AzTrials
AzTrials

SoccerNCT03588065

Health Education for Physiotherapy in Soccer Players

A study testing FMS, TICS and CONFERENCE in people with Soccer, run by Cardenal Herrera University at 1 site in Colombia.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

INTRODUCTION. Health education based on interventions with new information and communication technologies. OBJECTIVE. To compare the effectiveness of an educational physiotherapy intervention in footballers, in face-to-face mode (conference) versus an intervention mediated by ICT, on the risk of medical injury with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 20 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Soccer
What is being tested?
FMS, TICS and CONFERENCE
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteColombia
Study dates
2 Jul 2017to 15 Nov 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 20 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Athletes over 18 years of age belonging to the La Equidad sports club.
  • Athletes with a previous sporting age of more than three years.Athletes who have taken the entrance exam for the interdisciplinary team of the previous or initial physical condition of the La Equidad sports club.
  • Resident in Bogotá or municipalities of Cundinamarca.

Who cannot join

  • Alterations of perception or behavior that hinder educational interventions.
  • Other co-morbidities reported by the user or in the clinical history of the sport that limit the intervention (Example: hearing loss, kyphosis, memory deficit or cognitive attention, visual limitation).
  • Users who do not have training in educational computer skills.
  • Not having a computer with an internet connection.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Colombia1 site
  • Equidad Sport

    Bogotá, Cundinamarca, 057

Other trials in Colombia

About this study

INTRODUCTION. Health education based on interventions with new information and communication technologies.

OBJECTIVE. To compare the effectiveness of an educational physiotherapy intervention in footballers, in face-to-face mode (conference) versus an intervention mediated by ICT, on the risk of medical injury with the Functional Movement Screen [FMS].

MATERIAL AND METHODS. A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was carried out. The population consisted of 100 participants divided into two groups (ICT n = 50) and (Conference n = 50), with an average age of 18.2 versus 18.3 years for a conference. and ICT respectively.

Read the detailed description

Recruitment phase: In this phase the athletes were contacted to explain the objectives of the study and the interventions; those who agreed to participate filled out the questionnaire to verify the inclusion and exclusion criteria, later those who met the criteria gave written informed consent. This phase was held in a week in the sports team club Initial evaluation phase: In this phase, the contact form and the general characteristics of the population were filled out and the initial evaluation of knowledge about sports injuries was done in all the participants of the investigation. Likewise, the participants were assigned to each of the two interventions at random. For the random assignment, the Excel 2010® program was used, where random numbers were assigned to the sampling frame.

Intervention phase: The educational intervention in health was developed from physiotherapy in each of the groups (conference or mediated by ICT) according to the allocation group as explained below.

Final evaluation phase: The final evaluation of knowledge about the prevention of injuries in football was made to both groups of the investigation.

Conditions
Soccer
Being tested
FMS, TICS, CONFERENCE
Keywords
public health, Soccer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FMSDiagnostic test

    The evaluation of the risk of sports injury was obtained from the score in the Functional Movement Screen test suite.

    The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a battery of tests that allows the integral assessment of the risk of injury, evaluating the basic patterns of movement and motor control through the performance of seven tests in which the combination of force is reflected muscle, flexibility, range of motion range, coordination, balance and proprioception

  • TICSOther

    The educational activities were directed to soccer players belonging to Equidad, Bogotá-Colombia. Computerized media were used within the reach of footballers, applied with professionals of physical activity sciences under blind study methodology, using the new tendencies of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Health Education. The investigators counted on the advice of the group manager of knowledge of the secretary of the district of the city of Bogotá. In the educational intervention seven aspects were addressed, distributed in four weekly modules for a total of four months

  • CONFERENCEOther

    The face-to-face educational intervention (conference) consisted of four educational sessions, distributed over four weeks during the sports transition period of the Equity sub-20 team. During these sessions, workshops (conferences) were held with the players following a face-to-face methodology . All these activities were concerted with the multidisciplinary team of the Equity football team and were carried out by the researcher at the University of La Sabana, a physiotherapist, who was studying the needs of the prevention of musculoskeletal injuries in football.

Study groups in NCT03588065
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
attend education for TICSExperimentalThe educational activities were directed to soccer players belonging to Equidad, Bogotá-Colombia. Computerized media were used within the reach of footballers, applied with professionals of physical activity sciences under blind study methodology, using the new tendencies of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Health Education. The investigators counted on the advice of the group manager of knowledge of the secretary of the district of the city of Bogotá. In the educational intervention seven aspects were addressed, distributed in four weekly modules for a total of four months
Receives: Diagnostic Test: FMS; Other: TICS
attend education for conferenceActive comparatorThe intervention arm descriptionTHE CONFERENCE include face-to-face sessions focused on the four aspects mentioned above for ICT. To this end, the theoretical elements of the concepts under study were taken into account: human body movement, warm-up phases, postural hygiene, sports hygiene, nutrition and clothing. The face-to-face sessions focused on the four aspects mentioned above for ICT. To this end, the theoretical elements of the concepts under study were taken into account: human body movement, warm-up phases, postural hygiene, sports hygiene, nutrition and clothing.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: FMS; Other: CONFERENCE
attend for FMSSham comparatorThe FMS test was applied in two moments with three blind evaluators physiotherapists with specialization in therapeutic physical activity and master in Physical Activity and Sports, with an experience of more than 5 years in the field of assessment of sport condition and clinical experience in sport greater than 6 years in sports clubs in the region.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: FMS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. SELF-AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE ON SPORTS INJURIES

    A total of 17 questions were established, divided into seven categories of knowledge on the prevention of injuries, which should be addressed in the health education plan from Physiotherapy. The score was calculated as follows: each question answered correctly with the option of YES and NO had a point, the sum of the correct questions was made and divided by the number of questions. Using a rule of three this score was converted to a scale of 0 to 100.

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. FMS

    The scores of the seven movement patterns. If the athlete is able to make the movements without any compensation, receive a score of 3. If the athlete performs the movement with one or more compensations or with a difficulty to receive a score of 2. If the athlete is unable to reproduce the requested movement, receive a score of 1. If during the performance of the test the athlete presents pain, receive a score of zero and should be referred to a specialist. The maximum score for the sum of all movements is 21.

    Measured: 4 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2018
  2. Study start2 Jul 2017
  3. Primary completion8 Oct 2017
  4. Study completion15 Nov 2017

Why it stopped: The study was stopped by insufficient funds

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
For the process of imparting health education strategies in face-to-face (conference) and ICT-mediated mode, a 4-week time was estimated where 4 educational sessions were held at a rate of one each week, lasting about 40 minutes, for part of two physiotherapists experts in the theme of injury prevention around the conceptual elements of human body movement, warm-up phases, postural hygiene, sports hygiene, nutrition and clothing. Interventions were carried out simultaneously in both groups of the study, so that one researcher taught the lecture modality in person (conference group), and the other supervised the participants while using the computers of the sports training institution.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03588065
Sponsor's protocol ID
TERAPIA MANUAL
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
25 Jun 2018
Last updated
18 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: does not apply

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing FMS, TICS and CONFERENCE in people with Soccer, run by Cardenal Herrera University at 1 site in Colombia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Colombia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: The study was stopped by insufficient funds). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

SELF-AWARENESS QUESTIONNAIRE ON SPORTS INJURIES (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in