Post-Dural Puncture HeadachePhase 4NCT03587441
Intrathecal Neostigmine for Prevention of PDPH
A Phase 4 study testing Neostigmine Methylsulfate and Dextrose 5% in water in people with Post-Dural Puncture Headache, run by Fayoum University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Neuraxial blocks continue to be the cornerstone of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for normal vaginal delivery and elective caesarean section due to its approved safety and efficiency for decades. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 40 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Post-Dural Puncture Headache
- What is being tested?
- Neostigmine Methylsulfate and Dextrose 5% in water
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 4 Aug 2018to 10 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 40 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- American society association (ASA) physical status II parturients who will be scheduled for an elective caesarean section by IT anesthesia
Who cannot join
- significant renal, hepatic, and cardiovascular diseases
- pre-eclampsia
- any contraindication to regional anesthesia such as local infection or bleeding disorders
- allergy to neostigmine
- long-term opioid use
- a history of chronic pain, migraine, cluster headache
Show all 10Show fewer
- digestive problems with nausea or vomiting
- cognitive or memory disorders
- history of urinary retention; bronchial asthma
- perioperative blood transfusion
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Fayoum University hospital
El Fayoum Qesm, Faiyum Governorate, 63514
About this study
Official title: The Efficacy of Neostigmine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine for Intrathecal Block in Reducing the Incidence and Severity of Post-Dural Puncture Headache for Parturients Scheduled for Elective Caesarean Section
Neuraxial blocks continue to be the cornerstone of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for normal vaginal delivery and elective caesarean section due to its approved safety and efficiency for decades. Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is still one of the most common complications of neuraxial anesthetic techniques. The headache could be severe and limit the activities of the new mother to care for her baby, prolong hospital stay.
PDPH is defined as a headache that develops within five days of dural puncture and can't be attributed to any other types of headache and mostly is postural in character.
Read more
Neostigmine methylsulfate is a synthetic carbamic acid ester which reversibly inhibits the enzyme Acetylcholine esterase (AChE) that makes more Acetylcholine molecules available at cholinergic receptors. Neostigmine is used in anesthesia mainly as a reversal for non-depolarizing neuromuscular agents.
Intrathecal (IT) neostigmine was tried as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in IT block for elective cesarean sections to decrease local anesthetic consumption and to prolong postoperative analgesia. Side effects of IT neostigmine are dose-dependent with doses more than 25 µg especially nausea and vomiting and could be decreased by increasing the baricities of the local anesthetic solutions and by early head up position after IT injection. However, its effect on PDPH was not investigated before in literature.
Parturients will be randomly assigned into one of two groups: the intervention group will receive 20 µg with IT Bupivacaine and the control group will receive an equivalent volume of dextrose 5% with the IT Bupivacaine.
The objective of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IT neostigmine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in reducing the incidence and severity of post-dural puncture headache in parturients scheduled for an elective cesarean section.
Read the detailed description
The study will be performed from July 2018 to July 2019 at Fayoum University hospital after approval of the local institutional ethics committee and local institutional review board. The study design will be prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel groups, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A detailed informed consent will be signed by the eligible participants before recruitment and randomization.
Randomization will be done by using computer-generated random numbers that will be placed in separate opaque envelopes that will be opened by study investigators just before IT block. Neither the participants, the study investigators, the attending clinicians, nor the data collectors will be aware of groups' allocation until the study end. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) recommendations for reporting randomized, controlled clinical trials will be followed.
Preoperative preparations and Premedication:
The study solutions will be prepared in a one milliliter syringe as following: For the intervention group (N), it will contain 20 µg of Neostigmine® (0.5 mg/ml ampules manufactured by Amriya for pharmaceutical industries in Alexandria, Egypt) neostigmine ampule will be diluted in 4 ml dextrose 5% to make a solution of 100 µg/ml, 0.2 ml of this solution will be used, while in the control group an equal volume (0.2 ml) of dextrose 5% will be prepared. The syringes used will be labeled as A and B per their content. The identical coded syringe will be prepared by trained anesthesia technicians who will not be included in the study.
