Nasal PolyposisPhase 3NCT03591068
Efficacy & Safety of OPN-375 Adults With Bilateral Nasal Polyps Using Nasoendoscopic Video
A Phase 3 study testing Fluticasone Propionate in people with Nasal Polyposis, run by Optinose US Inc. at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a 24-week, open-label, multi-center study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of OPN-375 186 μg twice a day in subjects with nasal polyps using Nasoendoscopic video. The total planned number of subjects is approximately 10, with each subject receiving OPN-375 186 μg twice a day. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nasal Polyposis
- What is being tested?
- Fluticasone Propionate
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 11 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Jun 2018to 22 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men or women aged 18 years and older at Visit 1 (Baseline/Day1)
- Women of child bearing potential must be abstinent, or if sexually active,
- be practicing an effective method of birth control (e.g., prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, contraceptive patch, intrauterine device, double-barrier method [e.g., condoms, diaphragm, or cervical cap with spermicidal foam, cream, or gel], or male partner sterilization) before entry and throughout the study, or
- be surgically sterile (have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, tubal ligation, or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy), or
- be postmenopausal (amenorrhea for at least 1 year).
- Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline)
Show all 14Show fewer
- Must have bilateral nasal polyposis with a grade of 2 or 3 in at least one side of the nasal cavity as determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy at Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline)
- Must have a SNOT-22 score of ≥20 at Visit 1(Baseline/Day 1)
- Must have been on an adequate dose of an intranasal corticosteroid (e.g. fluticasone propionate, fluticasone furoate, mometasone, triamcinolone, ciclosenide, budesonide, budesonide respules, beclomethasone) for at least 1 month, in the previous 3 months prior to Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline)
- Subjects with comorbid asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) must be stable with no exacerbations (e.g., no emergency room visits, hospitalization, or oral or parenteral steroid use) within the 3 months before the screening visit. Inhaled corticosteroid use must be limited to stable doses of no more than 1,000 μg/day of beclomethasone (or equivalent) for at least 3 months before screening with plans to continue use throughout the study
- Must be able to cease treatment with oral steroids, intranasal steroids, inhaled corticosteroids (except permitted doses listed above for asthma and COPD) at Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline)
- Must demonstrate correct use of the demo EDS
- Ability to read and speak English
- Must be capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of providing informed consent to participate in the study. Subjects must sign an informed consent document indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Women who are pregnant or lactating
- Inability to have each nasal cavity examined for any reason, including nasal septum deviation
- Have used XHANCE™ (fluticasone propionate) nasal spray within the past 2 months
- Nasal septum perforation
- Has had more than 1 episode of epistaxis with frank bleeding in the month before Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline)
- Have evidence of significant mucosal injury or ulceration (e.g. exposed cartilage) on Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline) nasal examination/nasoendoscopy
Show all 22Show fewer
- History of sinus or nasal surgery within 3 months before Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline). If >3 months subject should be fully recovered from surgery
- Current, ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa (rebound rhinitis)
- Have significant oral structural abnormalities, e.g., a cleft palate
- Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis
- History of Churg-Strauss syndrome or dyskinetic ciliary syndromes
- Purulent nasal infection, acute sinusitis, or upper respiratory tract infection within 2 weeks before Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline). Potential subjects presenting with any of these infections may be rescreened 4 weeks after symptom resolution
- Planned sinonasal surgery during the period of the study
- Allergy, hypersensitivity, or contraindication to corticosteroids, steroids, or to any excipients in OPN-375
- Exposure to any glucocorticoid treatment with potential for systemic effects (e.g., oral, parenteral, intra-articular, or epidural steroids, high dose topical steroids) within 1 month before Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline); except as noted in inclusion criteria for subjects with comorbid asthma or COPD
- Have nasal candidiasis at Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline)
- History or current diagnosis of any form of glaucoma, ocular hypertension, or intraocular pressure elevation on any form of steroid therapy
- History or current diagnosis of the presence (in either eye) of a sub-capsular cataract
- Any serious or unstable concurrent disease, psychiatric disorder, or any significant condition that, in the opinion of the investigator could confound the results of the study or could interfere with the subject's participation or compliance in the study
- Recent (within 1 year of Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline)) history of drug or alcohol abuse, or dependence that, in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with the subject's participation or compliance in the study
- Have participated in an investigational drug clinical trial within 30 days of Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline)
- Employees of the investigator or study center, with direct involvement in the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that investigator or study center, as well as family members of the employees or the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Colorado SOM, Department of Otolaryngology
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Dept. of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
Houston, Texas, 77030
About this study
Official title: A 24-Week Open-Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of OPN-375 186 μg Twice a Day (BID) in Adults With Bilateral Nasal Polyps Using Nasoendoscopic Video
This is a 24-week, open-label, multi-center study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of OPN-375 186 μg twice a day in subjects with nasal polyps using Nasoendoscopic video. The total planned number of subjects is approximately 10, with each subject receiving OPN-375 186 μg twice a day.
