MastectomyNCT03578237
Cryoanalgesia to Prevent Acute and Chronic Pain Following Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled Study
A study testing Cryoneurolysis (active) in people with Mastectomy and Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The ultimate objective of the proposed line of research is to determine if cryoanalgesia is an effective adjunctive treatment for pain in the period immediately following various painful surgical procedures; and, if this analgesic modality decreases the risk of persistent postoperative pain, or "chronic" pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Mastectomy, Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow, Upper Limb Amputation Above Elbow
- What is being tested?
- Cryoneurolysis (active)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 99 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 25 Aug 2018to 25 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients of at least 18 years of age
- scheduled for a primary, unilateral total knee or shoulder arthroplasty, primary unilateral rotator cuff repair, VATS procedure, skin grafting of the lateral thigh, unilateral or bilateral mastectomy, or limb amputation distal to the femoral/humeral head and including at least one metatarsal/metacarpal bone
- single-injection or continuous peripheral nerve blocks block or epidural infusion planned for perioperative analgesia
- accepting of a cryoneurolysis procedure
Who cannot join
- chronic opioid use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use > 4 weeks)
- pregnancy
- incarceration
- inability to communicate with the investigators
- morbid obesity (body mass index > 40 kg/m2)
- possessing any contraindication specific to cryoneurolysis such as a localized infection at the treatment site, cryoglobulinemia, cold urticaria and Reynaud's Syndrome
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Cryoanalgesia to Prevent Acute and Chronic Pain Following Surgery
The ultimate objective of the proposed line of research is to determine if cryoanalgesia is an effective adjunctive treatment for pain in the period immediately following various painful surgical procedures; and, if this analgesic modality decreases the risk of persistent postoperative pain, or "chronic" pain. The objective of the proposed pilot study is to optimize the protocol and collect data to power subsequent, definitive clinical trials.
Specific Aim 1: To determine if, compared with current and customary analgesia, the addition of cryoanalgesia decreases the incidence and severity of post-surgical pain.
Read more
Hypothesis 1a (primary): The severity of surgically-related pain will be significantly decreased on postoperative day 2 with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.
Hypothesis 1b: The incidence of chronic pain will be significantly decreased one year following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.
Hypothesis 1c: The severity of chronic pain will be significantly decreased one year following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.
Specific Aim 2: To determine if, compared with current and customary analgesia, the addition of cryoanalgesia improves postoperative functioning.
Hypothesis 2a: Following primary unilateral knee and shoulder arthroplasty as well as rotator cuff repair, joint range of motion will be significantly increased within the year following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.
Hypothesis 2b: Following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, inspiratory spirometry will be improved within the month following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.
Read the detailed description
Subjects will be individuals undergoing unilateral or bilateral mastectomy; upper or lower limb amputation; primary, unilateral total knee or shoulder arthroplasty; primary, unilateral rotator cuff repair; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; and burn-related skin grafting of the lateral thigh. Those who consent to participate in this study will have standard preoperative peripheral nerve blocks administered and catheters inserted: paravertebral blocks or a fascial plane block (e.g., erector spinae plane block) for mastectomy, femoral/sciatic for lower limb amputation, and brachial plexus (or terminal nerves) for upper limb amputation; femoral or adductor canal for total knee arthroplasty; interscalene for shoulder arthroplasty or rotator cuff repair; thoracic epidural for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS); and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve for skin grafting of the lateral thigh.
Treatment group assignment (randomization). Subjects with successfully-administered peripheral nerve blocks (defined by sensory changes in the appropriate nerve distribution) will be allocated to one of two possible treatments:
- cryoneurolysis
- sham cryoneurolysis (placebo control)
Randomization will be stratified by surgery type (e.g., mastectomy, upper limb amputation, and lower limb amputation). Computer-generated randomization lists will be used to create sealed, opaque randomization envelopes with the treatment group assignment enclosed in each envelope labeled with the randomization number.
The specific nerves targeted will depend on the surgical site: intercostal nervesblocks (4 levels depending on the specific surgical approach) for mastectomy; femoral/sciatic for lower limb amputation, and brachial plexus (or terminal nerves) for upper limb amputation; infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve for knee arthroplasty; suprascapular nerve for shoulder surgery; intercostal nerves for VATS procedures, and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve for skin grafting of the lateral thigh. The cryoneurolysis sites will be cleansed with chlorhexidine gluconate and isopropyl alcohol. Using the optimal ultrasound transducer for the specific anatomic location and subject anatomy (linear vs curvilinear array), the target nerves will be identified in a transverse cross-sectional (short axis) view.