All parturients will receive 150 mg Ranitidine oral tablet on the night before and on the morning of the operation as a premedication.
Intraoperative technique and management:
Upon arrival to the operating room standard monitors (Pulse oximeter, Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring, and Electrocardiogram) will be applied and continued all over the operation, an eighteen gauge (18G) peripheral intravenous (IV) cannula will be inserted, and 10 ml/kg of Ringer lactate solution warmed to 37°C will be infused over 15 minutes as a preload.
IT block will be performed via a midline approach into the L4-5 interspaces in sitting position with complete aseptic condition using a 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle after giving 3 ml of lidocaine 2% (60 mg) as a subcutaneous infiltration. After confirming free cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow through the needle a 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % in addition to the content of the prepared study syringe will be slowly injected. Then, the parturient will be immediately placed in the supine position with 15° left tilt, and an oxygen mask will be applied at 2 l/min.
After ensuring sufficient anesthesia level, the surgical procedure will start with continuous hemodynamics monitoring and recording. If the systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased to 20% below the baseline or less than 90 mmHg, ephedrine 5 mg will be administered intravenously. Also, if heart rate (HR) will be less than 50 beats/min, atropine sulfate 0.5 mg will be administered intravenously. Any intraoperative or postoperative nausea or vomiting will be managed with 10 mg of metoclopramide Upon delivery of the fetus, ten units of oxytocin will be given by IV infusion, and if the uterus is not well contracted, additional increments of 5 units will be added accordingly. One gm of Ceftriaxone will be also given after delivery of the fetus by IV infusion.
Postoperative monitoring, Pain control and follow up:
At the end of surgery, Participant will be transferred to postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU) with standard monitoring applied. All Participants will receive 75 mg diclofenac sodium intramuscular every 12 hours as a pain management per institution policy, 1,23 4 mg of morphine will be given IV if rescue analgesia is needed postoperatively every 10 minutes with a maximum of 20 mg in 6 hours or 32 mg in 24 hours. The participant will be transferred to obstetrics ward after fulfilling the criteria of modified Aldrete scoring system. 24 Assessment for post-dural puncture headache and other associated symptoms will be done from day 0 to day five postoperatively and if the participant will be discharged home, follow up will be done by a phone call. If there will be a complaint of a headache, the participant will be asked to come back to the hospital for proper assessment and management either on an outpatient or inpatient bases per the headache severity.
The participants who will be diagnosed to have PDPH per the criteria of the International Headache Society (HIS) will be treated by using oral medications Panadol extra™ (paracetamol 1gm + caffeine 130 mg) (Manufactured by: Alexandria company for pharmaceuticals \& chemical industries under license: GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Ltd. Ireland) at 6-hour interval in addition to hydration and bed rest. Severe Intractable headache (VAS ≥ 40) persistent for more than 48 hours with no response to conservative measures will be managed with an epidural blood patch after participant approval and consent signing.
Statistical analysis and sample size estimation:
Continuous variables will be tested for normal distribution by the Shapiro-Wilk test (P ≤ 0.05). Parametric data will be expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by using the independent t-test. Data with kurtosis or skewness will be depicted as median and interquartile range and compared for significant difference by implementation of Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables will be presented as numbers and frequencies and the chi-square test or Fisher exact test will be used to analyze the significant differences between the two arms. A P value ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Data will be analyzed using SPSS (SPSS 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, II, USA).
The sample size calculation based on that a 15 % reduction in the incidence of PDPH between the two arms could be of clinically important relevance. The reported incidence of PDPH with the use of 25 gauge Quincke needle is 25 %. Sample size of 100 participants per group were found sufficient assuming (two tail) α = 0.05, β = 0.2 (80 % power), and 1:1 allocation ratio. We will plan to recruit 120 participants per group to account for data loss or protocol violation. The sample size calculation performed with G*Power software version 3.1.9.2 (Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany).