Read the detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OPN-375 186 μg twice a day in adults with Bilateral Nasal Polyps using Nasoendoscopic video. The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety of OPN-375 via adverse event reports, vital signs, and nasal examination. In addition, to measure any change in subject symptoms and functioning from Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks during the study, using the Sinonasal Outcome Test -22 (SNOT-22), Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and measurement of nasal polyps by independent, blinded reader, and any changes throughout the study.
- Conditions
- Nasal Polyposis
- Being tested
- Fluticasone Propionate
- Medical subject headings
- Nasal Polyps
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fluticasone PropionateDrug
OPN-375 186 μg BID, Delivered via exhalation delivery system
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OPN-375 186 mcg BID | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Fluticasone Propionate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Visit 1 at End of Study in Bilateral Nasal Polyp Grade Using Endoscopic Video
: Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. 0: No polyps
- Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate
- Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate
- Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate
Measured: Week 24
Secondary outcomes (11)
Assessment for Safety by Recording Adverse Events and Adverse Events of Special Interests
Measured: 24 Weeks, up to 30 days after last dose
Assessment for Safety Through Nasal Examination
Assessed in nasal examination worksheet which includes recording the presence of any epistaxis, septal erosion/perforation, ulceration/erosion of area other than septum. If present, the nostril location is also recorded, along with severity, and if there is any relation to an injury or trauma
Measured: 24 Weeks, up to 30 days after last dose
Assessment for Safety From Recording Vital Sign - Blood Pressure
Includes systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements in millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Assessment for Safety From Recording Vital Sign - Pulse
measure pulse in beats per minute (bpm)
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Assessment for Safety From the Collection of Information for Concomitant Medications Usage
Measured: 24 Weeks, up to 30 days after last dose
Total Polyp Grading Score (Sum of Scores From Both Nasal Cavities)
Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. 0: No polyps
- Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate
- Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate
- Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate
Measured: Week 24
Number of Subjects With a Change of Greater Than or Equal to 1 Point in Bilateral Polyp Grade
Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. 0: No polyps
- Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate
- Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate
- Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate
Measured: Week 24
Number of Subjects With a Polyp Grade of 0 on at Least One Side of the Nose at Each Visit
Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. 0: No polyps
- Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate
- Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate
- Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate
Measured: Week 24
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 questions. The questions on the SNOT-22 efficacy evaluation were used to calculate a total score. 22 questions are divided among 4 subscales: Rhinologic (7 questions), Ear/Facial Symptoms (4 questions), Sleep Function (3 questions), and Psychological Issues (6 questions). Each item was rated on the 5-point scale. The total score can range from 0-110, 0 being the best and 110 being the worst.
0: No problem
- Very mild problem
- Mild or slight problem
- Moderate problem
- Severe problem
- Problem as bad as can be
Measured: Week 24
Sniffin' Sticks N-butanol Test
The Sniffin' Sticks n-butanol (Extended test) are used to investigate human olfactory performance by use of odor pens. the Extended Test consists of 3 different subtests: Threshold, Discrimination and Identification. the Threshold test is used to ascertain the patient's olfactory threshold. the Discrimination test requires the patient to differentiate smells. The Identification test requires the patient to identify everyday smells by means of a card with different choices. The result of this test is expressed as the sum of the results of the 3 subtests, the so called TDI score (threshold, discrimination, identification). A score of more than 30 rates as normal, a score of 30 or less indicates hyposmia and a score of 15 and below point to functional anosmia in form of complete loss of the sense of smell or an extremely weakened smell ability.