We initially used a hand-held cryoneurolysis machine (Iovera, Myoscience, Redwood City, CA; prior to merger with Pacira Pharmaceuticals). For subjects randomized to sham, we inserted the angiocatheters just through the skin and subsequently place the probe through the angiocatheter, but not deeper than immediately subcutaneous (lidocaine 2% will be administered, as needed, to anesthetize the angiocatheter track). We simulated a cryo treatment but did not actually deliver gas to the probe. Therefore, there was no temperature change. However, since all subjects had a paravertebral block in place, and intercostal cryoneurolysis approach was via the subjects' back outside of their line of vision, subjects were unable to sense much besides the pressure of the angiocatheter insertion and remained masked to treatment group. For subjects randomized to receive cryoneurolysis, the same procedure was used, only the angiocatheters inserted deeper towards the intercostal nerves, the probes situated adjacent to the intercostal nerves, and active gas passed through the probe resulting in cryoneurolysis of the target nerves.
When it became available, the hand-held device was replaced by a console cryoneurolysis device. Cryoneurolysis probes are available for a console neurolysis device (PainBlocker, Epimed, Farmers Branch, Texas) that either (1) pass nitrous oxide to the tip inducing freezing temperatures; or, (2) vent the nitrous oxide at the base of the probe so that no gas reaches the probe tip, resulting in no temperature change. Importantly, these probes are indistinguishable in appearance, and therefore treating physicians, subjects, and all clinical staff will be masked to treatment group assignment [only the treating physician/investigator performing the cryoneurolysis with be unmasked]. An angiocatheter/introducer may be inserted beneath the ultrasound transducer and directed until the probe tip is immediately adjacent to the target nerve (lidocaine 2% will be administered, as needed, to anesthetize the angiocatheter track). The angiocatheter needle will be removed, leaving the angiocatheter through which the appropriate Epimed probe will be inserted until it is adjacent to the target nerve. The cryoneurolysis device will be triggered using 3 cycles of 2-minute gas activation (active or sham) separated by 1-minute defrost periods. For active probes, the nitrous oxide will be deployed to the tip where a drop in temperature to -70°C will result in cryoneurolysis. For the sham probes, the nitrous oxide will be vented prior to reaching the probe shaft, resulting in a lack of perineural temperature change. The process will be repeated with the same treatment probe for any additional nerves (e.g., all nerves will receive either active cryoneurolysis or sham/placebo, and not a mix of the two possible treatments).
Statistical Analysis. The limb amputation, total knee and shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, VATS, and skin grafting subjects will be included in pilot studies to help power a future clinical trials, so the investigators will enroll a convenience sample and not have a pre-determined primary endpoint or statistical plan. However, the end points of most interest will be average pain score on postoperative day 2 for shoulder arthroplasty and skin grafting subjects, range-of-motion at 6 weeks for the rotator cuff repairs, range-of-motion for knee arthroplasty, and FEV1 for the VATS procedures.
For the subjects having mastectomy, the investigators will power this study for an acute pain end point which will provide conclusive results for that end point; but, the data will also be used to help power a subsequent large, multicenter clinical trial for a chronic pain-related end point (which will require far more subjects than the investigators will enroll for the current study).
For the mastectomy subjects, sample size calculations are centered around the hypothesis that cryoneurolysis decreases the incidence and severity of post-mastectomy pain in the week following surgery. To this end, the primary outcome is the average NRS (as administered as part of the Brief Pain Inventory) queried on the afternoon of postoperative day 2. The difference in the distribution of NRS between groups will be assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The investigators approximate power using the two-sample t-test. Assuming a standard deviation of 2.25 NRS points, and minimum clinically meaningful difference of 2 NRS points, n=30 patients per group provide 86% power with two-sided alpha=5%.