- Conditions
- Post-Dural Puncture Headache
- Being tested
- Neostigmine Methylsulfate, Dextrose 5% in water
- Keywords
- postural headache, intrathecal neostigmine for prevention of PDPH
- Medical subject headings
- Post-Dural Puncture Headache
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Neostigmine MethylsulfateDrug
Also called Neostigmine (0.5 mg)
20 µg Neostigmine Methylsulfate intrathecal in 0.2 ml of Dextrose 5% solution
Dextrose 5% in waterDrug
Also called Dextrose 5% in Water (D5W)
intrathecal
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| The Intervention Group (N) | Active comparator | Neostigmine Methylsulfate intervention : A one milliliter syringe will contain 20 µg of Neostigmine methyl sulfate. 0.5 mg ampule (1 ml) will be diluted in 4 ml dextrose 5% to make a solution of 100 µg/ml, 0.2 ml of this solution will be added to 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % used for intrathecal injection. Receives: Drug: Neostigmine Methylsulfate; Drug: Dextrose 5% in water |
| The Control Group (P) | Placebo comparator | Dextrose 5% in water intervention : an equal volume (0.2 ml) of dextrose 5% will be added to 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % used for intrathecal injection. Receives: Drug: Dextrose 5% in water |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
incidence of post-dural puncture headache
any headache that develops within five days of dural puncture and can't be attributed to any other types of headache and mostly is postural in character
Measured: At day 5 from intrathecal block
Secondary outcomes (26)
Visual analog score of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) at presentation
Severity of PDPH at presentation estimated by visual analog score (VAS) (where 0 = no headache, and 100 = worst imaginable headache)
Measured: At 24 hours after headache onset
Visual analog score of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) after medical treatment
Severity of PDPH after 48 hours from receiving medical treatment estimated by visual analog score (VAS) (where 0 = no headache, and 100 = worst imaginable headache)
Measured: At 48 hours after starting medical treatment
highest Visual analog score of post-dural puncture headache
Severity of PDPH estimated by visual analog score (VAS) (where 0 = no headache, and 100 = worst imaginable headache)
Measured: At 48 hours after starting medical treatment
Percent of participants with neck stiffness
incidence of neck stiffness in participants with PDPH in each group
Measured: At 48 hours after headache onset
Percent of participants in need for epidural blood patch
Severe Intractable headache (VAS ≥ 40) persistent for more than 48 hours with no response to conservative measures will be managed with an epidural blood patch after participant approval and consent signing
Measured: After 48 hours from onset of headache
Percent of participants complained from intraoperative nausea and vomiting
Any intraoperative nausea or vomiting related to intrathecal neostigmine injection
Measured: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
Percent of participants complained from postoperative nausea and vomiting
Any postoperative nausea or vomiting related to PDPH
Measured: AT 48 hours after PDPH
incidence of urine retention
postoperative inability to pass urine
Measured: At 48 hours from intrathecal block
incidence of memory and cognitive disorders
any observed or complained memory or cognitive disorders
Measured: At 48 hours from intrathecal block
incidence of hypotension
systolic blood pressure (≤ 20 % of baseline level or < 90 mmhg
Measured: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
ephedrine requirements
ephedrine used measured in milligrams
Measured: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
incidence of desaturation
(SPO2 < 92 %)
Measured: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
incidence of respiratory depression
Respiratory rate (RR) < 8 bpm
Measured: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
incidence of bradycardia
heart rate < 50 beat per minute
Measured: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
atropine requirements
atropine used measured in milligrams
Measured: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
incidence of shivering
any shivering
Measured: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
time to the first requirement of analgesic supplement
calculated in minutes
Measured: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
total analgesic consumption
amount of morphine used in milligrams
Measured: At 24 hour after intrathecal block
the assessment of duration of sensory blockade
measured in minutes, assessed by a pinprick test
Measured: From intrathecal block until the first appearance of pain at the T10 dermatome, assessed up to 24 hours
