AzTrials
AzTrials

Headache, MigraineCEPHAPSYNCT03577548

Influence of Main Psychological and Social Factors on Primary Headaches

An observational study of Headache, Migraine, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to describe the psychological and social characteristics of patients suffering from primary headache and monitored in Neurology department of Besançon University Hospital Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Headache, Migraine
What is being tested?
Auto- questionnaires
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
2 May 2016to Aug 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Study population: All subjects are suffering from primary headache and come for come for a specialized consultation in the Neurology department of Besançon University Hospital

Who may be able to join

  • Patients from 25 to 60 ans y.o suffering from primary headache and monitored in the Neurology department of Besançon University Hospital

Who cannot join

  • Patients with former or current psychic troubles

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Rose-Angélique BELOT contact

rose-angelique.belot@univ-fcomte.fr

Margaux BOUTELOUP contact

margaux.bouteloup@live.fr

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CHU de Besançon

    Besançon, 25000

    Rose-Angélique BELOT, rose-angelique.belot@univ-fcomte.fr

    Margaux BOUTELOUP, margaux.bouteloup@live.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

This study aims to describe the psychological and social characteristics of patients suffering from primary headache and monitored in Neurology department of Besançon University Hospital

Read the detailed description

The aim of our study is to describe the psychological patterns in a population of patients suffering of episodic migraine or chronic migraine with and without medication overuse and the level of disability.

Data about migraine characteristics will be obtained using a standardized questionnaire.

Socio-demographic data will be obtained for all patients including gender, age, educational level and professional status.

A booklet of 10 self-administered questionnaires will permit to measure psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, alexithymia...

Being tested
Auto- questionnaires
Medical subject headings
Migraine Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Auto- questionnairesOther

    10 auto-questionnaires are submitted to the patient during his/her consultation (which is part of the standard care).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Descriptive analysis of socio-demographic questionnaire

    Composite outcome assessed with 10 questionnaires are submitted to the patients and all their results are combined in order to identify psychological and social characteristics of the patients:

    Quantitative variables will be mean, standard deviation, median and minimal/maximal values. Qualitative variables will be described by frequency and proportion of each class.

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Descriptive analysis of Short Form 36 (SF 36) Health Survey

    Composite outcome assessed with 10 questionnaires are submitted to the patients and all their results are combined in order to identify psychological and social characteristics of the patients:

    Quantitative variables will be mean, standard deviation, median and minimal/maximal values. Qualitative variables will be described by frequency and proportion of each class.

    This questionnaire asseses quality of life.

    Measured: Day 1

  3. Descriptive analysis of General Health Questionnaire 12

    Composite outcome assessed with 10 questionnaires are submitted to the patients and all their results are combined in order to identify psychological and social characteristics of the patients:

    Quantitative variables will be mean, standard deviation, median and minimal/maximal values. Qualitative variables will be described by frequency and proportion of each class.

    Ranges for this questionnaire: 0 - 1 : no psychological distress / 2 - 3 : psychological problems / 4 - 48 : suspicion of mental illness.

    Measured: Day 1

  4. Descriptive analysis of Cungi test

    Composite outcome assessed with 10 questionnaires are submitted to the patients and all their results are combined in order to identify psychological and social characteristics of the patients:

    Quantitative variables will be mean, standard deviation, median and minimal/maximal values. Qualitative variables will be described by frequency and proportion of each class.

    Ranges for this questionnaire: 12 - 19 : very low level of stress / 20 - 30 : low level of stress / 31 - 45 : high level of stress / > 45 : very high level of stress.

    Measured: Day 1

  5. Descriptive analysis of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Y-A

    Composite outcome assessed with 10 questionnaires are submitted to the patients and all their results are combined in order to identify psychological and social characteristics of the patients:

    Quantitative variables will be mean, standard deviation, median and minimal/maximal values. Qualitative variables will be described by frequency and proportion of each class.

    Ranges for this questionnaire (current anxiety): < 36 : very low / 36 à 45 : low / 46 à 55 : medium / 56 à 65 : high / > 65 : very high.

    Measured: Day 1

  6. Descriptive analysis of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Y-B

    Composite outcome assessed with 10 questionnaires are submitted to the patients and all their results are combined in order to identify psychological and social characteristics of the patients:

    Quantitative variables will be mean, standard deviation, median and minimal/maximal values. Qualitative variables will be described by frequency and proportion of each class.

    Ranges for this questionnaire (general anxiety): < 36 : very low / 36 à 45 : low / 46 à 55 : medium / 56 à 65 : high / > 65 : very high.

    Measured: Day 1

  7. Descriptive analysis of Beck Depression Inventory

    Composite outcome assessed with 10 questionnaires are submitted to the patients and all their results are combined in order to identify psychological and social characteristics of the patients:

    Quantitative variables will be mean, standard deviation, median and minimal/maximal values. Qualitative variables will be described by frequency and proportion of each class.

    Ranges for this questionnaire: 0 - 4 : no depression / 5 - 7 : mild depression / 8 - 15 : moderate depression / > 15 : severe depression.

    Measured: Day 1

  8. Descriptive analysis of Social Support Questionnaire 6

    Composite outcome assessed with 10 questionnaires are submitted to the patients and all their results are combined in order to identify psychological and social characteristics of the patients:

    Quantitative variables will be mean, standard deviation, median and minimal/maximal values. Qualitative variables will be described by frequency and proportion of each class.

    This questionnaire assesses satisfaction upon social support.

    Measured: Day 1

  9. Descriptive analysis of Toronto Alexithymia Scale 20

    Composite outcome assessed with 10 questionnaires are submitted to the patients and all their results are combined in order to identify psychological and social characteristics of the patients:

    Quantitative variables will be mean, standard deviation, median and minimal/maximal values. Qualitative variables will be described by frequency and proportion of each class.

    Three levels for alexythimia: < 44 : non-alexithymia / 44 à 55 : possible alexithymia / > 55 : alexithymia.

    Measured: Day 1

  10. Descriptive analysis of Bartholomew Relationship Scales Questionnaire

    Composite outcome assessed with 10 questionnaires are submitted to the patients and all their results are combined in order to identify psychological and social characteristics of the patients:

    Quantitative variables will be mean, standard deviation, median and minimal/maximal values. Qualitative variables will be described by frequency and proportion of each class.

    Four levels for this questionnaire: Secure, Preoccupied, Dismissing and Fearful.

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jul 2018
  2. Study start2 May 2016
  3. Primary completionAug 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03577548
Sponsor's protocol ID
P/2016/290
Acronym
CEPHAPSY
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
26 Mar 2018
Last updated
5 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Belot RA, Bouteloup M, Bonnet M, Parmentier AL, Magnin E, Mauny F, Vuillier F. Evaluation of Attachment Style and Social Support in Patients With Severe Migraine. Applications in Doctor-Patient Relationships and Treatment Adherence. Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 12;12:706639. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.706639. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34322089
  • Bouteloup M, Belot RA, Noiret N, Sylvestre G, Bertoux M, Magnin E, Vuillier F. Social and emotional cognition in patients with severe migraine consulting in a tertiary headache center: A preliminary study. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2021 Oct;177(8):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2020.09.013. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

    PubMed 33454126

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Headache, Migraine, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Rose-Angélique BELOT (rose-angelique.belot@univ-fcomte.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Descriptive analysis of socio-demographic questionnaire (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03577548, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in