The t-test approximation was confirmed by simulating integer valued NRS scores in the range 0 to 10. One group was simulated by rounding normally distributed data with mean 1.5 and standard deviation 2.5 (resulting in median of 2 and interquartile range 0 to 3); and the other with mean 3.5 and standard deviation 2.5 (resulting in median of 4 and interquartile range 1 to 5). Note these resulting summary statistics are consistent with Ilfeld et al (2014). When 10,000 trials were simulated under these assumptions, the Mann-Whitney U test provided 89.5% power, and Type I error was maintained at 4.85%.
Differences between groups in demographic variables and secondary endpoints will be assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous or ordinal data, and Fisher's Exact test for categorical data. Box-and-whisker plots will be used to visualize distributions by group.
R version 3.4.4 (R-project.org) was used for sample size calculations and simulations; and the most recent version of R will be used at the time of analysis.
- Conditions
- Mastectomy, Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow, Upper Limb Amputation Above Elbow, Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee, Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee, Knee Arthropathy
- Being tested
- Cryoneurolysis (active), Sham cryoneurolysis procedure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cryoneurolysis (active)Device
Mastectomy (subjects 1-18): Myoscience Iovera device: full cryo cycle. Mastectomy (subjects 19-end) and all other procedures: Epimed PainBlocker device: 3 cycles of 2-minute gas activation separated by 1-minute defrost periods with an active probe which results in a decrease in temperature
Sham cryoneurolysis procedureDevice
Also called Placebo treatment
Mastectomy (subjects 1-18): Myoscience Iovera device: simulated full cryo cycle without administering gas to the probe.
Mastectomy (subjects 19-end) and all other procedures: 3 cycles of 2-minute gas activation separated by 1-minute defrost periods with a SHAM probe that does not deliver gas to the tip or result in a drop in temperature
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (active cryoneurolysis) | Experimental | Receiving active cryoneurolysis Receives: Device: Cryoneurolysis (active) |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Receiving sham cryoneurolysis procedure Receives: Device: Sham cryoneurolysis procedure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Average Pain (Mastectomy Subjects Only)
Measured with the 0-10 numeric rating scale as part of the Brief Pain Inventory, with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
Measured: afternoon of postoperative day 2
Secondary outcomes (13)
Analgesic Consumption
Analgesic consumption for previous 24 hours
Measured: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, 21, as well as months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Brief Pain Inventory (Interference Subscale)
The Brief Pain Inventory short form (interference scale) is designed to assess pain's impact on physical and emotional functioning. It has established reliability and validity, with minimal inter-rater discordance, and is recommended by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) consensus statement. The interference domaine is comprised of 7 questions involving the degree of pain's interference on physical and emotional functioning using a 0-10 Likert scale (0 = none; 10 = complete). The scale is thus 0-70 with higher scores equivalent to more interference due to pain>
Measured: Months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Worst Pain Measured on the 11 Point Numeric Rating Scale
The subjects' perception of their worst level pain in the previous 24 hours measured with the 0-10 numeric rating scale as part of the Brief Pain Inventory, with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
Measured: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21
Average Pain Measured on the 11 Point Numeric Rating Scale
The subjects' perception of their average level pain in the previous 24 hours measured with the 0-10 numeric rating scale as part of the Brief Pain Inventory, with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
Measured: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21
Difficultly Sleeping Due to Pain
Difficulty sleeping due to pain (binary answer: yes or no; not based on a scale or instrument). The numbers presented in the results are the number of participants in each treatment group answering YES, they DID have difficulty sleeping due to pain
Measured: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21
Number of Awakenings
Number of awakenings from sleep due to pain (simply the number of times of awakenings--not based on a scale or instrument)
Measured: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21
Nausea
Nausea measured on a 0-10 scale with 0=no nausea and 10=vomiting; thus higher on the scale is worse
Measured: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21
Phantom Pain Occurences [Mastectomy & Amputation]
How many times in the previous 3 days subject experienced phantom pain (the number of times experienced--not based on a scale or instrument)
Measured: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Phantom Pain Duration [Mastectomy & Amputation]
The average duration of phantom pain occurrences in the previous 3 days
Measured: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Phantom Sensation Occurrences [Mastectomy & Amputation]
How many times in the previous 3 days subject experienced phantom sensations (the number of times experienced--not based on a scale or instrument). This outcome differs from "phantom pain occurrences" in that for this outcome no pain is necessary; rather, participants feel the missing body part is actually there, when it is not--yet it is not a painful sensation.