the assessment of duration of motor blockade
measured in minutes, assessed by the modified Bromage score (0, no motor loss; 1, inability to flex the hip; 2, inability to flex the knee; and 3, inability to flex the ankle)
Measured: From intrathecal block until the modified Bromage score will be zero, assessed up to 24 hours
Age
in years
Measured: 6 hours before intervention
Weight
in kilograms (kg)
Measured: 6 hours before intervention
Height
in meters (m)
Measured: 6 hours before intervention
Body mass index
in kg/m square
Measured: 6 hours before intervention
Headache onset
in hours
Measured: After intrathecal block for five days till appearance of PDPH
Duration of surgical procedures
in minutes
Measured: After completion of surgical procedures, within about two hours of intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2018
- Study start4 Aug 2018
- Primary completion5 Feb 2019
- Study completion10 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Post-Dural Puncture HeadacheStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fayoum University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hany M Yassin, MD, Fayoum University Hospital
- Investigators
- Hany M Yassin, MD, Principal investigator, Faculty of medicine, Fayoum university
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03587441
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M335
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 15 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. No abstract available.
PubMed 23771276Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Munoz L, Godoy-Casasbuenas N, Ciapponi A, Arevalo JJ, Boogaard S, Roque I Figuls M. Needle gauge and tip designs for preventing post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 7;4(4):CD010807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010807.pub2.
PubMed 28388808Nath S, Koziarz A, Badhiwala JH, Alhazzani W, Jaeschke R, Sharma S, Banfield L, Shoamanesh A, Singh S, Nassiri F, Oczkowski W, Belley-Cote E, Truant R, Reddy K, Meade MO, Farrokhyar F, Bala MM, Alshamsi F, Krag M, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Kunz R, Nishida O, Matouk C, Selim M, Rhodes A, Hawryluk G, Almenawer SA. Atraumatic versus conventional lumbar puncture needles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018 Mar 24;391(10126):1197-1204. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32451-0. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
PubMed 29223694Fattahi Z, Hadavi SM, Sahmeddini MA. Effect of ondansetron on post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients undergoing cesarean section: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. J Anesth. 2015 Oct;29(5):702-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2000-5. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
PubMed 25812804Cossu AP, De Giudici LM, Piras D, Mura P, Scanu M, Cossu M, Saba M, Finco G, Brazzi L. A systematic review of the effects of adding neostigmine to local anesthetics for neuraxial administration in obstetric anesthesia and analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 Aug;24(3):237-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 19.
PubMed 26119258
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Efficacy of Neostigmine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine for Intrathecal Block in Reducing the Incidence and Severity of Post-Dural Puncture Headache for Parturients Scheduled for Elective Caesarean Section
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03587441
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M335
- Conditions
- Post-Dural Puncture Headache
- Keywords
- postural headache, intrathecal neostigmine for prevention of PDPH
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fayoum University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Neuraxial blocks continue to be the cornerstone of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for normal vaginal delivery and elective caesarean section due to its approved safety and efficiency for decades. Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is still one of the most common complications of neuraxial anesthetic techniques. The headache could be severe and limit the activities of the new mother to care for her baby, prolong hospital stay.
PDPH is defined as a headache that develops within five days of dural puncture and can't be attributed to any other types of headache and mostly is postural in character.
Neostigmine methylsulfate is a synthetic carbamic acid ester which reversibly inhibits the enzyme Acetylcholine esterase (AChE) that makes more Acetylcholine molecules available at cholinergic receptors. Neostigmine is used in anesthesia mainly as a reversal for non-depolarizing neuromuscular agents.
