publications

  • Schmidt WA, Dasgupta B, Sloane J, Giannelou A, Xu Y, Unizony SH, Mackie SL, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Spiera R, Warrington KJ, Villiger PM, Nivens MC, Akinlade B, Lin Y, Buttgereit F, Stone JH. A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in patients with giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2023 Oct 16;25(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03177-6.

    PubMed 37840134

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Sarilumab SAR153191 and Prednisone in people with Giant Cell Arteritis, run by Sanofi at 61 sites in 21 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 61 sites in United States, France, Canada, Germany, Spain and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jan 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Sustained Disease Remission at Week 52 (time frame: At Week 52). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03600805, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in