Measured: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Phantom Sensation Duration [Mastectomy & Amputation]
The average duration of phantom sensation occurrences in the previous 3 days. This outcome differs from "phantom pain duration" in that for this outcome no pain is necessary; rather, participants feel the missing body part is actually there, when it is not--yet it is not a painful sensation.
Measured: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Residual Limb or Wound Pain Occurences
How many times in the previous 3 days subject experienced residual limb or wound pain (the number of times experienced--not based on a scale or instrument)
Measured: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Residual Limb or Wound Pain Duration
The average duration of residual limb or wound pain occurrences in the previous 3 days
Measured: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jul 2018
- Study start25 Aug 2018
- Primary completion7 Jan 2022
- Study completion25 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for MastectomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San DiegoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 99 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Diego
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Epimed International, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS, University of California, San Diego
- Investigators
- Brian Ilfeld, MD, MS, Principal investigator, University California San DiegoJohn Finneran, MD, Study director, University California San DiegoMatthew Swisher, MD, MS, Study director, University California San Diego
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03578237
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Cryo Prevention PILOTs
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 25 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cryoanalgesia to Prevent Acute and Chronic Pain Following Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03578237
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Cryo Prevention PILOTs
- Conditions
- Mastectomy, Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow, Upper Limb Amputation Above Elbow, Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee, Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee, Knee Arthropathy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 99 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San DiegoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Epimed International, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc
- Study start
- 25 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 Feb 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The ultimate objective of the proposed line of research is to determine if cryoanalgesia is an effective adjunctive treatment for pain in the period immediately following various painful surgical procedures; and, if this analgesic modality decreases the risk of persistent postoperative pain, or "chronic" pain. The objective of the proposed pilot study is to optimize the protocol and collect data to power subsequent, definitive clinical trials.
Specific Aim 1: To determine if, compared with current and customary analgesia, the addition of cryoanalgesia decreases the incidence and severity of post-surgical pain.
Hypothesis 1a (primary): The severity of surgically-related pain will be significantly decreased on postoperative day 2 with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.
Hypothesis 1b: The incidence of chronic pain will be significantly decreased one year following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.
Hypothesis 1c: The severity of chronic pain will be significantly decreased one year following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.
Specific Aim 2: To determine if, compared with current and customary analgesia, the addition of cryoanalgesia improves postoperative functioning.
Hypothesis 2a: Following primary unilateral knee and shoulder arthroplasty as well as rotator cuff repair, joint range of motion will be significantly increased within the year following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.
Hypothesis 2b: Following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, inspiratory spirometry will be improved within the month following surgery with the addition of cryoanalgesia as compared with patients receiving solely standard-of-care treatment.
Detailed description
Subjects will be individuals undergoing unilateral or bilateral mastectomy; upper or lower limb amputation; primary, unilateral total knee or shoulder arthroplasty; primary, unilateral rotator cuff repair; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; and burn-related skin grafting of the lateral thigh. Those who consent to participate in this study will have standard preoperative peripheral nerve blocks administered and catheters inserted: paravertebral blocks or a fascial plane block (e.g., erector spinae plane block) for mastectomy, femoral/sciatic for lower limb amputation, and brachial plexus (or terminal nerves) for upper limb amputation; femoral or adductor canal for total knee arthroplasty; interscalene for shoulder arthroplasty or rotator cuff repair; thoracic epidural for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS); and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve for skin grafting of the lateral thigh.
Treatment group assignment (randomization). Subjects with successfully-administered peripheral nerve blocks (defined by sensory changes in the appropriate nerve distribution) will be allocated to one of two possible treatments:
- cryoneurolysis
- sham cryoneurolysis (placebo control)
Randomization will be stratified by surgery type (e.g., mastectomy, upper limb amputation, and lower limb amputation). Computer-generated randomization lists will be used to create sealed, opaque randomization envelopes with the treatment group assignment enclosed in each envelope labeled with the randomization number.