Intrathecal (IT) neostigmine was tried as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in IT block for elective cesarean sections to decrease local anesthetic consumption and to prolong postoperative analgesia. Side effects of IT neostigmine are dose-dependent with doses more than 25 µg especially nausea and vomiting and could be decreased by increasing the baricities of the local anesthetic solutions and by early head up position after IT injection. However, its effect on PDPH was not investigated before in literature.
Parturients will be randomly assigned into one of two groups: the intervention group will receive 20 µg with IT Bupivacaine and the control group will receive an equivalent volume of dextrose 5% with the IT Bupivacaine.
The objective of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IT neostigmine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in reducing the incidence and severity of post-dural puncture headache in parturients scheduled for an elective cesarean section.
Detailed description
The study will be performed from July 2018 to July 2019 at Fayoum University hospital after approval of the local institutional ethics committee and local institutional review board. The study design will be prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel groups, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A detailed informed consent will be signed by the eligible participants before recruitment and randomization.
Randomization will be done by using computer-generated random numbers that will be placed in separate opaque envelopes that will be opened by study investigators just before IT block. Neither the participants, the study investigators, the attending clinicians, nor the data collectors will be aware of groups' allocation until the study end. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) recommendations for reporting randomized, controlled clinical trials will be followed.
Preoperative preparations and Premedication:
The study solutions will be prepared in a one milliliter syringe as following: For the intervention group (N), it will contain 20 µg of Neostigmine® (0.5 mg/ml ampules manufactured by Amriya for pharmaceutical industries in Alexandria, Egypt) neostigmine ampule will be diluted in 4 ml dextrose 5% to make a solution of 100 µg/ml, 0.2 ml of this solution will be used, while in the control group an equal volume (0.2 ml) of dextrose 5% will be prepared. The syringes used will be labeled as A and B per their content. The identical coded syringe will be prepared by trained anesthesia technicians who will not be included in the study.
All parturients will receive 150 mg Ranitidine oral tablet on the night before and on the morning of the operation as a premedication.
Intraoperative technique and management:
Upon arrival to the operating room standard monitors (Pulse oximeter, Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring, and Electrocardiogram) will be applied and continued all over the operation, an eighteen gauge (18G) peripheral intravenous (IV) cannula will be inserted, and 10 ml/kg of Ringer lactate solution warmed to 37°C will be infused over 15 minutes as a preload.
IT block will be performed via a midline approach into the L4-5 interspaces in sitting position with complete aseptic condition using a 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle after giving 3 ml of lidocaine 2% (60 mg) as a subcutaneous infiltration. After confirming free cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow through the needle a 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % in addition to the content of the prepared study syringe will be slowly injected. Then, the parturient will be immediately placed in the supine position with 15° left tilt, and an oxygen mask will be applied at 2 l/min.
After ensuring sufficient anesthesia level, the surgical procedure will start with continuous hemodynamics monitoring and recording. If the systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased to 20% below the baseline or less than 90 mmHg, ephedrine 5 mg will be administered intravenously. Also, if heart rate (HR) will be less than 50 beats/min, atropine sulfate 0.5 mg will be administered intravenously. Any intraoperative or postoperative nausea or vomiting will be managed with 10 mg of metoclopramide Upon delivery of the fetus, ten units of oxytocin will be given by IV infusion, and if the uterus is not well contracted, additional increments of 5 units will be added accordingly. One gm of Ceftriaxone will be also given after delivery of the fetus by IV infusion.
Postoperative monitoring, Pain control and follow up:
At the end of surgery, Participant will be transferred to postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU) with standard monitoring applied. All Participants will receive 75 mg diclofenac sodium intramuscular every 12 hours as a pain management per institution policy, 1,23 4 mg of morphine will be given IV if rescue analgesia is needed postoperatively every 10 minutes with a maximum of 20 mg in 6 hours or 32 mg in 24 hours. The participant will be transferred to obstetrics ward after fulfilling the criteria of modified Aldrete scoring system. 24 Assessment for post-dural puncture headache and other associated symptoms will be done from day 0 to day five postoperatively and if the participant will be discharged home, follow up will be done by a phone call. If there will be a complaint of a headache, the participant will be asked to come back to the hospital for proper assessment and management either on an outpatient or inpatient bases per the headache severity.