Measured: Week 24
Number of Participants With a PGIC Score of Minimally/Much/Very Much Improved
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), is a questionnaire where the patient rates the change in their symptoms. Score range is from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse)
Measured: Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jul 2018
- Study start7 Jun 2018
- Primary completion22 Feb 2019
- Study completion22 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Nasal PolyposisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Optinose US Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jennifer Carothers, Study director, Optinose US Inc.John Messina, Study chair, Optinose US Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03591068
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OPN-FLU-NP-3104
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 11 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 3 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 24-Week Open-Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of OPN-375 186 μg Twice a Day (BID) in Adults With Bilateral Nasal Polyps Using Nasoendoscopic Video
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03591068
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPN-FLU-NP-3104
- Conditions
- Nasal Polyposis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Optinose US Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 7 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 3 Aug 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a 24-week, open-label, multi-center study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of OPN-375 186 μg twice a day in subjects with nasal polyps using Nasoendoscopic video. The total planned number of subjects is approximately 10, with each subject receiving OPN-375 186 μg twice a day.
Detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OPN-375 186 μg twice a day in adults with Bilateral Nasal Polyps using Nasoendoscopic video. The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety of OPN-375 via adverse event reports, vital signs, and nasal examination. In addition, to measure any change in subject symptoms and functioning from Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks during the study, using the Sinonasal Outcome Test -22 (SNOT-22), Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and measurement of nasal polyps by independent, blinded reader, and any changes throughout the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OPN-375 186 mcg BID | Experimental | Drug: Fluticasone Propionate |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Men or women aged 18 years and older at Visit 1 (Baseline/Day1)
- Women of child bearing potential must be abstinent, or if sexually active,
- Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline)
- Must have bilateral nasal polyposis with a grade of 2 or 3 in at least one side of the nasal cavity as determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy at Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline)
- Must have a SNOT-22 score of ≥20 at Visit 1(Baseline/Day 1)
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Women who are pregnant or lactating
- Inability to have each nasal cavity examined for any reason, including nasal septum deviation
- Have used XHANCE™ (fluticasone propionate) nasal spray within the past 2 months
- Nasal septum perforation
- Has had more than 1 episode of epistaxis with frank bleeding in the month before Visit 1 (Day 1/Baseline)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fluticasone PropionateOPN-375 186 μg BID, Delivered via exhalation delivery system | Drug | OPN-375 186 mcg BID |
Primary outcome
Change From Visit 1 at End of Study in Bilateral Nasal Polyp Grade Using Endoscopic Video
Time frame: Week 24
: Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate
11 secondary outcomes
Assessment for Safety by Recording Adverse Events and Adverse Events of Special Interests
Time frame: 24 Weeks, up to 30 days after last dose
Assessment for Safety Through Nasal Examination
Time frame: 24 Weeks, up to 30 days after last dose
Assessment for Safety From Recording Vital Sign - Blood Pressure
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Assessment for Safety From Recording Vital Sign - Pulse
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Assessment for Safety From the Collection of Information for Concomitant Medications Usage
Time frame: 24 Weeks, up to 30 days after last dose
Total Polyp Grading Score (Sum of Scores From Both Nasal Cavities)
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Subjects With a Change of Greater Than or Equal to 1 Point in Bilateral Polyp Grade
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Subjects With a Polyp Grade of 0 on at Least One Side of the Nose at Each Visit
Time frame: Week 24
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
Time frame: Week 24
Sniffin' Sticks N-butanol Test
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With a PGIC Score of Minimally/Much/Very Much Improved
Time frame: Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Aug 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Nasal Polyposis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of GSK5784283 (Felcorekibart) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)
Nasal Polyps
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Lebrikizumab (LY3650150) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps Treated With Intranasal Corticosteroids (CONTRAST-NP)
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)
RecruitingPhase 4
Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis
Chronic Sinusitis, Nasal Polyps
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate Changes in Symptoms in Adult Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis Initiating Treatment With Tezepelumab
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Intraoperative Outcomes of Microdebrider-Assisted Versus Conventional Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients With Sinonasal Polyposis
Nasal Polyps
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennifer Carothers study director
Optinose US Inc.
John Messina study chair
Optinose US Inc.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Fluticasone Propionate in people with Nasal Polyposis, run by Optinose US Inc. at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Aug 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Visit 1 at End of Study in Bilateral Nasal Polyp Grade Using Endoscopic Video (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2020.