The specific nerves targeted will depend on the surgical site: intercostal nervesblocks (4 levels depending on the specific surgical approach) for mastectomy; femoral/sciatic for lower limb amputation, and brachial plexus (or terminal nerves) for upper limb amputation; infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve for knee arthroplasty; suprascapular nerve for shoulder surgery; intercostal nerves for VATS procedures, and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve for skin grafting of the lateral thigh. The cryoneurolysis sites will be cleansed with chlorhexidine gluconate and isopropyl alcohol. Using the optimal ultrasound transducer for the specific anatomic location and subject anatomy (linear vs curvilinear array), the target nerves will be identified in a transverse cross-sectional (short axis) view.
We initially used a hand-held cryoneurolysis machine (Iovera, Myoscience, Redwood City, CA; prior to merger with Pacira Pharmaceuticals). For subjects randomized to sham, we inserted the angiocatheters just through the skin and subsequently place the probe through the angiocatheter, but not deeper than immediately subcutaneous (lidocaine 2% will be administered, as needed, to anesthetize the angiocatheter track). We simulated a cryo treatment but did not actually deliver gas to the probe. Therefore, there was no temperature change. However, since all subjects had a paravertebral block in place, and intercostal cryoneurolysis approach was via the subjects' back outside of their line of vision, subjects were unable to sense much besides the pressure of the angiocatheter insertion and remained masked to treatment group. For subjects randomized to receive cryoneurolysis, the same procedure was used, only the angiocatheters inserted deeper towards the intercostal nerves, the probes situated adjacent to the intercostal nerves, and active gas passed through the probe resulting in cryoneurolysis of the target nerves.
When it became available, the hand-held device was replaced by a console cryoneurolysis device. Cryoneurolysis probes are available for a console neurolysis device (PainBlocker, Epimed, Farmers Branch, Texas) that either (1) pass nitrous oxide to the tip inducing freezing temperatures; or, (2) vent the nitrous oxide at the base of the probe so that no gas reaches the probe tip, resulting in no temperature change. Importantly, these probes are indistinguishable in appearance, and therefore treating physicians, subjects, and all clinical staff will be masked to treatment group assignment [only the treating physician/investigator performing the cryoneurolysis with be unmasked]. An angiocatheter/introducer may be inserted beneath the ultrasound transducer and directed until the probe tip is immediately adjacent to the target nerve (lidocaine 2% will be administered, as needed, to anesthetize the angiocatheter track). The angiocatheter needle will be removed, leaving the angiocatheter through which the appropriate Epimed probe will be inserted until it is adjacent to the target nerve. The cryoneurolysis device will be triggered using 3 cycles of 2-minute gas activation (active or sham) separated by 1-minute defrost periods. For active probes, the nitrous oxide will be deployed to the tip where a drop in temperature to -70°C will result in cryoneurolysis. For the sham probes, the nitrous oxide will be vented prior to reaching the probe shaft, resulting in a lack of perineural temperature change. The process will be repeated with the same treatment probe for any additional nerves (e.g., all nerves will receive either active cryoneurolysis or sham/placebo, and not a mix of the two possible treatments).
Statistical Analysis. The limb amputation, total knee and shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, VATS, and skin grafting subjects will be included in pilot studies to help power a future clinical trials, so the investigators will enroll a convenience sample and not have a pre-determined primary endpoint or statistical plan. However, the end points of most interest will be average pain score on postoperative day 2 for shoulder arthroplasty and skin grafting subjects, range-of-motion at 6 weeks for the rotator cuff repairs, range-of-motion for knee arthroplasty, and FEV1 for the VATS procedures.
For the subjects having mastectomy, the investigators will power this study for an acute pain end point which will provide conclusive results for that end point; but, the data will also be used to help power a subsequent large, multicenter clinical trial for a chronic pain-related end point (which will require far more subjects than the investigators will enroll for the current study).
For the mastectomy subjects, sample size calculations are centered around the hypothesis that cryoneurolysis decreases the incidence and severity of post-mastectomy pain in the week following surgery. To this end, the primary outcome is the average NRS (as administered as part of the Brief Pain Inventory) queried on the afternoon of postoperative day 2. The difference in the distribution of NRS between groups will be assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test. The investigators approximate power using the two-sample t-test. Assuming a standard deviation of 2.25 NRS points, and minimum clinically meaningful difference of 2 NRS points, n=30 patients per group provide 86% power with two-sided alpha=5%.