The participants who will be diagnosed to have PDPH per the criteria of the International Headache Society (HIS) will be treated by using oral medications Panadol extra™ (paracetamol 1gm + caffeine 130 mg) (Manufactured by: Alexandria company for pharmaceuticals \& chemical industries under license: GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Ltd. Ireland) at 6-hour interval in addition to hydration and bed rest. Severe Intractable headache (VAS ≥ 40) persistent for more than 48 hours with no response to conservative measures will be managed with an epidural blood patch after participant approval and consent signing.
Statistical analysis and sample size estimation:
Continuous variables will be tested for normal distribution by the Shapiro-Wilk test (P ≤ 0.05). Parametric data will be expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by using the independent t-test. Data with kurtosis or skewness will be depicted as median and interquartile range and compared for significant difference by implementation of Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables will be presented as numbers and frequencies and the chi-square test or Fisher exact test will be used to analyze the significant differences between the two arms. A P value ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Data will be analyzed using SPSS (SPSS 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, II, USA).
The sample size calculation based on that a 15 % reduction in the incidence of PDPH between the two arms could be of clinically important relevance. The reported incidence of PDPH with the use of 25 gauge Quincke needle is 25 %. Sample size of 100 participants per group were found sufficient assuming (two tail) α = 0.05, β = 0.2 (80 % power), and 1:1 allocation ratio. We will plan to recruit 120 participants per group to account for data loss or protocol violation. The sample size calculation performed with G*Power software version 3.1.9.2 (Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| The Intervention Group (N) | Active comparator | Drug: Neostigmine Methylsulfate, Drug: Dextrose 5% in waterNeostigmine Methylsulfate intervention : A one milliliter syringe will contain 20 µg of Neostigmine methyl sulfate. 0.5 mg ampule (1 ml) will be diluted in 4 ml dextrose 5% to make a solution of 100 µg/ml, 0.2 ml of this solution will be added to 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % used for intrathecal injection. |
| The Control Group (P) | Placebo comparator | Drug: Dextrose 5% in waterDextrose 5% in water intervention : an equal volume (0.2 ml) of dextrose 5% will be added to 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % used for intrathecal injection. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- American society association (ASA) physical status II parturients who will be scheduled for an elective caesarean section by IT anesthesia
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- significant renal, hepatic, and cardiovascular diseases
- pre-eclampsia
- any contraindication to regional anesthesia such as local infection or bleeding disorders
- allergy to neostigmine
- long-term opioid use
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Neostigmine MethylsulfateAlso: Neostigmine (0.5 mg)20 µg Neostigmine Methylsulfate intrathecal in 0.2 ml of Dextrose 5% solution | Drug | The Intervention Group (N) |
| Dextrose 5% in waterAlso: Dextrose 5% in Water (D5W)intrathecal | Drug | The Control Group (P), The Intervention Group (N) |
Primary outcome
incidence of post-dural puncture headache
Time frame: At day 5 from intrathecal block
any headache that develops within five days of dural puncture and can't be attributed to any other types of headache and mostly is postural in character
26 secondary outcomes
Visual analog score of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) at presentation
Time frame: At 24 hours after headache onset
Visual analog score of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) after medical treatment
Time frame: At 48 hours after starting medical treatment
highest Visual analog score of post-dural puncture headache
Time frame: At 48 hours after starting medical treatment
Percent of participants with neck stiffness
Time frame: At 48 hours after headache onset
Percent of participants in need for epidural blood patch
Time frame: After 48 hours from onset of headache
Percent of participants complained from intraoperative nausea and vomiting
Time frame: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
Percent of participants complained from postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time frame: AT 48 hours after PDPH
incidence of urine retention
Time frame: At 48 hours from intrathecal block
incidence of memory and cognitive disorders
Time frame: At 48 hours from intrathecal block
incidence of hypotension