The t-test approximation was confirmed by simulating integer valued NRS scores in the range 0 to 10. One group was simulated by rounding normally distributed data with mean 1.5 and standard deviation 2.5 (resulting in median of 2 and interquartile range 0 to 3); and the other with mean 3.5 and standard deviation 2.5 (resulting in median of 4 and interquartile range 1 to 5). Note these resulting summary statistics are consistent with Ilfeld et al (2014). When 10,000 trials were simulated under these assumptions, the Mann-Whitney U test provided 89.5% power, and Type I error was maintained at 4.85%.
Differences between groups in demographic variables and secondary endpoints will be assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous or ordinal data, and Fisher's Exact test for categorical data. Box-and-whisker plots will be used to visualize distributions by group.
R version 3.4.4 (R-project.org) was used for sample size calculations and simulations; and the most recent version of R will be used at the time of analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (active cryoneurolysis) | Experimental | Device: Cryoneurolysis (active)Receiving active cryoneurolysis |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Device: Sham cryoneurolysis procedureReceiving sham cryoneurolysis procedure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- adult patients of at least 18 years of age
- scheduled for a primary, unilateral total knee or shoulder arthroplasty, primary unilateral rotator cuff repair, VATS procedure, skin grafting of the lateral thigh, unilateral or bilateral mastectomy, or limb amputation distal to the femoral/humeral head and including at least one metatarsal/metacarpal bone
- single-injection or continuous peripheral nerve blocks block or epidural infusion planned for perioperative analgesia
- accepting of a cryoneurolysis procedure
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- chronic opioid use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use > 4 weeks)
- pregnancy
- incarceration
- inability to communicate with the investigators
- morbid obesity (body mass index > 40 kg/m2)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cryoneurolysis (active)Mastectomy (subjects 1-18): Myoscience Iovera device: full cryo cycle. Mastectomy (subjects 19-end) and all other procedures: Epimed PainBlocker device: 3 cycles of 2-minute gas activation separated by 1-minute defrost periods with an active probe which results in a decrease in temperature | Device | Treatment (active cryoneurolysis) |
| Sham cryoneurolysis procedureAlso: Placebo treatmentMastectomy (subjects 1-18): Myoscience Iovera device: simulated full cryo cycle without administering gas to the probe. Mastectomy (subjects 19-end) and all other procedures: 3 cycles of 2-minute gas activation separated by 1-minute defrost periods with a SHAM probe that does not deliver gas to the tip or result in a drop in temperature | Device | Sham |
Primary outcome
Average Pain (Mastectomy Subjects Only)
Time frame: afternoon of postoperative day 2
Measured with the 0-10 numeric rating scale as part of the Brief Pain Inventory, with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
13 secondary outcomes
Analgesic Consumption
Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, 21, as well as months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Brief Pain Inventory (Interference Subscale)
Time frame: Months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Worst Pain Measured on the 11 Point Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21
Average Pain Measured on the 11 Point Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21
Difficultly Sleeping Due to Pain
Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21
Number of Awakenings
Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21
Nausea
Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21
Phantom Pain Occurences [Mastectomy & Amputation]
Time frame: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Phantom Pain Duration [Mastectomy & Amputation]
Time frame: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Phantom Sensation Occurrences [Mastectomy & Amputation]
Time frame: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Phantom Sensation Duration [Mastectomy & Amputation]
Time frame: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Residual Limb or Wound Pain Occurences
Time frame: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Residual Limb or Wound Pain Duration
Time frame: Postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Mastectomy
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative vs. Pathologic Size in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study
Mastectomy, Breast Neoplasm Malignant Primary
Enrolling by invitation
Comparison of the Effects of Kinesio Taping and Compression Bandaging on Edema, Range of Motion, Upper Extremity Function, and Grip Strength in Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
Lymphedema, Lymphedema Arm
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Different Skin Care Approaches to Prevent Skin Reactions in People With Breast Cancer Receiving Radiation Therapy After Mastectomy
Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer Female
Recruiting
Silk Bioprotein as a Wound Dressing for Double-Incision Mastectomy
Wound Healing
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brian Ilfeld, MD, MS principal investigator
University California San Diego
John Finneran, MD study director
University California San Diego
Matthew Swisher, MD, MS study director
University California San Diego
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cryoneurolysis (active) in people with Mastectomy and Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Average Pain (Mastectomy Subjects Only) (time frame: afternoon of postoperative day 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2023.