Time frame: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
ephedrine requirements
Time frame: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
incidence of desaturation
Time frame: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
incidence of respiratory depression
Time frame: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
incidence of bradycardia
Time frame: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
atropine requirements
Time frame: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
incidence of shivering
Time frame: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
time to the first requirement of analgesic supplement
Time frame: From intrathecal block until discharge from PACU, assessed up to 24 hours
total analgesic consumption
Time frame: At 24 hour after intrathecal block
the assessment of duration of sensory blockade
Time frame: From intrathecal block until the first appearance of pain at the T10 dermatome, assessed up to 24 hours
the assessment of duration of motor blockade
Time frame: From intrathecal block until the modified Bromage score will be zero, assessed up to 24 hours
Age
Time frame: 6 hours before intervention
Weight
Time frame: 6 hours before intervention
Height
Time frame: 6 hours before intervention
Body mass index
Time frame: 6 hours before intervention
Headache onset
Time frame: After intrathecal block for five days till appearance of PDPH
Duration of surgical procedures
Time frame: After completion of surgical procedures, within about two hours of intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jul 2019.
- Background: PubMed 23771276Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28388808Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Munoz L, Godoy-Casasbuenas N, Ciapponi A, Arevalo JJ, Boogaard S, Roque I Figuls M. Needle gauge and tip designs for preventing post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 7;4(4):CD010807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010807.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 29223694Nath S, Koziarz A, Badhiwala JH, Alhazzani W, Jaeschke R, Sharma S, Banfield L, Shoamanesh A, Singh S, Nassiri F, Oczkowski W, Belley-Cote E, Truant R, Reddy K, Meade MO, Farrokhyar F, Bala MM, Alshamsi F, Krag M, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Kunz R, Nishida O, Matouk C, Selim M, Rhodes A, Hawryluk G, Almenawer SA. Atraumatic versus conventional lumbar puncture needles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018 Mar 24;391(10126):1197-1204. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32451-0. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
- Background: PubMed 25812804Fattahi Z, Hadavi SM, Sahmeddini MA. Effect of ondansetron on post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients undergoing cesarean section: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. J Anesth. 2015 Oct;29(5):702-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2000-5. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
- Background: PubMed 26119258Cossu AP, De Giudici LM, Piras D, Mura P, Scanu M, Cossu M, Saba M, Finco G, Brazzi L. A systematic review of the effects of adding neostigmine to local anesthetics for neuraxial administration in obstetric anesthesia and analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 Aug;24(3):237-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 19.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Post-Dural Puncture Headache
RecruitingObservational study
Epidural Hydroxyethyl Starch for Post-Dural Puncture Headache in Parturients
Parturients, Accidental Puncture of Dura During Anaesthesia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Effect of Magnesium on Post-spinal Headaches
Post-spinal Headache
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Oral Gabapentin Versus Intravenous Neostigmine/Atropine Versus Combination of Both for Prevention of PDPH
Postdural Puncture Headache (PDPH)
Not yet recruiting
Dural Puncture Epidural With 27G vs 26G Needles Versus Standard Epidural for Elective Cesarean Delivery
Cesarean Section, Anesthesia, Obstetrical
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Spinal, Epidural, and Dural Puncture Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Hemodynamics and Block Quality
Hypotension After Neuraxial Anesthesia, Cesarean Section
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hany M Yassin, MD principal investigator
Faculty of medicine, Fayoum university
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Neostigmine Methylsulfate and Dextrose 5% in water in people with Post-Dural Puncture Headache, run by Fayoum University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
incidence of post-dural puncture headache (time frame: At day 5 from intrathecal block). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03587441, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2019.